Failure to sign permit in ink - $110 fine. I figured pleading not guilty is the same as saying it was signed which is stupid. A friend of mine told me I could plead guilty with explanation and try to get the fine reduced when I come in. Can anyone comment on this, is this true at all?
Failure to sign permit in ink - $110 fine.
I figured pleading not guilty is the same as saying it was signed which is stupid. A friend of mine told me I could plead guilty with explanation and try to get the fine reduced when I come in.
Plead guilty with an explanation is still pleading guilty. What is your permit signed with? Pencil? Usually the cops would let you sign that permit and be done with that. Were you charged with 8(1)? Look here and see if it says anywhere that the permit must be signed in any manner. Nowhere. That is how you defeat the charge - it was mislaid.
Plead guilty with an explanation is still pleading guilty. What is your permit signed with? Pencil? Usually the cops would let you sign that permit and be done with that.
Were you charged with 8(1)? Look here and see if it says anywhere that the permit must be signed in any manner. Nowhere. That is how you defeat the charge - it was mislaid.
"The more laws, the less justice" - Marcus Tullius Cicero
"The hardest thing to explain is the obvious"
HTA OREG 628 Vehicle Permits 8. (1) It is a condition applying to every permit, that it bear the signature of the holder thereof, written in ink. (2) Where the permit holder is a corporation, the signature of a person authorized to sign on behalf of the corporation is compliance with subsection (1). ********************* I always get the owner to sign the permit if the owner is present (to prevent repetition of offence), however, does not mean they will not receive a ticket.
HTA OREG 628 Vehicle Permits
8. (1) It is a condition applying to every permit, that it bear the signature of the holder thereof, written in ink.
(2) Where the permit holder is a corporation, the signature of a person authorized to sign on behalf of the corporation is compliance with subsection (1).
*********************
I always get the owner to sign the permit if the owner is present (to prevent repetition of offence), however, does not mean they will not receive a ticket.
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
It wasn't signed at all. Normally they would tell you to sign it at the Ministry, but this time the dealer took care of the paperwork and just gave me the plates and the ownership. So I never signed, just checked my name is written correctly on it. They explained me at the court house, that people plead guilty with an explanaition if they want the charge to be reduced or postponed. That's what I am going to do, as I don't see any defense here. Insuranse company doesn't care about convictions like that?
racer wrote:
Plead guilty with an explanation is still pleading guilty. What is your permit signed with? Pencil? Usually the cops would let you sign that permit and be done with that.
It wasn't signed at all. Normally they would tell you to sign it at the Ministry, but this time the dealer took care of the paperwork and just gave me the plates and the ownership. So I never signed, just checked my name is written correctly on it.
They explained me at the court house, that people plead guilty with an explanaition if they want the charge to be reduced or postponed. That's what I am going to do, as I don't see any defense here.
Insuranse company doesn't care about convictions like that?
Fail to sign ownership in ink, no. There are one or two very weird insurance companies that would but the overwhelming majority don't care. That particular offence seldom, if ever, will have any effect on your rates. Speeding tickets, yes, but up to 15 km/h over the limit for first offence in a three year period, most of them just let it go. Second offence for 15 or less over, they usually start raising rates or add a small surcharge.
Insuranse company doesn't care about convictions like that?
Fail to sign ownership in ink, no. There are one or two very weird insurance companies that would but the overwhelming majority don't care. That particular offence seldom, if ever, will have any effect on your rates.
Speeding tickets, yes, but up to 15 km/h over the limit for first offence in a three year period, most of them just let it go. Second offence for 15 or less over, they usually start raising rates or add a small surcharge.
Speeding tickets, yes, but up to 15 km/h over the limit for first offence in a three year period, most of them just let it go. Second offence for 15 or less over, they usually start raising rates or add a small surcharge.
8. (1) It is a condition applying to every permit, that it bear the signature of the holder thereof, written in ink.
(2) Where the permit holder is a corporation, the signature of a person authorized to sign on behalf of the corporation is compliance with subsection (1).
*********************
I always get the owner to sign the permit if the owner is present (to prevent repetition of offence), however, does not mean they will not receive a ticket.
Which OHTA are you quoting? This is Sect 8.
Permit limitations
8. (1) Where the fee prescribed by the regulations for a permit or validated permit for a motor vehicle is calculated with regard to specific limitations or restrictions on the use of a vehicle, the owner of the vehicle shall not drive or cause or permit the vehicle to be driven on a highway except in accordance with the limitations or restrictions. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 8 (1).
Penalty
(2) Every person who contravenes subsection (1) is guilty of an offence and on conviction is liable to a fine of not less than $100 and not more than $500. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 8 (2).
"The more laws, the less justice" - Marcus Tullius Cicero
"The hardest thing to explain is the obvious"
Which OHTA are you quoting? This is Sect 8. You referred to HTA section 8....... there is an an HTA, Ontario Regulation 628....that is up/beyond HTA sec 8. (something like driver's licences are section 32, but there is an HTA OREG 340/94). There are also quite a few permit stipulations in HTA sec 7.
racer wrote:
hwybear wrote:
HTA OREG 628 Vehicle Permits
8. (1) It is a condition applying to every permit, that it bear the signature of the holder thereof, written in ink.
(2) Where the permit holder is a corporation, the signature of a person authorized to sign on behalf of the corporation is compliance with subsection (1).
*********************
I always get the owner to sign the permit if the owner is present (to prevent repetition of offence), however, does not mean they will not receive a ticket.
Which OHTA are you quoting? This is Sect 8.
Permit limitations
8. (1) Where the fee prescribed by the regulations for a permit or validated permit for a motor vehicle is calculated with regard to specific limitations or restrictions on the use of a vehicle, the owner of the vehicle shall not drive or cause or permit the vehicle to be driven on a highway except in accordance with the limitations or restrictions. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 8 (1).
Penalty
(2) Every person who contravenes subsection (1) is guilty of an offence and on conviction is liable to a fine of not less than $100 and not more than $500. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 8 (2).
You referred to HTA section 8.......
there is an an HTA, Ontario Regulation 628....that is up/beyond HTA sec 8.
(something like driver's licences are section 32, but there is an HTA OREG 340/94). There are also quite a few permit stipulations in HTA sec 7.
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
guess a way to look at it is that the HTA itself is basic. To clarify some sections the gov't (in their wisdom :roll: ) adds in a regulation which now supersedes the HTA or clarifies the HTA. ontario elaws, then search, instead of typing in HTA, click on the letter "H". scroll down to the Highway Traffic Act, then click on the "plus" sign, this will show a *EDIT* load of regulations. want weird stuff.....just read HTA 62(17) and see how many bicycles are in compliance......maybe 0.1%
guess a way to look at it is that the HTA itself is basic. To clarify some sections the gov't (in their wisdom ) adds in a regulation which now supersedes the HTA or clarifies the HTA.
ontario elaws, then search, instead of typing in HTA, click on the letter "H". scroll down to the Highway Traffic Act, then click on the "plus" sign, this will show a *EDIT* load of regulations.
want weird stuff.....just read HTA 62(17) and see how many bicycles are in compliance......maybe 0.1%
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
guess a way to look at it is that the HTA itself is basic. To clarify some sections the gov't (in their wisdom ) adds in a regulation which now supersedes the HTA or clarifies the HTA.
ontario elaws, then search, instead of typing in HTA, click on the letter "H". scroll down to the Highway Traffic Act, then click on the "plus" sign, this will show a *EDIT* load of regulations.
want weird stuff.....just read HTA 62(17) and see how many bicycles are in compliance......maybe 0.1%
So, as much as the OHTA itself then?
"The more laws, the less justice" - Marcus Tullius Cicero
"The hardest thing to explain is the obvious"
I was reading these lines over and over again trying to understand what fee is calculated based on what specific restrictions. Even if I've read the HTA before I wouldn't be able to understand that, so the only way for me to learn and understand that is to pay 110 dollars. The other thing it states that the permit is not valid without the signature, so basicly the officer let me go without the valid permit yet with the ticket, good job![/quote]
8. (1) Where the fee prescribed by the regulations for a permit or validated permit for a motor vehicle is calculated with regard to specific limitations or restrictions on the use of a vehicle, the owner of the vehicle shall not drive or cause or permit the vehicle to be driven on a highway except in accordance with the limitations or restrictions. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 8 (1).
I was reading these lines over and over again trying to understand what fee is calculated based on what specific restrictions.
Even if I've read the HTA before I wouldn't be able to understand that, so the only way for me to learn and understand that is to pay 110 dollars.
The other thing it states that the permit is not valid without the signature, so basicly the officer let me go without the valid permit yet with the ticket, good job![/quote]
I was reading these lines over and over again trying to understand what fee is calculated based on what specific restrictions. The fee that is mentioned pertains to how much the MTO will charge for validation on plates. In short it goes by weight/use of the vehicle. All the fees are located on HTA OREG 628 in schedules. The ticket fine is set by the Ontario courts.
shmeli wrote:
8. (1) Where the fee prescribed by the regulations for a permit or validated permit for a motor vehicle is calculated with regard to specific limitations or restrictions on the use of a vehicle, the owner of the vehicle shall not drive or cause or permit the vehicle to be driven on a highway except in accordance with the limitations or restrictions. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 8 (1).
I was reading these lines over and over again trying to understand what fee is calculated based on what specific restrictions.
The fee that is mentioned pertains to how much the MTO will charge for validation on plates. In short it goes by weight/use of the vehicle. All the fees are located on HTA OREG 628 in schedules.
The ticket fine is set by the Ontario courts.
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
I was driving on Eglinton W and turn right on Strathearn (near Eglinton/Allen Road). There was a no right turn (from 3pm to 7pm) sign which I didn't see.
The cop was waiting there, apparently nobody sees the signs but they are there.
I don't believe I have much to do here but, trying to find…
I know this technically doesn't fit on this board (3 demerit points) as it seems that 15km/h over just means a 50 dollar fine, I would like some advise though, I'm not sure how I should proceed.
The incident happened in Feb, driving south on highway 400 near Barrie. I was in the fast lane, doing…
Quick question about debris (broken taillights ect) from an accident and responsibility.
If someone hit something that broke off (not cargo), but 30 minutes after the original accident and other cars managed to avoid everything. The debris was avoidable who is responsible for damage to that car.
Need some advice on reaching a plea deal with the prosecutor and how to go about talking to the crown. I'm not here to be lectured ect. I'm aware I made a mistake, and need advice on fixing it. So kindly keep comments about my impulsive decision to yourself.
First post..... My fiancee this week was in an accident and she was handed a 3 demerit point 154 (1) (a) charge for 115 dollars or something and 3 demerit points.
Demerit points do not matter to insurance companies, convictions do ... is there a chance that she could go to court and the…
I was on hwy 37 trying to make my girlfriends ganadmas mass and I live an hour away and I had an hour to get there so I was going fast but not 50 over untill some idiot got on my tail soo close that I was to concentrated on him that I kept going faster…
Got stopped for what I thought was going to be speeding, officer apparently had other ideas which needless to say surprised the heck out of me since Im positive I was not going over 150.
Ive done a LOT of reading already on here, Ticket Combat and some specific cases on Canlii (need to look up even…
I just received my first stop sign ticket in Markham. Has anyone successfully defended a stop sign ticket? If so, what strategies did you use? The officer that pulled me over said I slowed down but didn't stop. I felt that I stopped momentarily. I have no previous moving violations or…