168 in 100 zone. 400

bigmistake
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 10:27 am

168 in 100 zone. 400

by: bigmistake on
Sat Dec 01, 2012 10:38 am

Hi Guys,

Yesterday night I was charged for stunt driving (excess over 50km/h) and I have a few inquiries. I'm sure you've all heard the same story, but the unmarked cop in an SUV was tailing me for a good 2-3 minutes as I was travelling 120~135 km/h. Then as he came close I decided to boot it up to 168. Regardless, I was pulled and that's that. However, when he pulled me over, he asked for my information and only said (you were going 168, this calls for roadside towing and 7 day suspension).

I then sat in the tow trucks car and the officer finally came up to me and told me that going 50km/h over the speed limit is considered stunt driving, so that is why I am charged under that. Does that make sense? His exact words were that because I was doing 50+ it is considered stunt driving.


Thank you for the help.

Ps - first time ever being pulled over + just in time for exam week (ugh!)




Stanton
High Authority
High Authority
Posts: 2111
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 8:49 pm
Location: Ontario

by: Stanton on
Sat Dec 01, 2012 1:05 pm

It's possible. I think the more common plea deal is to drop the stunt driving charge but leaving the speeding offence as is (68 over in your case). It's still a terrible conviction in terms of insurance rates, but you wouldn't be looking at an additional licence suspension.


bigmistake
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 10:27 am

by: bigmistake on
Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:11 pm

Thanks for the reply.

I still find it unusual that speeding exists on top of stunt driving. It was a slow acceleration that got me to 168 (heavy foot that night)...he literally said I have to put stunt driving because it is over 50km/h.

Anywho, my insurance is going to be through the roof. Hopefully I can figure this out. I've heard of some incredible scenarios and horrid ones as well.


User avatar
hwybear
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2933
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:21 am
Location: In YOUR rearview mirror!

Moderator

by: hwybear on
Tue Dec 04, 2012 6:36 am

bigmistake wrote:I still find it unusual that speeding exists on top of stunt driving. .
can put it another way, as an example

a person can be charged with "impaired driving" and can also be charged with "driving with over 80mgs of alcohol in 100ml of blood" (which has a numerical value) as BOTH are seperate offences
now relate that to the HTA
a person can be charged with "stunt driving" and can also be charged with "speeding at X km/hr in a Y km/hr zone" (which has a numerical value) as BOTH are seperate offences
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca


bend
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1184
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 1:44 am

Posting Awards

Moderator

by: bend on
Tue Dec 04, 2012 6:00 pm

bigmistake wrote:the unmarked cop in an SUV was tailing me for a good 2-3 minutes as I was travelling 120~135 km/h. Then as he came close I decided to boot it up to 168.
This act, without considering the numerical value of speed, falls under stunt driving. That is why can be combined. You can't engage in contests with other vehicles on the road. Either pull into the far right lane, or pull over if need be.


viper1
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 502
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:31 pm

by: viper1 on
Tue Dec 04, 2012 8:32 pm

hwybear wrote:
bigmistake wrote:I still find it unusual that speeding exists on top of stunt driving. .
can put it another way, as an example

a person can be charged with "impaired driving" and can also be charged with "driving with over 80mgs of alcohol in 100ml of blood" (which has a numerical value) as BOTH are seperate offences
now relate that to the HTA
a person can be charged with "stunt driving" and can also be charged with "speeding at X km/hr in a Y km/hr zone" (which has a numerical value) as BOTH are seperate offences
I thought that those 2 charges were criminal charges?
As I understand it a person cannot be guilty of 2 criminal offenses in the same occurrence.

Are "stunt" and over "50" criminal?

It used to be over double the speed you lost license.

Cheers
Viper1
"hang onto your chair when reading my posts
use at your own risk"


User avatar
hwybear
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2933
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:21 am
Location: In YOUR rearview mirror!

Moderator

by: hwybear on
Wed Dec 05, 2012 7:23 am

viper1 wrote:
hwybear wrote:
bigmistake wrote:I still find it unusual that speeding exists on top of stunt driving. .
can put it another way, as an example

a person can be charged with "impaired driving" and can also be charged with "driving with over 80mgs of alcohol in 100ml of blood" (which has a numerical value) as BOTH are seperate offences
now relate that to the HTA
a person can be charged with "stunt driving" and can also be charged with "speeding at X km/hr in a Y km/hr zone" (which has a numerical value) as BOTH are seperate offences
I thought that those 2 charges were criminal charges?
As I understand it a person cannot be guilty of 2 criminal offenses in the same occurrence.

Are "stunt" and over "50" criminal?

It used to be over double the speed you lost license.

Cheers
Viper1
I was describing and example where there are 2 criminal offences, and then 2 provincial offences both as you mentioned coming out of the same incident. This was b/c the original poster asked that there is a speeding charge that could also be applied to those 50km+ the speed limit, guess I should have put it another way.......
- performing a stunt with a motor vehicle, greater than 50km over the limit HTA 172
- speeding (at whatever speed) HTA 128 still applies

I have never, ever heard or seen the double over lose your licence thing!!
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca


viper1
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 502
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:31 pm

by: viper1 on
Wed Dec 05, 2012 8:24 pm

In the mid sixties when I got my license.

Double the speed was about the most serious offense to get.

DWI was not criminal then either.

Probably before you started.

Cheers
Viper1
"hang onto your chair when reading my posts
use at your own risk"


User avatar
Decatur
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 702
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:31 am

Posting Awards

Moderator

by: Decatur on
Wed Dec 05, 2012 9:38 pm

Impaired driving was certainly criminal in the mid 1960's and even as early as the 1920's. The section in the early 50's to mid 60's was 223.


OPS Copper
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 355
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:06 pm

by: OPS Copper on
Thu Dec 06, 2012 10:49 am

Unrelated but sort of related. Your right you cannot be convicted of impaired driving and over 80 but you can be charged with both and court even fought on both. If found guilty the judge will decide which one your guilty of.


Post Reply
  • Similar Topics

Return to “Stunt Driving”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest