Search found 1400 matches

Here's a sample of the Kitchener Parking Bylaw. Your ticket should have the exact bylaw number on it.

Method of Parking or Stopping

2. Method of Parking or Stopping

a) General
Unless otherwise prohibited or permitted in this by-law, no person shall park or stop a vehicle on any roadway except on the right side of the roadway, having regard to ...

No, you're not going to jail. Yes, there's a possibility that they'll offer you a charge of 49km over.

However, do yourself a favor and drop this hill story. To say you let go of the gas, coasted, and your car catapulted from 80 to nearly 140... it's insulting. Not that it's a defense anyways.

1) What type of documentation/note will a friend of mine need to represent me in the court as an agent?

Your friend can just bring a simple letter just in case, but they probably wont even need to use it. As long as they're not accepting money for services, it should be fine.

However, this is a pretty serious charge as far as traffic act ...

When can the officer ask you out of a vehicles though? Can he order you out if he does not like your attittude?


An officer can tell you to get out of your car for the purpose of checking for sobriety.

Another reason would be for the officers safety.

"Attitude" may not mean the same for you as it does for the officer. The officer may look at ...

This is the type of question that will send a topic into a never ending vortex. You're going to get a one or two wannabe freedom fighters in here and it'll never end....

Too many people look at this like "what can I do" instead of "what should I do".

I have a feeling there's a bit more to this story. Keep in mind the side of the road is not a ...

I would disagree with your interpretation of the regulation. It's about putting signs behind a wall, tree, pole, etc. You can't place a sign to avoid glare at any given time. It's like putting your hands in front of your face and saying the sign isn't wasn't placed properly because you couldn't see it.

Glare in what way? Glare bouncing off the ...

These are not impossible to beat, but would require hiring a paralegal AND hiring an expert witness that can testify about the problems with these device

Paralegals don't deal with red light tickets as is, let alone billing additional hours on top of that.

request a trial with the officer present.


What officer? No officer needs to be ...

I don't know how strong my case is. I have never received any ticket and my driving record is clean.

Not to sound harsh, but driving oblivious is not a defense. Also, it's an absolute liability offense. That means you either did or didn't drive through the red light. There's no middle ground.

Luckily, red light camera tickets are glorified ...

Witnesses would be individuals supplying evidence for the charge.

general-talk/when-can-child-sit-the-fro ... t7719.html

This thread goes into detail.

- If I decide not to take whatever they offer at early resolution, does that mean they'll schedule a trial date at a future time, potentially months away? Or would it be the same day? Cornwall is a 5 hour drive away from where I live so this ticket is a huge pain.

Early resolution is an attempt to strike a deal between the parties and avoid ...

Your ticket and your insurance fault are two different things. Your insurance is there to settle a financial dispute and has its own set of standards and practices. Your insurance provider uses the Fault Determination Rules .

No, being charged doesn't mean you're automatically on the hook financially. Although, they are going to be based off the ...

Yes, the cop did cut me a break from charging me for Stunt driving but are there other options to reduce the charge?

I dont know which option to choose from. Option 1 plead guilty and pay the fine, Option 2 meet with prosecutor or Option 3 go to Trial with possibility of amendment. My plan of action was to choose option 3, request disclosure and ...

Speedtaxed wrote:You wish me a peaceful life, huh? Officer's never lie, right?

Speedtaxed wrote:The system is very rigged as you probably know. It is meant to convict and collect tax revenues under the guise of Public Safety.

Lets not derail thread after thread with this. Enough with the ranting.

New signs don't require notice.

However, there's nothing stopping you from attending an early resolution if that's your plan.

If you're still looking for an early resolution meeting, you can plead not guilty and show up any available day from now until your trial. You can even show up on your trial date.

I would not waste my time thinking this mistake will result in your ticket being torn up. i'd consider early resolutions a courtesy. They are not required to do anything ...

1> I was told that if the other party is charged, that there is a yellow charge sheet given one or both drivers, I only recieved a "motor vehicle collision info exc. card"
I've been told this means that the other party was not charged, due to no witness's or conflicting stories, this could have a bearing on the insuramce especially if the other ...

The collision centre wouldn't assign fault percentages. If there was a charge to be laid, that's a possibility. The only person who needs to worry is the other driver, who will probably get a knock on the door.

Fault determinations is based on the Fault Determination Rules , which are standard for all insurance providers. The other driver is 100 ...

How should I approach this? It was an emergency

You might see it this way, but they'd probably disagree. It doesn't sound like any steps were taken for an active emergency. Did you inform the officer of the emergency? That your friend required immediate medical assistance? Why would the officer keep writing tickets while your friend is having ...

The officer didn't file the ticket for whatever reason. It's not exactly a regular occurrence, but it happens.

However, I don't think I would have dumped money into a paralegal here. Not all that necessary for what you wanted.

Turn was not in safety. You had the right of way. There's no reason for the fault to be split. Unless there's more to this story, it's pretty clear cut.

They changed it 2 years back when they increased the penalties for handheld driving.

What was in your hand?

If your wife was pulled over roadside, she would have been charged with driving while suspended. If there's some sort of odd circumstance that shows she didn't simply ignore her conviction and was unaware of a suspension, they'd likely take that into consideration at your summons date and go from there.

Insurance providers deny coverage for ...

It's your responsibility to make sure you can complete the turn in safety while yielding to all incoming traffic. The other driver has the right of way. Whether there is a signal wouldn't supersede your obligation to turn in safety.

Your video isn't currently available so I've attached somewhat of a recreation for others to comment.

The Ram is hardly excessive in speed. The fault is on you. His turn has priority over yours.

Agreed.

Unless you stop you car on the feet of the officer in a perfectly straight line, everything is technically going to be "on an angle", "curved", etc.

The error you are trying to prove benefits the driver. The device measures Point A to Point B in a straight line.

What you are essentially saying by bringing up this argument is that you ...

There's a bit of confusion over your interpretation of the first picture. All red light camera tickets will show your car right before the line. The first picture always looks like this. The intent of the first picture is to show the car approaching the intersection while the light is already red before you move over the line.

Whether or not your ...

1. I received 3 tickets 2 years ago: one for speeding (I went 16 over in a school zone not knowing it was a school zone), one for an expired ownership (I was driving my dad's car) and one for forgetting my insurance card at home. However I made a deal with the prosecutor and only had to pay the fine for not having my insurance card on me. My ...

You were already speeding while following the officer.

Is that not a bit of failed logic in the entrapment theory you've provided?

Why would an officer need to go through all this trouble when you're already sitting behind him and speeding?