Hello, Received a notice from the police that a motion is being put forward to adjourn upcoming trial date. Notice indicates that an officer has sworn an affidavit that the crucial witness cannot attend date trial is set for (we know there is a social engagement at 7:30 pm for the witness, trial time is 1:30 pm). This further delay is a big problem to my daughter's case. She is moving away to attend university in August, and is working full time through the summer an cannot take time off. Is there anything she can do (there is a date the motion will be brought before the court noted on the notice) to have the current date stick? In all likelihood, if the date is changed and there is a further delay, she will want to take a plea bargain as she needs this behind her and it will be so expensive for her to miss work or return at a later date. Any chance the prosecutor dealing with the motion next week will be open to offering the plea bargain again at this time? Is there a best way to ask for it? Our representative cannot make the motion date and time. Thank you for the assistance.
Hello,
Received a notice from the police that a motion is being put forward to adjourn upcoming trial date. Notice indicates that an officer has sworn an affidavit that the crucial witness cannot attend date trial is set for (we know there is a social engagement at 7:30 pm for the witness, trial time is 1:30 pm). This further delay is a big problem to my daughter's case. She is moving away to attend university in August, and is working full time through the summer an cannot take time off.
Is there anything she can do (there is a date the motion will be brought before the court noted on the notice) to have the current date stick?
In all likelihood, if the date is changed and there is a further delay, she will want to take a plea bargain as she needs this behind her and it will be so expensive for her to miss work or return at a later date. Any chance the prosecutor dealing with the motion next week will be open to offering the plea bargain again at this time? Is there a best way to ask for it? Our representative cannot make the motion date and time.
If your daughter's representative can't personally attend, they should retain an agent to attend in their place. That's what a professional does and that's what you are paying them for--representation. If they don't do this, your daughter seriously needs to re-consider whether to continue using that representative's services. A represented individual certainly should not have to attend personally if they've retained someone. However, if worse comes to worse and no one will be attending on your daughter's behalf, then she should personally attend that day and self-represent herself. After all, if no one attends for your daughter, its almost certain that the court will agree to the adjournment. On the other hand, if someone attends to contest the adjournment and raise the arguments you stated in your post, the court might not agree to adjourn, especially if the reason for the request is weak (e.g. person on holidays or attending some training program or non-essential event). As for plea bargaining, it never hurts to attempt to resolve the matter. The prosecutor will certainly be able to discuss things with your daughter that day. The only issue is whether the court will permit the guilty plea (if there is one) on that specific day, since its not scheduled on the docket that day; only the motion to adjourn is. The plea might need to be done on the scheduled trial date (making the motion to adjourn irrelevant).
If your daughter's representative can't personally attend, they should retain an agent to attend in their place. That's what a professional does and that's what you are paying them for--representation. If they don't do this, your daughter seriously needs to re-consider whether to continue using that representative's services. A represented individual certainly should not have to attend personally if they've retained someone. However, if worse comes to worse and no one will be attending on your daughter's behalf, then she should personally attend that day and self-represent herself.
After all, if no one attends for your daughter, its almost certain that the court will agree to the adjournment. On the other hand, if someone attends to contest the adjournment and raise the arguments you stated in your post, the court might not agree to adjourn, especially if the reason for the request is weak (e.g. person on holidays or attending some training program or non-essential event).
As for plea bargaining, it never hurts to attempt to resolve the matter. The prosecutor will certainly be able to discuss things with your daughter that day. The only issue is whether the court will permit the guilty plea (if there is one) on that specific day, since its not scheduled on the docket that day; only the motion to adjourn is. The plea might need to be done on the scheduled trial date (making the motion to adjourn irrelevant).
Argh, figures! Darling daughter has a final exam at the same time the adjournment motion is scheduled for, she will not be able to attend. Not sure if I will be able to find new representation before, they really didn't give much time for this. Can I go, as her parent? Do I need a letter from her? Thanks a great deal
Argh, figures! Darling daughter has a final exam at the same time the adjournment motion is scheduled for, she will not be able to attend.
Not sure if I will be able to find new representation before, they really didn't give much time for this. Can I go, as her parent? Do I need a letter from her?
Good Evening, Met with a new representative. He is advising that it would be bad form/improper to seek to contest the adjournment as the crown has done everything proper to request the adjournment, and since the victim has asked for a reschedule it will most certainly be granted regardless of their reasons for not attending. His thought is the best we can hope for is to seek a plea deal at this time, or just allow the adjournment for a future date. If it matters, this was a minor MVA, under $1000 and no injury. I am feeling torn, as I am not confident in the advise given earlier feedback from this group. Would be interested in hearing thoughts from others who have court experience. I do not want to direct the representative to contest the motion if it is in deed frowned upon as generally not done out of respect for victims…also know his heart would not be in it. Waiting longer for resolution is not ideal, and is most difficult for my daughter to deal with, as it will now impact work schedule and she is moving out of town in 2 months. She is just about ready to just plead guilty to anything to have it done with, if we can keep the original trial date (next week) that would be best for her to see it through. Thank you for the help
Good Evening,
Met with a new representative. He is advising that it would be bad form/improper to seek to contest the adjournment as the crown has done everything proper to request the adjournment, and since the victim has asked for a reschedule it will most certainly be granted regardless of their reasons for not attending. His thought is the best we can hope for is to seek a plea deal at this time, or just allow the adjournment for a future date. If it matters, this was a minor MVA, under $1000 and no injury.
I am feeling torn, as I am not confident in the advise given earlier feedback from this group. Would be interested in hearing thoughts from others who have court experience.
I do not want to direct the representative to contest the motion if it is in deed frowned upon as generally not done out of respect for victims…also know his heart would not be in it. Waiting longer for resolution is not ideal, and is most difficult for my daughter to deal with, as it will now impact work schedule and she is moving out of town in 2 months. She is just about ready to just plead guilty to anything to have it done with, if we can keep the original trial date (next week) that would be best for her to see it through.
Unfortunately, you received bad advice. One should never easily accept or condone a prosecution adjournment in order to always protect your 11b (unreasonable delay) rights. You always want the court to know that you are ready to proceed to trial and the prosecution's actions are creating hardship/prejudice to you and/or your case. Even if the court is more than likely to accept the adjournment, always make submissions on the record so that the court has a basis in which to rely upon if you later decide to apply for an 11b stay. Your representative is either unaware of the proper tactics of trial advocacy or simply trying to get a guilty plea out of you (and avoid the time/effort) that you deserve. Remember, trials are not a popularity contest--there are ways to advance your arguments in a respectful way. Besides, why would a social engagement at 7:30pm have any bearing on the case---courts close by 4:30pm. In any event, courts are not in the business of accommodating conveniences for witnesses; the witness better have a better excuse such as an unforeseen surgery, family illness/death, etc. If he/she has to work that day, can't find a babysitter, has to attend school, etc. the court is much more reluctant to give the adjournment since those are examples of things that could and should have been adjusted---court takes precedence over most things!
Unfortunately, you received bad advice. One should never easily accept or condone a prosecution adjournment in order to always protect your 11b (unreasonable delay) rights. You always want the court to know that you are ready to proceed to trial and the prosecution's actions are creating hardship/prejudice to you and/or your case. Even if the court is more than likely to accept the adjournment, always make submissions on the record so that the court has a basis in which to rely upon if you later decide to apply for an 11b stay.
Your representative is either unaware of the proper tactics of trial advocacy or simply trying to get a guilty plea out of you (and avoid the time/effort) that you deserve. Remember, trials are not a popularity contest--there are ways to advance your arguments in a respectful way. Besides, why would a social engagement at 7:30pm have any bearing on the case---courts close by 4:30pm. In any event, courts are not in the business of accommodating conveniences for witnesses; the witness better have a better excuse such as an unforeseen surgery, family illness/death, etc. If he/she has to work that day, can't find a babysitter, has to attend school, etc. the court is much more reluctant to give the adjournment since those are examples of things that could and should have been adjusted---court takes precedence over most things!
The representative we hired did not have your knowledge/expertise/willingness to fight, and I can honestly say it is in short supply. Today's motion to adjourn turned into a plea bargaining session, as my daughter did not want to have this matter carry on any longer. The prosecutor looked over everything, asked a few questions, referred to the officer and the reporting party in a derogatory way, and offered a 2 point offence, and would not offer a suspended sentence and no fine, but was not oppose to it being requested, and offered no opposition to the justice ruling in favour of it. With that, the kid moves on and no longer has it hanging over her head. We have learned a lot, and the same mistakes will not be made again in the future. I can understand her need to have closure and move forward, if it had been me accused, I would have enjoyed the trial route as there were several issues not in favour of prosecution.
The representative we hired did not have your knowledge/expertise/willingness to fight, and I can honestly say it is in short supply.
Today's motion to adjourn turned into a plea bargaining session, as my daughter did not want to have this matter carry on any longer. The prosecutor looked over everything, asked a few questions, referred to the officer and the reporting party in a derogatory way, and offered a 2 point offence, and would not offer a suspended sentence and no fine, but was not oppose to it being requested, and offered no opposition to the justice ruling in favour of it. With that, the kid moves on and no longer has it hanging over her head.
We have learned a lot, and the same mistakes will not be made again in the future. I can understand her need to have closure and move forward, if it had been me accused, I would have enjoyed the trial route as there were several issues not in favour of prosecution.
I will be going to trial for my red light camera offence.
I'll be arguing two issues, centered on the fact that there are two essential elements of 144(18) - a) a vehicle approaching the intersection shall stop; and b) the vehicle shall not proceed until green. Both essential elements must be contravened beyond a reasonable doubt to be an offence.
1) My ticket says I (being the owner) am "charged…
I know that the RIDE program has been covered extensively in these great forums, but I have a question about the stop itself:
I recently was stopped for a RIDE Program and the officer asked me to roll the window down all of the way (I had it at half and could easily communicate with them). I told them that I could hear them just fine and they insisted I roll it down all of the way. Again I told…
Not sure the right place for this so if it needs to be moved please do so.
I was stopped today for 15 over the speed limit, I gave all the documents to the officer and he said he could not accept a photocopy of my ownership only the original I had a photo copy front and back and I had my plate sticker number with it.
he gave me a ticket for HWY ACT Section 7(5)(a) he said only the original would…
Hey! I'm from Sudbury Ontario. Hope that general talk is fine for this subject
I am very serious about looking for exact ruling about underfacing lighting
Section 14 clearly states:
Red and blue lights to the front restricted
(14.1) In addition to the lighting requirements in this Part, a police department vehicle may carry lamps that cast red and blue lights, but no other motor vehicle shall carry…
i was driving my dad's car when i was caught by the red light camera in Brampton. My dad would've to take time off work to go ask for a trial and then go to one.
Can i represent him? if yes, what do i need to do?
I was pulled over and told I went through a red light during a right turn. I learned through a friend who is a police constable that the one who pulled me over is new to the job (under a year, and possibly even the first month or two of real duty).
I was given a ticket for $180. I have some questions:
(1) Is this offense automatically associated with 3 demerit points? I see no mention of them on…
I got a ticket for 'Disobey Stop Sign' in November of 2013 (in York Region), requested disclosure and went to court in August of 2014. At my first appearance, I did not plea but requested an ajournment to to consult legal advice. The JOP set the next appearance in September.
I contacted a paralegal about my options. He told me that on my next appearance, if the police officer did not show, the…
I had a trial and found guilty, but the trial seemed to go wrong since the beginning.
The JP asked me if i am intending to take the stand- I said NO.
I asked how to submit my evidence-documents and photos.
JP said-i have to take the stand if i want to submit evidence.(Now i am finding this is wrong-i could introduce my evidence during cross examination and my defense would be much stronger)
Ottawa, Canada (AHN) - Beginning Tuesday, or April Fool's Day 2008, fines on Quebec drivers caught overspeeding will be doubled. It is not only the money penalty that will go up, but also demerit points.
The new law, Bill 42, is similar to Ontario's street racing rule. It stipulates fines for motorists who drive at over 40 km/h at under 60 km/h zones, speed at 50 km/h at 60 to 90 km/h areas and…
Make big trucks go slower and the roads will become safer.
Obvious, isn't it? It's also obvious when you look out the window that the world is flat.
Last Monday, truckers in Ontario tried to mount a convoy to Queen's Park to show their opposition to electronic speed limiters. These devices, electronic chips in trucks' engine management systems, restrict speeds…
I was out on a four lane highway around Orangeville Ontario and I noticed a school bus coming south (I was going north). I kept my eyes on the bus in case it was going to stop. As I approached it, it was slowing down a little, but no lights, and especially no arm with the STOP sign. As I was just about to pass the bus, I still did not see the lights, nor did I see the STOP sign.
Hey everyone first off I'd like to say great website, I have been reading and it is very useful
I'm posting today as I'd like to get some feedback on my situation and have a couple of questions. Please excuse the vagueness in some areas - I don't want my case to be identifiable given the small town.
So I was driving up north and was pulled over by an OPP SUV for doing 31 over. Cop drove past me,…
Driving on a 80km/hr highway the car ahead hits the brakes and slows to 55, l slow down right behind him no reason to slow down traffic was moving between 80 and 90. I notice the driver is on the phone and looking through papers on the passenger seat. He begins to start to go a opp officer drives by doing 80 plus in oncoming lane turns around and says l was following to close. Told him what was…
My son was making a right turn at the intersection he had a green so slowed down looked and proceeded into the turn. It was pouring rain and the was a big pool of water as he got arround the curb. He tried to keep the car going sharp right however it slid into the car making a left turn. the lane he was turning into is very narrow and at a very busy corner. He paniced and left the scene only…
I had an collision the other day. I was turing left and ran into a car going straight in the opposite direction. The insurance company has already determined that I'm at fault, since I made the left turn. But I'm wondering whether I should go on trail and at least I might get rid of the ticket. The ticket was under 142(1)
I was told that if I go on court, both the guy I hit and the officer who…
question for a friend of mine.....says she got a 3 day suspension for giving a A on a roadside. Thing is she wasnt driving. She is a g2 driver and the car was parked in a parking lot, she just ran out to get something and turned the car on. Can a 3 day be issued if you arent driving on a highway - (I've read for impaired it doesnt matter, but 3 day isnt criminal)? And is there any way to…
I can't find the category for this post so I'm posting it here.
Two questions...
1. Are golf carts considered a 'vehicle' under the Highway traffic act? I know carts can't drive across roads or on roads but if you try to bring one from the USA into Canada they are considered a 'vehicle'.
2. If you are on private property are you allowed to carry 'opened' alcohol in your golf cart? I know golf…
I got pulled over (along with about 10 other cars) for going through a road closed sign. I had just pulled out of a parking lot pretty much right beside the road closed sign, and with about 4 cars behind me there wasn't much I could do but go through, so I think I have a good chance of fighting it. However, on my ticket under the Signature of issuing Provincial Offences Officer, it's left…
I was driving westbound on Hwy. 8 earlier this month in North Dumfries Township, approaching the Cambridge city limits. The weather was clear and the roads were dry. I noticed a vehicle on the shoulder on my side of the road, pointing towards me. This didn't concern me right away, as it is a rural area and I sometimes see vehicles doing mail delivery. The vehicle then started accelerating and…
I was pulled over yesterday in a community safety zone and told I was doing 84 in a 50. When i passed the officer I looked at my odometer and I was only doing 64. I was given a summons on the spot to appear in court at the end of June. Do I have any chance in this if it comes down to his word over mine. I was in the car alone but have travelled these same roads every day, twice a day for 6 years…
who is at fault when :a) a passenger opens door and jumps out of vehicle onto the road with traffic. b) he gets hit by a car travelling in the adjoining lane. c) traffic lights were green. d) pedestrian crossing was further up and indicated "no crossing" light e) the vehicle that he exited from leaves the scene as soon as accident occurred. f) no charges have been laid after police filed report…