Hi, Police officer didn't show up so I thought the tickets I got would be withdrawn. However, the JP said the trial needs to be rescheduled; now I need to take another day off to attend. Many people at the court with me also appealed but their trials were rescheduled, too. Is this common practice? If police officer doesn't show up again, would it be rescheduled again? Or, is it all depends on JP's call? Thanks!
Hi,
Police officer didn't show up so I thought the tickets I got would be withdrawn. However, the JP said the trial needs to be rescheduled; now I need to take another day off to attend. Many people at the court with me also appealed but their trials were rescheduled, too. Is this common practice? If police officer doesn't show up again, would it be rescheduled again? Or, is it all depends on JP's call? Thanks!
If there's a reason why they aren't there such as illness then it might be rescheduled but if they just don't turn up then the charges should be dropped normally.
If there's a reason why they aren't there such as illness then it might be rescheduled but if they just don't turn up then the charges should be dropped normally.
Former Ontario Police Officer. Advice will become less relevant as the time goes by !
Was there a reason given why the officer was not there? I have heard of this in some cases from other people, if you ask me this usually it happens when JP is biased. It may have been a blessing in disguise. I have been to court when officer was on call or on duty and the ticket was withdrawn, but this was done by the prosecutor not the JP, assuming because he knew this JP would not go for an adjournment. At the end of the day, this delay goes against the crown, so if it goes into 11b territory, it works in your advantage.
Was there a reason given why the officer was not there?
I have heard of this in some cases from other people, if you ask me this usually it happens when JP is biased. It may have been a blessing in disguise.
I have been to court when officer was on call or on duty and the ticket was withdrawn, but this was done by the prosecutor not the JP, assuming because he knew this JP would not go for an adjournment.
At the end of the day, this delay goes against the crown, so if it goes into 11b territory, it works in your advantage.
The reason for the officer's absence was illness. Interestingly, three cases including mine had the same reason :mrgreen: - I got the ticket early April, 2015 - Trial was scheduled for early December, 2015 - I requested change in the trial date as I was not able to take time off from the work - New trial date was set to early March, 2016, where I attended but the police officer didn't show up - JP set a new trial date, mid April 2016 Is the case eligible for an 11b application even with the fact that there's ~3 months of delay requested by me? Do I apply for an 11b before the new trial or I just attend the new trial mid April and make an argument with the 11b right? Thank you!!
The reason for the officer's absence was illness. Interestingly, three cases including mine had the same reason
- I got the ticket early April, 2015
- Trial was scheduled for early December, 2015
- I requested change in the trial date as I was not able to take time off from the work
- New trial date was set to early March, 2016, where I attended but the police officer didn't show up
- JP set a new trial date, mid April 2016
Is the case eligible for an 11b application even with the fact that there's ~3 months of delay requested by me? Do I apply for an 11b before the new trial or I just attend the new trial mid April and make an argument with the 11b right? Thank you!!
Illness is a valid reason. Same goes for the defendant: if you're ill, you get an adjournment, if you just don't turn up you get a judgement against you.
Illness is a valid reason. Same goes for the defendant: if you're ill, you get an adjournment, if you just don't turn up you get a judgement against you.
Former Ontario Police Officer. Advice will become less relevant as the time goes by !
Did you OBJECT when the JP wanted to reschedule the trial? This may not always work, but it shows up on the court transcript that you wanted to proceed and you objected to a new date. Too many people just agree without objecting. When they count the days for an 11b they substract any time that was caused by you. So the 11b will probably not be succesful given that 3 months delay is caused by you. If you want to do an 11b application you need to file it about 4 weeks ahead of the trial.
Did you OBJECT when the JP wanted to reschedule the trial? This may not always work, but it shows up on the court transcript that you wanted to proceed and you objected to a new date. Too many people just agree without objecting.
When they count the days for an 11b they substract any time that was caused by you. So the 11b will probably not be succesful given that 3 months delay is caused by you. If you want to do an 11b application you need to file it about 4 weeks ahead of the trial.
Thank you, jsherk Yes, I did appeal and told the JP that it's hard to take another time off from the workplace. One of the people at the trial with me even brought his witness but the JP just re-scheduled his, too. Is there any minimum duration for an 11b application, such as a year? Thanks!
Thank you, jsherk
Yes, I did appeal and told the JP that it's hard to take another time off from the workplace. One of the people at the trial with me even brought his witness but the JP just re-scheduled his, too.
Is there any minimum duration for an 11b application, such as a year? Thanks!
jsherk wrote:
Did you OBJECT when the JP wanted to reschedule the trial? This may not always work, but it shows up on the court transcript that you wanted to proceed and you objected to a new date. Too many people just agree without objecting.
When they count the days for an 11b they substract any time that was caused by you. So the 11b will probably not be succesful given that 3 months delay is caused by you. If you want to do an 11b application you need to file it about 4 weeks ahead of the trial.
Thanks, argyll Now I guess my question is what are the odds the police officer shows up in the re-scheduled trial next month :lol:
Thanks, argyll
Now I guess my question is what are the odds the police officer shows up in the re-scheduled trial next month
argyll wrote:
Illness is a valid reason. Same goes for the defendant: if you're ill, you get an adjournment, if you just don't turn up you get a judgement against you.
Somebody I know has 55 over ticket which is now a criminal charge, officer was a no-show and JP immediately re-scheduled for another date while his lawyer tried to argue the charge should be dismissed since officer was not present, did not work and I am also curious about why.
ilike wrote:
Hi,
Police officer didn't show up so I thought the tickets I got would be withdrawn. However, the JP said the trial needs to be rescheduled; now I need to take another day off to attend. Many people at the court with me also appealed but their trials were rescheduled, too. Is this common practice? If police officer doesn't show up again, would it be rescheduled again? Or, is it all depends on JP's call? Thanks!
Somebody I know has 55 over ticket which is now a criminal charge, officer was a no-show and JP immediately re-scheduled for another date while his lawyer tried to argue the charge should be dismissed since officer was not present, did not work and I am also curious about why.
55 over is not a criminal charge...Adjournments happen all the time, for both sides, this is not uncommon or unusual. Just keep track of the adjournments, and who is asking for them for any future 11b arguments...
55 over is not a criminal charge...Adjournments happen all the time, for both sides, this is not uncommon or unusual. Just keep track of the adjournments, and who is asking for them for any future 11b arguments...
Hi everyone. I'm asking for a friend who has a question of interpretation.
He was ticketed for using a hand-held device. He contends that he was acting within the exemption provided under Subsection 14 (1) of O. Reg. 366/09, which reads as follows (emphasis added):
Hey guys i just wanted to know what speeds you see others do on the roads on a regular basis. As we all know no body drives 100 km. It seems they only hit that speed twice once on the way up and once on the way down.
it seems the De Facto limit on the 401 is about 120-130. But lately i dont know if…
On June 10, 2017, I was pulled over by an OPP on the 403 heading WB and told I registered 136km/hr. I kept chit chat to a minimum and took my ticket and went on with my day. I later requested my disclosure and did not receive it until a week before my Oct. 27 court date, and so I had my date…
Anyone know any more information? Apparently kathleen wynne mentioned trying to introduce legislation after more than 20 years of no speed cameras. My guess is that it wont happen, since they've tried before many times to bring it back after it was abolished.
The other day I was given a ticket for speeding 119 in a 90, on highway 17 near Marathon, ON (Speeding ticket capital of the universe, BTW). The officer claims to have "clocked" me using the vehicle mounted radar at 121 KMH and dropped it (presumably to lower fine and demerits).
I posted this in the 3 Demerit Section and haven't received any
responses.
I received a failure to stop at an amber light ticket on April 17, 2009. At my First Attendance Meeting I asked to read the police officer's notes and remember thinking how ridiculous they were and the difficulty…
I was on the right side of the road going straight when a pedestrian waved down the taxi driver in the lane next to me. He pulled over to the right without any notice or signalling and hit me with the side of his car.
There were many witnesses but I immediately had a concussion and did not think of…
My mother was driving EB on a 4 lane street (2 lanes EB, 2 lanes WB).
She was in the left hand lane and started a left hand turn so as to enter a side street, crossing WB traffic. There was NO intersection. She hit a cyclist who was heading WB. Police where called but none showed up. My…
If the speed limit is 50, and you do 100+, not only do you get 6 points. Your car gets impounded for a week, and your license suspended for 7 days, along with a hefty fine of at least $2000. The penalty is actually the same as for racing. The law came in effect on October 1, 2007. Remember -…
I was driving westbound on Hwy. 8 earlier this month in North Dumfries Township, approaching the Cambridge city limits. The weather was clear and the roads were dry. I noticed a vehicle on the shoulder on my side of the road, pointing towards me. This didn't concern me right away, as it is a rural…