- Reflections
- High Authority

- Posts: 1489
- Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:49 pm
- Location: somewhere in traffic
And another reason to strike down S.172
- Radar Identified
- High Authority

- Posts: 2881
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:26 pm
- Location: Toronto
Re: And another reason to strike down S.172
That Sergeant needed to be pulled from the road. The vehicle impoundment idea was nothing other than a gleeful attempt to show "those God-damn street racers" that "we're gonna get you." Then they went after everyone except the real street racers and, in this case, looks like that guy went after anyone he wanted to. Now there are allegations of him receiving kickbacks from towing companies.
One word: Travesty.
The easiest way to ensure that this does not happen again is to remove the vehicle impoundment part of the legislation. (Sigh... wish that would happen... probably won't until it goes up to the Ontario Court of Appeal or the Supreme Court of Canada.) Even the 7-day licence suspension doesn't sit well with me but the licence is property of the province so they can technically do what they want with it. Even then, a 24-hour suspension should suffice, it still stops them in their tracks and forces alternate arrangements. The only time a vehicle impoundment might be useful is if it is involved in a cannonball run, but then police could use the Criminal Code provisions and still seize the vehicle.
Re: And another reason to strike down S.172
I just thank God they caught that one and ONLY officer in the province who would have the gawl to over-extend his authority ![]()
- admin
- Site Admin

- Posts: 1126
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:04 pm
- Location: Guelph, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
-
Posting Awards
Moderator
Re: And another reason to strike down S.172
"I asked him why he pulled me over and he said, `Today I'm only picking white cars,'" recalls Breznica, who owns a white 2008 Mercedes-Benz and had his two young children in the back seat at the time. "I asked him if I was the only one driving around here with a white car, and he said yes. Honest to God, that's what he told me."
LOL ...This cop is funny! Glad he got arrested. What a Jerk!
Re: And another reason to strike down S.172
Ya i just read that to.
I wonder what Julian Fantino thinks of the road side trial now?
This is exactly why this law is garbage.
I like what the guy says about he is still down about 900 $ for the towing and storage fees.
172, needs to be changed and or scrapped.
Just one of thousands of people in Ontario screwed over by this law.
Justice!!!!!
And the officer, well he gets his day in court before being convicted, other people not so lucky.
- Radar Identified
- High Authority

- Posts: 2881
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:26 pm
- Location: Toronto
Re: And another reason to strike down S.172
Fantino still thinks the roadside trial is amazing. Imagine his reaction if the SIU were given the same sort of arbitrary, irrevocable authority.
He'd be foaming at the mouth. I'm not suggesting the SIU should be given anything like that, but still, just imagine.
Complete silence from the powers-that-be at Queen's Park. I wonder why that might be.
I'm sure they'll pass it off as an isolated incident, try to divert attention saying it is necessary in the interest of safety (e.g. "look at how deaths have gone down - never mind the high gas prices and the effect it has") and then start chewing people out: "How can you support speeding? Think of the children!" In other words, try to change the subject, because dealing with the issue is too difficult.
Re: And another reason to strike down S.172
Oh ya don't forget about those CO2 emissions from driving to fast R.I
- racer
- Moderator

- Posts: 957
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:27 pm
- Location: Guelph, Ontario
- Contact:
-
Posting Awards
Moderator
Re: And another reason to strike down S.172
...nothing can make up for the $950 he had to pay the tow truck company and the hundreds of dollars he spent on taxis for the week his car was impounded...
Perhaps using the suspension pay to recoup those losses could do the trick?
"The hardest thing to explain is the obvious"
Ontario Traffic Ticket | Ontario Highway Traffic Act
Re: And another reason to strike down S.172
Radar Identified wrote:
Fantino still thinks the roadside trial is amazing. Imagine his reaction if the SIU were given the same sort of arbitrary, irrevocable authority.
He'd be foaming at the mouth. I'm not suggesting the SIU should be given anything like that.
SIU????
The guys and gals with them fancy ball jackets on?
The guys and gals who are investagating a record number of cases this year?
The same guys and gals who have done nothing since Martin left?
The same guys and gals the province is going to call to look at the OPP and the AG illegal conduct up in Barrie this week?
This crook will be on Paid vacation for 3 years.
- Radar Identified
- High Authority

- Posts: 2881
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:26 pm
- Location: Toronto
Re: And another reason to strike down S.172
Yes, what I'm saying is imagine how Julian Fantino would feel if his officers were subjected to an immediate, irrevocable punishment without any proof by another agency, so I picked the SIU. So imagine if they got called to a collision scene under that context: Well, I haven't done an investigation, there's nothing proven yet - so I'll issue an immediate termination of the officer's employment and 7 days in jail to "safeguard" the public. How would Fantino like that? He'd go off like Krakatoa.
No one should be subject to the type of irreversible punishment imposed at the roadside that s. 172 brings, not in a "free and democratic" country anyway.
- Reflections
- High Authority

- Posts: 1489
- Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:49 pm
- Location: somewhere in traffic
Re: And another reason to strike down S.172
Radar Identified wrote:
How would Fantino like that? He'd go off like Krakatoa.
Mass destruction, short period of time..... Fantino may have a new nickname ![]()
- Radar Identified
- High Authority

- Posts: 2881
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:26 pm
- Location: Toronto
Re: And another reason to strike down S.172
He'd be Julian "the Volcano" Fantino.
- Reflections
- High Authority

- Posts: 1489
- Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:49 pm
- Location: somewhere in traffic
Re: And another reason to strike down S.172
That's got a nice ring to it, "And in this corner, weighing in at 270lbs, 50lbs of ego, The Volcano"......Let's get ready to rumbllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllle.
Re: And another reason to strike down S.172
Maybee BelSti would fight him.
With his dogs on the side of the ring with the Anti 172 Shirts!!!!
1 Hit for every unconstitutional road side trial ! ![]()
- racer
- Moderator

- Posts: 957
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:27 pm
- Location: Guelph, Ontario
- Contact:
-
Posting Awards
Moderator
Re: And another reason to strike down S.172
tdrive2 wrote:
1 Hit for every unconstitutional road side trial !
Ohhh, that will be not a "pizza face" but a "pizza body". Bel would also have to have enough body strength to deliver 12000 punches, or 1000 punches per round. That's 5-6 hits per second. Bel would probably get the nickname "Helicopter" after that!
"The hardest thing to explain is the obvious"
Ontario Traffic Ticket | Ontario Highway Traffic Act
Similar Topics
-
-
- Another reason not to run
- Posted in Police Cruisers and Vehicles
- By Radar Identified on
- Replies: 1
-
-
-
- Another Victim of HTA 172
- Posted in General Talk
- By BelSlySTi on
-
-
-
-
S.128 and S.172(1) and s.130 and s.8(1) - is possible all to
- Posted in Stunt Driving
- By driver on
- Replies: 6
-
-
-
-
- 117 in 80 with decent reason
- Posted in Exceeding the speed limit by 30 to 49 km/h
- By Jamie K on
- Replies: 2
-
-
-
- Suspended due to medical reason
- Posted in Driving While Suspended
- By Buemi on
- Replies: 2
-
-
-
- Failed to wear belt with medical reason: still ticketed
- Posted in Driver failing to wear a seat belt
- By earthbelowus on
- Replies: 4
-
-
-
- 3 tickets for everything except the reason i got pulled over
- Posted in Compulsory Automobile Insurance Act
- By mistry on
- Replies: 8
-
-
-
- cellphone ticket-can a decent reason do anyting?
- Posted in General Talk
- By camlea on
- Replies: 4
-
-
-
- No By-Law to Cover Reason for Parking Ticket
- Posted in Parking Tickets
- By PhantomInferno on
- Replies: 2
-
-
-
- Reducing fine: Police stop car for no reason or made-up one
- Posted in General Talk
- By northexposure on
- Replies: 19
-
-
-
- Parking ticket for no reason?
- Posted in Parking Tickets
- By bmz on
- Replies: 5
-
-
-
-
- Section 172 and Section 128
- Posted in Stunt Driving
- By jsiddiqi on
- Replies: 2
-
-
-
- Jeep Wrangler with Windshield Down?
- Posted in General Talk
- By jonhimself on
- Replies: 7
-
-
-
- NEW section...scroll down
- Posted in General Talk
- By hwybear on
-
-
-
- SLOW DOWN - Hwy 401 West of London
- Posted in General Talk
- By hwybear on
- Replies: 13
-
-
-
- Bad Wreck down the road...
- Posted in General Talk
- By Bookm on
- Replies: 25
-
-
-
- Nutcase tries to run down an officer to avoid traffic ticket
- Posted in General Talk
- By Radar Identified on
- Replies: 2
-
-
-
- DVP ticket coming down hill at Eglington
- Posted in Exceeding the speed limit by 30 to 49 km/h
- By Off_Camber on
- Replies: 7
-
-
-
- WINTER... SLOW DOWN .... MOVE OVER....DONT DRIVE
- Posted in General Talk
- By hwybear on
- Replies: 1
-
Featured Topics
lift laws, bumper height laws, headlight height laws
hey all im lifting my 03 f350 crew cab..
and ive called 3 different local police stations with NO HELP AT ALL...
im wondering...
is there bumper height laws?
headlight height laws?
what is a headlight?? ( like can i put any light at the proper level and it be legal?? or does it have to be a certain…
Falsely Accused of Handheld Device Usage
Hi!
This is my first time ever getting a ticket and I am completely frustrated and don't know what to do.
On July 7th, I was driving to work, taking my usual route and it's about a 15 minute drive for me. At the first red light, I noticed I had a bit of time thanks to the countdown so I quickly…
Radar Gun Error Code & Incomplete Disclosure
Hello,
I'm hoping somebody can point me in the right direction to track down various radar gun error codes.
Way back in March of this year I was stopped for speeding, 86kmh in a 60 Community Safety Zone, on Mayfield Rd., on the outskirts of Brampton. (Aloa school)
The cop was using hand held radar,…
Fail to Stop for School Bus- Owner - 175 (20)
Hi everyone,
My husband was driving my car and passed a school bus with flashing lights. He did not realize this until he was past the bus. The driver honked at him but there were no cops nearby and he didn't get pulled over. I believe the driver or witnesses reported this and we got issued a…
Prohibited Turn Sign Cannot be Seen
Hey guys I was hoping for some advice on my first ever ticket.
I just moved to the Aurora area and made a prohibited left turn between the prohibited hours. This is my very first ticket so I am unsure as to how to precede. I have already requested and received my court date and I assume the next…
Novice Driver B.A.C Above 0%
heres the story
i am 25 with a G2 Drivers license. had a lot to drink saturday night. woke up the next morning and drove home around 1pm sunday. got pulled over for speeding, police officer smelled booze had me blow a breathalyzer. i blew 0.035 . he aloud my passenger to drive my truck home. he gave…
Red Light Camera has extended delay for ticket
Hello Folks,
Well please confirm a couple of things.
1> Red Light Camera ticket is a "parking ticket" in essence, does not go on the record, so could just pay and forget.
2> Can early resolution, bring down the ticket fine, only reason would be excellent driving record, last 10 years. If…
Improper Left Turn: Harbor & Yonge St
Hi, last summer I was pulled over when I made a left turn from he middle lane at Harbor and Yonge Street (heading east on the Gardiner and taking the Yonge exit). I swear they nabbed about 10 people in 5 minutes. Anyways, I decided to challenge in court, my court date is in April and I have just…
How To Fight A No Seatbelt Ticket
The key ruling on fighting a seatbelt ticket is R. v. Kanda, 2008 and an example of it's application is R. v. Gupta, 2008.
In Kanda, the court established that this offence is a strict liability charge. In other words, you can offer a defence of due diligence. In Kanda the defendant explained the…
Have trial next week for Failure to Obey Stop Sign
Last July I got pulled over for failure to obey stop sign at a T-intersection in my neighbourhood. After I got my trial date I requested disclosure in November. Sent in another request for disclosure in early January and in mid-January got a call to pick it up at the court office. The disclosure…