I was stopped by Niagara Regional Police yesterday while riding an E-Bike (scooter style).I was wearing an approved bicycle helmet,charged with "fail to wear proper helmet on power-assisted bicycle".Additionally three other HTA charges,no plates,no insurance.My charges stem from the fact that the removable pedals were not on the bike,(bike was awaiting parts).Any feedback on this matter would be most welcome.My E-Bike was towed and impounded for seven days at a cost of $50.00 per day plus the tow charge.The laws pertaining to these machines are very vague it seems.
-
AlienAlien117
- Newbie

- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:04 am
E-Bikes and the HTA
Re: E-Bikes and the HTA
The laws are spread all over the place making them confusing and a little hard to research. The big issue in your case seems to be that your bike didn't have any pedals attached. They must have pedals and aren't supposed to be operated without them. Minus the pedals, you no longer qualify as a power assisted bicycle.
The Highway Traffic Act defines a power assisted bicycle as the following:
(a) is a power-assisted bicycle as defined in subsection 2 (1) of the Motor Vehicle Safety Regulations made under the Motor Vehicle Safety Act (Canada),
(b) bears a label affixed by the manufacturer in compliance with the definition referred to in clause (a),
(c) has affixed to it pedals that are operable, and
(d) is capable of being propelled solely by muscular power
Here's the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Act, section 2(1):
"power-assisted bicycle" means a vehicle that:
(a) has steering handlebars and is equipped with pedals,
(b) is designed to travel on not more than three wheels in contact with the ground,
(c) is capable of being propelled by muscular power,
(d) has one or more electric motors that have, singly or in combination, the following characteristics:
(i) it has a total continuous power output rating, measured at the shaft of each motor, of 500 W or less,
(ii) if it is engaged by the use of muscular power, power assistance immediately ceases when the muscular power ceases,
(iii) if it is engaged by the use of an accelerator controller, power assistance immediately ceases when the brakes are applied, and
(iv) it is incapable of providing further assistance when the bicycle attains a speed of 32 km/h on level ground,
(e) bears a label that is permanently affixed by the manufacturer and appears in a conspicuous location stating, in both official languages, that the vehicle is a power-assisted bicycle as defined in this subsection, and
(f) has one of the following safety features,
(i) an enabling mechanism to turn the electric motor on and off that is separate from the accelerator controller and fitted in such a manner that it is operable by the driver, or
(ii) a mechanism that prevents the motor from being engaged before the bicycle attains a speed of 3 km/h
Power Assisted Bicycles are also covered under Ontario Regulation 369/09:
Maximum weight
1. The unladen weight of a power-assisted bicycle must not be more than 120 kilograms. O. Reg. 369/09, s. 1.
Wheel width, diameter
2. (1) The wheels of a power-assisted bicycle must not be less than 35 millimetres wide. O. Reg. 369/09, s. 2 (1).
(2) The diameter of the wheels of a power-assisted bicycle must not be less than 350 millimetres. O. Reg. 369/09, s. 2 (2).
Battery and motor
3. (1) The battery and motor of a power-assisted bicycle must be securely fastened to the bicycle to prevent them from moving while the bicycle is in motion. O. Reg. 369/09, s. 3 (1).
(2) The motor of a power-assisted bicycle must disengage if pedalling ceases, the accelerator is released or the brakes are applied. O. Reg. 369/09, s. 3 (2).
Electric terminals
4. All electric terminals on a power-assisted bicycle must be completely insulated and covered. O. Reg. 369/09, s. 4.
Brakes
5. The brakes of a power-assisted bicycle must be capable of bringing the bicycle, while being operated at a speed of 30 kilometres per hour on a clean, paved and level surface, to a full stop within nine metres from the point at which the brakes were applied. O. Reg. 369/09, s. 5.
No modifications
6. A power-assisted bicycle must not be ridden on, driven or operated if it has been modified after its manufacture in any way that may result in increasing its power or its maximum speed beyond the limits set out in clause (d) of the definition of "power-assisted bicycle" in section 2 of the Motor Vehicle Safety Regulations made under the Motor Vehicle Safety Act (Canada). O. Reg. 369/09, s. 6.
Good working order
7. A power-assisted bicycle must not be ridden on, driven or operated unless it is in good working order. O. Reg. 369/09, s. 7.
While it may seem a little trivial to be operating your bike without the pedals, the charges themselves are quite serious unfortunatley. Even on a first offence, no insurance carries a minimum fine of $5,000. I'd suggest scheduling a meeting with the prosecutor to explain your situation and see if you can work out some kind of deal. Bring proof that your bike is now fixed and up to spec with the pedals attached. I'd hope they'd be reasonable and cut you a break, hopefully dropping most of the charges in exchange for a guilty plea to one of the less serious charges. If not you may want to consider hiring a paralegal to represent you.
- Simon Borys
- VIP

- Posts: 1065
- Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:20 am
Re: E-Bikes and the HTA
AlienAlien117 wrote:
My E-Bike was towed and impounded for seven days
What for?
-
AlienAlien117
- Newbie

- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:04 am
Re: E-Bikes and the HTA
Stanton wrote:
The laws are spread all over the place making them confusing and a little hard to research. The big issue in your case seems to be that your bike didn't have any pedals attached. They must have pedals and aren't supposed to be operated without them. Minus the pedals, you no longer qualify as a power assisted bicycle.
The Highway Traffic Act defines a power assisted bicycle as the following:
(a) is a power-assisted bicycle as defined in subsection 2 (1) of the Motor Vehicle Safety Regulations made under the Motor Vehicle Safety Act (Canada),
(b) bears a label affixed by the manufacturer in compliance with the definition referred to in clause (a),
(c) has affixed to it pedals that are operable, and
(d) is capable of being propelled solely by muscular power
Here's the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Act, section 2(1):
"power-assisted bicycle" means a vehicle that:
(a) has steering handlebars and is equipped with pedals,
(b) is designed to travel on not more than three wheels in contact with the ground,
(c) is capable of being propelled by muscular power,
(d) has one or more electric motors that have, singly or in combination, the following characteristics:
(i) it has a total continuous power output rating, measured at the shaft of each motor, of 500 W or less,
(ii) if it is engaged by the use of muscular power, power assistance immediately ceases when the muscular power ceases,
(iii) if it is engaged by the use of an accelerator controller, power assistance immediately ceases when the brakes are applied, and
(iv) it is incapable of providing further assistance when the bicycle attains a speed of 32 km/h on level ground,
(e) bears a label that is permanently affixed by the manufacturer and appears in a conspicuous location stating, in both official languages, that the vehicle is a power-assisted bicycle as defined in this subsection, and
(f) has one of the following safety features,
(i) an enabling mechanism to turn the electric motor on and off that is separate from the accelerator controller and fitted in such a manner that it is operable by the driver, or
(ii) a mechanism that prevents the motor from being engaged before the bicycle attains a speed of 3 km/h
Power Assisted Bicycles are also covered under Ontario Regulation 369/09:
Maximum weight
1. The unladen weight of a power-assisted bicycle must not be more than 120 kilograms. O. Reg. 369/09, s. 1.
Wheel width, diameter
2. (1) The wheels of a power-assisted bicycle must not be less than 35 millimetres wide. O. Reg. 369/09, s. 2 (1).
(2) The diameter of the wheels of a power-assisted bicycle must not be less than 350 millimetres. O. Reg. 369/09, s. 2 (2).
Battery and motor
3. (1) The battery and motor of a power-assisted bicycle must be securely fastened to the bicycle to prevent them from moving while the bicycle is in motion. O. Reg. 369/09, s. 3 (1).
(2) The motor of a power-assisted bicycle must disengage if pedalling ceases, the accelerator is released or the brakes are applied. O. Reg. 369/09, s. 3 (2).
Electric terminals
4. All electric terminals on a power-assisted bicycle must be completely insulated and covered. O. Reg. 369/09, s. 4.
Brakes
5. The brakes of a power-assisted bicycle must be capable of bringing the bicycle, while being operated at a speed of 30 kilometres per hour on a clean, paved and level surface, to a full stop within nine metres from the point at which the brakes were applied. O. Reg. 369/09, s. 5.
No modifications
6. A power-assisted bicycle must not be ridden on, driven or operated if it has been modified after its manufacture in any way that may result in increasing its power or its maximum speed beyond the limits set out in clause (d) of the definition of "power-assisted bicycle" in section 2 of the Motor Vehicle Safety Regulations made under the Motor Vehicle Safety Act (Canada). O. Reg. 369/09, s. 6.
Good working order
7. A power-assisted bicycle must not be ridden on, driven or operated unless it is in good working order. O. Reg. 369/09, s. 7.
While it may seem a little trivial to be operating your bike without the pedals, the charges themselves are quite serious unfortunatley. Even on a first offence, no insurance carries a minimum fine of $5,000. I'd suggest scheduling a meeting with the prosecutor to explain your situation and see if you can work out some kind of deal. Bring proof that your bike is now fixed and up to spec with the pedals attached. I'd hope they'd be reasonable and cut you a break, hopefully dropping most of the charges in exchange for a guilty plea to one of the less serious charges. If not you may want to consider hiring a paralegal to represent you.
Thanks for the response,the pedals are removable by design,they are a safetty hazard in normal operation.None of the scooter style E-bikes can be propelled by muscle power.
-
AlienAlien117
- Newbie

- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:04 am
Re: E-Bikes and the HTA
Simon Borys wrote:
AlienAlien117 wrote:
My E-Bike was towed and impounded for seven days
What for?
The officer informed me that I was charged because the scooter did not have its pedals affixed.None of the charges reflect that.As a result of the pedals not being affixed I was charged with operating a "motor vehicle" except for charge "fail to wear proper helmet on power assisted bicycle".I was wearing an approved bicycle helmet.
Re: E-Bikes and the HTA
AlienAlien117 wrote:
Thanks for the response,the pedals are removable by design,they are a safetty hazard in normal operation.None of the scooter style E-bikes can be propelled by muscle power.
Courts won't accept that they're a safety hazard, they're required by law. I've seen some where the pedals fold in, to me that would be legal as they're still attached and can be used (although I guess an argument could be made they're not operable in that state). As for scooters without pedals, they're either illegal for use in Ontario, or they fall under the limited speed vehicle category. LSV's big difference is they can attain a higher speed, don't require pedals but do require plates, licence, insurance, etc.
Here's an MTO page that lists many of the new alternative vehicles and requirements: http://www.mto.gov.on.ca/english/dandv/ ... ndex.shtml
Edit: And as Simon said, why is your vehicle impounded for 7 days? They can tow it off the road (not legal for use) but to impound it for a week would require that you were driving while under a certain type of suspension or were charged with impaired/fail to provide.
-
AlienAlien117
- Newbie

- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:04 am
Re: E-Bikes and the HTA
Thanks to both of you for responding.A search determined my licence was suspended in 04 (failure to provide).I decided not to apply for renewal and have been under the impression it had simply expired.I fully understand the transformation from "E-bike" to "motor vehicle" is based on the pedals being removed,the charge should relate directly to that. ie.E-bike not in compliance.As previously stated most owners will testify that with no battery these scooters have to be pushed the pedals will not power them.
Re: E-Bikes and the HTA
So they charge you for riding a power-assisted bicycle with the incorrect helmet. Then they turn around and say this power-assisted bicycle that you are riding is not a power-assisted bicycle at all, so how can you be charged with fail to wear a proper helmet while on a power-assisted bicycle if you were not riding one?
They know this is a power-assisted bicycle with no pedals is still a power-assisted bicycle, even though technically they can upgrade the charges and throw the book at you. Lack of equipment should be like any other equipment deficiency, most of which have nominal set fines, like no bell, no lights, no brakes, etc. This sounds like unusual punishment for what ordinarily should be a minor offense.
You cannot get plates and insurance anyway as an ebike has no VIN number, even if you had a license. If you had a license, with all the serious charges you would probably lose it with all the points you would lose, as well as thousands of dollars in fines. Hardly a fair punishment for a minor infraction.
You can use almost any helmet as long as it is approved, either a bicycle or motorcycle helmet. The requirements are here:
http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statut ... m#s103p1s1 and
103.1 (1) Every power-assisted bicycle shall have the prescribed equipment and conform to the prescribed requirements and standards. 2009, c. 5, s. 35.
Helmet requirement
(2) No person shall ride on, drive or operate a power-assisted bicycle on a highway unless the person is wearing a helmet as required by subsection 104 (1) or (2.1).
104. (1) No person shall ride on or operate a motorcycle or motor assisted bicycle on a highway unless the person is wearing a helmet that complies with the regulations and the chin strap of the helmet is securely fastened under the chin. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 104 (1).
Idem
(2) No person shall carry a passenger who is under sixteen years of age on a motorcycle on a highway unless the passenger is wearing a helmet that complies with the regulations and the chin strap of the helmet is securely fastened under the chin. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 104 (2).
Bicyclists to wear helmet
(2.1) Subject to subsection 103.1 (2), no person shall ride on or operate a bicycle on a highway unless the person is wearing a bicycle helmet that complies with the regulations and the chin strap of the helmet is securely fastened under the chin.
Approved helmets motorcycle and bicycle either which an ebiker can wear
Re: E-Bikes and the HTA
I got charge for this last summer as well, my pedals were never attached by my dealer and they said it was just legal issue to give it to me.
The Hamilton police charged me with 3 things: no license, no insurance, no plates. Reminded that no license and no plate is a ticket, no insurance is a summon to court. So in any case, you have to go to court.
In my case, I got paralegal to deal this for me which costed me $600. In the end, I was only stick with no plate which is a fine of $110 and since no plate is not the responsibility of the driver, it didn't affect my driving abstract.
I find this law really stupid and does not reflect the cost of these machine. The e-bike I got cost $1200 in which I paid $710 to get out of a fine.
-
AlienAlien117
- Newbie

- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:04 am
Re: E-Bikes and the HTA
Thanks for all of your updates on this subject.I will be fighting this whole issue in court in Welland August 23rd.I am currently collecting data,photographs,comments etc. on all aspects of the E-bike travesty.One year ago (July 30th) a Welland Tribune article showcased these machines from a safety perspective,having ridden various makes and models for the past five years I've accumulated a significant amount of knowledge pertaining to the machines, and the law.As we build a defense for the upcoming case your input is most welcome.I will keep you informed as to progress,meanwhile "go green" is still the best way to travel!
Re: E-Bikes and the HTA
So out of curiosity, what is your defense strategy? If you're going to try and argue it's unsafe to have pedals attached, that would probably be a very uphill battle. I've never heard of Courts going against Ministry equipment regulations. The other issue in my mind is that even if you show the pedals are unsafe, they'll ask you why you simply didn't treat it as a LSV instead.
I apologize if that sounds a little nasty, I'm not trying to give you a hard time, but I think you might have a very hard time in Court. It wouldn't be a simple trial and finding admissible supportive evidence will be tough in my opinion.
Re: E-Bikes and the HTA
I agree you need legal counsel considering the seriousness of the charges a lawyer or paralegal.
Scooter style ebikes can and are being designed to be pedaled, Just because the one you bought (and other people buy) are poorly designed does not say the law is flawed, just the ebike you bought is flawed. I doubt this line of defense will go anywhere. The pedals are part of the package but not the only thing, that separates your vehicle from a low speed motorcycle. The other things are the compliance sticker, the speed limiter, the limited power and the weight limit.
The charges are all out of proportion to the offense. This would make it to be more of a Charter section 12 challenge. Under the Insurance Act that you were charged with your minimum charge is $5000 plus surcharge, but can be fined up to $50,000 plus surcharge and lose you license, if you had one, up to one year. I think I would have better luck with unusual punishment (section 12) all out of proportion to the crime than trying to show poor ebike design requires not adhering to the law. If you are going to attack the law I would go after the fact that missing pedals should be no more serious than any other mechanical defect like a missing bell, defective brakes, missing or defective lighting, all of which have fines of less than a hundred dollars. Note that a horn or bell, brakes on both wheels, proper lighting also make an ebike an ebike because it is required on ebikes as well as bicycles.
By reclassifying the ebike the police are usurping the will of the Provincial Parliament, first when it modified the HTA to exempt an ebike from requirements of it being a motor vehicle, and second using the Compulsory Automobile Insurance Act to punish ebike users, which was never designed to punish ebike users for mechanical insufficiencies. There is no mention of ebikes nor pedals in the Insurance act.
Re: E-Bikes and the HTA
AlienAlien117 wrote:
Thanks for all of your updates on this subject.I will be fighting this whole issue in court in Welland August 23rd.I am currently collecting data,photographs,comments etc. on all aspects of the E-bike travesty.One year ago (July 30th) a Welland Tribune article showcased these machines from a safety perspective,having ridden various makes and models for the past five years I've accumulated a significant amount of knowledge pertaining to the machines, and the law.As we build a defense for the upcoming case your input is most welcome.I will keep you informed as to progress,meanwhile "go green" is still the best way to travel!
Hey, best of luck with your case.
I was pulled over the 2nd week that I had my e-bike for not having the pedals affixed. I couldn't believe it. I got lucky, he let me off after I showed him the pedals were "equipped" on the bike which is what I thought the law was. I showed him the pedals and he let me finish my ride to work which was in eye shot, I installed the pedals at work. He warned me and told me to tell anyone else I know that has one to make sure the pedals are on it.
Here's the thing, I would like ANYONE to give a logical good reason why a scooter like e-bike should require pedals affixed. Once someone gives me a logical good reason I can accept the law around it. Currently we're all arguing about different definitions and the way that the law is worded in order to justify whether pedals should be "affixed" or "equipped". This is just retarded, listen to ourselves. It's legal to have blinkers and mirrors on vehicles because it makes them safe. Boats are required to be equipped with certain things such as a paddle. These are logical reasons.
As for your court case, here's my two cents that might be a little unique from others. I think it will be difficult IF you realized you were breaking the law and you did it anyways, I can't see the judge sympathizing with you. Even if it's a stupid law, you broke it and no office or judge likes that. Otherwise, if you didn't know then the judge will allow you to explain yourself and the reasoning why you thought you didn't need them affixed on the bike.
If you can involve the media I think there's a better chance too. If I can make it to your court case then I'll definitely be there. I live in London, ON but I will show my support 100% that this condition of a scooter type e-bike is simply stupid and makes no sense to be enforced.
You mentioned there was an article that was published. Was it about your incident? Is there a link to it?
For anyone else reading this. Does anyone know a proactive way to argue and get our point across about the fact pedals should not have to be affixed for general usage of the vehicle.
Personally, I have emailed the local police department here as well as the MTO who actually didn't know the law and told me to contact the police department because they were not sure.
Here's a link to all of my findings on another thread --> http://gioebike.phpbb3now.com/viewtopic ... a&start=10 and this one too which is where I found out about your story --> http://www.ebikeriders.com/messages/boa ... d/14006011
Best of luck!
Re: E-Bikes and the HTA
Id argue the requirement to have pedals isnt unreasonable, because its supposed to be a vehicle that can be propelled by muscular power. If the vehicle cant be propelled by muscular power, it simply falls under a different vehicle classification, a limited speed motorcycle. LSMs, like e-bikes, are perfectly legal to operate, they simply have a few more requirements, namely a licenced operator, vehicle plate and insurance. The Courts do not require the government to satisfy some type of safety argument in regards to equipment requirements that differentiate one vehicle classification from another. The insistence that an e-bike without pedals is still a bike could easily be seen as an attempt to exploit a loophole to avoid the additional expense associated with plating and insuring a vehicle.
Re: E-Bikes and the HTA
t00nie wrote:
AlienAlien117 wrote:
Thanks for all of your updates on this subject.I will be fighting this whole issue in court in Welland August 23rd.I am currently collecting data,photographs,comments etc. on all aspects of the E-bike travesty.One year ago (July 30th) a Welland Tribune article showcased these machines from a safety perspective,having ridden various makes and models for the past five years I've accumulated a significant amount of knowledge pertaining to the machines, and the law.As we build a defense for the upcoming case your input is most welcome.I will keep you informed as to progress,meanwhile "go green" is still the best way to travel!
Hey, best of luck with your case.
I was pulled over the 2nd week that I had my e-bike for not having the pedals affixed. I couldn't believe it. I got lucky, he let me off after I showed him the pedals were "equipped" on the bike which is what I thought the law was. I showed him the pedals and he let me finish my ride to work which was in eye shot, I installed the pedals at work. He warned me and told me to tell anyone else I know that has one to make sure the pedals are on it.
Here's the thing, I would like ANYONE to give a logical good reason why a scooter like e-bike should require pedals affixed. Once someone gives me a logical good reason I can accept the law around it. Currently we're all arguing about different definitions and the way that the law is worded in order to justify whether pedals should be "affixed" or "equipped". This is just retarded, listen to ourselves. It's legal to have blinkers and mirrors on vehicles because it makes them safe. Boats are required to be equipped with certain things such as a paddle. These are logical reasons.
As for your court case, here's my two cents that might be a little unique from others. I think it will be difficult IF you realized you were breaking the law and you did it anyways, I can't see the judge sympathizing with you. Even if it's a stupid law, you broke it and no office or judge likes that. Otherwise, if you didn't know then the judge will allow you to explain yourself and the reasoning why you thought you didn't need them affixed on the bike.
If you can involve the media I think there's a better chance too. If I can make it to your court case then I'll definitely be there. I live in London, ON but I will show my support 100% that this condition of a scooter type e-bike is simply stupid and makes no sense to be enforced.
You mentioned there was an article that was published. Was it about your incident? Is there a link to it?
For anyone else reading this. Does anyone know a proactive way to argue and get our point across about the fact pedals should not have to be affixed for general usage of the vehicle.
Personally, I have emailed the local police department here as well as the MTO who actually didn't know the law and told me to contact the police department because they were not sure.
Here's a link to all of my findings on another thread --> http://gioebike.phpbb3now.com/viewtopic ... a&start=10 and this one too which is where I found out about your story --> http://www.ebikeriders.com/messages/boa ... d/14006011
Best of luck!
Be care full what you ask for.
The pedals are needed for it to be called a bicycle.
Years ago I had 1 of the first mopeds, I could pedal it but it was faster to push it.(pedal was used to start it up.)
Once it started there was no need of the pedals.
It was limited to 28 M.P.H and under 50 C.C.
No rules at all.
The next year they added that insurance was needed.(now I guess it is a low speed motorcycle)
If you prove pedals are not needed they find a way to regulate them as that is how they get around the law.
That said: to the OP
Your bike is considered a bike like any pedal bike.
If for some reason a bike loses it's pedals and you got on it, are you now on a vehicle of some other class.
Cheers
Viper1
use at your own risk"
-
AlienAlien117
- Newbie

- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:04 am
Re: E-Bikes and the HTA
Thanks to you all for your input,still working on the defence plus other issues relating to the whole E-bike legislation.I realize it's a can of worms however when I'm done it will hopefully be somewhat clearer.I have already been accused by an importer in Stratford of trying to put them out of business.Safety is the overiding concern, my case will permit me to shine a spotlight on the whole matter.For the record the Provincial prosecutor in Welland will review my defence before trial.Thanks again and keep your input coming,my e-mail is abunyan@vaxxine.com I'll keep you posted.
Re: E-Bikes and the HTA
In short, this is just stupid. Anytime people debate this they compare it to a bicycle or a moped or a motorcycle. A scooter style e-bike is completely different and unique and therefore shouldn't be compared to anything else. It's designed differently than the standard e-bike that looks like a standard mountain bike.
Without comparing it to ANY other vehicles. Can anyone provide a logical reason why the scooter style e-bike should require pedals on them?
If you can then yes...there should be a law/regulation around them. If not...then let's stop thinking like lawyers and think about what are the steps to change the law/regulation around them.
-
AlienAlien117
- Newbie

- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:04 am
Re: E-Bikes and the HTA
Toonie,having 45 years plus of experience with all forms of wheeled vehicles,I'm fully familiar with all the aspects of the E-bike differences.For a more detailed explanation of my role in this debate look for an archive article in the Welland Tribune July 30th 2010. www.wellandtribune.ca My whole intent is to a) clarify the legislation, b) expose the flaws in the current designation, c) see these bikes meet full CSA Standards, d) engineer a pedal system that functions. I have addressed this to multiple law officers, their response is as varied and confused as the public.I was hoping to bring this to pass in a non-adversarial setting,the reason it's going to court is quite simple,quoting the officer who charged me in response to my question Why? "Because you gave me attitude when I pulled you over"
Re: E-Bikes and the HTA
t00nie wrote:
Without comparing it to ANY other vehicles. Can anyone provide a logical reason why the scooter style e-bike should require pedals on them?.
They're supposed be a muscular powered vehicle, hence the exemptions that are granted for them. If you're not using muscle power to propel them, how are they any different then a limited speed motorcycle and why should they be treated differently? Why is it unreasonable to require the driver to be licence and the vehicle to be plated/insured?
Re: E-Bikes and the HTA
Stanton wrote:
t00nie wrote:
Without comparing it to ANY other vehicles. Can anyone provide a logical reason why the scooter style e-bike should require pedals on them?.
They're supposed be a muscular powered vehicle, hence the exemptions that are granted for them. If you're not using muscle power to propel them, how are they any different then a limited speed motorcycle and why should they be treated differently? Why is it unreasonable to require the driver to be licence and the vehicle to be plated/insured?
exactly!!
seems very clear - even on the MTO site
Re: E-Bikes and the HTA
When the Federal Government approved power-assisted bicycles, they were in fact only looking at pedelecs that have to be pedeled before power is applied to the motor. They decided to include throttle full time power assist when they found them safe alternative mode of transportation. The laws were thus formulated around power-assisted bicycles. The definition was broad enough to include scooter style ebikes, but it is the fault of the manufacturers that they did not design the scooter style to conform properly to the laws. Some scooter style ebikes can be pedalled, and without a danger scraping the road. It is the fault of the manufacturers that the pedals do not function correctly. I have seen a Daymak model pedalled, and I think some their models have retractable pedals
If scooter style ebikes get their own clasification, they will more likely end up regulated like motor-assisted bicycles, with plates, insurance and license required, rather than the ebike designation. The majority of people seem to want the scooter style off the trails, licensed and insured, and reclassifying them will be the perfect excuse to impose the additional requirements which will sound the death knell for ebikes. That is what happened to mopeds. Has anyone seen a moped lately? Of course not, the insurance requirement killed them off.
Re: E-Bikes and the HTA
orillia3 wrote:
When the Federal Government approved power-assisted bicycles, they were in fact only looking at pedelecs that have to be pedeled before power is applied to the motor. They decided to include throttle full time power assist when they found them safe alternative mode of transportation. The laws were thus formulated around power-assisted bicycles. The definition was broad enough to include scooter style ebikes, but it is the fault of the manufacturers that they did not design the scooter style to conform properly to the laws. Some scooter style ebikes can be pedalled, and without a danger scraping the road. It is the fault of the manufacturers that the pedals do not function correctly. I have seen a Daymak model pedalled, and I think some their models have retractable pedals
If scooter style ebikes get their own clasification, they will more likely end up regulated like motor-assisted bicycles, with plates, insurance and license required, rather than the ebike designation. The majority of people seem to want the scooter style off the trails, licensed and insured, and reclassifying them will be the perfect excuse to impose the additional requirements which will sound the death knell for ebikes. That is what happened to mopeds. Has anyone seen a moped lately? Of course not, the insurance requirement killed them off.
I haven't seen the Daymak model(s) but I've heard only how Daymak started in Canada which was an interesting story. Either way, if the pedals retract, I wonder if you're allowed to actually ride with them retracted? I've heard that you're not allowed to use "modified pedals". Would these count as modified when they're retracted? What's the laws definition on that...? Another variable to add to the already confusing mix!
Re: E-Bikes and the HTA
sheesh make it simple.......
- if it does not have a motor it is a bicycle and needs nothing other than regular bicycle stuff
- if it has a motor it is a motorcycle
plain and simple, no confusion
Re: E-Bikes and the HTA
Once again we're comparing a scooter style e-bike to a normal bicycle. The two don't primarily operate the same way therefore should not be compared to each other.
Re: E-Bikes and the HTA
t00nie wrote:
Once again we're comparing a scooter style e-bike to a normal bicycle. The two don't primarily operate the same way therefore should not be compared to each other.
No, we (or at least me) are comparing it a limited speed motorcycle. I agree it's definitely not a bicycle, hence why it shouldn't be treated as one. I'm not really hearing any reason why it shouldn't need to be plated/insured, other then some people would find the cost prohibitive.
Re: E-Bikes and the HTA
Stanton wrote:
t00nie wrote:
Once again we're comparing a scooter style e-bike to a normal bicycle. The two don't primarily operate the same way therefore should not be compared to each other.
No, we (or at least me) are comparing it a limited speed motorcycle. I agree it's definitely not a bicycle, hence why it shouldn't be treated as one. I'm not really hearing any reason why it shouldn't need to be plated/insured, other then some people would find the cost prohibitive.
Agree.....
My post above was just for the gov't to make changes in legislation to make it simple ...either it is a bicycle(human power) or it is a motorcycle (mechanical power)
Re: E-Bikes and the HTA
I agree, e-bikes should be registered and you should have to put a plate on them. The main reason for this is because we need the ability to track/monitor those who do not have licenses but can still ride an e-bike. Also, it gives an opportunity for everyone to report a e-bike rider who doesn't obey laws such as riding on sidewalks and through red lights. These things give us a bad name, we get compared to the punks who ride up on sidewalks to go through red lights then back onto the street.
As for insurance, I don't see forcing e-bikes to be insured to be logical if standard bicycles don't have to be insured. My reason for this is that the risk for injury while riding either vehicles is the same. In fact, I feel safer riding my scooter style e-bike on the roads than I do on my bicycle, I find that other vehicles give me much more space than when I ride my mountain bike.
Re: E-Bikes and the HTA
I have looked at the Highway Traffic Act and the original poster could have been charged with three different sections of the HTA. The statement that removing the pedals reclassifies the ebike into an motor vehicle are false and I will explain why.
First of all, the ebiker without pedals should have been charged with HTA section 103.1 (1)
103.1 (1) Every power-assisted bicycle shall have the prescribed equipment and conform to the prescribed requirements and standards. 2009, c. 5, s. 35.
I cannot find the set fines for this section of the HTA and am not sure what 2009, c. 5, s. 35 means. .
Alternatively the ebiker without pedals should have been charged with ONTARIO REGULATION 369/09 made under the HIGHWAY TRAFFIC ACT if they thought the ebike was modified.
No modifications
6. A power-assisted bicycle must not be ridden on, driven or operated if it has been modified after its manufacture in any way that may result in increasing its power or its maximum speed beyond the limits set out in clause (d) of the definition of "power-assisted bicycle" in section 2 of the Motor Vehicle Safety Regulations made under the Motor Vehicle Safety Act (Canada).
or if they thought the ebike was unsafe, should have been charged under the same HTA regulation, the next section
Good working order
7. A power-assisted bicycle must not be ridden on, driven or operated unless it is in good working order.
Under schedule 52.2 the sets fines for section 6:
Power-assisted bicycle – speed or power modified is $85
and under schedule 52.2 the set fine for section 7:
Power-assisted bicycle not in good working order is $85
According to this Regulation 369/09 section 6 you can have the ebike modified to completely not conform with the definition of an ebike under the HTA, modifying it beyond legal power and/or speed and the maximum sanction is a fine of $85. In contrast to removing the pedals, these modifications are far more serious, yet do not reclassify the ebike into a motor vehicle, so saying any modification of an ebike reclassifies it is false. The intent of the legislation is clear.
An ebike without pedals is dealt with under the HTA in the above legislation.
The Compulsory Automobile Insurance Act was never written to be used to punish for ebikes with no pedals.
-
AlienAlien117
- Newbie

- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:04 am
Re: E-Bikes and the HTA
Good morning folks,reading all your comments has been extremely helpful,several have already confirmed what we already knew,it would appear that a large degree of confusion exists across the spectrum on the correct and appropriate legislation pertaining to the charges in my case.Former NRP officer Mick Riddle will be advocating this case should it proceed to trial,it was hoped the issue could be addressed in a non-confrontational manner,that thought still persists.Obviously at this stage I am limited in what may now be discussed.Thanks again for all of your input,there will be more to come on the subject.
-
Greywolf Ghost
- Newbie

- Posts: 5
- Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:53 am
Re: E-Bikes and the HTA
Sad that someone is to be used as test case, example, but these forms of transport are just a year out of their trial period on Ontario roads.
I am no leagel expert, but I did read up on these bikes, learned the rules, and follow them to the letter of the law!!!!
I hate to say but the Head Gear Charge will stick, once the peddels are off the bike ( even if under the seat), and you are on a raod that carries traffic, you now require a DOT rated Mellon Cover.
I have seen so many who ride e-bikes now, no peddles attached....I would guess not knowing they can be pulled off the road with a bunch of trouble to boot.
I have a 500 watt Motorino XPh , one of the more weighty models, and I can indeed power the bike via the peddles.
I was pulled over one night, so the Officer could check if my Peddles did indeed work. I did peddle, but in truth I could have jogged next to it pushing much faster.
I do not mean to poo poo any person on a right to have their day in Court, but on this I think the Law will win out, and some big fines will come down. So that The MTO, Police will have a clear direction.
Please note, no Peddles attached make you now a LSM which is already classed by the MTO and it's set of rules.
An LSM is a Limited Speed Motorcycle (Moped) which reqires a restricted class M licence for limited-speed motorcycle (LSM)
Similar Topics
-
-
- Bikes and SUV's?
- Posted in Police Cruisers and Vehicles
- By tdrive2 on
- Replies: 6
-
-
-
- Pulling over a group of bikes
- Posted in General Talk
- By FiReSTaRT on
- Replies: 15
-
-
-
- custom built bikes
- Posted in General Talk
- By LeafsChopper on
- Replies: 4
-
-
-
- HTA Section 32 (1) and HTA Section 13 (2) Driving with an expired license and faded license plate
- Posted in General Talk
- By Franny on
- Replies: 1
-
-
-
- - HTA O.Reg 611 and HTA 84
- Posted in General Talk
- By hydronaut on
- Replies: 1
-
-
-
- HTA 144(18) changed to HTA 130, is that allowed?
- Posted in Careless Driving
- By kooler on
- Replies: 3
-
-
-
- Charged with wrong offence: HTA 62(11) instead of HTA 62(19)
- Posted in General Talk
- By shnuffy on
- Replies: 7
-
-
-
- HTA S144(18) vs HTA S144(19) fatal error or not
- Posted in Failing to obey signs
- By momemon on
- Replies: 2
-
-
-
-
S.128 and S.172(1) and s.130 and s.8(1) - is possible all to
- Posted in Stunt Driving
- By driver on
- Replies: 6
-
-
-
-
- Part XIII of HTA of no force and effect
- Posted in General Talk
- By lawmen on
-
-
-
- Not HTA But new ontario law about 21 and under
- Posted in General Talk
- By PrincessKyle on
- Replies: 1
-
-
-
- What and How a HTA vioation affects CVOR
- Posted in General Talk
- By Off_Camber on
- Replies: 2
-
-
-
-
- Red Light and Careless Driving HTA 130
- Posted in Careless Driving
- By jgboudrias on
-
-
-
- Suspension and Judgement under HTA
- Posted in General Talk
- By teddybear2112 on
- Replies: 12
-
-
-
-
HTA 142(1) and CAIA 3(1)
- Posted in Prohibited turns
- By darshan.4 on
- Replies: 6
-
-
-
-
- HTA section 85.1 CVOR Truck and Trailer tickets
- Posted in General Talk
- By ckitch on
- Replies: 2
-
-
-
- New Member? Come and say Hi and Introduce yourself here! :)
- Posted in Forum Rules
- By racer on
- Replies: 168
-
-
-
- Heavy and/or Farm Equipment and Snow Removal Equipment
- Posted in General Talk
- By oopsie on
- Replies: 2
-
-
-
- Summons and first appearance_Worried and confused
- Posted in Summon
- By ontario_78 on
- Replies: 2
-
Featured Topics
fight stop sign
I got ticket for failing to stop at stop sign in Toronto. i heard that the police officer must see the stop line, if there is one, from where he was sitting. That is exactly my case, Is it a strong case? If so do i need a picture to show that there is a stop line and a picture to show that he could not see the stop line from where he was sitting?
Any help would be appreciated
Disobey stop sign, stop signs on both sides of intersection?
I got a ticket, Disobey stop sign, sec 136.1.a on dec 6th
I made a left in an intersection and was pulled over by a police officer in an unmarked car who had been sitting down the road. A classic fishing hole situation. I was genuinely surprised when he stopped me and told me I went through a stop sign without even slowing down. I know to shut up and be polite and take the ticket. I…
After accident, the police gave me a Careless Driving ticket
I'm having a big issue right now.
Yesterday morning, I rear-ended someone. I was going the speed limit. The sun was directly in front of me and it blinded my windshield and my eyes. At the same time, the person in front of me stopped/slowed down (also due to the sun). I started to slow down but didn't stop and I hit them since I couldn't see anything. I was not driving too close initially. I…
T-boned a limo - optical illusion
I was driving in the county at night and hit a limousine stretched out side ways across the road. The limo had its lights on and had side lighting as well. The police officer charged me with careless driving because it was "fully lit up".
It took me to the next day to figure out what had happened - what I remember made no sense. What I had run across was a "false visual reference" illusion.
The…
68 over ..
I was reading the other topic in this fourm.
I was on hwy 37 trying to make my girlfriends ganadmas mass and I live an hour away and I had an hour to get there so I was going fast but not 50 over untill some idiot got on my tail soo close that I was to concentrated on him that I kept going faster untill I got pulled over at 147 on an 80 km hwy.
I alreaddy lost 3 points and this time was just the…
Failure to stop. 136(1)(b)
Hello, got stopped today for rolling a stop sign. Ticket says failure to stop, but quotes hta 1361b.
Doesn't 1361b mean failure to yield?
Is this a fatal error? Or could it be amended at trial. How can I prepare a defence if I don't know if I'm defending the failure to stop or the failure to yield?
OOps! The police officer forgot to return my documents...
After he was providing me with a ticket for failure to obey to the stop sign (I am pretty sure I stopped but less than 3 seconds recommended by my driver ed. instructor), I know everybody say that..as an excuse.
Then he stopped me again to return the documents.
Any advice and feed back would be really appreciated.
Do I have a case where I could win?
Proof for advanced green
Hello, hoping here someone can help.
Can you get evidence for whether someone had an advanced green at an intersection? My dad was making a right turn on a red (after stopping) into a plaza parking lot. He got hit by someone making a left turn from the opposite lane. The driver told the officer called to the collision that he had an advance green. My dad said he came out of nowhere which makes me…
Failing to stop for a school bus
So i was driving on Eglinton Avenue East near Rosemount Ave.

The school bus was on the the curb on the opposite side of the road while i was travelling on the middle lane of the three-laned Eglinton Avenue East (five lanes apart plus a raised median island seperating the traffic)

I could not see the school bus as my view of the bus was being obstructed by the cars in front of me and on my left hand…
If/when do I have to disclose my evidence for a trial?
Lots of good information on getting disclosure from the Crown here.
Now, I am just wondering if I will be relying upon evidence of my own at trial... do I have to voluntarily send this material to the Crown in a reasonable time before the trial, or only if they request disclosure from me?
Thanks!
Ticket for speeding on highway 401 (125 km/h)
Hey,
This morning I had an exam for university. I was studying the entire night and i wanted to catch like maybe 1-2 hours of sleep before the exam so i went to sleep. I woke up like 5 hrs after and realize that I was about to miss my exam. I still could have made it so I asked my dad for his car since I was in a huge rush and he gave it to me.
I went on the highway and I was going at 135 km/h but…
30 over i need help he said he hade me on radar he was going
the police officer was in in the opesite oncumming lane he was fallowing another car so close that i was not even able to see his cruser till he was buy he said that i was going 111 in a 80 he said he hade me on radar he only asked for me drivers licencs and never asked for my insurence so on the ticket there no insurence dose enyone think i can beat this i wana take it to cort becuse he was…
New Moderator Board Approval
Here we grow again!
We have a volunteer that volunteered to help us out in forum moderation.
However, we would like our visitors to approve him here.
Please vote Yay! if you are OK with BelSlySTi becoming a moderator, or vote Nay! if you are not (I do, however, expect a post or a PM as to why).
Both me and admin are OK with him, however, we will not participate in this vote. Approval should be…
Plead guilty when not. Can I appeal?
Hi I have a couple questions so I'll explain my situation and any advice would be appreciated.
Can't remember exact date so lets call it some time in 2008 I got a fine for $5000.00 for driving without in insurance. I never paid the fine and in 2012 I was pulled over and the officer asked to see my license. Although I had it on me I figured it would be under suspension for the unpaid fine from…
Caught speeding excessively but wasn't pulled over
Alright, so I did something really stupid the other day, I was driving down a country road and wanted to hit the curves so I passed 3 cars at once, inadvertently making it up to very much past 50 over (80 limit)... Much to my chagrin there was a cop coming in the opposite direction who immediately skidded on the gravel shoulder and who I thought was 100% going to turn around and pull me over,…
Markham Rd East Courthouse
Anyone know how backed this courthouse is? I submitted my ticket for trial at the end of August, and still no letter. Im scared it got lost in the mail, can i call the courthouse and find out my courtdate? Or would i have to go in personally?
Failure to Use Low Beams - Following
I recently received a ticket for failure to use low beams - while following - Ticket was issued Sec 168 (
- it was on the 401 and no one was within 500 meters of me, I was warning a oncoming vehicle that there was an officer hiding (which is not illegal or I could not find a law against it) it was a police vehicle travelling at very high rate of speed in the opposite direction with no lights on…
Trial in a week
I have a trial scheduled for Monday and finally went to pick up the notes and DVD. Would love some advice.
This is a ticketed 70 in a 60, reduced from an alleged 84.
xxxx car with PC <officer>
Sunny Clear Morning Roads Dry and Bare
Rds in good condition with clearly marked lanes.
Bee III tested at 0725 hrs
Police are W/B Observe a blk <my car> weaving through traffic…
Got conviction notice for a never-received ticket (2pts)
I received a warning letter from MTO for a 2pts ticket.What happened is that the police officer issued a "unsafe left turn" and then changed the ticket to "failed to signal" at the scene, but she submitted both tickets!!! And I !!!ONLY!!! received the latter ticket from her(I requested trial for "failed to signal"). I recently received notice from MTO that I'm convicted for "unsafe left turn".
I…
Hand- held device ticket- help
Hello everyone! I was given a ticket for using a hand-held communication device while driving. It was 3 am, I was at a stop light and the cop saw me with the my phone in my hand. I told him i was just checking the time on it. I received the notes a few weeks ago ill copy them down below. Any help is appreciated although i believe there's no hope for me. The cop recorded me saying what phone i…
Hands Free only Ocober 26, 2009
so I wonder if the OPP going to be out Monday morning handing out tickets for talking on the cell phone tommorow ![]()
wonder how much this is going to backlog the courts now--because im thinking, alot of people just arent going to get it..
Driving While Under Suspension
Hi,
I got pulled over about 15 or so days ago the court till this date has not received the summons what is the legal time period that the court has to follow to accept the summons from the office court says its 15 days is the legal timeframe the officer has to serve it on the court
but this information says differently..
www.canlii.org/en/on/laws/reâ¦latest/rro-1990-reg-200.html
11. (1) The clerk…
145KM/HR IN 100 POSTED HWY 401
I got a ticket for doing 145km/hr in a 100km/hr posted on hwy 401 East Region near Napanee at 11:15pm on Oct 24 2014.
I am fighting the ticket myself and just received the disclosure.
The officer used the Genesis II Select Directional Radar and in her notes she wrote:
"Radar - G2S25705"
"test before - 1100"
"test after - 0410"
Can anyone tell me what the two numbers for test before and test after mean?
I…
Need Advice on Limited Disclosure before Court Date
Dear friends,
I requested for disclosure of information two months ago.
I received the radar manual after one month, but not others (including maintenance/calibration record of the radar, certificate of police training). On further pursuit, the prosecutor told me that he did not have them and he did not see why I needed these documents. He said he did not know where to get them when I asked.
My…
speeding 134 in 100KM/hr
Last Friday I was pulled over by an OPP motorcycle cop who informed me I was going 134. I was on the SB 404, I did see him parked under a bridge and when I passed him he was not on his bike.
I'm hoping to get some insight for a defense in this case.
I was in lane 1 and I had a car in front of me, and a car behind me, also there was a car speeding down Lane 3 passing everyone and moved quickly into…