First off thank you for opening this post with intent to help me its deeply appreciated. I chose option 2 early resolution and submitted the ticket to the court and have yet to receive a letter in the mail about the meeting date with the prosecutor. I want to request disclosure by registered mail, and I would like to have the disclosure documents be submitted to me before the meeting with the prosecutor. Is this a valid acceptable thing to do or can disclosure only be requested if you chose option 3. What if I requested it by registered mail and I don't receive it by the meeting date? Any insight or advice how I should go about this all is greatly appreciated. Thank you.
First off thank you for opening this post with intent to help me its deeply appreciated.
I chose option 2 early resolution and submitted the ticket to the court and have yet to receive a letter in the mail about the meeting date with the prosecutor.
I want to request disclosure by registered mail, and I would like to have the disclosure documents be submitted to me before the meeting with the prosecutor. Is this a valid acceptable thing to do or can disclosure only be requested if you chose option 3.
What if I requested it by registered mail and I don't receive it by the meeting date? Any insight or advice how I should go about this all is greatly appreciated. Thank you.
Depending on the jurisdiction, registered mail may not be an option. Ex: City of Toronto requires you to include a phone # or e-mail so that you pick up disclosure in person. You can certainly include the resolution meeting date in your disclosure request. The crown requires 6-8 weeks to process disclosure requests. If you don't receive it by the time you have your resolution meeting, you can choose to go to trial or plea-bargain with the crown. Generally, information in the disclosure is somewhat irrelevant w/o the officer present. It's his handwriting and notes, and a lot of the time the crown may not be able to decipher the officer's writing.
Depending on the jurisdiction, registered mail may not be an option. Ex: City of Toronto requires you to include a phone # or e-mail so that you pick up disclosure in person.
You can certainly include the resolution meeting date in your disclosure request. The crown requires 6-8 weeks to process disclosure requests. If you don't receive it by the time you have your resolution meeting, you can choose to go to trial or plea-bargain with the crown.
Generally, information in the disclosure is somewhat irrelevant w/o the officer present. It's his handwriting and notes, and a lot of the time the crown may not be able to decipher the officer's writing.
If registered mail is not an option I will fax a disclosure request because I read with fax you can receive a confirmation to use as evidence later if should you request a stay due to lack of disclosure. The main reason I want to receive disclosure before or on the meeting date is to see the evidence they have against me because when I go pulled over it was on a dark 2 lane road and me and the officer where coming towards each other and as we passed out of reaction I hit the brakes and I think he seen that in his rear view mirror then turned on his lights and made a u turn far after we passed. He didn't mention anything about radar and he told me twice that I was the only car on the road even though I never mentioned anything about that it was kind of out of context. Also another police car came to the scene and the officer who pulled me over talked to him for quite some time. So im thinking maybe the other officer seen me speeding and radioed him. So its quite possible the officer could have pulled me over without any radar reading but out of reaction to seeing my brake lights threw his rearview mirror. Or if the other officer who later arrived to the scene caught me on radar wouldnt he have to be present at court too or else it would be heresay.
iFly55 wrote:
Depending on the jurisdiction, registered mail may not be an option. Ex: City of Toronto requires you to include a phone # or e-mail so that you pick up disclosure in person.
You can certainly include the resolution meeting date in your disclosure request. The crown requires 6-8 weeks to process disclosure requests. If you don't receive it by the time you have your resolution meeting, you can choose to go to trial or plea-bargain with the crown.
Generally, information in the disclosure is somewhat irrelevant w/o the officer present. It's his handwriting and notes, and a lot of the time the crown may not be able to decipher the officer's writing.
If registered mail is not an option I will fax a disclosure request because I read with fax you can receive a confirmation to use as evidence later if should you request a stay due to lack of disclosure.
The main reason I want to receive disclosure before or on the meeting date is to see the evidence they have against me because when I go pulled over it was on a dark 2 lane road and me and the officer where coming towards each other and as we passed out of reaction I hit the brakes and I think he seen that in his rear view mirror then turned on his lights and made a u turn far after we passed. He didn't mention anything about radar and he told me twice that I was the only car on the road even though I never mentioned anything about that it was kind of out of context. Also another police car came to the scene and the officer who pulled me over talked to him for quite some time. So im thinking maybe the other officer seen me speeding and radioed him. So its quite possible the officer could have pulled me over without any radar reading but out of reaction to seeing my brake lights threw his rearview mirror. Or if the other officer who later arrived to the scene caught me on radar wouldnt he have to be present at court too or else it would be heresay.
I think it's best that you request disclosure: officer's notes and manual for his speed measuring device. Sample disclosure form can be found here: http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic2959.html You shouldn't read too much into what the officer told you or the presence of the other officer. Wait until you read the officer's notes, it'll give you a much better idea as to how you were identified and how your speed was obtained.
You shouldn't read too much into what the officer told you or the presence of the other officer. Wait until you read the officer's notes, it'll give you a much better idea as to how you were identified and how your speed was obtained.
Exactly I just need to wait then decide from there. Should I send a request now or wait until I receive a date in the mail for the meeting and automatically schedaled trial Should there be no resolution at the meeting. From what I understand they need 6-8 weeks for the disclosure and I'd be stumped if my meeting was before that time period.
You shouldn't read too much into what the officer told you or the presence of the other officer. Wait until you read the officer's notes, it'll give you a much better idea as to how you were identified and how your speed was obtained.
Exactly I just need to wait then decide from there. Should I send a request now or wait until I receive a date in the mail for the meeting and automatically schedaled trial Should there be no resolution at the meeting.
From what I understand they need 6-8 weeks for the disclosure and I'd be stumped if my meeting was before that time period.
1) Fax the prosecutor's office your disclosure request. Repeat the request (if necessary) once you are notified of the resolution meeting date. 2) You should then be able to pick it up a few days before your meeting. If not, they'll simply give it to you on the day of your meeting. Simply ask for time to read it. 3) After about 10 minutes, you can then go in and have your meeting. Its quite simple actually. BTW, the only reason you should want disclosure before the meeting is to know whether to accept any deal they offer you that day. Don't expect to do much talking at the meeting--its very one-sided. If you don't like the deal they offer you, they'll just book it for trial. You'll get your chance to argue your case in court, not at the meeting. So, don't expect much of a 2-way discussion at the meeting. Just a heads up!
1) Fax the prosecutor's office your disclosure request. Repeat the request (if necessary) once you are notified of the resolution meeting date.
2) You should then be able to pick it up a few days before your meeting. If not, they'll simply give it to you on the day of your meeting. Simply ask for time to read it.
3) After about 10 minutes, you can then go in and have your meeting. Its quite simple actually.
BTW, the only reason you should want disclosure before the meeting is to know whether to accept any deal they offer you that day. Don't expect to do much talking at the meeting--its very one-sided. If you don't like the deal they offer you, they'll just book it for trial. You'll get your chance to argue your case in court, not at the meeting. So, don't expect much of a 2-way discussion at the meeting. Just a heads up!
Thanks for the heads up, the thing is should I just fax in the sample report kindly given to me by iFly55 seen here http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic2959.html or should I modify it to somehow say in the body of the request that I would like to receive this before or at the meeting. With all due respect, how would I know if it would even be ready before the meeting as you state above in 2)?
highwaystar wrote:
1) Fax the prosecutor's office your disclosure request. Repeat the request (if necessary) once you are notified of the resolution meeting date.
2) You should then be able to pick it up a few days before your meeting. If not, they'll simply give it to you on the day of your meeting. Simply ask for time to read it.
3) After about 10 minutes, you can then go in and have your meeting. Its quite simple actually.
BTW, the only reason you should want disclosure before the meeting is to know whether to accept any deal they offer you that day. Don't expect to do much talking at the meeting--its very one-sided. If you don't like the deal they offer you, they'll just book it for trial. You'll get your chance to argue your case in court, not at the meeting. So, don't expect much of a 2-way discussion at the meeting. Just a heads up!
Modify the letter for your needs. Specifically request disclosure be provided BEFORE your early resolution meeting ("ER"). In 95% of the cases general disclosure is given to defendants at their ER anyway without them ever needing to request it. However, request letters serve to request more disclosure specific to the case and serve as proof of the request. Most folks don't usually require the letter because the prosecution will generally give disclosure out anyway. However, from a procedural standpoint, it is always better to put the request in writing and formally make the request anyway. Plus, if you request disclosure that the court deems reasonably necessary for your defence and the prosecution doesn't or can't provide it, then this gives you grounds for charter remedies. In your case, if they don't call or email you 7-10 days before your ER, I'd contact them in writing again so that they tell you when it will be ready for pickup. If they don't have it at your ER, the prosecutor will usually just withdraw the case because the delay is attributed to them since the ER can't reasonably proceed---after all, neither party has the facts before them.
Modify the letter for your needs. Specifically request disclosure be provided BEFORE your early resolution meeting ("ER"). In 95% of the cases general disclosure is given to defendants at their ER anyway without them ever needing to request it. However, request letters serve to request more disclosure specific to the case and serve as proof of the request. Most folks don't usually require the letter because the prosecution will generally give disclosure out anyway. However, from a procedural standpoint, it is always better to put the request in writing and formally make the request anyway. Plus, if you request disclosure that the court deems reasonably necessary for your defence and the prosecution doesn't or can't provide it, then this gives you grounds for charter remedies.
In your case, if they don't call or email you 7-10 days before your ER, I'd contact them in writing again so that they tell you when it will be ready for pickup. If they don't have it at your ER, the prosecutor will usually just withdraw the case because the delay is attributed to them since the ER can't reasonably proceed---after all, neither party has the facts before them.
Modify the letter for your needs. Specifically request disclosure be provided BEFORE your early resolution meeting ("ER"). In 95% of the cases general disclosure is given to defendants at their ER anyway without them ever needing to request it. However, request letters serve to request more disclosure specific to the case and serve as proof of the request. Most folks don't usually require the letter because the prosecution will generally give disclosure out anyway. However, from a procedural standpoint, it is always better to put the request in writing and formally make the request anyway. Plus, if you request disclosure that the court deems reasonably necessary for your defence and the prosecution doesn't or can't provide it, then this gives you grounds for charter remedies.
In your case, if they don't call or email you 7-10 days before your ER, I'd contact them in writing again so that they tell you when it will be ready for pickup. If they don't have it at your ER, the prosecutor will usually just withdraw the case because the delay is attributed to them since the ER can't reasonably proceed---after all, neither party has the facts before them.
I followed the procedures mentioned in the previous threads regarding the disclosure and received it today. My court date is November 5 2009 in Whitby. After going through the notes I realized 2 things:
1- the notes are horribly illegible and difficult to read
2- I have notes from two different officers.
Now I am not sure if this means that both the officers will be at court for the hearing or…
I hope I can paint the picture with the accuracy that the truth deserves. I have no intention of just beating a ticket.. but more like beating a really unfair ticket. You decide!
I had entered Canada after a short trip downsouth through Detroit on my way to Toronto. Not being equipped with a GPS unit I had to rely on the printable poorman's version from Mapquest. I followed Huron Church Rd.,…
Need an expert advice here. 10 days ago I got a speeding ticket. Ticket has a fatal error on its face-offense not known to law. It says speeding 75km/hr in posted 60km/hr zone. What is the best way to proceed?
1. Should I completely ignore this ticket and let the JP to quash it?
2. Should I go with option 3 - request a trial and force the fatal error by not showing up at court?
My name is Brian. I am in my late 20s and live in Toronto. I do not own a car but half a dozen times a year I rent one with my Visa. (To get out of the city and go to a beach or ski for example.)
I have never drunk and drive but I face a problem and Im wondering if anyone can tell me what to do. Several months ago I was at a weekend party and had quit a bit to consume. When I stopped…
I was travelling east bound on ellesmere road and approached markham road attempting to make a right turn. All signal lights were red and cars traveling down markham road south were given the green arrow. I slowed down and attempted to make the right turn. I got ticketed by a cop who was parked in a gas station facing the intersection in a (no parking zone). I…
Crested a hill, officer coming at me, pulled a u turn and pulled me over.
I will go back and look again but I thought I was in an 80 not a 70 and I am positive I wasn't doing more than 120. My speedo read 110-115. I have aftermarket tires and rims so I assume this would be the difference.
It was around 7pm, already dark, nobody on the road but myself,…
I am looking for the case law that is commonly used when the prosecution says they only need to disclose the testing pages of a radar manual or laser manual.
I am only interested in the binding decisions (appeals court or higher?), and not in the non-binding Justice of the Peace decisions.
I was pulled over two nights ago and charged with failing to stop a stop sign. On the ticket, it says 'disobey stop sign - foil to stop' and does not say 'fail' -- something I think may be a fatal flaw? I have been driving for 12 years with no tickets, yet I live in Brampton where insurance prices are high so I do not want to be convicted as my insurance rates will spike significantly and…
A friend of mine (who is from China and with no knowledge of English at all) asked me to interpret for him on court.
He got pulled over by a stealth patrol car last october, got 3 tickets (fail to show insurance card, using cell phones and fail to stop on right for emergency vehicle) , court date is next week. He told me his insurance expired for less than a month and other charges are false…
I understand the severity of my offences, and I can't stress how much I regret it. I know I endangered the lives of myself and more importantly others. I usually do not speed and I know running late for work is an unacceptable excuse. I will be a man and accept the consequences of my actions although I would appreciate any advice for my situation.
Guys back in january i got a speeding ticket on dvp, but i am 90% sure he did not caught me on radar, i asked for disclosure request and i just received today, I have asked for: a full copy of the police officers notes, a copy of both sides of the officers copy of the ticket, witness will say statements, speed gun manual, calibration record, repair history and officer's training certificate but…
I need some help here. So today I was on my way to get my tires changed from my winter tires to my regular summer staggered set of tires. I was driving in mississauga on my way to my destination, I got pulled over by an officer where I was given a ticket for having improper mudguards. For some context, I drive a stock 2013 C63 AMG with winter tires at the time. I was never…
I'd like to start this off by saying for the last two weeks I have been browsing the forums. I'm trying to prepare myself for an early resolution meeting with a prosecutor (in Brampton, if that matters). I have a clean record and as a teacher, I always do my best to follow rules (trying to practice what I preach!)
On December 4, 2014 I was preparing to turn right at a very busy intersection.…
I have question, today I was going to work in my normal route there is a triangle intersection with my side being the only one with a stop sign.
There's a car in front me who stopped at the stop sign, and the third-side there's a incoming car with their hazard-light flashing but they don't have stop sign, yet coming in at a slow speed.
Right after the car in front me went through the stop sign,…
On my way to work this morning I received a ticket for disobey sign. I was on Hwy 10 Mississauga in the right lane. The right lane leads to the 401 and there is a sign saying Right Lane Exits. I Tried to merge left before the on ramp as did 3 other people. We all got a ticket for doing that. Is there anything I can do? I did not realize I was breaking any law it was a dotted line where I tried to…
This is my first post, before I jump right in I would like to thank the forum, members, posters and moderators for all the information posted. I feel like I have been able to learn a lot from others experiences, so thank you all.
This will be a lengthy post. But if you are dealing with a Disobey Sign HTA 182(2) - No Straight Through Intersection you may find this extremely…
Let me start this with saying that this isn't in regards to a ticket, more a discussion surrounding front license plates and learning about the rules behind them. (Most of the quote stuff is using colloquial terms, mostly because I couldn't really find a better way to describe it; it's not meant to be offensive.)
I know Ontario law/HTA mandates having a front license plate unlike some States in…
Hi Guys! I've just had my trial day yesterday. I was not at fault but was convicted anyways.
It is such a travesty! There is no justice at the traffic court. It is just a no mercy machine to part someone with his money, no common sense applies and no reasonable argument being considered. Such a shame! The justice, the policeman and the prosecutor ganged up against me. The justice kept interrupting…
Well first of all ... glad to have found the forum - hoping to find answers to 'alot' of questions
I was unfortunate in July 2010 in that I ended up rolling my 2009 Ranger three times, through a fence and landing on the roof on a rained-out road that was/is in need of proper repair in Eastern Ontario.
I was assisted out of the vehicle by the driver who was behind me.
I was traveling down the 401, noticed a speed trap, and started flashing my lights -- in order to warn oncoming drivers.
Within a 30 seconds, a car slowed, crossed the grass, and approached me from behind. Lights appeared, and I then realised that this was an officer in an undercover car.
The officer pulled me over, and while he was polite, clearly his motivation was to…
Does anyone know the specific law, statute, Charter right to refer to when a prosecutor or justice attempts to change the charge on a ticket after a trial has begun? I assume I'd object immediately (without interrupting anyone, of course) but what would be the specific legal basis of my objection?
I was right behind a school bus that looked like it was pulling over to the side in order to turn down a side street, I saw no lights so decided to go around (wide street). Was still moving as I was passing, then as I did pass I heard horn and looked back and in fact it was pulling over to p/u school kids (was a block away from my son's school, so just assumed it wouldn't be picking up kids...it…