I was given a ticket for failure to stop at a red light at 12:30 am. This was when it was slightly warmer, but as far as the weather was concerned, it was barely drizzling rain (it was almost a mist, but enough for me to be using my windshield wipers), and this resulted in a thin layer of moisture on the road. The intersection that I was approaching is on an incline, so I was applying my foot to the gas pedal as I cam up towards the intersection, however I never exceeded the speed limit. The light turned yellow as I was within 30 feet of the intersection. I noticed one or 2 cars stopped at the lights on both sides of the street perpendicular to the one I was traveling on. For a split second I did start to depress the gas, but I gauged that the distance would not be sufficient based on the conditions, and did not want to risk skidding to a stop in the middle of the intersection to the peril of the oncoming drivers, so about 3/4 of my car ended up going through the red light. As I went through the intersection, I looked to my left, and noticed a police car stopped at the light, and then predicted that I was about to be pulled over. As fate would have it, I was, and the officer proceeded to come to my car and then tell me that I had gone through what had been a "very red light". This part stuck out in my mind, because I figured that if the light had been very red, the officer's car, or the car that was next to him would have been in the intersection before I got to it, resulting in an accident that I strongly believe I avoided. As far as photos, I will go take some, but unfortunately, my city's Commisioner of Oaths does not certify true copies, and I can't afford to hire a Notary. I also checked online and found this website from the road safety authority of Ireland (so I doubt they'll take it seriously here): http://www.rulesoftheroad.ie/rules-for- ... -cars.html and see that the total stopping distance of a 35.2 meters (or 115.5 ft). Is there any hope for me to use this argument? Any advice on how to fight this ticket is appreciated. Thanks all
I was given a ticket for failure to stop at a red light at 12:30 am. This was when it was slightly warmer, but as far as the weather was concerned, it was barely drizzling rain (it was almost a mist, but enough for me to be using my windshield wipers), and this resulted in a thin layer of moisture on the road.
The intersection that I was approaching is on an incline, so I was applying my foot to the gas pedal as I cam up towards the intersection, however I never exceeded the speed limit. The light turned yellow as I was within 30 feet of the intersection. I noticed one or 2 cars stopped at the lights on both sides of the street perpendicular to the one I was traveling on. For a split second I did start to depress the gas, but I gauged that the distance would not be sufficient based on the conditions, and did not want to risk skidding to a stop in the middle of the intersection to the peril of the oncoming drivers, so about 3/4 of my car ended up going through the red light.
As I went through the intersection, I looked to my left, and noticed a police car stopped at the light, and then predicted that I was about to be pulled over. As fate would have it, I was, and the officer proceeded to come to my car and then tell me that I had gone through what had been a "very red light". This part stuck out in my mind, because I figured that if the light had been very red, the officer's car, or the car that was next to him would have been in the intersection before I got to it, resulting in an accident that I strongly believe I avoided.
As far as photos, I will go take some, but unfortunately, my city's Commisioner of Oaths does not certify true copies, and I can't afford to hire a Notary.
I also checked online and found this website from the road safety authority of Ireland (so I doubt they'll take it seriously here):
I also found this link to the website of the OSL (the Ontario Safety League) http://www.osl.org/print/speed.htm Is there any way that I can get the judge to consider this information?
I also found this link to the website of the OSL (the Ontario Safety League)
Don't mention that in court... but... The problem is going to be that the officer will testify that you ran the red light. If it's your word versus his, the odds of a JP finding your version more credible are pretty slim. It does happen, but it's so infrequent that I wouldn't bet anything on it. The odds of getting a reduced charge for disobeying a red light are low. While it is a 3-point offence, Prosecutors consider it to be fairly serious so they'll likely opt for a trial. BTW, where did the alleged offence take place? If there's any good news, the law says that you must stop your vehicle on a red light prior to entering the intersection. If you were across the stop line/crosswalk/whatever when the light changed to red, you're not guilty. However, the only way to find out is to get the officer's notes via disclosure. He should have indicated where he was, that he observed the red signal, and then he saw your vehicle proceed into the intersection AFTER your signal was red. If his notes say something different (e.g. observed vehicle enter intersection then noticed light was red; or, saw vehicle enter on amber, light changed to red when vehicle was half-way thru), that's a good thing - for you. Once you have the disclosure information, you can make a decision on what to do.
John Peters wrote:
For a split second I did start to depress the gas
Don't mention that in court... but...
John Peters wrote:
I never exceeded the speed limit. The light turned yellow as I was within 30 feet of the intersection. I noticed one or 2 cars stopped at the lights on both sides of the street perpendicular to the one I was traveling on...
but I gauged that the distance would not be sufficient based on the conditions, and did not want to risk skidding to a stop in the middle of the intersection to the peril of the oncoming drivers, so about 3/4 of my car ended up going through the red light.
The problem is going to be that the officer will testify that you ran the red light. If it's your word versus his, the odds of a JP finding your version more credible are pretty slim. It does happen, but it's so infrequent that I wouldn't bet anything on it. The odds of getting a reduced charge for disobeying a red light are low. While it is a 3-point offence, Prosecutors consider it to be fairly serious so they'll likely opt for a trial. BTW, where did the alleged offence take place?
If there's any good news, the law says that you must stop your vehicle on a red light prior to entering the intersection. If you were across the stop line/crosswalk/whatever when the light changed to red, you're not guilty. However, the only way to find out is to get the officer's notes via disclosure. He should have indicated where he was, that he observed the red signal, and then he saw your vehicle proceed into the intersection AFTER your signal was red. If his notes say something different (e.g. observed vehicle enter intersection then noticed light was red; or, saw vehicle enter on amber, light changed to red when vehicle was half-way thru), that's a good thing - for you. Once you have the disclosure information, you can make a decision on what to do.
I got a speeding ticket on the 401 by Cornwall. The officer said I was going 140 initially then dropped it to 130 (for the record I don't believe for a second I was going 140, that's way faster than I would ever intentionally drive). I filled out the info on the back of the notice to request a…
I was recently charged with stunt driving on a 60kmh road. When I was pulled over, the officer told me I was going almost 100kmh (still 40kmh above the limit) but was charging me for stunt driving because I accelerated quickly from an intersection on an empty road (in a straight line). I know…
what to do about a an illegal right turn onto steeles from staines rd
got the ticket around october of last year
put it to trial
so there is a big mess of cars at this intersection and I see a cop outside standing directing traffic with a huge row of cars pulled over to the side, through…
Are any non-domestic vehicles "pursuit-rated" in North America? Also have the Michigan State Police (this is relevant because apparently they have the most accepted selection/testing process) tested any of them to see if they meet their criteria? Just curious...
Ottawa, Canada (AHN) - Beginning Tuesday, or April Fool's Day 2008, fines on Quebec drivers caught overspeeding will be doubled. It is not only the money penalty that will go up, but also demerit points.
The new law, Bill 42, is similar to Ontario's street racing rule. It stipulates fines for…
A friend got a ticket Jan. 9th of this year for doing 110 kph in a 90 kph zone, so 20 over.
What should the set fine and total payable read?
It's confusing to me, as the prescribed fine under HTA s.128 is different than the set fine enumerated by the Chief Justice of the Ontario Court of Justice.
An OPP officer ticketed me claiming I was going 40km/h over the limit (140km/km) on my way home with a few friends on the 401. This is my first ever speeding offense. Although I am sure I was over the limit, I am almost certain that I was not going 40 over, more realistically closer to 30 over. The…
Yesterday night I was charged for stunt driving (excess over 50km/h) and I have a few inquiries. I'm sure you've all heard the same story, but the unmarked cop in an SUV was tailing me for a good 2-3 minutes as I was travelling 120~135 km/h. Then as he came close I decided to boot it up…
I had a speeding ticket in May 2013 which brought me to 9 demerit points out of 15. I received a letter and had to attend an interview. Due to a history of speeding tickets and a previous interview a few years prior, the interviewer decided to put me on zero tolerance for a year. Meaning if I…