this is my first post so i am not sure if this is the right section in this website to ask this quetion. However, here it is. I have a court date for ''failure to surrender license." Although I had a valid license at the point, I was not carrying it with me in the car. I had forgotten it at home. The receptionist is saying that I did not get for ''not having a valid license while driving'' but rather for ''failing to surrender license while driving'' and according to her I am not in a position to defend myself and I am guilty. Please tell me how can I fight this as I know its a play with words and since I had a valid license why shall I be guilty? Please provide more information. Thanks.
this is my first post so i am not sure if this is the right section in this website to ask this quetion. However, here it is.
I have a court date for ''failure to surrender license." Although I had a valid license at the point, I was not carrying it with me in the car. I had forgotten it at home. The receptionist is saying that I did not get for ''not having a valid license while driving'' but rather for ''failing to surrender license while driving'' and according to her I am not in a position to defend myself and I am guilty.
Please tell me how can I fight this as I know its a play with words and since I had a valid license why shall I be guilty?
It's not a play on words. This is the section you've been charged under: When you're stopped, you have to be able to produce your licence, ownership and proof of insurance. Commercial vehicle operators have several other documents to produce as well. The officer isn't disputing that you're licensed, simply that you didn't have your licence with you. He likely did several computer checks to verify you had a licence before charging you. If he had believed you were unlicensed, you would have been charged with "Drive Motor Vehicle No Licence" and received a much larger fine. I don't see any grounds you can fight it on. Forgetting it at home is not an excuse. The law requires you have the document with you while operating a motor vehicle. There is no truth to the commonly held belief that if you show up to the police station within 24 hours the ticket will be quashed. I've seen people fight this ticket before and every time the JP simply asks them "Did you give the police officer you licence when he asked you for it?" The minute they say no, they're found guilty. Your best bet might be to meet with the prosecutor and see if they'll agree to a reduced fine if you plead guilty.
It's not a play on words. This is the section you've been charged under:
Carrying licences and surrender on demand
33. (1) Every driver of a motor vehicle or street car shall carry his or her licence with him or her at all times while he or she is in charge of a motor vehicle or street car and shall surrender the licence for reasonable inspection upon the demand of a police officer or officer appointed for carrying out the provisions of this Act.
When you're stopped, you have to be able to produce your licence, ownership and proof of insurance. Commercial vehicle operators have several other documents to produce as well. The officer isn't disputing that you're licensed, simply that you didn't have your licence with you. He likely did several computer checks to verify you had a licence before charging you. If he had believed you were unlicensed, you would have been charged with "Drive Motor Vehicle No Licence" and received a much larger fine.
I don't see any grounds you can fight it on. Forgetting it at home is not an excuse. The law requires you have the document with you while operating a motor vehicle. There is no truth to the commonly held belief that if you show up to the police station within 24 hours the ticket will be quashed.
I've seen people fight this ticket before and every time the JP simply asks them "Did you give the police officer you licence when he asked you for it?" The minute they say no, they're found guilty.
Your best bet might be to meet with the prosecutor and see if they'll agree to a reduced fine if you plead guilty.
Agree with Stanton. You are not charged with "Drive with no licence." You are charged with failing to surrender your licence, which, by your own admission, is exactly what you did. You could try to get a lower fine by speaking to the Justice of the Peace at trial, however it won't necessarily be successful.
Agree with Stanton.
You are not charged with "Drive with no licence." You are charged with failing to surrender your licence, which, by your own admission, is exactly what you did. You could try to get a lower fine by speaking to the Justice of the Peace at trial, however it won't necessarily be successful.
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
My wife was stopped by a cop in Dec. 2009 with two tickets disobey stop sign - fail to stop, and fail to surrender permit...oops this might be different from fai to surrender license. The cop did say if we could have the proof of bought stick, came to the station, they would quash the second charge. By the time we were the station a week or so, they had filed to the court already. So we are still fighting the tickets.
My wife was stopped by a cop in Dec. 2009 with two tickets disobey stop sign - fail to stop, and fail to surrender permit...oops this might be different from fai to surrender license. The cop did say if we could have the proof of bought stick, came to the station, they would quash the second charge. By the time we were the station a week or so, they had filed to the court already. So we are still fighting the tickets.
Just to be clear, while officers can exercise discretion and allow you to bring your documents into the station at a later time, they're under no obligation to do so. The law is very clear that you need to have your licence, proof of ownership and insurance at all times when you're driving. There is NO requirement under law that police need to give you 24 hours, etc. Once the ticket is submitted to the Courts, it's too late for the officer to do you any favours.
signstop wrote:
My wife was stopped by a cop in Dec. 2009 with two tickets disobey stop sign - fail to stop, and fail to surrender permit...oops this might be different from fai to surrender license. The cop did say if we could have the proof of bought stick, came to the station, they would quash the second charge. By the time we were the station a week or so, they had filed to the court already. So we are still fighting the tickets.
Just to be clear, while officers can exercise discretion and allow you to bring your documents into the station at a later time, they're under no obligation to do so. The law is very clear that you need to have your licence, proof of ownership and insurance at all times when you're driving. There is NO requirement under law that police need to give you 24 hours, etc. Once the ticket is submitted to the Courts, it's too late for the officer to do you any favours.
pulled over leaving a survey in guelph. After arguing with the officer for about 10 minutes, he mentioned something being wrong with my truck. Told me to put on my emergency brake, and i did. Told me to put it in gear, and i did, truck did not move. Told me to hit the gas, and i did and the truck…
Got two very heavy tickets -- for failing to stop for a school bus, and for using a handheld device. Was running late in a morning rush traffic in Toronto and apparently passed a school bus on the opposite side w/o noticing its signal. A few meters after that I stopped behind the other cars waiting…
I recently received a ticket for proceeding contrary to sign at an intersection. While there are other issues with the offence (sign is not visible until 10ft from intersection, officer wrote wrong license plate number on ticket) my biggest question is about the sign itself.
I posted here a *while* back when I first got my speeding ticket, and I've been fighting it forever. Anyway, long story short - I went and had an appeal and both the prosecutor and the Judge agree that I have valid grounds to appeal on, but what we're arguing is whether the correct remedy is a…
My wife had an auto accident back in May. It is gradually being dealt with by our insurance company ( by the broker actually). My question is about the legal power of the insurance code OAP1. Evidently this set of rules is the Ten Commandments for the insurance companies and the adjustors seem to…
What is the requirement for stopping when a school bus is traveling down the roadway, initiates the flashing red lights while still moving but has not yet stopped? If a motorist is traveling through an intersection (through the free-flow approach, minor-street stop controlled) and an oncoming…
In 2005, the government passed legislation that enabled the introduction of variable speed limits at some point in the future. It didn't take effect right away, so it sat waiting for "proclamation by the Lieutenant Governor." Just by chance... I was reading the HTA earlier while browsing this…
I was on my way to work on a divided four lane highway. I was in the right hand lane following the flow of traffic. There was a slower car ahead of me and I wanted to change lanes and maintain my speed. When I looked in my left side mirror, I notice a red car going pretty fast in the passing…
So i got charged with Hand Held Device, just want to ask everyone if i could use this as my defence
It was midnight, I was dropping my fiance to pick up something on north bound Yonge st (near church) with my emergency lights on, Officer came and asked me to move along so i went up a few streets and…