I search the forums and couldn't find an answer, hopefully I am not duplicating someone's post. My wife didn't completely stop at a red light before turning right. Under cover cop pulled her over and gave her a Fail to stop at Red light - 3 points and $325. I am in Halton. Hopefully you guys can help 1) What can I get this reduced to if I go to court. Normally they will offer a lesser charge. I am assuming some sort of fail to stop with zero points. 2) For disclosure, do I ask for this when I go to set the court date or do I wait some time after that. Any other tips? I spoke to a traffic ticket specialist and they said they can either get me off completely to have it reduced to zero points and $110. I wander what reduced charge would be. Please help!! Thanks so much in advance
I search the forums and couldn't find an answer, hopefully I am not duplicating someone's post.
My wife didn't completely stop at a red light before turning right. Under cover cop pulled her over and gave her a Fail to stop at Red light - 3 points and $325. I am in Halton. Hopefully you guys can help
1) What can I get this reduced to if I go to court. Normally they will offer a lesser charge. I am assuming some sort of fail to stop with zero points.
2) For disclosure, do I ask for this when I go to set the court date or do I wait some time after that.
Any other tips? I spoke to a traffic ticket specialist and they said they can either get me off completely to have it reduced to zero points and $110. I wander what reduced charge would be.
1. You can probably get it reduced to "fail to proceed as directed" or "disobey lane light." 2. Usually you would ask for disclosure after you get a Notice of Trial. Basically the first step is to file the paperwork to set up the trial date. Disclosure may reveal some sort of deficiency in the officer's notes - didn't observe the traffic lights were functioning properly, didn't properly observe the offence (ie. must see the light go red first THEN observe vehicle enter the intersection against the red), etc. Keep us posted. If there are no problems with the officer's notes, then you could probably look at a plea-bargain to one of the above-mentioned charges.
1. You can probably get it reduced to "fail to proceed as directed" or "disobey lane light."
2. Usually you would ask for disclosure after you get a Notice of Trial.
Basically the first step is to file the paperwork to set up the trial date.
Disclosure may reveal some sort of deficiency in the officer's notes - didn't observe the traffic lights were functioning properly, didn't properly observe the offence (ie. must see the light go red first THEN observe vehicle enter the intersection against the red), etc. Keep us posted. If there are no problems with the officer's notes, then you could probably look at a plea-bargain to one of the above-mentioned charges.
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
Thanks so much, does it make sense to first go there to plea guilty with a lesser charge and see what the prosecutor offers. If no reduction in points, can I then choose trial. Also, do I need anything to go in my wife's place?
Radar Identified wrote:
1. You can probably get it reduced to "fail to proceed as directed" or "disobey lane light."
2. Usually you would ask for disclosure after you get a Notice of Trial.
Basically the first step is to file the paperwork to set up the trial date.
Disclosure may reveal some sort of deficiency in the officer's notes - didn't observe the traffic lights were functioning properly, didn't properly observe the offence (ie. must see the light go red first THEN observe vehicle enter the intersection against the red), etc. Keep us posted. If there are no problems with the officer's notes, then you could probably look at a plea-bargain to one of the above-mentioned charges.
Thanks so much, does it make sense to first go there to plea guilty with a lesser charge and see what the prosecutor offers. If no reduction in points, can I then choose trial. Also, do I need anything to go in my wife's place?
You have to select the trial option for any type of deal, the other two options are simply you pleading guilty to the Justice of the Peace. Don't get too hung up on points, since they have very little impact unless your wife has numerous other convictions. You will need some type of documentation from your wife showing that she is allowing you to represent her and make decisions on her behalf. It might not hurt for her to be present if you're thinking of going to trial.
You have to select the trial option for any type of deal, the other two options are simply you pleading guilty to the Justice of the Peace. Don't get too hung up on points, since they have very little impact unless your wife has numerous other convictions.
You will need some type of documentation from your wife showing that she is allowing you to represent her and make decisions on her behalf. It might not hurt for her to be present if you're thinking of going to trial.
actually, don't we speak to the crown before the JP begins. Then the crown usually gives us the option of a guilty plea to a lesser charge and or fine, or to choose trial option to fully fight it, and risk loosing and getting slapped with the full charge?
actually, don't we speak to the crown before the JP begins.
Then the crown usually gives us the option of a guilty plea to a lesser charge and or fine, or to choose trial option to fully fight it, and risk loosing and getting slapped with the full charge?
Stanton wrote:
You have to select the trial option for any type of deal, the other two options are simply you pleading guilty to the Justice of the Peace. Don't get too hung up on points, since they have very little impact unless your wife has numerous other convictions.
You will need some type of documentation from your wife showing that she is allowing you to represent her and make decisions on her behalf. It might not hurt for her to be present if you're thinking of going to trial.
You do, however Stanton is referring to the stage where you actually file the paperwork to request the trial.
sidmuer wrote:
actually, don't we speak to the crown before the JP begins.
You do, however Stanton is referring to the stage where you actually file the paperwork to request the trial.
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
Hi everyone. I'm asking for a friend who has a question of interpretation.
He was ticketed for using a hand-held device. He contends that he was acting within the exemption provided under Subsection 14 (1) of O. Reg. 366/09, which reads as follows (emphasis added):
Hey guys i just wanted to know what speeds you see others do on the roads on a regular basis. As we all know no body drives 100 km. It seems they only hit that speed twice once on the way up and once on the way down.
it seems the De Facto limit on the 401 is about 120-130. But lately i dont know if…
On June 10, 2017, I was pulled over by an OPP on the 403 heading WB and told I registered 136km/hr. I kept chit chat to a minimum and took my ticket and went on with my day. I later requested my disclosure and did not receive it until a week before my Oct. 27 court date, and so I had my date…
Anyone know any more information? Apparently kathleen wynne mentioned trying to introduce legislation after more than 20 years of no speed cameras. My guess is that it wont happen, since they've tried before many times to bring it back after it was abolished.
The other day I was given a ticket for speeding 119 in a 90, on highway 17 near Marathon, ON (Speeding ticket capital of the universe, BTW). The officer claims to have "clocked" me using the vehicle mounted radar at 121 KMH and dropped it (presumably to lower fine and demerits).
I posted this in the 3 Demerit Section and haven't received any
responses.
I received a failure to stop at an amber light ticket on April 17, 2009. At my First Attendance Meeting I asked to read the police officer's notes and remember thinking how ridiculous they were and the difficulty…
I was on the right side of the road going straight when a pedestrian waved down the taxi driver in the lane next to me. He pulled over to the right without any notice or signalling and hit me with the side of his car.
There were many witnesses but I immediately had a concussion and did not think of…
My mother was driving EB on a 4 lane street (2 lanes EB, 2 lanes WB).
She was in the left hand lane and started a left hand turn so as to enter a side street, crossing WB traffic. There was NO intersection. She hit a cyclist who was heading WB. Police where called but none showed up. My…
If the speed limit is 50, and you do 100+, not only do you get 6 points. Your car gets impounded for a week, and your license suspended for 7 days, along with a hefty fine of at least $2000. The penalty is actually the same as for racing. The law came in effect on October 1, 2007. Remember -…
I was driving westbound on Hwy. 8 earlier this month in North Dumfries Township, approaching the Cambridge city limits. The weather was clear and the roads were dry. I noticed a vehicle on the shoulder on my side of the road, pointing towards me. This didn't concern me right away, as it is a rural…