Hi there everybody, So as the title says, I made the bad decision to drive 180 in a 100 zone. It happened on Highway 400, a little north of Barrie around 11:30pm on a Friday Night. I've got some questions about how to deal with this charge. First off, the charge and the ticket itself makes no mention of the actual speed I was going. How will the court know I was going 80 over as opposed to just 50 over? Will the officer need to testify that himself or does the court receive this information from him prior? I've seen a lot of people on this message board make recommendations to get a paralegal for representation - Is this for cases where there is some ambiguity and/or departure from the typical protocol for being legitimately charged with racing a motor vehicle? Or is it just generally a better idea to have a paralegal argue your case, for the sake of reducing the fine, the charge, etc I ask the paralegal question because I am debating whether I should represent myself in court or pay to have somebody represent me. While I realize that the speed I was going was irresponsible and that whatever penalties I end up facing will be what I deserve in this case - I think that I could do a decent job representing myself. I was driving a car that I was unaccustomed to, that has a very, very sensitive acceleration (Mazda 3) on a highway that was almost devoid of traffic (didn't have much flow of traffic I could adjust to). My driving record is mostly clean, I believe I only have one ticket in the last three years - failing to present a license, although it unfortunately resulted in a driving suspension as the ticket went unpaid. And finally - I don't know what this will be worth in court - the officer seemed to empathize with me and was generally very kind. Now maybe I'm kidding myself and all of the above isn't anything remotely close to a good defence. Either way, if I have nothing else, should I still bother with a paralegal? Does anybody know how much they generally cost to defend a case like this? Very appreciative of any help, thanks guys and gals.
Hi there everybody,
So as the title says, I made the bad decision to drive 180 in a 100 zone. It happened on Highway 400, a little north of Barrie around 11:30pm on a Friday Night. I've got some questions about how to deal with this charge.
First off, the charge and the ticket itself makes no mention of the actual speed I was going. How will the court know I was going 80 over as opposed to just 50 over? Will the officer need to testify that himself or does the court receive this information from him prior?
I've seen a lot of people on this message board make recommendations to get a paralegal for representation - Is this for cases where there is some ambiguity and/or departure from the typical protocol for being legitimately charged with racing a motor vehicle? Or is it just generally a better idea to have a paralegal argue your case, for the sake of reducing the fine, the charge, etc
I ask the paralegal question because I am debating whether I should represent myself in court or pay to have somebody represent me. While I realize that the speed I was going was irresponsible and that whatever penalties I end up facing will be what I deserve in this case - I think that I could do a decent job representing myself. I was driving a car that I was unaccustomed to, that has a very, very sensitive acceleration (Mazda 3) on a highway that was almost devoid of traffic (didn't have much flow of traffic I could adjust to). My driving record is mostly clean, I believe I only have one ticket in the last three years - failing to present a license, although it unfortunately resulted in a driving suspension as the ticket went unpaid. And finally - I don't know what this will be worth in court - the officer seemed to empathize with me and was generally very kind.
Now maybe I'm kidding myself and all of the above isn't anything remotely close to a good defence. Either way, if I have nothing else, should I still bother with a paralegal? Does anybody know how much they generally cost to defend a case like this?
Very appreciative of any help, thanks guys and gals.
You could have a first attendance meeting with the Crown and see what (if any) deal they're willing to offer. You could also (typically free of charge) have a consultation with a paralegal and see if they think they can do any better for you. One important point to consider is what kind of impact the conviction will have on insurance. Sometimes paralegal fees may be more up front, but save you money in the long run with insurance. As for arguing unfamiliar car, sensitive throttle, etc., that will get you nowhere is terms of a defence against the charge as it stands.
You could have a first attendance meeting with the Crown and see what (if any) deal they're willing to offer. You could also (typically free of charge) have a consultation with a paralegal and see if they think they can do any better for you. One important point to consider is what kind of impact the conviction will have on insurance. Sometimes paralegal fees may be more up front, but save you money in the long run with insurance.
As for arguing unfamiliar car, sensitive throttle, etc., that will get you nowhere is terms of a defence against the charge as it stands.
If this is how you're expecting to represent yourself in court, i'd beg that you get a paralegal. Speeding is an absolute liability and can't be talked out of. The Justice of the Peace is only interested in whether you were speeding or not. Please don't repeat this sensitive throttle story to anyone else because it doesn't make your story better in the slightest. 50 and over is not something to take lightly. If you're ever going to pay for a Paralegal, this should be the time. I may be wrong here, but the reason why you received a ticket with no speed is because 50km and over is a straight summons to court. There's no set fine for going 80 over, therefore you are given a date to the courthouse.
Tazo wrote:
I was driving a car that I was unaccustomed to, that has a very, very sensitive acceleration (Mazda 3) on a highway that was almost devoid of traffic (didn't have much flow of traffic I could adjust to).
If this is how you're expecting to represent yourself in court, i'd beg that you get a paralegal. Speeding is an absolute liability and can't be talked out of. The Justice of the Peace is only interested in whether you were speeding or not. Please don't repeat this sensitive throttle story to anyone else because it doesn't make your story better in the slightest. 50 and over is not something to take lightly. If you're ever going to pay for a Paralegal, this should be the time.
I may be wrong here, but the reason why you received a ticket with no speed is because 50km and over is a straight summons to court. There's no set fine for going 80 over, therefore you are given a date to the courthouse.
Thanks for your quick and straight forward replies guys. I'm going to look for some quotes from paralegals tomorrow. To be honest, I just don't really understand what a paralegal will do for me. They can't change the facts of my case - that I committed the crime and I don't have a leg to stand on in terms of my defence. Can a paralegal do anything other than guide me through the process at this point?
Thanks for your quick and straight forward replies guys.
I'm going to look for some quotes from paralegals tomorrow. To be honest, I just don't really understand what a paralegal will do for me. They can't change the facts of my case - that I committed the crime and I don't have a leg to stand on in terms of my defence. Can a paralegal do anything other than guide me through the process at this point?
The paralegal will know the system well and will be able to tell you whether there are any holes in the prosecution's case. Some times the police make technical errors that can be used as a defense in court. The paralegal will see if the police have dotted all the I's and crossed all the T's. If they have, he can then probably tell you what kind of deal can be worked out with the prosecution to help lower the impact this will have on your record.
Tazo wrote:
Thanks for your quick and straight forward replies guys.
I'm going to look for some quotes from paralegals tomorrow. To be honest, I just don't really understand what a paralegal will do for me. They can't change the facts of my case - that I committed the crime and I don't have a leg to stand on in terms of my defence. Can a paralegal do anything other than guide me through the process at this point?
The paralegal will know the system well and will be able to tell you whether there are any holes in the prosecution's case. Some times the police make technical errors that can be used as a defense in court. The paralegal will see if the police have dotted all the I's and crossed all the T's. If they have, he can then probably tell you what kind of deal can be worked out with the prosecution to help lower the impact this will have on your record.
The first thing you need to do is do what you need to and get the disclosure, and a copy of officers written notes, etc. Go to Ticket Combat and follow the steps, there is even a form you can download and fill out to help you get what you need. Only then will you know how to proceed from there, and whether you have any leg to stand on at all. From what you said so far, it appears you don't, and I'll agree with the others on reasons. Once you have these things, then you then might want to setup a free consultation with a Paralegal. Of course this will be FREE, so they will only very quickly look through your stuff if you are lucky to look for potential issues to exploit. Also, of course, they want your business, and will make a case on why you will be much better off with them, blah blah blah. See what I did in this thread: http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com ... tml#p27314 I updated for you with the final outcome. Good luck, maybe the Crown will take some kind of pity on you (if you are poor in anyway might be worth mentioning) and offer a decent deal, but 180 is really fast, and if the officer caught you on radar (there are arguments against radar and ways to try and lesson the merit but I wouldn't count on them) then you are up the creek I'm sure.
The first thing you need to do is do what you need to and get the disclosure, and a copy of officers written notes, etc. Go to Ticket Combat and follow the steps, there is even a form you can download and fill out to help you get what you need.
Only then will you know how to proceed from there, and whether you have any leg to stand on at all. From what you said so far, it appears you don't, and I'll agree with the others on reasons.
Once you have these things, then you then might want to setup a free consultation with a Paralegal. Of course this will be FREE, so they will only very quickly look through your stuff if you are lucky to look for potential issues to exploit. Also, of course, they want your business, and will make a case on why you will be much better off with them, blah blah blah.
I updated for you with the final outcome. Good luck, maybe the Crown will take some kind of pity on you (if you are poor in anyway might be worth mentioning) and offer a decent deal, but 180 is really fast, and if the officer caught you on radar (there are arguments against radar and ways to try and lesson the merit but I wouldn't count on them) then you are up the creek I'm sure.
Hi folks, I've got a question. I did a search of my name on the internet recently and was surprised to find an "OPP News Release" describing a 'Racing a Motor Vehicle' offence I was charged with. I ended up accepting an early resolution with the prosecutor, which involved pleading guilty to a lesser charge. Rather than 'Racing a Motor Vehicle', I was convicted of 'Speeding'. So my question is, do I have any rights with regards to requesting the OPP remove/modify their 'News Release'? I obviously don't want this information on the internet at all - let alone describing a crime for which I was not ultimately convicted of. Thanks for your time.
Hi folks,
I've got a question. I did a search of my name on the internet recently and was surprised to find an "OPP News Release" describing a 'Racing a Motor Vehicle' offence I was charged with. I ended up accepting an early resolution with the prosecutor, which involved pleading guilty to a lesser charge. Rather than 'Racing a Motor Vehicle', I was convicted of 'Speeding'.
So my question is, do I have any rights with regards to requesting the OPP remove/modify their 'News Release'? I obviously don't want this information on the internet at all - let alone describing a crime for which I was not ultimately convicted of.
The article probably states you were charged, which you were. It doesn't mean you were convicted. Factually, it's sound. They aren't obligated to amend articles or releases based on new information unless it was in error. You can try contacting someone involved and see if something can be worked out.
Tazo wrote:
let alone describing a crime for which I was not ultimately convicted of.
The article probably states you were charged, which you were. It doesn't mean you were convicted. Factually, it's sound. They aren't obligated to amend articles or releases based on new information unless it was in error.
You can try contacting someone involved and see if something can be worked out.
Thanks for the quick reply Bend. Yeah, I've being doing some research myself, into defamation law, and I've come to the same conclusions. I've been considering calling the Constable that gave me the ticket, as his contact information is on the News Release. Alternatively, I could try and contact the township in which I received the ticket, as it is posted on their website. I have a feeling that my argument, about being convicted of a lesser charge, isn't going to elicit much sympathy from the Constable. So I think I may try to the township first, and the Constable as a last resort.
Thanks for the quick reply Bend.
Yeah, I've being doing some research myself, into defamation law, and I've come to the same conclusions.
I've been considering calling the Constable that gave me the ticket, as his contact information is on the News Release. Alternatively, I could try and contact the township in which I received the ticket, as it is posted on their website. I have a feeling that my argument, about being convicted of a lesser charge, isn't going to elicit much sympathy from the Constable. So I think I may try to the township first, and the Constable as a last resort.
Nothing will change The release is factual and correct. At the time you were charged with race a motor vehicle were you not? I have had people contact me to try and get accidents reports changed after they beat a charge in court. I tell them no there will be no deletions or additions. The report is factual and correct at the time. What happens in court is separate. OPS
Nothing will change The release is factual and correct. At the time you were charged with race a motor vehicle were you not?
I have had people contact me to try and get accidents reports changed after they beat a charge in court. I tell them no there will be no deletions or additions. The report is factual and correct at the time. What happens in court is separate.
Thanks for the response OPS. I contacted the township and they informed me that they reset the OPP News Releases every new year. Meaning it should only be up there a few more weeks. Appreciate all the help everybody, happy holidays.
Thanks for the response OPS.
I contacted the township and they informed me that they reset the OPP News Releases every new year. Meaning it should only be up there a few more weeks.
Appreciate all the help everybody, happy holidays.
I will be going to trial for my red light camera offence.
I'll be arguing two issues, centered on the fact that there are two essential elements of 144(18) - a) a vehicle approaching the intersection shall stop; and b) the vehicle shall not proceed until green. Both essential elements must be contravened beyond a reasonable doubt to be an offence.
1) My ticket says I (being the owner) am "charged…
I know that the RIDE program has been covered extensively in these great forums, but I have a question about the stop itself:
I recently was stopped for a RIDE Program and the officer asked me to roll the window down all of the way (I had it at half and could easily communicate with them). I told them that I could hear them just fine and they insisted I roll it down all of the way. Again I told…
Not sure the right place for this so if it needs to be moved please do so.
I was stopped today for 15 over the speed limit, I gave all the documents to the officer and he said he could not accept a photocopy of my ownership only the original I had a photo copy front and back and I had my plate sticker number with it.
he gave me a ticket for HWY ACT Section 7(5)(a) he said only the original would…
Hey! I'm from Sudbury Ontario. Hope that general talk is fine for this subject
I am very serious about looking for exact ruling about underfacing lighting
Section 14 clearly states:
Red and blue lights to the front restricted
(14.1) In addition to the lighting requirements in this Part, a police department vehicle may carry lamps that cast red and blue lights, but no other motor vehicle shall carry…
i was driving my dad's car when i was caught by the red light camera in Brampton. My dad would've to take time off work to go ask for a trial and then go to one.
Can i represent him? if yes, what do i need to do?
I was pulled over and told I went through a red light during a right turn. I learned through a friend who is a police constable that the one who pulled me over is new to the job (under a year, and possibly even the first month or two of real duty).
I was given a ticket for $180. I have some questions:
(1) Is this offense automatically associated with 3 demerit points? I see no mention of them on…
I got a ticket for 'Disobey Stop Sign' in November of 2013 (in York Region), requested disclosure and went to court in August of 2014. At my first appearance, I did not plea but requested an ajournment to to consult legal advice. The JOP set the next appearance in September.
I contacted a paralegal about my options. He told me that on my next appearance, if the police officer did not show, the…
I had a trial and found guilty, but the trial seemed to go wrong since the beginning.
The JP asked me if i am intending to take the stand- I said NO.
I asked how to submit my evidence-documents and photos.
JP said-i have to take the stand if i want to submit evidence.(Now i am finding this is wrong-i could introduce my evidence during cross examination and my defense would be much stronger)
Ottawa, Canada (AHN) - Beginning Tuesday, or April Fool's Day 2008, fines on Quebec drivers caught overspeeding will be doubled. It is not only the money penalty that will go up, but also demerit points.
The new law, Bill 42, is similar to Ontario's street racing rule. It stipulates fines for motorists who drive at over 40 km/h at under 60 km/h zones, speed at 50 km/h at 60 to 90 km/h areas and…
Make big trucks go slower and the roads will become safer.
Obvious, isn't it? It's also obvious when you look out the window that the world is flat.
Last Monday, truckers in Ontario tried to mount a convoy to Queen's Park to show their opposition to electronic speed limiters. These devices, electronic chips in trucks' engine management systems, restrict speeds…
I was out on a four lane highway around Orangeville Ontario and I noticed a school bus coming south (I was going north). I kept my eyes on the bus in case it was going to stop. As I approached it, it was slowing down a little, but no lights, and especially no arm with the STOP sign. As I was just about to pass the bus, I still did not see the lights, nor did I see the STOP sign.
Hey everyone first off I'd like to say great website, I have been reading and it is very useful
I'm posting today as I'd like to get some feedback on my situation and have a couple of questions. Please excuse the vagueness in some areas - I don't want my case to be identifiable given the small town.
So I was driving up north and was pulled over by an OPP SUV for doing 31 over. Cop drove past me,…
Driving on a 80km/hr highway the car ahead hits the brakes and slows to 55, l slow down right behind him no reason to slow down traffic was moving between 80 and 90. I notice the driver is on the phone and looking through papers on the passenger seat. He begins to start to go a opp officer drives by doing 80 plus in oncoming lane turns around and says l was following to close. Told him what was…
My son was making a right turn at the intersection he had a green so slowed down looked and proceeded into the turn. It was pouring rain and the was a big pool of water as he got arround the curb. He tried to keep the car going sharp right however it slid into the car making a left turn. the lane he was turning into is very narrow and at a very busy corner. He paniced and left the scene only…
I had an collision the other day. I was turing left and ran into a car going straight in the opposite direction. The insurance company has already determined that I'm at fault, since I made the left turn. But I'm wondering whether I should go on trail and at least I might get rid of the ticket. The ticket was under 142(1)
I was told that if I go on court, both the guy I hit and the officer who…
question for a friend of mine.....says she got a 3 day suspension for giving a A on a roadside. Thing is she wasnt driving. She is a g2 driver and the car was parked in a parking lot, she just ran out to get something and turned the car on. Can a 3 day be issued if you arent driving on a highway - (I've read for impaired it doesnt matter, but 3 day isnt criminal)? And is there any way to…
I can't find the category for this post so I'm posting it here.
Two questions...
1. Are golf carts considered a 'vehicle' under the Highway traffic act? I know carts can't drive across roads or on roads but if you try to bring one from the USA into Canada they are considered a 'vehicle'.
2. If you are on private property are you allowed to carry 'opened' alcohol in your golf cart? I know golf…
I got pulled over (along with about 10 other cars) for going through a road closed sign. I had just pulled out of a parking lot pretty much right beside the road closed sign, and with about 4 cars behind me there wasn't much I could do but go through, so I think I have a good chance of fighting it. However, on my ticket under the Signature of issuing Provincial Offences Officer, it's left…
I was driving westbound on Hwy. 8 earlier this month in North Dumfries Township, approaching the Cambridge city limits. The weather was clear and the roads were dry. I noticed a vehicle on the shoulder on my side of the road, pointing towards me. This didn't concern me right away, as it is a rural area and I sometimes see vehicles doing mail delivery. The vehicle then started accelerating and…
I was pulled over yesterday in a community safety zone and told I was doing 84 in a 50. When i passed the officer I looked at my odometer and I was only doing 64. I was given a summons on the spot to appear in court at the end of June. Do I have any chance in this if it comes down to his word over mine. I was in the car alone but have travelled these same roads every day, twice a day for 6 years…
who is at fault when :a) a passenger opens door and jumps out of vehicle onto the road with traffic. b) he gets hit by a car travelling in the adjoining lane. c) traffic lights were green. d) pedestrian crossing was further up and indicated "no crossing" light e) the vehicle that he exited from leaves the scene as soon as accident occurred. f) no charges have been laid after police filed report…