Before the car started skidding the driver noticed unusual sound(something breaking) from under left side of the car. It is on the audio record too. The driver got Careless driving ticket, $490. No check-mark on Witnesses field on the ticket. No any other vehicles involved, nobody injured, the Dodge Caravan is totally crushed, the light pole broken. Cant this record help to fight the ticket in the Court? [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_WT3vKE2wY[/youtube]
Before the car started skidding the driver noticed unusual sound(something breaking) from under left side of the car. It is on the audio record too.
The driver got Careless driving ticket, $490. No check-mark on Witnesses field on the ticket.
No any other vehicles involved, nobody injured, the Dodge Caravan is totally crushed, the light pole broken.
Cant this record help to fight the ticket in the Court?
So what caused your car to skid out? If it was mechanical failure your car should be examined and you could use the footage to corroborate the mechanics testimony.
So what caused your car to skid out? If it was mechanical failure your car should be examined and you could use the footage to corroborate the mechanics testimony.
I do not now really what caused skidding. The car sold on scrapyard.
ynotp wrote:
So what caused your car to skid out? If it was mechanical failure your car should be examined and you could use the footage to corroborate the mechanics testimony.
I dont believe the video would be sufficient evidence of a mechanical defect. A certified mechanic would need to inspect the vehicle to make that kind of determination. The noise seems to occur when the vehicle drives over a manhole. When I watch the video I get the impression that the back simply slid out on the wet roads. The bump from the manhole could have assisted in one or more the wheels temporarily losing traction. That being said, the video could still be of benefit. While arguably the driver was going too fast for the conditions, Im not sure it demonstrates sufficient carelessness for a conviction.
I dont believe the video would be sufficient evidence of a mechanical defect. A certified mechanic would need to inspect the vehicle to make that kind of determination. The noise seems to occur when the vehicle drives over a manhole. When I watch the video I get the impression that the back simply slid out on the wet roads. The bump from the manhole could have assisted in one or more the wheels temporarily losing traction. That being said, the video could still be of benefit. While arguably the driver was going too fast for the conditions, Im not sure it demonstrates sufficient carelessness for a conviction.
I agree. The car is certainly going too fast for the road conditions (its wet) and the loud Rasputin music doesn't help convey much of a cautious driver either; it actually illustrates the potential for distraction by the driver! In any event, it seems as if skid starts when the left rear wheel goes over the manhole and the driver loses control. There isn't any sound of braking going on or steering correction (which would definitely be heard throughout the skid); but rather, the vehicle only goes from accelerating to a state of constant speed; no deceleration occurs until the curb is actually hit. Unless a mechanic's report can confirm a tire, brake and steering defect, the driver may face a qualified accident re-constructionist who will be able to properly present the evidence. Best option: try to work a deal with the prosecution. The video can go either way.
I agree. The car is certainly going too fast for the road conditions (its wet) and the loud Rasputin music doesn't help convey much of a cautious driver either; it actually illustrates the potential for distraction by the driver! In any event, it seems as if skid starts when the left rear wheel goes over the manhole and the driver loses control. There isn't any sound of braking going on or steering correction (which would definitely be heard throughout the skid); but rather, the vehicle only goes from accelerating to a state of constant speed; no deceleration occurs until the curb is actually hit. Unless a mechanic's report can confirm a tire, brake and steering defect, the driver may face a qualified accident re-constructionist who will be able to properly present the evidence. Best option: try to work a deal with the prosecution. The video can go either way.
I think it's a good Careless charge. Using that video to defend yourself would only show that your speed was too fast for the conditions at the time. You can see that most of the manhole is inside the turning lane and the vehicle cuts across the corner and into the curve. By hitting the manhole cover the road friction was reduced significantly and you went into a yaw. I agree with highwaystar. See if the prosecutor will work out a deal and just be thankful that no other vehicles were hit
I think it's a good Careless charge. Using that video to defend yourself would only show that your speed was too fast for the conditions at the time. You can see that most of the manhole is inside the turning lane and the vehicle cuts across the corner and into the curve. By hitting the manhole cover the road friction was reduced significantly and you went into a yaw.
I agree with highwaystar. See if the prosecutor will work out a deal and just be thankful that no other vehicles were hit
While I dont disagree that the drivers speed was excessive for the conditions, Im still not certain thats sufficient for a careless driving conviction. R v. McNeil (2012) and R v. McLean (2011) both deal with drivers going too fast for the conditions, but the defendant is only convicted in the one of the cases. The Courts seem to be looking for an intentional disregard more than poor judgement due to inexperience. Id at the very least consult with a paralegal to see if they feel the video might be beneficial to the defendant.
While I dont disagree that the drivers speed was excessive for the conditions, Im still not certain thats sufficient for a careless driving conviction. R v. McNeil (2012) and R v. McLean (2011) both deal with drivers going too fast for the conditions, but the defendant is only convicted in the one of the cases. The Courts seem to be looking for an intentional disregard more than poor judgement due to inexperience. Id at the very least consult with a paralegal to see if they feel the video might be beneficial to the defendant.
This is my first time ever getting a ticket and I am completely frustrated and don't know what to do.
On July 7th, I was driving to work, taking my usual route and it's about a 15 minute drive for me. At the first red light, I noticed I had a bit of time thanks to the countdown so I quickly…
I'm hoping somebody can point me in the right direction to track down various radar gun error codes.
Way back in March of this year I was stopped for speeding, 86kmh in a 60 Community Safety Zone, on Mayfield Rd., on the outskirts of Brampton. (Aloa school)
My husband was driving my car and passed a school bus with flashing lights. He did not realize this until he was past the bus. The driver honked at him but there were no cops nearby and he didn't get pulled over. I believe the driver or witnesses reported this and we got issued a…
Hey guys I was hoping for some advice on my first ever ticket.
I just moved to the Aurora area and made a prohibited left turn between the prohibited hours. This is my very first ticket so I am unsure as to how to precede. I have already requested and received my court date and I assume the next…
i am 25 with a G2 Drivers license. had a lot to drink saturday night. woke up the next morning and drove home around 1pm sunday. got pulled over for speeding, police officer smelled booze had me blow a breathalyzer. i blew 0.035 . he aloud my passenger to drive my truck home. he gave…
Hi, last summer I was pulled over when I made a left turn from he middle lane at Harbor and Yonge Street (heading east on the Gardiner and taking the Yonge exit). I swear they nabbed about 10 people in 5 minutes. Anyways, I decided to challenge in court, my court date is in April and I have just…
In Kanda, the court established that this offence is a strict liability charge. In other words, you can offer a defence of due diligence. In Kanda the defendant explained the…
Last July I got pulled over for failure to obey stop sign at a T-intersection in my neighbourhood. After I got my trial date I requested disclosure in November. Sent in another request for disclosure in early January and in mid-January got a call to pick it up at the court office. The disclosure…