Today I got 3 tickets and one of them was Fail to surrender insurance 3(1), Drive motor vehicle no currently validatied and Fail to surrender permit motor vehilce The reason i got pulled over was because i was in the left lane trying to get in to the right lane because there was construction up ahead. there were appreaently two signs that said" right lane must exit" on to the highway. i didn't need to exit and there was cars bumper to bumper so i tried to give my left signal and and pull to the left. a car behind me honked because i was blocking its way from going on the the highway. the car infront of me went in to the left lane passing the highway as well as the soild white line . I tried to do the same but little did i know the person that i was trying to go infront of was a undercover cop. I am an occasional driver for the vehicle and I DO have insurance but it was not present at the time He said that " just because the person infront of me got away with it doesnt mean i can too " that is so unfair! anywho , he didn't take of any demirit point or anything, but he said that if i do appear in court then he will have to say: why i got pulled over. what should i do ?:(
Today I got 3 tickets and one of them was Fail to surrender insurance 3(1), Drive motor vehicle no currently validatied and Fail to surrender permit motor vehilce
The reason i got pulled over was because i was in the left lane trying to get in to the right lane because there was construction up ahead.
there were appreaently two signs that said" right lane must exit" on to the highway. i didn't need to exit and there was cars bumper to bumper so i tried to give my left signal and and pull to the left. a car behind me honked because i was blocking its way from going on the the highway. the car infront of me went in to the left lane passing the highway as well as the soild white line . I tried to do the same but little did i know the person that i was trying to go infront of was a undercover cop.
I am an occasional driver for the vehicle and I DO have insurance but it was not present at the time
He said that " just because the person infront of me got away with it doesnt mean i can too "
that is so unfair!
anywho , he didn't take of any demirit point or anything, but he said that if i do appear in court then he will have to say: why i got pulled over.
Regardless of demerit points, 3 convictions will definitely impact your insurance rates. I'd request a pretrial meeting with the Crown and try to work out a deal. Hopefully they'd be willing to drop one or two of the charges in exchange for a guilty plea on the third.
Regardless of demerit points, 3 convictions will definitely impact your insurance rates. I'd request a pretrial meeting with the Crown and try to work out a deal. Hopefully they'd be willing to drop one or two of the charges in exchange for a guilty plea on the third.
Hey thank you so much if i go to court however and he states the reason of why i got pulled over are they allowed to take the demirit points off? or it must at the incident?
Hey thank you so much
if i go to court however and he states the reason of why i got pulled over
Demerit points are administrative actions taken by the MTO. They only go on your record if you are convicted of, or plead guilty to, an offence that has demerit points. The courts and the police have zero control over it. If you get convicted of any offence with demerit points, MTO will automatically tack them on your record. If you don't get convicted of that offence, you don't get demerit points. However - NONE of the offences you got ticketed for have demerit points. That said, as Stanton points out, your insurance company will likely hammer you because you'd have three convictions (if you get convicted, that is). "Drive no currently validated permit" is often considered a major offence by insurance companies. You should try to offer to plead guilty to one or two of the offences in exchange for dropping the other. Get your permit updated and make sure that all of your paperwork is in the car at all times. You HAVE to carry it with you. If you go to court, they can't just charge you with a new offence mid-way through the trial, so admitting to trying to cut in at the last second is not going to result in a new charge against you. They have up to six months to file a new charge. So that's good news for you. Next time you get in a similar situation, just exit the highway and get back on it. The road will still be there.
Demerit points are administrative actions taken by the MTO. They only go on your record if you are convicted of, or plead guilty to, an offence that has demerit points. The courts and the police have zero control over it. If you get convicted of any offence with demerit points, MTO will automatically tack them on your record. If you don't get convicted of that offence, you don't get demerit points.
However - NONE of the offences you got ticketed for have demerit points. That said, as Stanton points out, your insurance company will likely hammer you because you'd have three convictions (if you get convicted, that is). "Drive no currently validated permit" is often considered a major offence by insurance companies. You should try to offer to plead guilty to one or two of the offences in exchange for dropping the other. Get your permit updated and make sure that all of your paperwork is in the car at all times. You HAVE to carry it with you.
If you go to court, they can't just charge you with a new offence mid-way through the trial, so admitting to trying to cut in at the last second is not going to result in a new charge against you. They have up to six months to file a new charge. So that's good news for you.
Next time you get in a similar situation, just exit the highway and get back on it. The road will still be there.
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
thank you, i would have gone on the highway but i only have my G2 not my G. the reason i asked you about my demirit points was because the cop pulled me over because i Failed to obey the sign... which could have lead to the points being taken off but luckily he didn't. and he told me if i come to court he willl have to tell them why he pulled me over . Indirectly it meant to me that if i dont pay the fine and end up coming to court I'm screwed because he would state the reason of me being pulled over.
thank you, i would have gone on the highway but i only have my G2 not my G.
the reason i asked you about my demirit points was because the cop pulled me over because i Failed to obey the sign...
which could have lead to the points being taken off but luckily he didn't. and he told me if i come to court he willl have to tell them why he pulled me over .
Indirectly it meant to me that if i dont pay the fine and end up coming to court I'm screwed because he would state the reason of me being pulled over.
http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statut ... quote]PART I COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS BY CERTIFICATE OF OFFENCE Certificate of offence and offence notice Service (3) The offence notice or summons shall be served personally upon the person charged within thirty days after the alleged offence occurred. R.S.O. 1990, c. P.33, s. 3 (3).[/quote]unless your trial is within 30-days after your alleged offense, i believe the officer/crown can't introduce the Disobey Sign HTA infraction at trial @Radar Identified can they issue a Summons for Disobey Sign? http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statut ... quote]PART V GENERAL PROVISIONS Limitation 76. (1) A proceeding shall not be commenced after the expiration of any limitation period prescribed by or under any Act for the offence or, where no limitation period is prescribed, after six months after the date on which the offence was, or is alleged to have been, committed.[/quote]
COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS BY CERTIFICATE OF OFFENCE
Certificate of offence and offence notice
Service
(3) The offence notice or summons shall be served personally upon the person charged within thirty days after the alleged offence occurred. R.S.O. 1990, c. P.33, s. 3 (3).[/quote]unless your trial is within 30-days after your alleged offense, i believe the officer/crown can't introduce the Disobey Sign HTA infraction at trial
76. (1) A proceeding shall not be commenced after the expiration of any limitation period prescribed by or under any Act for the offence or, where no limitation period is prescribed, after six months after the date on which the offence was, or is alleged to have been, committed.[/quote]
I thought you can drive on the highway with G2 without any problem. Am I missing something in here, as I have been doing that for the past 6 months. I did not see that condition on the paper given to me when I got my G2, though I remember having one for alcohol tolerance of Zero and the limit on kids in the car & so on, but nothing was about driving on the highway. Thanks, Erick
I thought you can drive on the highway with G2 without any problem. Am I missing something in here, as I have been doing that for the past 6 months.
I did not see that condition on the paper given to me when I got my G2, though I remember having one for alcohol tolerance of Zero and the limit on kids in the car & so on, but nothing was about driving on the highway.
Thanks,
Erick
mistry wrote:
thank you, i would have gone on the highway but i only have my G2 not my G.
the reason i asked you about my demirit points was because the cop pulled me over because i Failed to obey the sign...
which could have lead to the points being taken off but luckily he didn't. and he told me if i come to court he willl have to tell them why he pulled me over .
Indirectly it meant to me that if i dont pay the fine and end up coming to court I'm screwed because he would state the reason of me being pulled over.
Yes, a summons can be issued in lieu of an offence notice even for charges with a set fine. Its not a common practice, but there are certain circumstances where it may be warranted. Common reasons why: 1) More than 30 days have passed since the offence took place. 2) There are multiple charges, one of which has no set fine, therefor all charges would be laid by way of summons, even those with set fines (not required but best practice). 3) Seeking more severe punishment then set fine for serious or repeat offence. In regards to the 30 day limit in the first section youve quoted, thats referring to when the Court proceeds by way of a regular ticket (certificate of offence) versus the Part III summons (which are different than a certificate of offence summons). So even if the initial charges were laid on a regular ticket, the officer could still lay an additional charge up to six months after the fact by way of summons. That being said, I've never heard of it being done. The only time police tend to wait to lay a charge is when a matter takes some time to investigate.
iFly55 wrote:
can they issue a Summons for Disobey Sign?
Yes, a summons can be issued in lieu of an offence notice even for charges with a set fine. Its not a common practice, but there are certain circumstances where it may be warranted.
Common reasons why:
1) More than 30 days have passed since the offence took place.
2) There are multiple charges, one of which has no set fine, therefor all charges would be laid by way of summons, even those with set fines (not required but best practice).
3) Seeking more severe punishment then set fine for serious or repeat offence.
In regards to the 30 day limit in the first section youve quoted, thats referring to when the Court proceeds by way of a regular ticket (certificate of offence) versus the Part III summons (which are different than a certificate of offence summons). So even if the initial charges were laid on a regular ticket, the officer could still lay an additional charge up to six months after the fact by way of summons.
That being said, I've never heard of it being done. The only time police tend to wait to lay a charge is when a matter takes some time to investigate.
You are right. There is no restriction on driving on any highway in Ontario if you have a G2. It's if you have a G1 that you can't drive on a 400-Series Highway or roads like the Don Valley Parkway, the EC Row Expressway in Windsor or the Conestoga Parkway in Kitchener-Waterloo. @iFly55: Stanton beat me to it... but yes they can issue a summons for Disobey Sign, although it is VERY unlikely. @mistry: You were ticketed for "paperwork issues." Main thing I'd worry about is showing that all of your paperwork is up-to-date and in order, and then trying to plead down a couple of your offences - or offer to plead guilty to one or two in exchange for dropping another.
m5lover wrote:
I thought you can drive on the highway with G2 without any problem. Am I missing something in here, as I have been doing that for the past 6 months.
You are right. There is no restriction on driving on any highway in Ontario if you have a G2. It's if you have a G1 that you can't drive on a 400-Series Highway or roads like the Don Valley Parkway, the EC Row Expressway in Windsor or the Conestoga Parkway in Kitchener-Waterloo.
@iFly55:
Stanton beat me to it... but yes they can issue a summons for Disobey Sign, although it is VERY unlikely.
@mistry:
You were ticketed for "paperwork issues." Main thing I'd worry about is showing that all of your paperwork is up-to-date and in order, and then trying to plead down a couple of your offences - or offer to plead guilty to one or two in exchange for dropping another.
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
I got ticket for failing to stop at stop sign in Toronto. i heard that the police officer must see the stop line, if there is one, from where he was sitting. That is exactly my case, Is it a strong case? If so do i need a picture to show that there is a stop line and a picture to show that he could not see the stop line from where he was sitting?
I got a ticket, Disobey stop sign, sec 136.1.a on dec 6th
I made a left in an intersection and was pulled over by a police officer in an unmarked car who had been sitting down the road. A classic fishing hole situation. I was genuinely surprised when he stopped me and told me I went through a stop sign without even slowing down. I know to shut up and be polite and take the ticket. I…
Yesterday morning, I rear-ended someone. I was going the speed limit. The sun was directly in front of me and it blinded my windshield and my eyes. At the same time, the person in front of me stopped/slowed down (also due to the sun). I started to slow down but didn't stop and I hit them since I couldn't see anything. I was not driving too close initially. I…
I was driving in the county at night and hit a limousine stretched out side ways across the road. The limo had its lights on and had side lighting as well. The police officer charged me with careless driving because it was "fully lit up".
It took me to the next day to figure out what had happened - what I remember made no sense. What I had run across was a "false visual reference" illusion.
I was on hwy 37 trying to make my girlfriends ganadmas mass and I live an hour away and I had an hour to get there so I was going fast but not 50 over untill some idiot got on my tail soo close that I was to concentrated on him that I kept going faster untill I got pulled over at 147 on an 80 km hwy.
I alreaddy lost 3 points and this time was just the…
Hello, got stopped today for rolling a stop sign. Ticket says failure to stop, but quotes hta 1361b.
Doesn't 1361b mean failure to yield?
Is this a fatal error? Or could it be amended at trial. How can I prepare a defence if I don't know if I'm defending the failure to stop or the failure to yield?
After he was providing me with a ticket for failure to obey to the stop sign (I am pretty sure I stopped but less than 3 seconds recommended by my driver ed. instructor), I know everybody say that..as an excuse.
Then he stopped me again to return the documents.
Any advice and feed back would be really appreciated.
Can you get evidence for whether someone had an advanced green at an intersection? My dad was making a right turn on a red (after stopping) into a plaza parking lot. He got hit by someone making a left turn from the opposite lane. The driver told the officer called to the collision that he had an advance green. My dad said he came out of nowhere which makes me…
So i was driving on Eglinton Avenue East near Rosemount Ave.
The school bus was on the the curb on the opposite side of the road while i was travelling on the middle lane of the three-laned Eglinton Avenue East (five lanes apart plus a raised median island seperating the traffic)
I could not see the school bus as my view of the bus was being obstructed by the cars in front of me and on my left hand…
Lots of good information on getting disclosure from the Crown here.
Now, I am just wondering if I will be relying upon evidence of my own at trial... do I have to voluntarily send this material to the Crown in a reasonable time before the trial, or only if they request disclosure from me?
This morning I had an exam for university. I was studying the entire night and i wanted to catch like maybe 1-2 hours of sleep before the exam so i went to sleep. I woke up like 5 hrs after and realize that I was about to miss my exam. I still could have made it so I asked my dad for his car since I was in a huge rush and he gave it to me.
I went on the highway and I was going at 135 km/h but…
the police officer was in in the opesite oncumming lane he was fallowing another car so close that i was not even able to see his cruser till he was buy he said that i was going 111 in a 80 he said he hade me on radar he only asked for me drivers licencs and never asked for my insurence so on the ticket there no insurence dose enyone think i can beat this i wana take it to cort becuse he was…
Hi I have a couple questions so I'll explain my situation and any advice would be appreciated.
Can't remember exact date so lets call it some time in 2008 I got a fine for $5000.00 for driving without in insurance. I never paid the fine and in 2012 I was pulled over and the officer asked to see my license. Although I had it on me I figured it would be under suspension for the unpaid fine from…
Alright, so I did something really stupid the other day, I was driving down a country road and wanted to hit the curves so I passed 3 cars at once, inadvertently making it up to very much past 50 over (80 limit)... Much to my chagrin there was a cop coming in the opposite direction who immediately skidded on the gravel shoulder and who I thought was 100% going to turn around and pull me over,…
Anyone know how backed this courthouse is? I submitted my ticket for trial at the end of August, and still no letter. Im scared it got lost in the mail, can i call the courthouse and find out my courtdate? Or would i have to go in personally?
I recently received a ticket for failure to use low beams - while following - Ticket was issued Sec 168 (
- it was on the 401 and no one was within 500 meters of me, I was warning a oncoming vehicle that there was an officer hiding (which is not illegal or I could not find a law against it) it was a police vehicle travelling at very high rate of speed in the opposite direction with no lights on…
I received a warning letter from MTO for a 2pts ticket.What happened is that the police officer issued a "unsafe left turn" and then changed the ticket to "failed to signal" at the scene, but she submitted both tickets!!! And I !!!ONLY!!! received the latter ticket from her(I requested trial for "failed to signal"). I recently received notice from MTO that I'm convicted for "unsafe left turn".
Hello everyone! I was given a ticket for using a hand-held communication device while driving. It was 3 am, I was at a stop light and the cop saw me with the my phone in my hand. I told him i was just checking the time on it. I received the notes a few weeks ago ill copy them down below. Any help is appreciated although i believe there's no hope for me. The cop recorded me saying what phone i…
I got pulled over about 15 or so days ago the court till this date has not received the summons what is the legal time period that the court has to follow to accept the summons from the office court says its 15 days is the legal timeframe the officer has to serve it on the court
I requested for disclosure of information two months ago.
I received the radar manual after one month, but not others (including maintenance/calibration record of the radar, certificate of police training). On further pursuit, the prosecutor told me that he did not have them and he did not see why I needed these documents. He said he did not know where to get them when I asked.
Last Friday I was pulled over by an OPP motorcycle cop who informed me I was going 134. I was on the SB 404, I did see him parked under a bridge and when I passed him he was not on his bike.
I'm hoping to get some insight for a defense in this case.
I was in lane 1 and I had a car in front of me, and a car behind me, also there was a car speeding down Lane 3 passing everyone and moved quickly into…