22 Km Over (72 In 50 Zone)
Hey all,
I have recently received a ticket for going 22km/h over. The first ticket that I ever gotten.
I have been doing some reading on this site as well as ticketcombat, great site by the way. I decided to go the court route, and once i get my trial date in the mail I will fax a disclosure form. I am going to used the sample one from ticketcombat. From reading the forum I think i am going to ask for the following on the disclosure:
- copy of the police officers notes
copy of both sides of the officers copy of the ticket
typed version of any hand written notes
statements made by the defendant
calibration record of the unit
training record of the officer for the unit
and a manual
I was wondering if anyone could indicate if this is sufficient and what else i could ask for?
Thanks,
b0b
I would exclude "Statements made by defendant", but otherwise looks fine. Paralegals or 'Bear might comment better though.
"The hardest thing to explain is the obvious"
www.OHTA.ca & www.OntarioHighwayTrafficAct.com
-
- Sr. Member
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:06 pm
b0b wrote:Hey all,
for the following on the disclosure:
copy of the police officers notes: Will get
copy of both sides of the officers copy of the ticket with some tickets there is nothing on the back. With our e-ticketing there is no back
typed version of any hand written notes: will only get if you cannot read officers notes
statements made by the defendant: see officer notes
calibration record of the unit: won't get just get that officer verified calibration
training record of the officer for the unit :Won't get. Officer will just testify that they are qualified or not
and a manual:seems this is dependant on prosecutor. some give manual some only give relevant parts
b0b
OPS
- Reflections
- Moderator
- Posts: 1489
- Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:49 pm
- Location: somewhere in traffic
and a manual:seems this is dependant on prosecutor. some give manual some only give relevant parts
All parts are relevant
-
- Sr. Member
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:06 pm
Reflections wrote:and a manual:seems this is dependant on prosecutor. some give manual some only give relevant parts
All parts are relevant
Perhaps but Seems that prosecutors are all doing different things when it comes to this....
OPS
- Radar Identified
- Moderator
- Posts: 2881
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:26 pm
- Location: Toronto
OPS Copper wrote:Perhaps but Seems that prosecutors are all doing different things when it comes to this....
No kidding.
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
- Reflections
- Moderator
- Posts: 1489
- Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:49 pm
- Location: somewhere in traffic
Radar Identified wrote:OPS Copper wrote:Perhaps but Seems that prosecutors are all doing different things when it comes to this....
No kidding.
different courts+different rules+same provence=WTF
Wondering if anyone can help.
I have a court date this friday, November 19th, I asked for a disclosure packages back in August when i got my court date. I have not received the disclosure package and was wondering if anyone can tell me how I should proceed during the trial. I didn't file f4 and don't have enough time to do it now. Any help would be appreciated.
- Simon Borys
- VIP
- Posts: 1065
- Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:20 am
- Contact:
If you requested disclosure and the crown has had ample time to produce it and doesn't and the trial dates comes, you should be able to request an adjournment. The delay between that date and the next one counts against the crown for an 11(b) motion.
NOTHING I SAY ON HERE IS LEGAL ADVICE.
if you file F4, is it necessary to order the transcript too? what if the Crown ask you to order transcipt? is that means they are ready to jinx you on your 11B motion?
Should I request the adjournment before making a plea? or how does it work?
- Radar Identified
- Moderator
- Posts: 2881
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:26 pm
- Location: Toronto
Yes. Disclosure, motions, etc., are preliminary matters and must be dealt with before the trial starts. Show up early, check in with the Prosecutor. Do NOT accept the disclosure package if they have it and want to give it to you before trial. Tell them that you are going to have to speak to the JP first. Instead, when the trial is about to start, and they ask you "how do you plead," mention that before you are making any pleas, the Prosecutor has not provided disclosure which was requested in August. That should force an adjournment. If they say "okay, well we will give it to you now, so go review it and come back in five minutes," object and point out that the Prosecutor needs at least 15 days notice just for a Notice of Constitutional Question, and also could not produce disclosure even after three months, so how could you possibly be expected to do so in five minutes? That would be prejudicial and completely unfair.
Once the adjournment has been forced, you should then be able to file an 11B. If you're not comfortable with the process, you can get a paralegal to do it for you. Usually in Toronto the Prosecutors simply withdraw the charges if an 11B is filed rather than fight it out. They're way too busy to argue Constitutional Questions on a daily basis with the clogged court system.
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
Thanks for the help, I'll let you know how it goes on Friday.
Radar Identified wrote:Yes. Disclosure, motions, etc., are preliminary matters and must be dealt with before the trial starts. Show up early, check in with the Prosecutor. Do NOT accept the disclosure package if they have it and want to give it to you before trial. Tell them that you are going to have to speak to the JP first. Instead, when the trial is about to start, and they ask you "how do you plead," mention that before you are making any pleas, the Prosecutor has not provided disclosure which was requested in August. That should force an adjournment. .
I would suggest this is border line making a false statement in court as disclosure (no matter how late) was provided/available by the crown. Can do the same thing with a little more tact and will look a lot more positive on your part by accepting disclosure from the prosecution. Then explain to JP only received disclosure this AM, when your request was made etc..
-
- Similar Topics
-
-
New post 159 km/h in a 100km/h zone (G2)
by pruzhinkin in Stunt DrivingLast post by dedeoaraujo Tue Feb 23, 2021 9:00 pm
-
-
-
New post 150 km/hr in a posted 100 km/hr zone on highway 401
by micky202 in General TalkLast post by highwaystar Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:31 pm
-
-
-
New post 152 Km/H In A 150 Km/H Zone (On The 401) And I'm A Quebec Resident.
by HelpBobby in Stunt DrivingLast post by CoolRunnings Sat Dec 19, 2020 9:38 am
-
-
-
New post 70 in a 50 zone - reduced from 86 km/hr (Disclosure Included)
Last post by highwaystar Wed Jun 10, 2020 7:43 pm
-
-
-
New post Stunt Driving low 150s in 100 km/hour zone; not sure what to do
by matt49683 in Stunt DrivingLast post by bend Tue Oct 12, 2021 5:10 pm
-
-
-
New post 156km/h reduced to 149km/h on the spot in 100 km zone
Last post by bend Tue Jul 06, 2021 6:30 pm
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
Help us, Help You!
Hello, we notice you may be using an adblocker...
Please support free websites by turning off your Ad blocker.
Thank you!