I got 2 tickets in mid March 1. disobey stop sign: I intend to fight this 2. no currently validated permit: I had the permit with valid sticker when driving that day but missing the other identical half of it. The cop said to bring the other half to the court and they will cancel it. I filled out 2 notices of intention to appear for both tickets the next day and had stamps on both. However I received the Notice of Fine and due date for both tickets today (May 1) and it says that I have been convicted. It looks like that my forms of intention to appear in court went missing. What should i do now? Thanks for any input
I got 2 tickets in mid March
1. disobey stop sign: I intend to fight this
2. no currently validated permit: I had the permit with valid sticker when driving that day but missing the other identical half of it. The cop said to bring the other half to the court and they will cancel it.
I filled out 2 notices of intention to appear for both tickets the next day and had stamps on both.
However I received the Notice of Fine and due date for both tickets today (May 1) and it says that I have been convicted.
It looks like that my forms of intention to appear in court went missing. What should i do now?
Have you recently changed addresses or is the address on your licence exactly where you live right now? Did you really get your notice of trial in the mail and you or someone else put the envelope aside in a rush and forget about it? It's not a huge deal. Go to the court and reopen the case. You need to tell them why you are reopening the case because you didn't receive notice of trial.
Have you recently changed addresses or is the address on your licence exactly where you live right now? Did you really get your notice of trial in the mail and you or someone else put the envelope aside in a rush and forget about it?
It's not a huge deal. Go to the court and reopen the case. You need to tell them why you are reopening the case because you didn't receive notice of trial.
How is it everyone else's fault YOU comitted an offence?
No change of address. Sorry i should have been clear that the offence was in Mar 2013 and the conviction was in April 2013, so it was only one month gap, which means that the notice of trial has not been sent out. The only thing that can make sense to me is that my applications for intending to appear in court were lost. I agree with you also after doing some research that the resolution is reopening the matter. Thanks for input
HPTO wrote:
Have you recently changed addresses or is the address on your licence exactly where you live right now? Did you really get your notice of trial in the mail and you or someone else put the envelope aside in a rush and forget about it?
It's not a huge deal. Go to the court and reopen the case. You need to tell them why you are reopening the case because you didn't receive notice of trial.
No change of address.
Sorry i should have been clear that the offence was in Mar 2013 and the conviction was in April 2013, so it was only one month gap, which means that the notice of trial has not been sent out. The only thing that can make sense to me is that my applications for intending to appear in court were lost.
I agree with you also after doing some research that the resolution is reopening the matter.
No change of address. Sorry i should have been clear that the offence was in Mar 2013 and the conviction was in April 2013, so it was only one month gap, which means that the notice of trial has not been sent out. The only thing that can make sense to me is that my applications for intending to appear in court were lost. I agree with you also after doing some research that the resolution is reopening the matter. Thanks for input Called the court office today, a woman said same thing: reopen the case. One question though, do i have to pay the fine first while waiting for the reopening decision? Anyone?
greentea wrote:
HPTO wrote:
Have you recently changed addresses or is the address on your licence exactly where you live right now? Did you really get your notice of trial in the mail and you or someone else put the envelope aside in a rush and forget about it?
It's not a huge deal. Go to the court and reopen the case. You need to tell them why you are reopening the case because you didn't receive notice of trial.
No change of address.
Sorry i should have been clear that the offence was in Mar 2013 and the conviction was in April 2013, so it was only one month gap, which means that the notice of trial has not been sent out. The only thing that can make sense to me is that my applications for intending to appear in court were lost.
I agree with you also after doing some research that the resolution is reopening the matter.
Thanks for input
Called the court office today, a woman said same thing: reopen the case.
One question though, do i have to pay the fine first while waiting for the reopening decision?
I went the court house, asked to reopen the cases, they said it was their mistake so they would fix it and that i do not need to do anything, don't have to pay the fines just wait for notice of trial in the mail. Ok, I then asked to give me something in writing about what they just told me, but was told no receipt provided only verbal assurance. I then asked and spoke to the supervisor as well, but no dice. What a load of cr*p from these public (politician) servants!
tdottopcop wrote:
No
I went the court house, asked to reopen the cases, they said it was their mistake so they would fix it and that i do not need to do anything, don't have to pay the fines just wait for notice of trial in the mail.
Ok, I then asked to give me something in writing about what they just told me, but was told no receipt provided only verbal assurance. I then asked and spoke to the supervisor as well, but no dice.
What a load of cr*p from these public (politician) servants!
You should be clear about whether your case is being "reopened" or "appealed". Reopenings are governed by s. 11 of the POA. They are available only within 15 days of the conviction. Outside that time frame you would normally be talking about a full appeal, which is governed by Part VII of the POA (though possibly the court is reopening your case even if you are outside the 15 days, obviously I don't know). For appeals, s. 111(1) says you DO have to pay the fine before appealing, although I believe you can request an exception to that. Aside from whether you have to pay the fine up front or not, there are different procedures for reopenings and appeals. Again, it's important to know which one you are undertaking and regardless, unless you're familiar with how to conduct a reopening or appeal, consider contacting a lawyer or paralegal.
You should be clear about whether your case is being "reopened" or "appealed". Reopenings are governed by s. 11 of the POA. They are available only within 15 days of the conviction. Outside that time frame you would normally be talking about a full appeal, which is governed by Part VII of the POA (though possibly the court is reopening your case even if you are outside the 15 days, obviously I don't know). For appeals, s. 111(1) says you DO have to pay the fine before appealing, although I believe you can request an exception to that. Aside from whether you have to pay the fine up front or not, there are different procedures for reopenings and appeals. Again, it's important to know which one you are undertaking and regardless, unless you're familiar with how to conduct a reopening or appeal, consider contacting a lawyer or paralegal.
Its clear that my case is "reopened" because I was convicted without a hearing as I never received a notice of trial although I did file the notice of intention to appear (stamp on the ticket as proof) and Its still within 15 days after becoming aware of the conviction. I read that an "affidavit in support of a request for reopening" must be filed and a Justice will decide whether to grant the reopening or not. I am confident I will be granted the reopening as the bureaucrats already admitted that it was their fault and told me that they would fix it, they would reopen the case for me. But they refused to give me any receipt or writing to that effect so I have no proof of requesting the reopening. Can I trust that the bureaucrats will fix it behind the scene for me? What else can I do as there is still 8 days left before the reopening expires?
Simon Borys wrote:
You should be clear about whether your case is being "reopened" or "appealed". Reopenings are governed by s. 11 of the POA. They are available only within 15 days of the conviction. Outside that time frame you would normally be talking about a full appeal, which is governed by Part VII of the POA (though possibly the court is reopening your case even if you are outside the 15 days, obviously I don't know). For appeals, s. 111(1) says you DO have to pay the fine before appealing, although I believe you can request an exception to that. Aside from whether you have to pay the fine up front or not, there are different procedures for reopenings and appeals. Again, it's important to know which one you are undertaking and regardless, unless you're familiar with how to conduct a reopening or appeal, consider contacting a lawyer or paralegal.
Its clear that my case is "reopened" because I was convicted without a hearing as I never received a notice of trial although I did file the notice of intention to appear (stamp on the ticket as proof) and Its still within 15 days after becoming aware of the conviction.
I read that an "affidavit in support of a request for reopening" must be filed and a Justice will decide whether to grant the reopening or not.
I am confident I will be granted the reopening as the bureaucrats already admitted that it was their fault and told me that they would fix it, they would reopen the case for me. But they refused to give me any receipt or writing to that effect so I have no proof of requesting the reopening.
Can I trust that the bureaucrats will fix it behind the scene for me? What else can I do as there is still 8 days left before the reopening expires?
i lost my license in an accident i had to due my exceeding amount of demerit points. i went to jail and made bail i was put on a curfew of 9am to 9pm stupidly enough i did not follow and i got pulled over for driving with a different cars license plates, no insurance, and violating my curfew... i…
I was charged for disobey sign (no left turn) in a winter noon time around Bay/Edward (the prosecutor/judge said it to be a Absolute liability offences but disobey sign is actually a strict liability offence, right? And I found this: For example, if you made an illegal left-turn where there were…
so got fined with 69km in a 50km, at bottom of hill...didn't even have foot on the gas. first ticket ever in over 10 years of driving. fine was 62$ and 3 points.
cop says take to court and get demerit points reduced. didn't even let me speak and walks away.
On my way to work today I got a 110 dollar ticket + 2 demerit points.
I was driving north on Bathurst and turned left onto a side street into a residential area before hitting the lights at Eglinton and Bathurst. I normally do this to avoid the big line up to turn left onto Eglinton.
On the 400 extension EB towards Barrie cops like to hide out under an over pass that is Ski Trails Rd. They tag people as the come over the crest of the hill and that is 900m from where this officer was standing.
I'm confused because I knew this, saw the cop, and checked my…
I was making a left hand legal turn on a green light, a driver came through the lane I was supposed to be going into ran the red and hit me head on as I was turning into my lane. When the officer came he was telling me that I was racing and driving recklessly because apparently there was reports of…
Today i got caught doing 115 in a 90 at Mayfield and 410 and what I have been reading is that this offence is 3 points. Seeing this is my first offence I'm unsure if the ticket is supposed to I lost 3 points or is that just automatic. Also should I go to fight it to drop the points and just pay the…
I was (recently) involved in a traffic accident where, due to icy road conditions, I slid into oncoming traffic while making a right turn, while they were coming towards me and stopping at a stop sign. This was a residential area and there's no way I was exceeding anything over 20KM/h on…