Hi there everybody, So as the title says, I made the bad decision to drive 180 in a 100 zone. It happened on Highway 400, a little north of Barrie around 11:30pm on a Friday Night. I've got some questions about how to deal with this charge. First off, the charge and the ticket itself makes no mention of the actual speed I was going. How will the court know I was going 80 over as opposed to just 50 over? Will the officer need to testify that himself or does the court receive this information from him prior? I've seen a lot of people on this message board make recommendations to get a paralegal for representation - Is this for cases where there is some ambiguity and/or departure from the typical protocol for being legitimately charged with racing a motor vehicle? Or is it just generally a better idea to have a paralegal argue your case, for the sake of reducing the fine, the charge, etc I ask the paralegal question because I am debating whether I should represent myself in court or pay to have somebody represent me. While I realize that the speed I was going was irresponsible and that whatever penalties I end up facing will be what I deserve in this case - I think that I could do a decent job representing myself. I was driving a car that I was unaccustomed to, that has a very, very sensitive acceleration (Mazda 3) on a highway that was almost devoid of traffic (didn't have much flow of traffic I could adjust to). My driving record is mostly clean, I believe I only have one ticket in the last three years - failing to present a license, although it unfortunately resulted in a driving suspension as the ticket went unpaid. And finally - I don't know what this will be worth in court - the officer seemed to empathize with me and was generally very kind. Now maybe I'm kidding myself and all of the above isn't anything remotely close to a good defence. Either way, if I have nothing else, should I still bother with a paralegal? Does anybody know how much they generally cost to defend a case like this? Very appreciative of any help, thanks guys and gals.
Hi there everybody,
So as the title says, I made the bad decision to drive 180 in a 100 zone. It happened on Highway 400, a little north of Barrie around 11:30pm on a Friday Night. I've got some questions about how to deal with this charge.
First off, the charge and the ticket itself makes no mention of the actual speed I was going. How will the court know I was going 80 over as opposed to just 50 over? Will the officer need to testify that himself or does the court receive this information from him prior?
I've seen a lot of people on this message board make recommendations to get a paralegal for representation - Is this for cases where there is some ambiguity and/or departure from the typical protocol for being legitimately charged with racing a motor vehicle? Or is it just generally a better idea to have a paralegal argue your case, for the sake of reducing the fine, the charge, etc
I ask the paralegal question because I am debating whether I should represent myself in court or pay to have somebody represent me. While I realize that the speed I was going was irresponsible and that whatever penalties I end up facing will be what I deserve in this case - I think that I could do a decent job representing myself. I was driving a car that I was unaccustomed to, that has a very, very sensitive acceleration (Mazda 3) on a highway that was almost devoid of traffic (didn't have much flow of traffic I could adjust to). My driving record is mostly clean, I believe I only have one ticket in the last three years - failing to present a license, although it unfortunately resulted in a driving suspension as the ticket went unpaid. And finally - I don't know what this will be worth in court - the officer seemed to empathize with me and was generally very kind.
Now maybe I'm kidding myself and all of the above isn't anything remotely close to a good defence. Either way, if I have nothing else, should I still bother with a paralegal? Does anybody know how much they generally cost to defend a case like this?
Very appreciative of any help, thanks guys and gals.
You could have a first attendance meeting with the Crown and see what (if any) deal they're willing to offer. You could also (typically free of charge) have a consultation with a paralegal and see if they think they can do any better for you. One important point to consider is what kind of impact the conviction will have on insurance. Sometimes paralegal fees may be more up front, but save you money in the long run with insurance. As for arguing unfamiliar car, sensitive throttle, etc., that will get you nowhere is terms of a defence against the charge as it stands.
You could have a first attendance meeting with the Crown and see what (if any) deal they're willing to offer. You could also (typically free of charge) have a consultation with a paralegal and see if they think they can do any better for you. One important point to consider is what kind of impact the conviction will have on insurance. Sometimes paralegal fees may be more up front, but save you money in the long run with insurance.
As for arguing unfamiliar car, sensitive throttle, etc., that will get you nowhere is terms of a defence against the charge as it stands.
If this is how you're expecting to represent yourself in court, i'd beg that you get a paralegal. Speeding is an absolute liability and can't be talked out of. The Justice of the Peace is only interested in whether you were speeding or not. Please don't repeat this sensitive throttle story to anyone else because it doesn't make your story better in the slightest. 50 and over is not something to take lightly. If you're ever going to pay for a Paralegal, this should be the time. I may be wrong here, but the reason why you received a ticket with no speed is because 50km and over is a straight summons to court. There's no set fine for going 80 over, therefore you are given a date to the courthouse.
Tazo wrote:
I was driving a car that I was unaccustomed to, that has a very, very sensitive acceleration (Mazda 3) on a highway that was almost devoid of traffic (didn't have much flow of traffic I could adjust to).
If this is how you're expecting to represent yourself in court, i'd beg that you get a paralegal. Speeding is an absolute liability and can't be talked out of. The Justice of the Peace is only interested in whether you were speeding or not. Please don't repeat this sensitive throttle story to anyone else because it doesn't make your story better in the slightest. 50 and over is not something to take lightly. If you're ever going to pay for a Paralegal, this should be the time.
I may be wrong here, but the reason why you received a ticket with no speed is because 50km and over is a straight summons to court. There's no set fine for going 80 over, therefore you are given a date to the courthouse.
Thanks for your quick and straight forward replies guys. I'm going to look for some quotes from paralegals tomorrow. To be honest, I just don't really understand what a paralegal will do for me. They can't change the facts of my case - that I committed the crime and I don't have a leg to stand on in terms of my defence. Can a paralegal do anything other than guide me through the process at this point?
Thanks for your quick and straight forward replies guys.
I'm going to look for some quotes from paralegals tomorrow. To be honest, I just don't really understand what a paralegal will do for me. They can't change the facts of my case - that I committed the crime and I don't have a leg to stand on in terms of my defence. Can a paralegal do anything other than guide me through the process at this point?
The paralegal will know the system well and will be able to tell you whether there are any holes in the prosecution's case. Some times the police make technical errors that can be used as a defense in court. The paralegal will see if the police have dotted all the I's and crossed all the T's. If they have, he can then probably tell you what kind of deal can be worked out with the prosecution to help lower the impact this will have on your record.
Tazo wrote:
Thanks for your quick and straight forward replies guys.
I'm going to look for some quotes from paralegals tomorrow. To be honest, I just don't really understand what a paralegal will do for me. They can't change the facts of my case - that I committed the crime and I don't have a leg to stand on in terms of my defence. Can a paralegal do anything other than guide me through the process at this point?
The paralegal will know the system well and will be able to tell you whether there are any holes in the prosecution's case. Some times the police make technical errors that can be used as a defense in court. The paralegal will see if the police have dotted all the I's and crossed all the T's. If they have, he can then probably tell you what kind of deal can be worked out with the prosecution to help lower the impact this will have on your record.
The first thing you need to do is do what you need to and get the disclosure, and a copy of officers written notes, etc. Go to Ticket Combat and follow the steps, there is even a form you can download and fill out to help you get what you need. Only then will you know how to proceed from there, and whether you have any leg to stand on at all. From what you said so far, it appears you don't, and I'll agree with the others on reasons. Once you have these things, then you then might want to setup a free consultation with a Paralegal. Of course this will be FREE, so they will only very quickly look through your stuff if you are lucky to look for potential issues to exploit. Also, of course, they want your business, and will make a case on why you will be much better off with them, blah blah blah. See what I did in this thread: http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com ... tml#p27314 I updated for you with the final outcome. Good luck, maybe the Crown will take some kind of pity on you (if you are poor in anyway might be worth mentioning) and offer a decent deal, but 180 is really fast, and if the officer caught you on radar (there are arguments against radar and ways to try and lesson the merit but I wouldn't count on them) then you are up the creek I'm sure.
The first thing you need to do is do what you need to and get the disclosure, and a copy of officers written notes, etc. Go to Ticket Combat and follow the steps, there is even a form you can download and fill out to help you get what you need.
Only then will you know how to proceed from there, and whether you have any leg to stand on at all. From what you said so far, it appears you don't, and I'll agree with the others on reasons.
Once you have these things, then you then might want to setup a free consultation with a Paralegal. Of course this will be FREE, so they will only very quickly look through your stuff if you are lucky to look for potential issues to exploit. Also, of course, they want your business, and will make a case on why you will be much better off with them, blah blah blah.
I updated for you with the final outcome. Good luck, maybe the Crown will take some kind of pity on you (if you are poor in anyway might be worth mentioning) and offer a decent deal, but 180 is really fast, and if the officer caught you on radar (there are arguments against radar and ways to try and lesson the merit but I wouldn't count on them) then you are up the creek I'm sure.
Hi folks, I've got a question. I did a search of my name on the internet recently and was surprised to find an "OPP News Release" describing a 'Racing a Motor Vehicle' offence I was charged with. I ended up accepting an early resolution with the prosecutor, which involved pleading guilty to a lesser charge. Rather than 'Racing a Motor Vehicle', I was convicted of 'Speeding'. So my question is, do I have any rights with regards to requesting the OPP remove/modify their 'News Release'? I obviously don't want this information on the internet at all - let alone describing a crime for which I was not ultimately convicted of. Thanks for your time.
Hi folks,
I've got a question. I did a search of my name on the internet recently and was surprised to find an "OPP News Release" describing a 'Racing a Motor Vehicle' offence I was charged with. I ended up accepting an early resolution with the prosecutor, which involved pleading guilty to a lesser charge. Rather than 'Racing a Motor Vehicle', I was convicted of 'Speeding'.
So my question is, do I have any rights with regards to requesting the OPP remove/modify their 'News Release'? I obviously don't want this information on the internet at all - let alone describing a crime for which I was not ultimately convicted of.
The article probably states you were charged, which you were. It doesn't mean you were convicted. Factually, it's sound. They aren't obligated to amend articles or releases based on new information unless it was in error. You can try contacting someone involved and see if something can be worked out.
Tazo wrote:
let alone describing a crime for which I was not ultimately convicted of.
The article probably states you were charged, which you were. It doesn't mean you were convicted. Factually, it's sound. They aren't obligated to amend articles or releases based on new information unless it was in error.
You can try contacting someone involved and see if something can be worked out.
Thanks for the quick reply Bend. Yeah, I've being doing some research myself, into defamation law, and I've come to the same conclusions. I've been considering calling the Constable that gave me the ticket, as his contact information is on the News Release. Alternatively, I could try and contact the township in which I received the ticket, as it is posted on their website. I have a feeling that my argument, about being convicted of a lesser charge, isn't going to elicit much sympathy from the Constable. So I think I may try to the township first, and the Constable as a last resort.
Thanks for the quick reply Bend.
Yeah, I've being doing some research myself, into defamation law, and I've come to the same conclusions.
I've been considering calling the Constable that gave me the ticket, as his contact information is on the News Release. Alternatively, I could try and contact the township in which I received the ticket, as it is posted on their website. I have a feeling that my argument, about being convicted of a lesser charge, isn't going to elicit much sympathy from the Constable. So I think I may try to the township first, and the Constable as a last resort.
Nothing will change The release is factual and correct. At the time you were charged with race a motor vehicle were you not? I have had people contact me to try and get accidents reports changed after they beat a charge in court. I tell them no there will be no deletions or additions. The report is factual and correct at the time. What happens in court is separate. OPS
Nothing will change The release is factual and correct. At the time you were charged with race a motor vehicle were you not?
I have had people contact me to try and get accidents reports changed after they beat a charge in court. I tell them no there will be no deletions or additions. The report is factual and correct at the time. What happens in court is separate.
Thanks for the response OPS. I contacted the township and they informed me that they reset the OPP News Releases every new year. Meaning it should only be up there a few more weeks. Appreciate all the help everybody, happy holidays.
Thanks for the response OPS.
I contacted the township and they informed me that they reset the OPP News Releases every new year. Meaning it should only be up there a few more weeks.
Appreciate all the help everybody, happy holidays.
The fine is not the issue but I am worried about insurance rates. First speeding ticket in my life Any suggestions on how to handle this? I can't afford to spend a day at the court
So was at court today in Orillia for a friend, and I had submitted a couple notice of motion a couple weeks ago that I wanted to deal with before arraignment. I met with prosecutor before hand, and it went something like this:
Prosecutor: "Do you have the case law?"
Me: "What do you mean?"
Prosecutor: "Do you have the case law for your motion?"
Me: "All the case law is quoted in the motion that I…
1)failure to change address on license (i got married a couple of months earlier and moved)
2) license plate not fully visible
I got pulled over because I had 2 letters peeling off my license plate. I know ignorance isn't a defense, but I really had no idea that this was an issue. Plus, you see many cars on the road with peeling plates. I got both tickets and…
I was driving around 140km/h on a 100km/h posted on the highway. I was in the fast lane. The officer was very nice and reduced it to no points and just 15km/h over.
I only have my G2.
1. Will this affect me taking the G test next month?
2. I am very grateful for the officer lowering the ticket... should I just pay the 52.5$ and leave it as is.. I am a secondary driver under my dads name and we have…
Hi, thanks in advance for the help. Been driving for 10 years, clean record until today when I got slapped with two tickets. First: going 135 at 100 on the 401, second: not having a valid sticker (I recently moved and completely forgot about it)
My friend tells me I should fight the speed ticket, if anything to reduce the fine and points. Would be alot of help if anyone could walk me through…
My wife, who has never had a traffic ticket in her life, just got 11 points.
Two tickets: "following too closely" and "failure to stop"
She was on a residential street and was behind a car at a crosswalk waiting for a pedestrian. Pedestrian crossed, they continued. Cop was drivig towards them down a side street , and as they passed he went after my wife.
I was driving in mid lane and was following a line of cars around speed limit.
The vehicle in front of me was large and I decided to change to the left lane to get better line sight.
As soon as I entered the left lane, I saw the car in front of me approximately 200m away stopped dead (for some odd reason, there was more traffic on the left lane).
Over the last few months I have received several parking tickets from the City of Kitchener. I haven't paid any of them and have attempted to dicuss the situation with the parking authority of the City, however, they're very unreceptive and defensive.
I work at a downtown construction site....ironically a Court House. The site takes up a whole city block, of which ONE side has 2 hour parking…
I was driving on a teusday night in the rain and fog at whites and highview by St. Mary CSS in Pickering, ON. At the time I was waiting at a red light to make a left north onto whites. There was also a car on the opposite side of the intersection making a left. The cars beams were pointed almost directly at my face and as a result, with the combination of the rain and fog, I…
I am new to this website and this is my first post so please forgive me if I've put this question in the wrong place. Please bear with me until I learn the ropes a bit.
So here are my questions:
Antique cars and hot rods (1930's- early '60's) and seat belt use in Ontario. If these vehicles never came from the respective factories with any seat belts, do they have to be retrofitted ?
OK so Jshreck has been taking some heat for the concept of providing the DL as being not required and therefore inadmissable in court. Personally, I think that argument would fall on deaf ears in the lower court and any chance at victory would have to be in the highest court. That would be quite something. When pigs fly I think, but along that line of thought, allow me to continue.......
I have a court date soon and am wondering whether the officers just read off their disclosure notes when interrogated.
Basically, according to the disclosure notes and the said distances and speeds quoted, by doing some simple math it just doesn't add up. My concern is whether the officer can change his story when on the stand after maybe realizing this?
Last week I was driving home from college in the sauga area. I drive a 1995 Chevy Monte Carlo v6 which I've owned since 2000, I really haven't done anything to the car except tinted windows (not completely darken) and some rims, and Nothing Engine wise. Anyway I look in my rear view mirror and out of no where i see cherry flashing. When pulled over the officer asked do you…
I was charged 2 days ago with RED LIGHT - FAIL TO STOP and set fined $150 and I guess 3 points. I was driving turning left on the intersection with a traffic light, and when I jst about to turn left the light turned to orange and I didn't have enough time to stop. Once I turned I saw the light turned to red and 2seconds later I saw a police beacon flashing through my rear-view mirror. It…
I figured pleading not guilty is the same as saying it was signed which is stupid. A friend of mine told me I could plead guilty with explanation and try to get the fine reduced when I come in.
So this Friday I was stopped by a local officer for going 110 in a 80zone. He also claims I was going 105 in a 50zone,which we literally passed when he stopped me as I was braking. It has been 3 days already and I can't seem to locate my ticket on their Internet site "pay ticket". Is there a way to determine if he has filed for certificate of offence to the courts? It has been 3 days I presume…
My trial date is in a couple days for a speeding ticket (york region) and i am nervous it is my first ticket ever as well as first trial
I did notice my ticket was filed beyond 7 days, 10 days after the day i got the ticket to be exact, which is stamped on the ticket. is this enough to have it dismissed?
If you look close enough, beside the drivers' side "A" pillar you will see a white circle = front antenna of Genesis radar......plus look above the dash pad...there is the Spectre RDD.