My friend has her court date in the morning and is in need of help. At the time of the ticketing, she had her G2 for two months. Here is what happened. We were coming back from Barrie, she was making a right turn on a red light and did a rolling stop. She was not pulled over for at least five minutes after that and had no idea why she was being pulled over. She was under the impression that you only had to yield to oncoming traffic when making a right on the red unless there was a sign saying stop here on red, which at this set of lights there was no such sign. She explained the situation to the officer, but ended up getting the maximum fine of $325 and 3 demerit points. This was her first offence and she has not received any tickets or traffic violations since then. She has already put in the plea of not guilty, which is what the court date resulted from. In the Guide for defendants for provincial offences cases, it stated: Strict liability is one of the lines of defences and it says "you may raise a defence that you reasonably believed in a mistaken set of facts, which, if true, would render the act innocent". What would be her best option in order to get the fine dropped or at least not get the points?
My friend has her court date in the morning and is in need of help. At the time of the ticketing, she had her G2 for two months. Here is what happened.
We were coming back from Barrie, she was making a right turn on a red light and did a rolling stop. She was not pulled over for at least five minutes after that and had no idea why she was being pulled over. She was under the impression that you only had to yield to oncoming traffic when making a right on the red unless there was a sign saying stop here on red, which at this set of lights there was no such sign. She explained the situation to the officer, but ended up getting the maximum fine of $325 and 3 demerit points. This was her first offence and she has not received any tickets or traffic violations since then. She has already put in the plea of not guilty, which is what the court date resulted from.
In the Guide for defendants for provincial offences cases, it stated:
Strict liability is one of the lines of defences and it says "you may raise a defence that you reasonably believed in a mistaken set of facts, which, if true, would render the act innocent".
What would be her best option in order to get the fine dropped or at least not get the points?
At this point, its a little late to file for a disclosure to see what evidence the officer has against her, and base your argument against that. Best thing to do is show up and hope that the officer doesn't show up, otherwise, if he does, just apologize, say it was an honest mistake, you will probably get it reduced to a lower charge.
At this point, its a little late to file for a disclosure to see what evidence the officer has against her, and base your argument against that. Best thing to do is show up and hope that the officer doesn't show up, otherwise, if he does, just apologize, say it was an honest mistake, you will probably get it reduced to a lower charge.
This is probably written down in the officers notes. If you hadn't waited till the absolute last second, you could have requested disclosure and found out for sure. If she's already admitted guilt to the officer (which it sounds like she already has), good luck at a trial. It's over before it even starts. Your friend had a G2 for 2 months. It's hardly something to boast about, but there's still a chance they'll reduce the charge in return for a guilty plea. Going through a red is an absolute liability offense, not a strict liability. You'll talk to the prosecutor before any trial will take place. Just show up and listen to them. They'll likely make you an offer just for showing up, but not if you start throwing out reasons why you think you're not guilty. At that point they'll have no choice but to continue with a trial. They are not going to force a plea on someone who believes they are not guilty.
Will.Moreland wrote:
She explained the situation to the officer, but ended up getting the maximum fine of $325 and 3 demerit points.
This is probably written down in the officers notes. If you hadn't waited till the absolute last second, you could have requested disclosure and found out for sure. If she's already admitted guilt to the officer (which it sounds like she already has), good luck at a trial. It's over before it even starts.
Will.Moreland wrote:
This was her first offence and she has not received any tickets or traffic violations since then. She has already put in the plea of not guilty, which is what the court date resulted from.
Your friend had a G2 for 2 months. It's hardly something to boast about, but there's still a chance they'll reduce the charge in return for a guilty plea.
Will.Moreland wrote:
In the Guide for defendants for provincial offences cases, it stated:
Strict liability is one of the lines of defences and it says "you may raise a defence that you reasonably believed in a mistaken set of facts, which, if true, would render the act innocent".
Going through a red is an absolute liability offense, not a strict liability.
Will.Moreland wrote:
What would be her best option in order to get the fine dropped or at least not get the points?
You'll talk to the prosecutor before any trial will take place. Just show up and listen to them. They'll likely make you an offer just for showing up, but not if you start throwing out reasons why you think you're not guilty. At that point they'll have no choice but to continue with a trial. They are not going to force a plea on someone who believes they are not guilty.
I got a speeding ticket on the 401 by Cornwall. The officer said I was going 140 initially then dropped it to 130 (for the record I don't believe for a second I was going 140, that's way faster than I would ever intentionally drive). I filled out the info on the back of the notice to request a…
I was recently charged with stunt driving on a 60kmh road. When I was pulled over, the officer told me I was going almost 100kmh (still 40kmh above the limit) but was charging me for stunt driving because I accelerated quickly from an intersection on an empty road (in a straight line). I know…
what to do about a an illegal right turn onto steeles from staines rd
got the ticket around october of last year
put it to trial
so there is a big mess of cars at this intersection and I see a cop outside standing directing traffic with a huge row of cars pulled over to the side, through…
Are any non-domestic vehicles "pursuit-rated" in North America? Also have the Michigan State Police (this is relevant because apparently they have the most accepted selection/testing process) tested any of them to see if they meet their criteria? Just curious...
Ottawa, Canada (AHN) - Beginning Tuesday, or April Fool's Day 2008, fines on Quebec drivers caught overspeeding will be doubled. It is not only the money penalty that will go up, but also demerit points.
The new law, Bill 42, is similar to Ontario's street racing rule. It stipulates fines for…
A friend got a ticket Jan. 9th of this year for doing 110 kph in a 90 kph zone, so 20 over.
What should the set fine and total payable read?
It's confusing to me, as the prescribed fine under HTA s.128 is different than the set fine enumerated by the Chief Justice of the Ontario Court of Justice.
An OPP officer ticketed me claiming I was going 40km/h over the limit (140km/km) on my way home with a few friends on the 401. This is my first ever speeding offense. Although I am sure I was over the limit, I am almost certain that I was not going 40 over, more realistically closer to 30 over. The…
Yesterday night I was charged for stunt driving (excess over 50km/h) and I have a few inquiries. I'm sure you've all heard the same story, but the unmarked cop in an SUV was tailing me for a good 2-3 minutes as I was travelling 120~135 km/h. Then as he came close I decided to boot it up…
I had a speeding ticket in May 2013 which brought me to 9 demerit points out of 15. I received a letter and had to attend an interview. Due to a history of speeding tickets and a previous interview a few years prior, the interviewer decided to put me on zero tolerance for a year. Meaning if I…