can i represent my dad for red light camera violation

Moderators: admin, hwybear, Radar Identified, Reflections, Decatur, bend



User avatar
barraymian
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 4:48 pm

by: barraymian on
Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:18 am

i am not sure why i haven't received a reply to this question since a few ppl here must know it.

anyways, apparently i can so i am going to go in and find out what i've to do to represent my dad and will post the full details as to how this is done


User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1092
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:04 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Posting Awards

Moderator

by: admin on
Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:50 am



User avatar
barraymian
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 4:48 pm

by: barraymian on
Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:38 pm

thanks admin, i had seen the first one but not the others

so i went to the court today and told them that i wanted to represent my dad, the girl said no problem, gave me a form to fill with my dad's information but told me to sign my name in the end of the form and i got a trial date

NOW, when do i meet the prosecutor? i assume there is no first attendance with this type of ticket, so do i meet him before the trial and how would i find him on the trial day?

thanks


User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1092
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:04 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Posting Awards

Moderator

by: admin on
Tue Sep 08, 2009 5:57 pm

barraymian wrote: NOW, when do i meet the prosecutor? i assume there is no first attendance with this type of ticket, so do i meet him before the trial and how would i find him on the trial day?

thanks
Option 3 would have provided you with a First Attendance date when you filed your ticket. You would go on that date and plea bargain to a lower fine.


User avatar
barraymian
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 4:48 pm

by: barraymian on
Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:43 am

so apparently i should've asked for a first attendance specifically instead of a trial even though there was no option on the form for that. I called the court and they told me that and she said that its too late to request that and i've to go to the trial.

so any suggestions now? do i meet the prosecutor outside the court to plea bargain or what else can i do?


User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1092
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:04 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Posting Awards

Moderator

by: admin on
Mon Sep 14, 2009 6:24 pm

barraymian wrote:so apparently i should've asked for a first attendance specifically instead of a trial even though there was no option on the form for that. I called the court and they told me that and she said that its too late to request that and i've to go to the trial.

so any suggestions now? do i meet the prosecutor outside the court to plea bargain or what else can i do?
Don't they have dates you can pick and show up at? What court is this at?

If you still can't get first attendance, you will have to show up for your trial, and then most likely the prosecutor should offer you a deal before he/she takes you to trial.

Maybe some other members here with experience in these type of tickets can shed some light on this.


User avatar
ticketcombat
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 486
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 5:59 pm
Location: Toronto
Contact:

by: ticketcombat on
Tue Sep 22, 2009 3:33 pm

Admin asked me to comment on this thread (sorry I'm a little late with it).

First Attendance (FA) is not an alternative to choosing one of the options on your ticket. You must always request a trial. THEN you can negotiate a settlement at FA or before your trial.

FA is not offered in every jurisdiction and the ones that do offer it may not offer it for every charge (i.e. FA for speeding but not for parking tickets). Some places you have to schedule the FA, others you just go and line up.

Arriving early to your court date (at least 30 minutes in advance) you will be able to talk to the prosecutor in the court room to try and work out something. This is like an abbreviated FA meeting. This is usually less successful than a formal FA meeting as there is a time pressure to go through the docket before the justice walks into court. With a formal FA meeting you can take all the time you need. If not successful, you can always go back and hopefully get another prosecutor who is more willing to negotiate.

As for what to say, check out the sentencing part of my site: admission of guilty, a sincere apology, your driving behaviour has improved and your record is clean since the charge, there is little liklihood of you committing the offence again, the "societal interest" in convicting you is low, ...

One issue is whether to admit guilt or not. You can skirt around it a bit by taking responsibility for your actions and expressing a sincere desire to resolve the matter without truly admitting what you have done.

Or you can negotiate by saying you want to save the court time, it doesn't look like there is a strong case against you, let's settle this matter now.

There are different approaches to use depending on your situation and the vidence. That's why generally you should receive disclosure BEFORE you go to FA. Why negotiate a guilty plea if they do not have enough evidence to convict you in the first place?

With Red Light Camera tickets, the general rule of thumb is a 50% discount for a guilty plea (plus surcharge). As this is not a moving violation against a driver, it doesn't affect your demerit points or insurance. You can usually get this without any negotiating at all.
Fight Your Ticket!


Post Reply
  • Similar Topics

Return to “General Talk”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: goatmilk4U and 7 guests