HTA 144(18) changed to HTA 130, is that allowed?

kooler
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 8:49 pm

HTA 144(18) changed to HTA 130, is that allowed?

by: kooler on
Fri Mar 20, 2009 8:57 pm

Hi
On aug 2008, I had an accident and hit another car. and was given a ticket for HTA 144( 18 ). At the time, based on a witness, the cop said I ran a red light. I challenged the ticket (with assistance from a paralegal), and received a letter for the court date (May 25), with the specific charge of HTA 144

Last week, I received a 'NOTICE of MOTION' that changed the court date to April 29, BUT the charge was changed to HTA 130 (careless driving)

Can they do that? I mean, I have the ticket, and it shows 144( 18 )

what is my course of action?


User avatar
Radar Identified
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2881
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:26 pm
Location: Toronto

Moderator

by: Radar Identified on
Sat Mar 21, 2009 4:37 pm

Yes, it is allowed, but changing the trial date and amending the charge to something more substantial is somewhat abnormal. Have you spoken with your paralegal regarding this yet? While careless driving is one of the most serious charges that can be issued under the Highway Traffic Act, it is also one of the hardest to prove. Your paralegal should actually have an easier time getting this one dismissed as opposed to running the red light. As for changing the date, it should be fairly easy to get it changed to the original date or pushed back further. Almost seems like unilaterally moving the date up and amending the charge at the same time is acting in bad faith.


kooler
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 8:49 pm

by: kooler on
Sat Mar 21, 2009 9:11 pm

I informed him about it. Said he will check/clarify with them first. Hopefully something good will come out of it


User avatar
ticketcombat
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 486
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 5:59 pm
Location: Toronto
Contact:

by: ticketcombat on
Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:13 pm

Carefully reread your notice of motion.

The charge you have is before the court and it cannot be amended or changed without the court's consent. Likely there is a court date on April 29 to hear a motion to change the charge to careless driving.

There are two issues that are raised. First, the Crown would not seek the more severe charge of careless driving unless they have information that warrants this heavy charge. You should have disclosure by now and would know why they are seeking the greater offence.

Second, as Radar Identified has stated, it is a much harder charge to prove. Why would they make it more difficult for themselves to convict you?

You need to be very strategic about what you are going to do about this. It sounds like either charge will require the witness to show up. At first glance [without knowing any specific details about what happened] you have a much better chance of fighting the careless driving charge.

If your only strategy is to plead guilty to a lesser charge than try to keep the lower red light offence and plead that down. If you plan to fight the charge, then take the careless driving charge.

BUT read this case R. v. Penketh, 2008 ONCJ 596. The important point is that the defendant did not testify and the defence offered no evidence. Don't make this mistake.

Your paralegal should work with you on developing your defence strategy.
Fight Your Ticket!


Post Reply

Return to “Careless Driving”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests