Search found 2576 matches

Just like to take time and reflect at this time of year. Not that the other parts of the year are not as important, but seems a lot of us, myself included get excited and minds wander all over. With pressures of shopping/gift exchange/visiting friends and family etc. we all seem to get drawn into the rush and busy times.

I have done extensive ...

ontario court of justice, set fines here http://www.ontariocourts.on.ca/ocj/en/s ... dule43.doc
says should be $150 + victim surcharge

bc6254 wrote:, BLUE IS FOR SNOW PLOW OR EMERGENCY VEH.

just to clarify that part, flashing blue is ONLY for:
- police
- snow plows being operated ONLY by government road departments (muicipal/provincial/federal)

easy to time 2 vehicles thou...only need 500m for each one

I wonder if it's different since you're HSD and I assume you have a workstation in your vehicle to do simple checks. The guys here call all plates into the com centre - parked, rolling, traffic stop, etc., and the dispatcher runs it through CPIC and ISS. I'd say a comment along the lines of "your marker was run yesterday morning by Peel, nothing ...

the "drivers handbook" you refer to is NOT the law, the HTA and associated regulations are laws!
HTA 182(2) is a correct charge for any sign referred to in HTA OREG 615
NO parking signs are in the HTA OREG 615
- a NO parking sign with 2 arrows = prohibits parking in both directions
- a NO parking sign with 1 arrow = prohibits parking in one ...

radar antenna usually faces both directions of traffic....he would have followed you northbound to catch you at some point, probably clocked your increasing speed prior to him, not after

There is no record on the police system of each stop or incident. It is only on CPIC, which I think lasts for 7 days.

Only way a record gets on police system is a traffic complaint, then the officer has to tell the dispatcher to physically check the in house system which maybe i hear once every 2 months.

in the low end of volume is west of ...

throwing this out there....regardless of how many lanes, length of vehicle, speed, weather etc.....bottom line is if the other vehicle was stopped in its appropriate lane and was struck, therefore it was not a safe turn..... to me, safe means not hitting anything

He said he clocked me accelerating from 140 to 147 going north on the 416 but that would have been impossible since I saw him do a uturn from under an overpass which meant he was facing south and right after that he pulled me over.
so officer was facing south under an overpass and you are going north, obtains a speed and pulls out northbound ...

I do not deal with ORV on 400series hwys, but here is what I found with a quick search...

Off-Road Vehicles Act (ORV)
Definition of a "off-road vehicle" means a vehicle propelled or driven otherwise than by muscular power or wind and designed to travel,
(a) on not more than three wheels, or
(b) on more than three wheels and being of a prescribed ...

Stanton wrote:I haven't seen a handheld radar unit with an LED display for years.

Reminds me of the MuniQuip T3 handheld back in the 90's....wow, I am becoming ancient!

I am not that familiar with Charter law, but a lot of the ruling seem to be quite liberal in their interpretations. However this is a side issue to the original helmet charge, and largely irrelevent. He was a pedestrian walking his bike at the time of the ticket, he was not observed riding with no helmet..
There is more to this that the OP is ...

Reflections wrote: Prove that there was someone behind you, or get the officer to admit it and you're home free. .

Criminal offence is not part of this forum...thread locked

No where will you find an 80km/h zone transition directly to a 50km/h zone, that not safe due to a drastic difference in high to low speeds.
there are hundreds of 80-50 zones.
County Rd 46 (South Woodslee), just street view near 1612 County rd 46, South Woodslee, can see both signs 50 and the 80, plus that area also adds in a community safe zone ...

What has happened is this is obviously a saved computer generated form and the officer just didn't change the colour of the vehicle/times correctly when translating his/her notes to typed.

You not only have to have time to make the turn, but have to be able to get up to and or near the speed limit. Neither you or your son would be able to see brake lights of the vehicles.

Squishy wrote:I only see one black-and-white sign designating the left lane as a turn lane only. The OP used the centre lane which is not designated by any enforceable sign, as far as I can tell. Only a painted arrow within the lane itself.

ah, ok. gotcha now

basically i'm fighting the fact its not a 50km/h zone. should I go try to get something done before I enter a plea or enter the not guilty plea and go through the proceedings regularly and make the officer look silly like he doesn't even know what the speed limit is in an area he's handing out speeding tickets?
won't make the officer look silly ...

thought I recognize the typing....referring to greek notes....you had another post for yet another time
http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/post22139.html

Sec 84.1
Min penalty $2000-$50000
Absolute liability offence: It is not a defence to a charge that the person exercised due diligence to avoid or prevent the detaching of the wheel

Squishy wrote:Does the intersection still look as Google Street View has it, i.e., no actual black and white signs to designate lane usage? If so, you might be able to beat the charge as there were in fact no signs to disobey.

there is an actual black and white sign in the images above designating the lane

it appears from you photos....for the left lane (yonge street north), there is a "cautionary" yellow sign saying left lane exits (not enforceable), however after that there is the "left lane must turn sign" (enforceable), plus arrows on the pavement.......so like Stanton, I am confused what happened

It's a real piss off that in an area where the signage is messed up and its a transition zone from 50 or 60 to an 80km/h zone thats where a cop hangs out.
there are absolutely NO transition zones when the speed limit increases. Just b/c one can see a sign or knows about a sign 300m or 1000m ahead does not make it legal to just stomp on the ...

The bottom line is, why a heck they require you to carry this document, when they can pull off all required infomration, including registration and insurance, from the computer which is mounted in every cruiser, based on your driver's license number or any other legal id you have on you?
not all cruisers have computers
not all that information is ...

exactly Stanton...plus how is one using lidar out a window and the cruiser "video" apparently having a radar reading? car would be parked different from direction of lidar....and a MC can increase and dump speed very quickly...none of this article makes sense with what little info is on it..

tthe last 50km/h speed limit sign for southbound traffic is 60 metres before the 50km/h speed limit sign for northbound traffic. If this defense is not good enough i wanted to know if the last 50km/h sign does not meet HTA regulations could that section of dougall ave. technically be an improperly posted 60km/h zone??

your posts have been ...

just for clarification for you and others....you did not receive a "ticket" (provincial offence notice), what you received was a summons!

sounds like the initial court date was made in error and the prosecutor could not deal with it due to an error on the paperwork, therefore another summons was typed up with a proper court date