Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.

Ontario Highway Traffic Act

Discuss the Ontario Highway Traffic Act.


Post Your Traffic Ticket, and Get Help!


The Ontario Traffic Ticket Forum!


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Check It Out
No unread posts New Set Fines Starting Sept 1st, 2015! Read and Learn Here.
  Print view

Prosecution refused disclosure for speeding charge.
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:59 pm 
Offline
Jr. Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:21 pm
Posts: 42
Hi all,
Need advice on how to handle refusal to disclose the following
1. Device purchase, calibration, test and repair history
2. Policies and instructions relating to laying of charges and operation of the radar.
3. Officer's training records
The reason stated was that the information is not in the possession of the prosecution and if it exists it is not relevant to the case.
If the reliability of the device and the training of the operator is not relevant I don't see how anyone can ever win a speeding case. As for the possession, shouldn't the prosecutor obtain the information if they don't have it?
Comments please!


Top
 Profile  
 
Re: Prosecution refused disclosure for speeding charge.
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 3:45 pm 
Offline
High Authority

Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 9:49 pm
Posts: 2110
Location: Ontario
I know for #3, training records do NOT need to be produced for disclosure. You can certainly question the officer about his/her training at trial, but it doesn't need to be disclosed ahead of time. Not sure how likely you are to get the other two items. #1 probably more likely then #2.


Top
 Profile  
 
Re: Prosecution refused disclosure for speeding charge.
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 11:38 am 
Offline
Jr. Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:21 pm
Posts: 42
Thanks for your reply Stanton.
Alright, I can question the training but how do I know whether it was sufficient if I don't know what was required in the first place? isn't #2 necessary to prove deficiencies? Same goes for #1, the radar could be a lemon, in and out of repair and I would have no way of knowing that. Another question I have, sorry about my ignorance but I am totally new at this, should I argue with the prosecution now or should I do wait till court and present my objections to the judge? At this point, other than requesting another disclosure and stating that I believe this information is very relevant and ask for it again is all I can think of and somehow I don't think it will be an effective strategy :(
Help please!


Top
 Profile  
 
Re: Prosecution refused disclosure for speeding charge.
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 5:26 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:21 am
Posts: 2933
Location: In YOUR rearview mirror!
2 & 3 are one and the same, officer has to be a trained radar operator. The operator has to have received training from a radar instructor, and to have been requalified as an operator within the past 2 years.

_________________
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca


Top
 Profile  
 
Re: Prosecution refused disclosure for speeding charge.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 8:36 am 
Offline
Jr. Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:21 pm
Posts: 42
thanks hwybear. well, that's exactly what i mean, you'd just stated some requirements for training which I can only assume are documented somewhere. Without knowing that the policy calls for re-qualification every 2 years I wouldn't question the training if for example the officer said he was re-qualified 3 years ago. Comments please?


Top
 Profile  
 
Re: Prosecution refused disclosure for speeding charge.
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 10:30 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:21 am
Posts: 2933
Location: In YOUR rearview mirror!
There is no documentation of the training, other than would be in a notebook on whatever date and would be very minimal (ie: radar training and for some of us "radar instructing") and that is it. I do not know any officer that would jeopardize credibility by not being current in training.

The 2 years is being extended to 3 years in near future or/as been sometime this year.

_________________
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca


Top
 Profile  
 
Re: Prosecution refused disclosure for speeding charge.
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 10:50 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:31 am
Posts: 684
It has been changed already to "at least every 36 months"


Top
 Profile  
 
Re: Prosecution refused disclosure for speeding charge.
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 2:17 pm 
Offline
Sr. Member

Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 8:08 pm
Posts: 550
can #1 & 2 be obtained through a FOI request?


Top
 Profile  
 
Re: Prosecution refused disclosure for speeding charge.
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 7:52 am 
Offline
Jr. Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:21 pm
Posts: 42
Thanks everyone. There are specific guidelines for training in radar operation http://www.docstoc.com/docs/66799986/On ... or-Devices so I would think records should exist. I am sure no individual officer would knowingly omit required training but if the requirement wasn't there in the first place that's a different story. I would think the prosecution would be more than happy to provide this info if everything was done by the book.

iFly55, yes I believe I can get all 3 items via Freedom of info and looks like I will have to go that route. I was surprised to learn that you have to pay for FOI, it's not much but still... I guess freedom isn't free after all;)


Top
 Profile  
 
Re: Prosecution refused disclosure for speeding charge.
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 9:23 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:31 am
Posts: 684
That document has been replaced in 2011 by an updated version and is no longer in force. Those guidelines are also exactly that. Guides. They hold no force in law. If you read them, they use words like "should" and "may". As for the officers training, ask them on the stand when he/she was originally trained and the last requal date. Problem solved.


Top
 Profile  
 
Re: Prosecution refused disclosure for speeding charge.
PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:52 pm 
Offline
Jr. Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:21 pm
Posts: 42
According to this it is a requirement to have procedures in place " Every chief of police shall establish procedures on traffic management, traffic law enforcement and road safety. O. Reg. 3/99, s. 8."
http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/e ... 0003_e.htm
That makes sense, I certainly hope that officer's are not just given a radar gun and left to train on motorists.
As for questioning the officer on training it doesn't solve the problem at all. I need to know if training taken = training required and questioning the officer will only give me training taken.


Top
 Profile  
 
Re: Prosecution refused disclosure for speeding charge.
PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:02 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:31 am
Posts: 684
Those are two totally different documents. The last one is part of the Police Services Act and is an actual Provincial law. The first document is a "guidline" There is some case law that speaks to "training" I just can't seem to find it at the moment but will be able to access it tomorrow. Will repost at that time. You may have to use a Freedom of Information Act request for policies and procedures that cover, traffic management, traffic law enforcement and road safety.


Top
 Profile  
 
Re: Prosecution refused disclosure for speeding charge.
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:51 am 
Offline
Jr. Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:21 pm
Posts: 42
Thanks Decatur. Did you manage to find anything?


Top
 Profile  
 
Re: Prosecution refused disclosure for speeding charge.
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:24 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:31 am
Posts: 684
I grabbed the wrong binder and am not back in until Thursday. In the mean time, try http://www.canlii.org/en/ Do a search on radar training. Just be aware that some of the decisions listed many be from lower courts and are not binding on others.
I'll try to grab it on Thursday.


Top
 Profile  
 
Re: Prosecution refused disclosure for speeding charge.
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:04 am 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 9:54 am
Posts: 12
pepsi,
i am going to jump into this discussion too as I did the same as you and prosecution did not give me the disclosure too.
here is a case law that should help.
http://www.canlii.org/eliisa/highlight. ... 50669.html

I also had requested the certificate of conformance for Lidar as the laser used on general public should be certified as safe and not making people blind. any thoughts on that?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Prosecution provides disclosure right away on the spot?

silencer

2

602

Wed Nov 13, 2013 10:46 am

Stanton View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Court Date refused through mail?...

Bookm

6

575

Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:59 am

puzzled View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Early resolution meeting refused

Ppe

3

1189

Wed Feb 04, 2015 7:15 am

bend View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Negotiating with Prosecution HELP PLEASE!

Ken1234

2

2303

Thu Oct 23, 2008 1:01 pm

ticketcombat View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Missed Early Prosecution meeting

m2kk

9

6381

Wed Nov 27, 2013 5:17 pm

aasghar View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Obtaining G licence before prosecution of G2 violation

Charac

7

849

Sat Mar 15, 2014 9:01 am

C_B View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Prosecution not req'd to disclose manual/testing procedures?

Whenaxis

5

376

Tue Jan 24, 2017 5:32 pm

jsherk View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Am Devastated with Speeding Charge

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2 ]

Helper

19

2157

Mon Jan 24, 2011 11:13 am

Helper View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Speeding charge by pacing

Richmondhiller

1

1110

Tue Mar 08, 2011 6:57 am

Stanton View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Speeding charge - Do I qualify for 11(b) - Need advice

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2 ]

lesami

15

1569

Fri May 23, 2014 1:53 pm

iFly55 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. speeding Stunt Driving charge

Moomoo

10

840

Sun Oct 23, 2016 5:08 pm

argyll View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Charge of Speeding - Officer wants to file adjornment?

Leafs87

2

1185

Mon Nov 25, 2013 8:08 pm

Leafs87 View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Web Development & Search Engine Optimization
Home | Court Listings | Ontario Traffic Ticket

Copyright 2007 - 2017 © Microtekblue Inc. Web Development & Search Engine Optimization Service. We Support phpBB All Rights Reserved.