Yesterday evening I was stopped in line at a red light. About a dozen cars were in front of me. I had a safe distance between the car in front of me. I could see its tires on the pavement. I saw the light turn green, and a few seconds later the car in front of me released the brakes and rolled forward. I let off my brake and rolled forward. A moment later, the car in front slammed its brakes on. I hit my brakes and came to a stop with enough space for me to still see the license plate of the vehicle. Just then I was rear-ended hard and was pushed into the car in front of me. We all got out. I checked my front end and the car I was hit into first. My car was fine. Her car had a small indentation from the screw of my license plate. I checked my backend, and it was marked up with paint from the car that hit me. Nothing major. I have an old 97 car, so I wasn't concerned with damage. The car that hit me, hit me with such force that his air bag deployed. Because of the air bag deployment, the woman in the car in front of me called 911. While we were waiting, the driver who hit me stated that he wasn't paying attention and didn't brake at all. An hour later an off duty firefighter came by us and was surprised that no emergency vehicles were on the scene yet. He radioed for fire, which showed up in less than 3 minutes. a few minutes later EMS arrived. Fire crews checked the cars for leaking fluids (none) and EMS checked me and the driver behind me. No problems. 1 hour later, police arrived on the scene. When the office arrived, the first thing she did was take our license, insurance and registration and return to her cruiser. A few minutes later she returned and told the car I was hit into that she could leave. The officer then returned to her cruiser. Minutes later she returned to speak to the other driver and myself. She stated that we were both being charged with careless driving, handed us our tickets and told me that I could leave now. The other car needed to be towed away. I was shocked that the officer did not take any statements from any of us. At no point did she ask any of us what happened. I do not believe that I should be charged at all. Not with following too close, let alone careless. I feel that I demonstrated that I was not following to close when I managed to come to a stop without hitting the car in front of me. The only reason that I hit the car in front was that the force I was hit with. I want all charges dropped. Does anyone have any suggestions as to what I should do now? Does it sound like I was at fault? Do I contact the police department to file a statement? Do I take option 2 (meet with prosecutor), or 3 (trial)? Should I hire a firm like XCopper or POINTTS? I have been driving for 15 years, and had two minor speeding charges 10 years ago. This is my first collision.
Yesterday evening I was stopped in line at a red light. About a dozen cars were in front of me. I had a safe distance between the car in front of me. I could see its tires on the pavement. I saw the light turn green, and a few seconds later the car in front of me released the brakes and rolled forward. I let off my brake and rolled forward. A moment later, the car in front slammed its brakes on. I hit my brakes and came to a stop with enough space for me to still see the license plate of the vehicle. Just then I was rear-ended hard and was pushed into the car in front of me.
We all got out. I checked my front end and the car I was hit into first. My car was fine. Her car had a small indentation from the screw of my license plate. I checked my backend, and it was marked up with paint from the car that hit me. Nothing major. I have an old 97 car, so I wasn't concerned with damage. The car that hit me, hit me with such force that his air bag deployed. Because of the air bag deployment, the woman in the car in front of me called 911. While we were waiting, the driver who hit me stated that he wasn't paying attention and didn't brake at all.
An hour later an off duty firefighter came by us and was surprised that no emergency vehicles were on the scene yet. He radioed for fire, which showed up in less than 3 minutes. a few minutes later EMS arrived. Fire crews checked the cars for leaking fluids (none) and EMS checked me and the driver behind me. No problems. 1 hour later, police arrived on the scene.
When the office arrived, the first thing she did was take our license, insurance and registration and return to her cruiser. A few minutes later she returned and told the car I was hit into that she could leave. The officer then returned to her cruiser. Minutes later she returned to speak to the other driver and myself. She stated that we were both being charged with careless driving, handed us our tickets and told me that I could leave now. The other car needed to be towed away. I was shocked that the officer did not take any statements from any of us. At no point did she ask any of us what happened.
I do not believe that I should be charged at all. Not with following too close, let alone careless. I feel that I demonstrated that I was not following to close when I managed to come to a stop without hitting the car in front of me. The only reason that I hit the car in front was that the force I was hit with. I want all charges dropped.
Does anyone have any suggestions as to what I should do now? Does it sound like I was at fault? Do I contact the police department to file a statement? Do I take option 2 (meet with prosecutor), or 3 (trial)? Should I hire a firm like XCopper or POINTTS?
I have been driving for 15 years, and had two minor speeding charges 10 years ago. This is my first collision.
Id start by requesting disclosure to see what evidence the officer has to support a careless driving charge. Based on what youve said, I certainly dont feel the charge is warranted nor would you be convicted. First attendance meeting might not hurt, see what the Crown says. If they feel the charge is unwarranted they might simply withdraw it.
Id start by requesting disclosure to see what evidence the officer has to support a careless driving charge. Based on what youve said, I certainly dont feel the charge is warranted nor would you be convicted. First attendance meeting might not hurt, see what the Crown says. If they feel the charge is unwarranted they might simply withdraw it.
I'd get a paralegal involved as well. Certainly from your description, I don't believe that you should have been charged with Careless Driving. However, as Careless Driving is a very serious charge with some pretty heavy implications for insurance etc., I'd get some sort of professional representation. Unless the officer was a collision reconstruction expert, the fact that no witness statements were taken is not going to be particularly helpful for the Prosecutor's case, if they decide to pursue it.
I'd get a paralegal involved as well. Certainly from your description, I don't believe that you should have been charged with Careless Driving. However, as Careless Driving is a very serious charge with some pretty heavy implications for insurance etc., I'd get some sort of professional representation. Unless the officer was a collision reconstruction expert, the fact that no witness statements were taken is not going to be particularly helpful for the Prosecutor's case, if they decide to pursue it.
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
n00b questions. 1) Can I request a disclosure before submitting my response to the charge? Mainly, do I have to pick option 2 or 3 first? 2) If I request a first attendance meeting (option 2) does that mean I am pleading guilt of some sort? If I do not like the outcome of the meeting with the prosecutor, can I then request a trial date?
Stanton wrote:
Id start by requesting disclosure to see what evidence the officer has to support a careless driving charge. Based on what youve said, I certainly dont feel the charge is warranted nor would you be convicted. First attendance meeting might not hurt, see what the Crown says. If they feel the charge is unwarranted they might simply withdraw it.
n00b questions.
1) Can I request a disclosure before submitting my response to the charge? Mainly, do I have to pick option 2 or 3 first?
2) If I request a first attendance meeting (option 2) does that mean I am pleading guilt of some sort? If I do not like the outcome of the meeting with the prosecutor, can I then request a trial date?
Another question I can't seem to find on here. If I go with Option 2 (Early Resolution) can I file for disclosure? If so, when?
MegaSilver wrote:
n00b questions.
1) Can I request a disclosure before submitting my response to the charge? Mainly, do I have to pick option 2 or 3 first?
2) If I request a first attendance meeting (option 2) does that mean I am pleading guilt of some sort? If I do not like the outcome of the meeting with the prosecutor, can I then request a trial date?
Another question I can't seem to find on here. If I go with Option 2 (Early Resolution) can I file for disclosure? If so, when?
No - you have to pick 2 or 3 first. If it specifies "First Attendance meeting," then no. However, if it says "plead guilty with an explanation," then yes you are pleading guilty. If you go with Option 2, you can file for disclosure as soon as you get a First Attendance date - or even sooner (wait a couple of weeks).
MegaSilver wrote:
1) Can I request a disclosure before submitting my response to the charge? Mainly, do I have to pick option 2 or 3 first?
No - you have to pick 2 or 3 first.
MegaSilver wrote:
2) If I request a first attendance meeting (option 2) does that mean I am pleading guilt of some sort? If I do not like the outcome of the meeting with the prosecutor, can I then request a trial date?
If it specifies "First Attendance meeting," then no. However, if it says "plead guilty with an explanation," then yes you are pleading guilty.
If you go with Option 2, you can file for disclosure as soon as you get a First Attendance date - or even sooner (wait a couple of weeks).
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
I received my date for Early Resolution (May 9th) in the middle of February. I faxed in a request for disclosure a few days later (Feb 19th). I still have not heard anything. Been 5 weeks now. I'll send in another request at 6 weeks from last request.
I received my date for Early Resolution (May 9th) in the middle of February. I faxed in a request for disclosure a few days later (Feb 19th). I still have not heard anything. Been 5 weeks now. I'll send in another request at 6 weeks from last request.
I received my disclosure last week. I have an early resolution meeting on Thursday. A few points of interest. In the officers notes, she makes notes of the damage to my car being on the front bumper. I had no damage to my front bumper. My REAR bumper is damaged with the impression of the licence plate from the car behind me. 4 1/2 months later I can still read the mirror image of the license plate. Don't think that matters, as the officer was not a witness, so discrediting her won't serve a purpose, right? Enclosed is also the statement of the car collided with. Here is an edited version of that: "On December 13th, 2012 at approximately 5:08am I was driving my white Nissan with licence plate <retracted> south bound on the <retracted> Street bridge towards <retracted> Crescent. The light was green but there was a lot of traffic. I was slowing down, almost at a complete stop and then I got rear-ended. Then another car rear-ended the car that hit me. I did not receive any injuries and the damages to my car were very minimal. I waited until Police arrived." Now, that is not the same scenario that I observed. Guess that's up for debate. My case basically comes down to if she felt one bump or two. If she doesn't show at court, does the crown lack any evidence, forcing them to drop charges? In court, I plan to discredit her testimony. In the 2 hours we spent waiting for police to arrive, I got to talk to both of them. I plan on asking her things about me that we discussed to see if she can remember all those details. If she can't clearly remember all the details we discussed, perhaps she didn't remember the details of the collision correctly? Her daughter was also involved in a traffic accident that night. She was shaken up over that situation also. Her mind was probably not very clear. Also, the driver behind me sat in her car for a long period of time while we waited for police. I found out that they work in the same office together!! Sounds like she may have altered her statement to support her co-workers case.
I received my disclosure last week. I have an early resolution meeting on Thursday. A few points of interest. In the officers notes, she makes notes of the damage to my car being on the front bumper. I had no damage to my front bumper. My REAR bumper is damaged with the impression of the licence plate from the car behind me. 4 1/2 months later I can still read the mirror image of the license plate. Don't think that matters, as the officer was not a witness, so discrediting her won't serve a purpose, right?
Enclosed is also the statement of the car collided with. Here is an edited version of that:
"On December 13th, 2012 at approximately 5:08am I was driving my white Nissan with licence plate <retracted> south bound on the <retracted> Street bridge towards <retracted> Crescent. The light was green but there was a lot of traffic. I was slowing down, almost at a complete stop and then I got rear-ended. Then another car rear-ended the car that hit me. I did not receive any injuries and the damages to my car were very minimal. I waited until Police arrived."
Now, that is not the same scenario that I observed. Guess that's up for debate. My case basically comes down to if she felt one bump or two. If she doesn't show at court, does the crown lack any evidence, forcing them to drop charges? In court, I plan to discredit her testimony. In the 2 hours we spent waiting for police to arrive, I got to talk to both of them. I plan on asking her things about me that we discussed to see if she can remember all those details. If she can't clearly remember all the details we discussed, perhaps she didn't remember the details of the collision correctly? Her daughter was also involved in a traffic accident that night. She was shaken up over that situation also. Her mind was probably not very clear. Also, the driver behind me sat in her car for a long period of time while we waited for police. I found out that they work in the same office together!! Sounds like she may have altered her statement to support her co-workers case.
Just got back from the courthouse from my early resolution meeting. Going in, my wife was pushing me to take a lesser charge and move on with it. I was adamant that I did nothing wrong, and didn't want to plea guilty to anything. So, this morning I sat in the waiting room. People were being called into 1 of the 2 offices to meet with the prosecutor. After virtually everyone had gone in, one of the prosecutors asks if anyone hasn't been seen. So, I met with him. I stated that I did not agree with the statement giving by the first driver, and gave my recollection of the events. He agreed that careless wasn't a warranted charge, but could not dismiss the charge. We agreed to take it to court. I went back into the waiting room. My name was then called by the other prosecutor. I went in and met with her. She offered me failing to turn left to avoid collision and an $85 fine. I accepted and went into the court room. I watched as others stepped up and pleaded guilty to a lesser charge, and a few going to trial. When I was called up, the 1st prosecutor was present and stated that in previous discussions we wished to go to trial. I stated that I had met with the other prosecutor and had accepted a lesser charge. This threw the prosecutor, and the judge then asked me to sit down and wait for the prosecution to sort things out. When I got called up again, the prosecutor said we had agreed to a lesser charge or failing to turn left to avoid. The judge asked how I plea. After I pleaded guilty, the prosecutor stated the "facts" of the case. He essentially said back what I had told him earlier! My story of events! The judge caught that and said he didn't understand why I would be charged under careless or failure to turn left. If I had stopped, how could I turn left? And how was that careless? He dismissed the charge! The prosecutor tried to have him accept my earlier plea, but he stuck with his dismissal! A huge win for me!
Just got back from the courthouse from my early resolution meeting. Going in, my wife was pushing me to take a lesser charge and move on with it. I was adamant that I did nothing wrong, and didn't want to plea guilty to anything. So, this morning I sat in the waiting room. People were being called into 1 of the 2 offices to meet with the prosecutor. After virtually everyone had gone in, one of the prosecutors asks if anyone hasn't been seen. So, I met with him. I stated that I did not agree with the statement giving by the first driver, and gave my recollection of the events. He agreed that careless wasn't a warranted charge, but could not dismiss the charge. We agreed to take it to court. I went back into the waiting room. My name was then called by the other prosecutor. I went in and met with her. She offered me failing to turn left to avoid collision and an $85 fine. I accepted and went into the court room.
I watched as others stepped up and pleaded guilty to a lesser charge, and a few going to trial. When I was called up, the 1st prosecutor was present and stated that in previous discussions we wished to go to trial. I stated that I had met with the other prosecutor and had accepted a lesser charge. This threw the prosecutor, and the judge then asked me to sit down and wait for the prosecution to sort things out.
When I got called up again, the prosecutor said we had agreed to a lesser charge or failing to turn left to avoid. The judge asked how I plea. After I pleaded guilty, the prosecutor stated the "facts" of the case. He essentially said back what I had told him earlier! My story of events! The judge caught that and said he didn't understand why I would be charged under careless or failure to turn left. If I had stopped, how could I turn left? And how was that careless? He dismissed the charge! The prosecutor tried to have him accept my earlier plea, but he stuck with his dismissal!
Nice win for you! That part bugs me. The Crown certainly can withdraw a charge if they feel it's unwarranted or the evidence doesn't support it. Not sure if they were just trying to placate you or what, but glad it worked out in the end.
Nice win for you!
MegaSilver wrote:
He agreed that careless wasn't a warranted charge, but could not dismiss the charge.
That part bugs me. The Crown certainly can withdraw a charge if they feel it's unwarranted or the evidence doesn't support it. Not sure if they were just trying to placate you or what, but glad it worked out in the end.
Not just CAN withdraw a charge, but MUST if there is no reasonable prospect of conviction - per the Crown Policy Manual. To pursue a conviction where there is no reasonable prospect of conviction (because the facts don't support it) would be unethical. That being said, it may well be that the prosecutor did feel there was a reasonable prospect of conviction on careless, even if it wasn't the most ideal charge for the circumstances, so I'm in NO WAY accusing this particular prosecutor of misconduct - obviously I don't know all the facts or what their thought process was. Remember, careless is a pretty broad offence and can, theoretically, cover a wide variety of situations where other offences might also apply. This is just for general information.
Not just CAN withdraw a charge, but MUST if there is no reasonable prospect of conviction - per the Crown Policy Manual. To pursue a conviction where there is no reasonable prospect of conviction (because the facts don't support it) would be unethical. That being said, it may well be that the prosecutor did feel there was a reasonable prospect of conviction on careless, even if it wasn't the most ideal charge for the circumstances, so I'm in NO WAY accusing this particular prosecutor of misconduct - obviously I don't know all the facts or what their thought process was. Remember, careless is a pretty broad offence and can, theoretically, cover a wide variety of situations where other offences might also apply. This is just for general information.
I got ticket for failing to stop at stop sign in Toronto. i heard that the police officer must see the stop line, if there is one, from where he was sitting. That is exactly my case, Is it a strong case? If so do i need a picture to show that there is a stop line and a picture to show that he could not see the stop line from where he was sitting?
I got a ticket, Disobey stop sign, sec 136.1.a on dec 6th
I made a left in an intersection and was pulled over by a police officer in an unmarked car who had been sitting down the road. A classic fishing hole situation. I was genuinely surprised when he stopped me and told me I went through a stop sign without even slowing down. I know to shut up and be polite and take the ticket. I…
Yesterday morning, I rear-ended someone. I was going the speed limit. The sun was directly in front of me and it blinded my windshield and my eyes. At the same time, the person in front of me stopped/slowed down (also due to the sun). I started to slow down but didn't stop and I hit them since I couldn't see anything. I was not driving too close initially. I…
I was driving in the county at night and hit a limousine stretched out side ways across the road. The limo had its lights on and had side lighting as well. The police officer charged me with careless driving because it was "fully lit up".
It took me to the next day to figure out what had happened - what I remember made no sense. What I had run across was a "false visual reference" illusion.
I was on hwy 37 trying to make my girlfriends ganadmas mass and I live an hour away and I had an hour to get there so I was going fast but not 50 over untill some idiot got on my tail soo close that I was to concentrated on him that I kept going faster untill I got pulled over at 147 on an 80 km hwy.
I alreaddy lost 3 points and this time was just the…
Hello, got stopped today for rolling a stop sign. Ticket says failure to stop, but quotes hta 1361b.
Doesn't 1361b mean failure to yield?
Is this a fatal error? Or could it be amended at trial. How can I prepare a defence if I don't know if I'm defending the failure to stop or the failure to yield?
After he was providing me with a ticket for failure to obey to the stop sign (I am pretty sure I stopped but less than 3 seconds recommended by my driver ed. instructor), I know everybody say that..as an excuse.
Then he stopped me again to return the documents.
Any advice and feed back would be really appreciated.
Can you get evidence for whether someone had an advanced green at an intersection? My dad was making a right turn on a red (after stopping) into a plaza parking lot. He got hit by someone making a left turn from the opposite lane. The driver told the officer called to the collision that he had an advance green. My dad said he came out of nowhere which makes me…
So i was driving on Eglinton Avenue East near Rosemount Ave.
The school bus was on the the curb on the opposite side of the road while i was travelling on the middle lane of the three-laned Eglinton Avenue East (five lanes apart plus a raised median island seperating the traffic)
I could not see the school bus as my view of the bus was being obstructed by the cars in front of me and on my left hand…
Lots of good information on getting disclosure from the Crown here.
Now, I am just wondering if I will be relying upon evidence of my own at trial... do I have to voluntarily send this material to the Crown in a reasonable time before the trial, or only if they request disclosure from me?
This morning I had an exam for university. I was studying the entire night and i wanted to catch like maybe 1-2 hours of sleep before the exam so i went to sleep. I woke up like 5 hrs after and realize that I was about to miss my exam. I still could have made it so I asked my dad for his car since I was in a huge rush and he gave it to me.
I went on the highway and I was going at 135 km/h but…
the police officer was in in the opesite oncumming lane he was fallowing another car so close that i was not even able to see his cruser till he was buy he said that i was going 111 in a 80 he said he hade me on radar he only asked for me drivers licencs and never asked for my insurence so on the ticket there no insurence dose enyone think i can beat this i wana take it to cort becuse he was…
Hi I have a couple questions so I'll explain my situation and any advice would be appreciated.
Can't remember exact date so lets call it some time in 2008 I got a fine for $5000.00 for driving without in insurance. I never paid the fine and in 2012 I was pulled over and the officer asked to see my license. Although I had it on me I figured it would be under suspension for the unpaid fine from…
Alright, so I did something really stupid the other day, I was driving down a country road and wanted to hit the curves so I passed 3 cars at once, inadvertently making it up to very much past 50 over (80 limit)... Much to my chagrin there was a cop coming in the opposite direction who immediately skidded on the gravel shoulder and who I thought was 100% going to turn around and pull me over,…
Anyone know how backed this courthouse is? I submitted my ticket for trial at the end of August, and still no letter. Im scared it got lost in the mail, can i call the courthouse and find out my courtdate? Or would i have to go in personally?
I recently received a ticket for failure to use low beams - while following - Ticket was issued Sec 168 (
- it was on the 401 and no one was within 500 meters of me, I was warning a oncoming vehicle that there was an officer hiding (which is not illegal or I could not find a law against it) it was a police vehicle travelling at very high rate of speed in the opposite direction with no lights on…
I received a warning letter from MTO for a 2pts ticket.What happened is that the police officer issued a "unsafe left turn" and then changed the ticket to "failed to signal" at the scene, but she submitted both tickets!!! And I !!!ONLY!!! received the latter ticket from her(I requested trial for "failed to signal"). I recently received notice from MTO that I'm convicted for "unsafe left turn".
Hello everyone! I was given a ticket for using a hand-held communication device while driving. It was 3 am, I was at a stop light and the cop saw me with the my phone in my hand. I told him i was just checking the time on it. I received the notes a few weeks ago ill copy them down below. Any help is appreciated although i believe there's no hope for me. The cop recorded me saying what phone i…
I got pulled over about 15 or so days ago the court till this date has not received the summons what is the legal time period that the court has to follow to accept the summons from the office court says its 15 days is the legal timeframe the officer has to serve it on the court
I requested for disclosure of information two months ago.
I received the radar manual after one month, but not others (including maintenance/calibration record of the radar, certificate of police training). On further pursuit, the prosecutor told me that he did not have them and he did not see why I needed these documents. He said he did not know where to get them when I asked.
Last Friday I was pulled over by an OPP motorcycle cop who informed me I was going 134. I was on the SB 404, I did see him parked under a bridge and when I passed him he was not on his bike.
I'm hoping to get some insight for a defense in this case.
I was in lane 1 and I had a car in front of me, and a car behind me, also there was a car speeding down Lane 3 passing everyone and moved quickly into…
