Prospects Of Resolution With Prosecution Regarding Handheld Device While Driving?
Hi.
I was charged with having a handheld in my hand while driving. The fees are ridiculous (615 plus 280 for license reinstatement and the forthcoming insurance rates). I was wondering if prosecutors have shown mercy with the severity of the fines on these matters, or if I should not bother to ask. Anyone have experience of the prosecutors taking mercy on a young and struggling family, something other than a payment plan for the same amount of money?
- highwaystar
- Sr. Member
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 5:46 pm
Prosecutors can no longer lower the fine, the points nor the suspension period on that charge. The set fine on Drive Handheld is already at the minimum and the Ontario Court of Appeal has decided that the minimum penalty is the base (re: the Henry of Pelham decision). Of course, if you choose to go to trial, then the fine may also go up (but that's rare on a first offence). So, don't waste your time with an Early Resolution meeting. If you just need time to pay, you can set it down for trial and then plead guilty on your trial date and ask for time to pay then. That way, you get a few extra months till your trial day and then whatever additional time the JP gives you on your trial date.
Hello.
Thanks for your post, but I'm confused. As I read it, Henry of Pelham only limits s.59(2) of the POA as it applies to individuals - it affirms a high burden, apparently. But I don't see any basis to think that the decision eradicates the prospects lowering the fine. Of course, I could be wrong.
- highwaystar
- Sr. Member
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 5:46 pm
Unfortunately, you are limiting the decision's actual practical effect. You see, in practice, all offers must go before the court for acceptance. You can't just go to the counter and pay the lower amount offered by the prosecution after a resolution meeting. So, given the Henry of Pelham decision, the JP's hands are restricted in accepting any penalty that is lower than the minimum, even if both sides agree on such. So, prosecutors will not waste the court's time with offering penalties below the minimum. The defendant can still make a s. 59(2) POA application for relief on the minimum penalty but that's the exception now in success (especially given the remarks of the court), unlike in previous years when joint-position offers were proposed by the parties and JPs felt they could rely on discretion.
-
- Similar Topics
-
-
New post Ontario handheld device - what is definition of a button?
by torque133 in Hand-held devicesLast post by bend Sat Feb 29, 2020 1:36 pm
-
-
-
New post Rescheduled Early Resolution Meeting - 30 Days
by Ta85 in Courts and ProcedureLast post by highwaystar Thu Feb 13, 2020 9:43 pm
-
-
-
New post Video evidence - Wrongful charge for hand held device
by saftyfirst in Hand-held devicesLast post by saftyfirst Thu Sep 08, 2022 2:14 pm
-
-
-
New post Toronto Hand Held Device, Court Date = End of July 2020.
by Todayonly in Hand-held devicesLast post by Decatur Wed Jul 08, 2020 8:41 pm
-
-
-
New post Stunt driving and driving overthe limit by 50 km court summons.
by frostysam44 in Stunt DrivingLast post by frostysam44 Fri Jan 01, 2021 9:43 am
-
-
-
New post Careless Driving Ticket
by Torresac in Careless DrivingLast post by bend Tue Aug 16, 2022 11:20 pm
-
-
-
New post Careless driving to Turn Not In Safty?
by 740758694 in Careless DrivingLast post by Zatota Thu May 19, 2022 2:28 pm
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest