After how many days or weeks do insurance companies have access to the information that you've been convicted?
If convicted, how long for insurance companies to learn?
- Radar Identified
- High Authority

- Posts: 2881
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:26 pm
- Location: Toronto
Re: If convicted, how long for insurance companies to learn?
Theoretically, as soon as MTO knows, they could find out. Probably within a couple of days, but I can't say for sure.
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
Re: If convicted, how long for insurance companies to learn?
they will never find out unless they spend $5 (or whatever it costs) to pull your record from the MTO. as you can imagine, your insurance company has thousands of clients. they aren't going to spend tens of thousands annually to pull the driving record of every client. so if you don't give them a reason to look, chances are they probably won't know you were recently convicted.
in my experience, if you don't "touch" your file at the insurance company so it doesn't come to the top of the pile, your only chance of getting discovered is by random chance. however, if you're changing your addresses, filing claims, making modifications to your policy, odds are they will pull your record just to see what's up.
-
secretsquirrel
- Newbie

- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2011 5:54 pm
Re: If convicted, how long for insurance companies to learn?
I too have often wondered about the "right" and laws regarding Insurance companies having access to this information. Aside from telling them yourself when you are renewing or updating a Policy I can't see how they would have "legal" access to this information. Case in point is that one of the Forum members mentions that an Insurance Company can pay $5 to have your records pulled and sent to them. Really? What right do they have to this info and what right does MTO have in selling it???!!!! If this practice is in fact occurring I would be totally baffled if no one has challenged this yet. This is a clear violation of a right to privacy and what makes it all the worse is that MTO would be doing it for nothing more than profit. If anyone has any insight into this matter please post it.
-
Stanton
- High Authority

- Posts: 2111
- Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 8:49 pm
- Location: Ontario
-
Posting Awards
Re: If convicted, how long for insurance companies to learn?
secretsquirrel wrote:
I too have often wondered about the "right" and laws regarding Insurance companies having access to this information. Aside from telling them yourself when you are renewing or updating a Policy I can't see how they would have "legal" access to this information. Case in point is that one of the Forum members mentions that an Insurance Company can pay $5 to have your records pulled and sent to them. Really? What right do they have to this info and what right does MTO have in selling it???!!!! If this practice is in fact occurring I would be totally baffled if no one has challenged this yet. This is a clear violation of a right to privacy and what makes it all the worse is that MTO would be doing it for nothing more than profit. If anyone has any insight into this matter please post it.
Most contracts clearly state that you must disclose all convictions and your provider has the right to check your abstract at any time. While you could refuse to disclose this information, I can't imagine any provider would ever insure you. The only way I could see this being a violation of privacy laws would be if the information was just randomly sold. When you enter into a contract with an insurance company, you consent for this information to be shared with them.
- Radar Identified
- High Authority

- Posts: 2881
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:26 pm
- Location: Toronto
Re: If convicted, how long for insurance companies to learn?
secretsquirrel wrote:
This is a clear violation of a right to privacy and what makes it all the worse is that MTO would be doing it for nothing more than profit.
It is not a violation of your right to privacy. No one has a "right" to drive. The insurance companies are authorized to obtain that information under the Insurance Act. Don't want insurance companies having access to your driver history? Don't drive. The Financial Services Commission of Ontario oversees the insurance industry and specifically says that driver history is a valid basis for setting insurance rates; however, things like credit history are not.
Think about it: If a driver has numerous convictions and collisions, does it make sense for the insurance company to offer the same rates to that driver as someone who has no crashes and no convictions? We'd all be paying substantially higher rates to keep bad drivers on the road. Of course someone who would pay substantially higher rates would not volunteer their bad driver record to an insurance company unless they had another way of finding out, so the access to information is required.
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
Similar Topics
-
-
- Which driver's abstract does insurance companies check?
- Posted in Compulsory Automobile Insurance Act
- By HTANub on
- Replies: 2
-
-
-
- How long is too long for a charge to get a hearing.
- Posted in General Talk
- By applegrower on
- Replies: 2
-
-
-
- How long is too long to wait for a trial? *Hand held device*
- Posted in General Talk
- By Todayonly on
- Replies: 16
-
-
-
- Didn't Learn the 1st Time
- Posted in Stunt Driving
- By hwybear on
- Replies: 11
-
-
-
- Didn't learn the first time
- Posted in General Talk
- By Radar Identified on
- Replies: 1
-
-
-
- New Set Fines Starting Sept 1st, 2015! Read and Learn Here
- Posted in General Talk
- By Decatur on
- Replies: 1
-
-
-
-
- CTV News: Careless Driver Convicted After Boasting Online
- Posted in General Talk
- By Simon Borys on
- Replies: 2
-
-
-
- Disobey Sign HTA 182(2) - Convicted Today
- Posted in Failing to obey signs
- By bpassand on
- Replies: 2
-
-
-
- You should be convicted
- Posted in General Talk
- By getgrungy on
- Replies: 1
-
-
-
- Speeding ticket, convicted, want to appeal based on error
- Posted in Exceeding the speed limit by 30 to 49 km/h
- By gpolitop on
- Replies: 6
-
-
-
- Convicted, Paid, Going to appeal help
- Posted in Exceeding the speed limit by 30 to 49 km/h
- By Synnic on
- Replies: 1
-
-
-
- Help - Convicted by Mail - but had requested court date
- Posted in General Talk
- By mb2012 on
- Replies: 1
-
-
-
- Can I appeal a convicted 3rd impaired from 7 years ago
- Posted in Criminal Offences
- By nitpicker on
- Replies: 10
-
-
-
- Speeding Ticket - Was convicted - Never got notice of trial
- Posted in Exceeding the speed limit by 16 to 29 km/h
- By Nowisthetime on
- Replies: 1
-
-
-
-
-
-
Suspended for stunt driving, not convicted but still remain?
- Posted in General Talk
- By trinxified on
- Replies: 2
-
-
-
-
- Convicted 2X for IMPROPER LEFT w/o NOTICE OF TRIAL
- Posted in Courts and Procedure
- By Rollwith on
- Replies: 9
-
-
Featured Topics
No Right Turn - Disobey Sign
Hi There,
I was driving on Eglinton W and turn right on Strathearn (near Eglinton/Allen Road). There was a no right turn (from 3pm to 7pm) sign which I didn't see.
The cop was waiting there, apparently nobody sees the signs but they are there.
I don't believe I have much to do here but, trying to find…
Owner Notification in writing of Vehicle Impoundment Letter
I was presented with a summons to a stunt driving charge on November 1st and the vehicle ownership is under my dad's name for insurance reasons.
It says on my impoundment form there is supposed to be a form mailed to the owner to notify the owner of the vehicle impoundment.
My dad does not yet know…
115km/h on hwy 400
I know this technically doesn't fit on this board (3 demerit points) as it seems that 15km/h over just means a 50 dollar fine, I would like some advise though, I'm not sure how I should proceed.
The incident happened in Feb, driving south on highway 400 near Barrie. I was in the fast lane, doing…
Question regarding debris
Quick question about debris (broken taillights ect) from an accident and responsibility.
If someone hit something that broke off (not cargo), but 30 minutes after the original accident and other cars managed to avoid everything. The debris was avoidable who is responsible for damage to that car.
HELP: Stunt Driving (117 km/hr in a 40) + Speeding sec.128
Need some advice on reaching a plea deal with the prosecutor and how to go about talking to the crown. I'm not here to be lectured ect. I'm aware I made a mistake, and need advice on fixing it. So kindly keep comments about my impulsive decision to yourself.
Backstory:
I'm 19 with a g2 license. Was…
Is this legal (Lighting)?
Hi there,
I was just wondering if this is legal? From what I interpreted from the HTA, it is legal but the wording is very vague.
My car as of right now (stock) has the:
Inner light (closest to grille) as orange (on when parking lights/headlights are on and blink when turn signal is activated)
Outer…
Failure to stop within marked lane
Hello,
First post..... My fiancee this week was in an accident and she was handed a 3 demerit point 154 (1) (a) charge for 115 dollars or something and 3 demerit points.
Demerit points do not matter to insurance companies, convictions do ... is there a chance that she could go to court and the…
68 over ..
I was reading the other topic in this fourm.
I was on hwy 37 trying to make my girlfriends ganadmas mass and I live an hour away and I had an hour to get there so I was going fast but not 50 over untill some idiot got on my tail soo close that I was to concentrated on him that I kept going faster…
NEED HELP - Stunt charge - Some initial questions please
Got stopped for what I thought was going to be speeding, officer apparently had other ideas which needless to say surprised the heck out of me since Im positive I was not going over 150.
Ive done a LOT of reading already on here, Ticket Combat and some specific cases on Canlii (need to look up even…
Disobey Stop Sign ticket - Markham Dec09
I just received my first stop sign ticket in Markham. Has anyone successfully defended a stop sign ticket? If so, what strategies did you use? The officer that pulled me over said I slowed down but didn't stop. I felt that I stopped momentarily. I have no previous moving violations or…