First off thank you for opening this post with intent to help me its deeply appreciated. I chose option 2 early resolution and submitted the ticket to the court and have yet to receive a letter in the mail about the meeting date with the prosecutor. I want to request disclosure by registered mail, and I would like to have the disclosure documents be submitted to me before the meeting with the prosecutor. Is this a valid acceptable thing to do or can disclosure only be requested if you chose option 3. What if I requested it by registered mail and I don't receive it by the meeting date? Any insight or advice how I should go about this all is greatly appreciated. Thank you.
First off thank you for opening this post with intent to help me its deeply appreciated.
I chose option 2 early resolution and submitted the ticket to the court and have yet to receive a letter in the mail about the meeting date with the prosecutor.
I want to request disclosure by registered mail, and I would like to have the disclosure documents be submitted to me before the meeting with the prosecutor. Is this a valid acceptable thing to do or can disclosure only be requested if you chose option 3.
What if I requested it by registered mail and I don't receive it by the meeting date? Any insight or advice how I should go about this all is greatly appreciated. Thank you.
Depending on the jurisdiction, registered mail may not be an option. Ex: City of Toronto requires you to include a phone # or e-mail so that you pick up disclosure in person. You can certainly include the resolution meeting date in your disclosure request. The crown requires 6-8 weeks to process disclosure requests. If you don't receive it by the time you have your resolution meeting, you can choose to go to trial or plea-bargain with the crown. Generally, information in the disclosure is somewhat irrelevant w/o the officer present. It's his handwriting and notes, and a lot of the time the crown may not be able to decipher the officer's writing.
Depending on the jurisdiction, registered mail may not be an option. Ex: City of Toronto requires you to include a phone # or e-mail so that you pick up disclosure in person.
You can certainly include the resolution meeting date in your disclosure request. The crown requires 6-8 weeks to process disclosure requests. If you don't receive it by the time you have your resolution meeting, you can choose to go to trial or plea-bargain with the crown.
Generally, information in the disclosure is somewhat irrelevant w/o the officer present. It's his handwriting and notes, and a lot of the time the crown may not be able to decipher the officer's writing.
If registered mail is not an option I will fax a disclosure request because I read with fax you can receive a confirmation to use as evidence later if should you request a stay due to lack of disclosure. The main reason I want to receive disclosure before or on the meeting date is to see the evidence they have against me because when I go pulled over it was on a dark 2 lane road and me and the officer where coming towards each other and as we passed out of reaction I hit the brakes and I think he seen that in his rear view mirror then turned on his lights and made a u turn far after we passed. He didn't mention anything about radar and he told me twice that I was the only car on the road even though I never mentioned anything about that it was kind of out of context. Also another police car came to the scene and the officer who pulled me over talked to him for quite some time. So im thinking maybe the other officer seen me speeding and radioed him. So its quite possible the officer could have pulled me over without any radar reading but out of reaction to seeing my brake lights threw his rearview mirror. Or if the other officer who later arrived to the scene caught me on radar wouldnt he have to be present at court too or else it would be heresay.
iFly55 wrote:
Depending on the jurisdiction, registered mail may not be an option. Ex: City of Toronto requires you to include a phone # or e-mail so that you pick up disclosure in person.
You can certainly include the resolution meeting date in your disclosure request. The crown requires 6-8 weeks to process disclosure requests. If you don't receive it by the time you have your resolution meeting, you can choose to go to trial or plea-bargain with the crown.
Generally, information in the disclosure is somewhat irrelevant w/o the officer present. It's his handwriting and notes, and a lot of the time the crown may not be able to decipher the officer's writing.
If registered mail is not an option I will fax a disclosure request because I read with fax you can receive a confirmation to use as evidence later if should you request a stay due to lack of disclosure.
The main reason I want to receive disclosure before or on the meeting date is to see the evidence they have against me because when I go pulled over it was on a dark 2 lane road and me and the officer where coming towards each other and as we passed out of reaction I hit the brakes and I think he seen that in his rear view mirror then turned on his lights and made a u turn far after we passed. He didn't mention anything about radar and he told me twice that I was the only car on the road even though I never mentioned anything about that it was kind of out of context. Also another police car came to the scene and the officer who pulled me over talked to him for quite some time. So im thinking maybe the other officer seen me speeding and radioed him. So its quite possible the officer could have pulled me over without any radar reading but out of reaction to seeing my brake lights threw his rearview mirror. Or if the other officer who later arrived to the scene caught me on radar wouldnt he have to be present at court too or else it would be heresay.
I think it's best that you request disclosure: officer's notes and manual for his speed measuring device. Sample disclosure form can be found here: http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic2959.html You shouldn't read too much into what the officer told you or the presence of the other officer. Wait until you read the officer's notes, it'll give you a much better idea as to how you were identified and how your speed was obtained.
You shouldn't read too much into what the officer told you or the presence of the other officer. Wait until you read the officer's notes, it'll give you a much better idea as to how you were identified and how your speed was obtained.
Exactly I just need to wait then decide from there. Should I send a request now or wait until I receive a date in the mail for the meeting and automatically schedaled trial Should there be no resolution at the meeting. From what I understand they need 6-8 weeks for the disclosure and I'd be stumped if my meeting was before that time period.
You shouldn't read too much into what the officer told you or the presence of the other officer. Wait until you read the officer's notes, it'll give you a much better idea as to how you were identified and how your speed was obtained.
Exactly I just need to wait then decide from there. Should I send a request now or wait until I receive a date in the mail for the meeting and automatically schedaled trial Should there be no resolution at the meeting.
From what I understand they need 6-8 weeks for the disclosure and I'd be stumped if my meeting was before that time period.
1) Fax the prosecutor's office your disclosure request. Repeat the request (if necessary) once you are notified of the resolution meeting date. 2) You should then be able to pick it up a few days before your meeting. If not, they'll simply give it to you on the day of your meeting. Simply ask for time to read it. 3) After about 10 minutes, you can then go in and have your meeting. Its quite simple actually. BTW, the only reason you should want disclosure before the meeting is to know whether to accept any deal they offer you that day. Don't expect to do much talking at the meeting--its very one-sided. If you don't like the deal they offer you, they'll just book it for trial. You'll get your chance to argue your case in court, not at the meeting. So, don't expect much of a 2-way discussion at the meeting. Just a heads up!
1) Fax the prosecutor's office your disclosure request. Repeat the request (if necessary) once you are notified of the resolution meeting date.
2) You should then be able to pick it up a few days before your meeting. If not, they'll simply give it to you on the day of your meeting. Simply ask for time to read it.
3) After about 10 minutes, you can then go in and have your meeting. Its quite simple actually.
BTW, the only reason you should want disclosure before the meeting is to know whether to accept any deal they offer you that day. Don't expect to do much talking at the meeting--its very one-sided. If you don't like the deal they offer you, they'll just book it for trial. You'll get your chance to argue your case in court, not at the meeting. So, don't expect much of a 2-way discussion at the meeting. Just a heads up!
Thanks for the heads up, the thing is should I just fax in the sample report kindly given to me by iFly55 seen here http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic2959.html or should I modify it to somehow say in the body of the request that I would like to receive this before or at the meeting. With all due respect, how would I know if it would even be ready before the meeting as you state above in 2)?
highwaystar wrote:
1) Fax the prosecutor's office your disclosure request. Repeat the request (if necessary) once you are notified of the resolution meeting date.
2) You should then be able to pick it up a few days before your meeting. If not, they'll simply give it to you on the day of your meeting. Simply ask for time to read it.
3) After about 10 minutes, you can then go in and have your meeting. Its quite simple actually.
BTW, the only reason you should want disclosure before the meeting is to know whether to accept any deal they offer you that day. Don't expect to do much talking at the meeting--its very one-sided. If you don't like the deal they offer you, they'll just book it for trial. You'll get your chance to argue your case in court, not at the meeting. So, don't expect much of a 2-way discussion at the meeting. Just a heads up!
Modify the letter for your needs. Specifically request disclosure be provided BEFORE your early resolution meeting ("ER"). In 95% of the cases general disclosure is given to defendants at their ER anyway without them ever needing to request it. However, request letters serve to request more disclosure specific to the case and serve as proof of the request. Most folks don't usually require the letter because the prosecution will generally give disclosure out anyway. However, from a procedural standpoint, it is always better to put the request in writing and formally make the request anyway. Plus, if you request disclosure that the court deems reasonably necessary for your defence and the prosecution doesn't or can't provide it, then this gives you grounds for charter remedies. In your case, if they don't call or email you 7-10 days before your ER, I'd contact them in writing again so that they tell you when it will be ready for pickup. If they don't have it at your ER, the prosecutor will usually just withdraw the case because the delay is attributed to them since the ER can't reasonably proceed---after all, neither party has the facts before them.
Modify the letter for your needs. Specifically request disclosure be provided BEFORE your early resolution meeting ("ER"). In 95% of the cases general disclosure is given to defendants at their ER anyway without them ever needing to request it. However, request letters serve to request more disclosure specific to the case and serve as proof of the request. Most folks don't usually require the letter because the prosecution will generally give disclosure out anyway. However, from a procedural standpoint, it is always better to put the request in writing and formally make the request anyway. Plus, if you request disclosure that the court deems reasonably necessary for your defence and the prosecution doesn't or can't provide it, then this gives you grounds for charter remedies.
In your case, if they don't call or email you 7-10 days before your ER, I'd contact them in writing again so that they tell you when it will be ready for pickup. If they don't have it at your ER, the prosecutor will usually just withdraw the case because the delay is attributed to them since the ER can't reasonably proceed---after all, neither party has the facts before them.
Modify the letter for your needs. Specifically request disclosure be provided BEFORE your early resolution meeting ("ER"). In 95% of the cases general disclosure is given to defendants at their ER anyway without them ever needing to request it. However, request letters serve to request more disclosure specific to the case and serve as proof of the request. Most folks don't usually require the letter because the prosecution will generally give disclosure out anyway. However, from a procedural standpoint, it is always better to put the request in writing and formally make the request anyway. Plus, if you request disclosure that the court deems reasonably necessary for your defence and the prosecution doesn't or can't provide it, then this gives you grounds for charter remedies.
In your case, if they don't call or email you 7-10 days before your ER, I'd contact them in writing again so that they tell you when it will be ready for pickup. If they don't have it at your ER, the prosecutor will usually just withdraw the case because the delay is attributed to them since the ER can't reasonably proceed---after all, neither party has the facts before them.
ok well here is my story .. I had an old megaphone from alarm system and decided since my horns on my car were rusted and were not making a loud enough sound.. i connected the alarm megaphone to the horn wires and it sounded very cool. depending on how log i hold my horn down for . due to the size of the power horn.. and mhy car being a Honda.. meaning no room under the hood i had installed it…
So I got this ticket because the lady behind me was WAY too close and I had to back up before getting hit by another car and dented her bumper.
Offense is stated as follows: Start from Stopped position - Not in Safety
Highway Traffic Act 142 (2)
First of all, I don't really know what that means and if it says that I was not in safety (which I wasn't) why am I getting a ticket? And why didn't the…
This is my first time ever getting a ticket and I am completely frustrated and don't know what to do.
On July 7th, I was driving to work, taking my usual route and it's about a 15 minute drive for me. At the first red light, I noticed I had a bit of time thanks to the countdown so I quickly reached into my bag to grab a lip balm. I noticed I had brought the wrong one so I just kept it out and…
It happened last December. I was facing north in the middle of the intersection at Donmills and McNicoll waiting to make a left turn. There was a big white van on the other side of McNicoll facing south waiting to turn left too. When the light changed to amber, I checked and the road was clear, there was no upcoming vehicle. So slowly I made the left turn. Suddenly a small car dashed up from…
First off, the most similar case and HELPFUL thread has y far come from neo333: a great read and very similar and relevant to my case and of course ticketcombat.com
I'll cole's notes this so that it can be concise and can recap my experience with disclosure, notes and failed stay request and adjourned court date. Thank you for reading and leaving your opinion.
I got a notice in the mail that trial is set four weeks from today, so it's time to request disclosure. I have zero chance of getting an 11b since trial is less than two months after the offense date and the officer did not reduce the charge. I really want to try and create delays on the trial, to reduce the chance of the officer showing up on multiple occasions. Is there any known loop-holes…
Got my first ticket last Thursday and I have a couple of questions. I was driving westbound on Moore St. (west of Bayview) and made a left onto a residential street at a 4-way stop sign. It was my first time driving through that area - was driving my girlfriend to a wisdom tooth surgery.
The police were set up to catch people, as that intersection had a no left turn sign from 7-9 am (buses…
I was in a light collision with a police vehicle last November and will be having a trial by the end of the month. What happened was I was pulled over. I stopped and kept my right signal on. The cop car then tried to pull behind me when he was on my left but 2 cars pulled behind me. The cop wasn't too smart and instead of waiting for the two cars to pull away, he drove forward and boxed all the…
A friend of mine (who is from China and with no knowledge of English at all) asked me to interpret for him on court.
He got pulled over by a stealth patrol car last october, got 3 tickets (fail to show insurance card, using cell phones and fail to stop on right for emergency vehicle) , court date is next week. He told me his insurance expired for less than a month and other charges are false…
My husband was driving my car and passed a school bus with flashing lights. He did not realize this until he was past the bus. The driver honked at him but there were no cops nearby and he didn't get pulled over. I believe the driver or witnesses reported this and we got issued a ticket in the mail. The ticket is under my name as the registered owner: charged with Fail to Stop for…
I have just got a ticket (Fail to yield on through highway) and by the way it's me first ticket and this is how I got it.
Me driving in a residential neighborhood maybe 10-15 km/h approaching a stop sign completely stopped at the stop sign started moving again turning right and out of nowhere I was hit by this van. he went directly to the driver's side fender,wheel, and bumper. Since it was my…
Hi I'm new to this forum but I hope I'm bringing you all good news.
I recently wrote a book short titled ABUSE OF POWER
This book is all about how the Ontario government broke the law to enact the new street racing legislation.
To start with the denial of the right to remain innocent until proven guilty was enacted without due process under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. How it wasn't done…
So i lent my car to my gf the other day and she went to drop her friend at a Go station but when she was turning left into the parking lot at the Go station a bus hits her from behind while she was turning so now my rear fender is pushed in and more scrathes and my bumper is damaged...but the cop that showed up just kept telling my gf thats its her fault cause its private property...is that true…
Hi, thanks for reading. I've read a bunch of articles online and searched the forum to try and find my answers but I'm still unsure so I'm creating a new thread.
I was following a car that was going SUPER fast down the DVP but I got pulled over. I was speeding, too; however I don't want to use the "you got the wrong guy" defence because I'll probably lose.
I left my home at 4 am to pick up my daughter from downtown Toronto. When I passed the major intersection south of my house there were two police cars in the middle of the intersection and one officer waved me through the intersection.
When I returned with my daughter at 5:30 am the police cars were still in the intersection. I slowed down as I approached the intersection but the police were no…
I will be representing my wife at her speeding trial next week. Mostly everything is pretty much run of the mill but since she wasn't speeding we will be having her take the stand. Since this opens up the opportunity for the prosecutor to cross examine, I am just wondering if anyone here knows what kind of questions we should expect from the prosecutor in order to best prepare.
When the court sends out the notice of trial, do they use the address the officer wrote on the ticket, or the actual address in the MTO database? In the case of the former, what are the implications? The reason I ask is that my wife got a ticket last week and the officer wrote the wrong city on it.
This topic discusses the same thing but with CN police; is it any different for regular offences?
Driving onto ramp entering a major highway, posted limit is 100km/h, suggested ramp limit is 40km/h - I end up colliding with the concrete barrier on the passenger side of the vehicle.
Police arrive, suspect alcohol and breathalyze me with a result of 0.00 - I am asked for a statement and cautioned, however (stupidly) I proceed to provide the details anyways.
My friends and I were heading to Kelso Beach, I had signalled and i pulled off to the shoulder as my car seemed to be making noise, but after riding over the shoulder the noise stopped, i signalled back again and merged back into traffic after making sure it was safe, the officer which was ahead of me on the shoulder a few meters away pulled me over.…
I've decided to fight a traffic ticket for stop sign violation. The offense was 12 months ago, and I've got a court date for next Tuesday. I've requested disclosure and, although a bit last minute, received it two weeks before my court date.
Upon reviewing the case materials, there isn't much of a defense I can find -based on the cop having an obstructed view, or any mistakes in the…
I will be going to trial for my red light camera offence.
I'll be arguing two issues, centered on the fact that there are two essential elements of 144(18) - a) a vehicle approaching the intersection shall stop; and b) the vehicle shall not proceed until green. Both essential elements must be contravened beyond a reasonable doubt to be an offence.
1) My ticket says I (being the owner) am "charged…
I'm a newbie, so be kind if I'm messing up. Question: is it illegal to signal oncoming traffic that they are approaching a speed trap by flashing one's lights?
I ask because I was stopped for doing that yesterday evening, but did not end up with a ticket. The officer spend 5-10 minutes n his car, then sent me on my way. I'm wondering if he changed his mind or found out it was legal.