Thanks for the reply.
I still find it unusual that speeding exists on top of stunt driving. It was a slow acceleration that got me to 168 (heavy foot that night)...he literally said I have to put stunt driving because it is over 50km/h.
Anywho, my insurance is going to be through the roof. Hopefully I can figure this out. I've heard of some ...
Search found 3 matches
- Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:11 pm
- Forum: Stunt Driving
- Topic: 168 in 100 zone. 400
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3935
- Sat Dec 01, 2012 11:44 am
- Forum: Stunt Driving
- Topic: 168 in 100 zone. 400
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3935
Re: 168 in 100 zone. 400
I'm sorry, I've read about it. Standard issue.
Curious if anyone has even seen this be dropped to 49+ speeding?
Curious if anyone has even seen this be dropped to 49+ speeding?
- Sat Dec 01, 2012 10:38 am
- Forum: Stunt Driving
- Topic: 168 in 100 zone. 400
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3935
168 in 100 zone. 400
Hi Guys,
Yesterday night I was charged for stunt driving (excess over 50km/h) and I have a few inquiries. I'm sure you've all heard the same story, but the unmarked cop in an SUV was tailing me for a good 2-3 minutes as I was travelling 120~135 km/h. Then as he came close I decided to boot it up to 168. Regardless, I was pulled and that's that ...
Yesterday night I was charged for stunt driving (excess over 50km/h) and I have a few inquiries. I'm sure you've all heard the same story, but the unmarked cop in an SUV was tailing me for a good 2-3 minutes as I was travelling 120~135 km/h. Then as he came close I decided to boot it up to 168. Regardless, I was pulled and that's that ...
