TORONTO STAR A Brampton man driving with a suspended license after a previous street-racing conviction was clocked at 190 km/h on Hwy. 407 this morning. The 27-year-old suspect was driving east near Weston Rd. around 6:50 a.m. when police spotted the vehicle travelling at a high rate of speed, said Ontario Provincial Police Const. Dave Woodford. The suspect was driving his sister's black Acura without insurance. He was previously convicted for street racing in March. Police seized the car and the man has been charged with stunt driving, driving with a suspended license and driving without insurance. He faces a maximum penalty of up to $10,000.
TORONTO STAR
A Brampton man driving with a suspended license after a previous street-racing conviction was clocked at 190 km/h on Hwy. 407 this morning.
The 27-year-old suspect was driving east near Weston Rd. around 6:50 a.m. when police spotted the vehicle travelling at a high rate of speed, said Ontario Provincial Police Const. Dave Woodford.
The suspect was driving his sister's black Acura without insurance. He was previously convicted for street racing in March.
Police seized the car and the man has been charged with stunt driving, driving with a suspended license and driving without insurance.
He faces a maximum penalty of up to $10,000.
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
Well it goes to show how reckless some people are and they just don't care. IMO the fine should be more, he already had a stunt driving conviction + No insurance (sint that a maximum of 5k), + suspended license? I thought the fine for 50 over was already a max of 2000. What time in the morning. Was he going 190 at 3:30 am in the morning or was he doing it at 8:30 am rush hour traffic????? Big difference here, one is well driving very fast and deserves a ticket and the other is well down right dangerous. From the sounds of ill guess this was early in the morning, he was driving in a straight line in the left lane just going to fast and being unlucky to get caught. Ill understand the public outcry if this guy was weaving in and out of traffic at 190. But who and what danger was he causing early in the morning driving in a straight line at 190 km/hr???
Well it goes to show how reckless some people are and they just don't care.
IMO the fine should be more, he already had a stunt driving conviction + No insurance (sint that a maximum of 5k), + suspended license?
I thought the fine for 50 over was already a max of 2000.
What time in the morning.
Was he going 190 at 3:30 am in the morning or was he doing it at 8:30 am rush hour traffic?????
Big difference here, one is well driving very fast and deserves a ticket and the other is well down right dangerous.
From the sounds of ill guess this was early in the morning, he was driving in a straight line in the left lane just going to fast and being unlucky to get caught.
Ill understand the public outcry if this guy was weaving in and out of traffic at 190.
But who and what danger was he causing early in the morning driving in a straight line at 190 km/hr???
Minimum!! Max of $10K and this guy deserves it. The law was created for dumb-dumb's like this and here it does apply. However, nobody is going to stop him from doing this again, law or no law.
I thought the fine for 50 over was already a max of 2000.
Minimum!! Max of $10K and this guy deserves it. The law was created for dumb-dumb's like this and here it does apply. However, nobody is going to stop him from doing this again, law or no law.
http://www.OHTA.ca OR http://www.OntarioTrafficAct.com
Could always get jail time for driving under suspension. Last person I saw got 45days, served on weekends. And throughout the week he was......doing........? Tell you what how's about putting biometric scanners in cars, fingerprints work just fine. We got them on all the servers here at work. We can then enable/disable the ignition, preset speed limiters for the kids etc. Cellular technology should be capable of doing this.......wait, it would require a government data base and that would only get F&&$ed up anyway.....carry on.
hwybear wrote:
Reflections wrote:
However, nobody is going to stop him from doing this again, law or no law.
Could always get jail time for driving under suspension. Last person I saw got 45days, served on weekends.
And throughout the week he was......doing........?
Tell you what how's about putting biometric scanners in cars, fingerprints work just fine. We got them on all the servers here at work. We can then enable/disable the ignition, preset speed limiters for the kids etc. Cellular technology should be capable of doing this.......wait, it would require a government data base and that would only get F&&$ed up anyway.....carry on.
http://www.OHTA.ca OR http://www.OntarioTrafficAct.com
Didn't the article mention that he was charged with driving without insurance? I thought that carried a minimum $10K fine all on its own, with the JP having the discretion to drop it a bit if your sob story is good enough.
Didn't the article mention that he was charged with driving without insurance? I thought that carried a minimum $10K fine all on its own, with the JP having the discretion to drop it a bit if your sob story is good enough.
It did. First offence for drive without insurance is minimum $5000, max $20 000, but you're right with the JP having discretion to lower it. I've seen some pay as little as $50 :shock: That was under very extenuating circumstances, namely: Defendant had been evicted from his apartment on the day of the ticket, could not afford insurance due to losing his job and "did not know" insurance had lapsed, had sold his car and was no longer driving. Would also prevent auto theft or unauthorized driving... yep, gov't would screw it up. Never mind. Maybe some time in Maplehurst would wake the guy up.
Squishy wrote:
Didn't the article mention that he was charged with driving without insurance? I thought that carried a minimum $10K fine all on its own, with the JP having the discretion to drop it a bit if your sob story is good enough.
It did. First offence for drive without insurance is minimum $5000, max $20 000, but you're right with the JP having discretion to lower it. I've seen some pay as little as $50 That was under very extenuating circumstances, namely: Defendant had been evicted from his apartment on the day of the ticket, could not afford insurance due to losing his job and "did not know" insurance had lapsed, had sold his car and was no longer driving.
Reflections wrote:
Tell you what how's about putting biometric scanners in cars, fingerprints work just fine.
Would also prevent auto theft or unauthorized driving... yep, gov't would screw it up. Never mind.
hwybear wrote:
Could always get jail time for driving under suspension.
Maybe some time in Maplehurst would wake the guy up.
Would also prevent auto theft or unauthorized driving... yep, gov't would screw it up. Never mind. Don't you watch CSI? You can steal someone's fingerprint with strawberry Jello. :lol:
Radar Identified wrote:
Reflections wrote:
Tell you what how's about putting biometric scanners in cars, fingerprints work just fine.
Would also prevent auto theft or unauthorized driving... yep, gov't would screw it up. Never mind.
Don't you watch CSI? You can steal someone's fingerprint with strawberry Jello.
I know you'll all be quite surprised, but I've ALSO been charged with no insurance once before. I was having a buddy tow me with a new toy ('65 Comet). But the rope kept breaking and it was starting to get dark. So I decided to just drive the dang thing the remaining few blocks. Just my luck the po-po would come along just then! :shock: The minimum fine at the time was $500, but when I plead my case for sentencing, I explained that safety was my main priority at the time, and the JP lowered my fine to $250. I had always thought "minimum fine" meant "minimum fine"! But apparently the JP DOES have discretion.
I know you'll all be quite surprised, but I've ALSO been charged with no insurance once before. I was having a buddy tow me with a new toy ('65 Comet). But the rope kept breaking and it was starting to get dark. So I decided to just drive the dang thing the remaining few blocks. Just my luck the po-po would come along just then!
The minimum fine at the time was $500, but when I plead my case for sentencing, I explained that safety was my main priority at the time, and the JP lowered my fine to $250.
I had always thought "minimum fine" meant "minimum fine"! But apparently the JP DOES have discretion.
I'd rather not surrender my biometric information to anyone, which includes the government and private corporations. That's one of the reasons I never picked up a Nexus card.
I'd rather not surrender my biometric information to anyone, which includes the government and private corporations. That's one of the reasons I never picked up a Nexus card.
What kind of a man would put a known criminal in charge of a major branch of government? Apart from, say, the average voter.
I have a problem and not sure what the hell to do about it. Few days ago I was stopped on a street going westbound against blinding afternoon sun following the flow of traffic. I drive a taxi for living in Toronto and have ACZ driver's license. I have a perfect record both for professional as well regular demerit points. I haven't been pulled over as a matter of fact in some 15 years for…
I have recently gone to court for a speeding ticket issued by an OPP officer. As it stood, the officer forgot to sign the ticket. So at my trial, before I made a plea, I pointed this out to the justice of the peace and asked that the ticket be quashed. I was asked to produce my copy of the ticket, which I gave and the JOP then agreed with me and dismissed the case. Before he did so, the…
I got pulled over (along with about 10 other cars) for going through a road closed sign. I had just pulled out of a parking lot pretty much right beside the road closed sign, and with about 4 cars behind me there wasn't much I could do but go through, so I think I have a good chance of fighting it. However, on my ticket under the Signature of issuing Provincial Offences Officer, it's left…
So here's my situation, any advice would be appreciated.
On June 26, 2013 I received a ticket for 25 over in a 60 zone
In early October I received my notice of trial (Feb 25, 2014)
In early January I sent in my request for disclosure
In late January I received a letter to pick up my disclosure, however when I picked up my disclosure it wasn't typed (I had requested it to be) and I needed…
Is there a legal requirement to report an accident to the insurer?
Scenario
- 2 vehicle accident
- each vehicle has less than $1000 damage
- each vehicle has damage roughly equal to insurance deductible
- a police Accident Report was completed
In this scenario the drivers decided to repair their own damages. But are they legally bound to report the accident and damages to the insurer? ...and out of…
I will be representing my wife at her speeding trial next week. Mostly everything is pretty much run of the mill but since she wasn't speeding we will be having her take the stand. Since this opens up the opportunity for the prosecutor to cross examine, I am just wondering if anyone here knows what kind of questions we should expect from the prosecutor in order to best prepare.
i got pulled over by a cop this morning in my kids's school zone for failure to stop at a stop sign. i am thinking of fighting this ticket, but i noticed that on the ticket itself it only says "disobey stop sign - fail to stop" and there is no mention of the demerit points. a co-worker mentioned to me that a ticket should state how many demerit points i am being docked. i know the Highway Traffic…
Alright, so this happened back awhile ago on June and I haven't appeared in Court. However, I would like some inputs and advice before I get into this battle.
Back in June I got a Speeding Ticket claiming I was going 100km/h on Blackcreek going south towards Lawrence. The Speed Limit there is 70km/h.
At this point of time, it was roughly traffic hour around 4-5PM. Coming off of the Highway, and…
Ive already done searches, read the act as best i can but still haven't read a complete answer. Where in the HTA does it state that the front license plate must be attached to the front bumper? I have it on the passenger sun visor (if ppl remember the old temp permits that taped to the pass side of windshield) i figured that this spot would be the same. However now they have got rid of…
My son was returning from school and was just entering the driveway when another vehicle hit the rear end. Police writes a ticket "fail to yield from private drive" 139(i). He is going to fight this ticket and made an application for disclosure. The trial is next week and he still hasn't received the disclosure.
He checked with the court last month and they said that they will call when disclosure…
i was travelling on the 401 (posted speed 100km/h) in the far left lane, when i caught up to a vehicle going ~110km/h. I patiently waited for the vehicle to move over a lane, but they did not. The vehicle behind me moved to the center lane to pass, but because he was a safe distance behind me, i moved into the middle lane ahead of him to pass the slower moving car. When I accelerated, i…
So I was returning from my honeymoon in Montreal, and was cruising down the 401 just inside the Ontario/Quebec border. I was passing one of the Onroute stations and saw an OPP cruiser. I checked my speed and I was doing 120. A few kilometers up the road the cruiser pulled me over and told me I was clocked doing 132 by the aircraft. I was a little surprised to see the ticket was for the full…
I made a right turn during prohibited hours (7am-6pm) in Toronto. I was ticketed by a COP who was specially watching for that trap.
After I've received the ticket HTA144(9), I discovered one of the seven digits of my license plate was incorrectly written on my ticket. I was thinking about to make a First Attendance at the court office to see the prosecutor for a reduced charge...any advice or…
Have been busy and haven't had much time to follow up on this...
Went to court having not received disclosure (and was not organized enough to apply for a stay), so the trial was adjourned. They photocopied the officer's ticket and notes and provided a log sheet from the plane. I've sent another request for the rest of the disclosure items.
So here's my question -- can an officer amend the ticket…
I am not sure if my case is really a case of " mis-use parking permit" and need some advises on whether i should fight the ticket. Here is what happened:
During the labor day long weekend, I took my parents to diner at a local shopping mall. (my father's hip was broken in 2016 and he's been on wheelchair since, the permit is in his name and I been using the permit to help him for doctor's…
I have a court date coming up where I need to subpoena one of the officers that was present when I got my ticket. The issuing officer didn't include the fact that the second one was present at the time in his report (disclosure) but did give me the second officers name and badge number after the judge told him to do it.
What I'm looking for help with is the process of me getting to…
I got pulled over on a 4 lane section fo Highway 7... Thank god I didn't get a stay at home ticket as well or my car impounded.
Officer clocked me at 156 km/h he decided not to impound my car and give me a 149 km/h since it was my first offence and he said I was polite and respectful. I would give this officer a 5/5 review if I could, very polite and respectful.
Long story short, I was driving from Toronto to Ottawa and around Napanee with my friend in two separated cars, the officer was parked on uturn. He followed us turn his light on and got between us and pulled us over, he told me that i was running at 152 km/h without showing me his LISAR. they suspended my and my friends license and impounded the two cars for 7 days. This was a Friday in January…
I'm unsure on what to do here. I was under the impression that I could request a stay on the day of trial because disclosure was not given to me in an adequate time. I requested disclosure 2x by fax, 5 months ago.
I read on ticketcombat that I had to file a motion 15 days prior to the trial to request a stay of proceedings.
Does anyone else get blinded by fog lights on rural roads? I don't seem to have a problem with them on lighted streets, but the badly aimed fog lights or ones with a poor cutoff really get to me when driving the Escort. I just came back from a 20-minute drive, and every single pickup truck had fog lights on, and forced me to focus on the bottom right of the road. My windshield is clean and…
That was under very extenuating circumstances, namely: Defendant had been evicted from his apartment on the day of the ticket, could not afford insurance due to losing his job and "did not know" insurance had lapsed, had sold his car and was no longer driving.
