Looking for advise on how to fight this ticket. I believe the officer booked a car in front of me but not sure it's admissible in court. -Court date is over a year from date of offense Already received officers notes and radar manual Thanks Links to scanned docs: http://i.imgur.com/Uc4dvTWh.jpg http://i.imgur.com/uIa7ADch.jpg http://i.imgur.com/5WAil1Vh.jpg http://i.imgur.com/ZK8bPgVh.jpg
Looking for advise on how to fight this ticket. I believe the officer booked a car in front of me but not sure it's admissible in court.
Are you saying the officer got the speed of the wrong vehicle? The notes mention you were the closest vehicle to him and that you were pulling away from the traffic behind you (traffic 100m behind). Notes are pretty good. Doesn't sound like that argument could get you very far.
igota wrote:
I believe the officer booked a car in front of me but not sure it's admissible in court.
Are you saying the officer got the speed of the wrong vehicle? The notes mention you were the closest vehicle to him and that you were pulling away from the traffic behind you (traffic 100m behind). Notes are pretty good. Doesn't sound like that argument could get you very far.
Once you start talking about bends in the road you put yourself in a vulnerable position. Going around a bend will only have your speed read out slower than it was, so if they follow the officers notes, it kind of makes you look worse than it already is. It's not going to make your conviction any worse, but you might not want to be that guy who goes in and talks about mistaken identity and bends in the road. Have you had any early resolution meetings or did you simply plead not guilty the first time around and received that notice of trial?
igota wrote:
It was going around a bend and there was a car in front of me. But it's pretty much his word.
Once you start talking about bends in the road you put yourself in a vulnerable position. Going around a bend will only have your speed read out slower than it was, so if they follow the officers notes, it kind of makes you look worse than it already is. It's not going to make your conviction any worse, but you might not want to be that guy who goes in and talks about mistaken identity and bends in the road.
Have you had any early resolution meetings or did you simply plead not guilty the first time around and received that notice of trial?
So just note that if you go to trial, they will amend the speed up to 81 in a 50 (31 over) as that is what the officers notes say. From demerit perspective, I think 31 over is 4 points and 29 over is 3 points, but demerits have nothing to do with insurance. From an insurance perspective, 29 over and 31 over are both minor and are viewed the same by insurance company, so either one will have the exact same effect on your insurance rates. Officer notes look execellent with nothing missing. If you testify that there was a car in front of you and officer says there was not, they will usually believe the officer in less you have a second witness that can testify and verify your side of the story. When did you request a trial? Right away, or did you choose Early Resolution first? The counting of time for a "speedy trial" charter argument does not start until you request a trial. So if you requested trial right away when you got ticket, then it would be over 11 months which would give you a good chance of succeeding with a charter argument. If you go to trial, you should not testify unless you 100% can say that you were not speeding at all. Speeding is absolute liability so if you get on the stand and say you were only going even 1 km/h over the speed limit then you have admitted to speeding and then with the officer saying you were going 81 they will ding you with the 31 over. So if you were not speeding at all then you can get on the stand and tell what happened. If you were speeding even 1km/h over then do not get on the stand and do not testify and do not give your side of the story. So besides the possible charter argument above, cross-examination and bringing doubt to officers testimony is the only way to win. Read these posts: http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic7039.html -> Representing yourself http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic7041.html -> Cross-examination http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic7284.html -> Win speeding trial http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic7286.html -> Win speeding trial on appeal
So just note that if you go to trial, they will amend the speed up to 81 in a 50 (31 over) as that is what the officers notes say. From demerit perspective, I think 31 over is 4 points and 29 over is 3 points, but demerits have nothing to do with insurance. From an insurance perspective, 29 over and 31 over are both minor and are viewed the same by insurance company, so either one will have the exact same effect on your insurance rates.
Officer notes look execellent with nothing missing. If you testify that there was a car in front of you and officer says there was not, they will usually believe the officer in less you have a second witness that can testify and verify your side of the story.
When did you request a trial? Right away, or did you choose Early Resolution first? The counting of time for a "speedy trial" charter argument does not start until you request a trial. So if you requested trial right away when you got ticket, then it would be over 11 months which would give you a good chance of succeeding with a charter argument.
If you go to trial, you should not testify unless you 100% can say that you were not speeding at all. Speeding is absolute liability so if you get on the stand and say you were only going even 1 km/h over the speed limit then you have admitted to speeding and then with the officer saying you were going 81 they will ding you with the 31 over. So if you were not speeding at all then you can get on the stand and tell what happened. If you were speeding even 1km/h over then do not get on the stand and do not testify and do not give your side of the story.
So besides the possible charter argument above, cross-examination and bringing doubt to officers testimony is the only way to win.
Thanks for suggestions. I requested the trial about a week after the ticket was issued. Looks like my best case scenario is speaking with prosecutor before trial to get this ticket reduced. Thanks.
Thanks for suggestions. I requested the trial about a week after the ticket was issued. Looks like my best case scenario is speaking with prosecutor before trial to get this ticket reduced.
If you asked a trial a week later, it'll be over a year from the day you declared your intentions to go to trial. You can always go down that route. You don't got much to lose, anyways. Even if you had a trial, all you'd be doing is risking yourself some points and a few dollars, but the points expire June 2017 anyways. If you're a novice driver, it's a different story. You'll probably want to avoid a trial. 31km (as originally charged) would get you 4 points would have you suspended for 30 days.
igota wrote:
Thanks for suggestions. I requested the trial about a week after the ticket was issued. Looks like my best case scenario is speaking with prosecutor before trial to get this ticket reduced.
Thanks.
If you asked a trial a week later, it'll be over a year from the day you declared your intentions to go to trial. You can always go down that route.
You don't got much to lose, anyways. Even if you had a trial, all you'd be doing is risking yourself some points and a few dollars, but the points expire June 2017 anyways.
If you're a novice driver, it's a different story. You'll probably want to avoid a trial. 31km (as originally charged) would get you 4 points would have you suspended for 30 days.
If you asked a trial a week later, it'll be over a year from the day you declared your intentions to go to trial. You can always go down that route. You don't got much to lose, anyways. Even if you had a trial, all you'd be doing is risking yourself some points and a few dollars, but the points expire June 2017 anyways. If you're a novice driver, it's a different story. You'll probably want to avoid a trial. 31km (as originally charged) would get you 4 points would have you suspended for 30 days. I am not a novice driver but already have a minor infraction from 2 years ago. would like to avoid another conviction.
bend wrote:
igota wrote:
Thanks for suggestions. I requested the trial about a week after the ticket was issued. Looks like my best case scenario is speaking with prosecutor before trial to get this ticket reduced.
Thanks.
If you asked a trial a week later, it'll be over a year from the day you declared your intentions to go to trial. You can always go down that route.
You don't got much to lose, anyways. Even if you had a trial, all you'd be doing is risking yourself some points and a few dollars, but the points expire June 2017 anyways.
If you're a novice driver, it's a different story. You'll probably want to avoid a trial. 31km (as originally charged) would get you 4 points would have you suspended for 30 days.
I am not a novice driver but already have a minor infraction from 2 years ago. would like to avoid another conviction.
Can they amend the speed back up? According to the computer generated notes (First Page of Disclosure) it said charged speed 79 and actual speed 79. Also on the ticket, it doesn't have a reduced code (R) on it. Just curious on this one.
jsherk wrote:
So just note that if you go to trial, they will amend the speed up to 81 in a 50 (31 over) as that is what the officers notes say.
Can they amend the speed back up? According to the computer generated notes (First Page of Disclosure) it said charged speed 79 and actual speed 79. Also on the ticket, it doesn't have a reduced code (R) on it. Just curious on this one.
They do not have to mark anywhere that it was reduced. On the last page of dislcosure, the officers notes say 81 even though the second last page says "actual:79". So if the officer testifies to the 81 speed, then they can amend it up. Just because there is discrepency in notes is not really an issue as it will be the officers testimony that counts. Usually they will tell you they are going to amend it up before the trial, and then they will usually advise the JP when the trial starts that they are going to amend it up. They can not officially amend it up though until there is evidence of the higher speed (until the officer actually testifies to the higher speed).
They do not have to mark anywhere that it was reduced. On the last page of dislcosure, the officers notes say 81 even though the second last page says "actual:79". So if the officer testifies to the 81 speed, then they can amend it up. Just because there is discrepency in notes is not really an issue as it will be the officers testimony that counts.
Usually they will tell you they are going to amend it up before the trial, and then they will usually advise the JP when the trial starts that they are going to amend it up. They can not officially amend it up though until there is evidence of the higher speed (until the officer actually testifies to the higher speed).
Looking at different guides, i am confused about which forms must be submitted for 11b application. Do i have to create 6 binders based on this sample: http://scopezoom.com/11b/StayPDF.pdf or is 4 copies of FORM 4F (1 page) completed enough? Confused...
Looking at different guides, i am confused about which forms must be submitted for 11b application. Do i have to create 6 binders based on this sample: http://scopezoom.com/11b/StayPDF.pdf
or is 4 copies of FORM 4F (1 page) completed enough?
UPDATE: Case won. Completed my 11b application. waited for trial. On trial date, in the courtroom everyone pretty much pleaded guilty to lesser charges (mostly fines only). 2 people were left. My name was called. Prosecutor informed the judge that they will not be pursuing this matter. Judge asked me if was dropping the motion. I said yes and i was free to go. Basically followed these steps: 1. Fill out Form 4F x 4 2. Serve attorney General of Ontario/Canada and fill out 16b(affidavit of service). Make copies of fax receipts as proof. 3. At court admin office file 11b. Get ticket for M or other 4. Get the clerk to swear me and sign affidavit 5. Go to prosecutors office (4th floor) to serve them and get stamped 6. Go back to court admin office and serve the court.
UPDATE:
Case won.
Completed my 11b application. waited for trial.
On trial date, in the courtroom everyone pretty much pleaded guilty to lesser charges (mostly fines only). 2 people were left. My name was called. Prosecutor informed the judge that they will not be pursuing this matter. Judge asked me if was dropping the motion. I said yes and i was free to go.
Basically followed these steps:
1. Fill out Form 4F x 4
2. Serve attorney General of Ontario/Canada and fill out 16b(affidavit of service). Make copies of fax receipts as proof.
3. At court admin office file 11b. Get ticket for M or other
4. Get the clerk to swear me and sign affidavit
5. Go to prosecutors office (4th floor) to serve them and get stamped
6. Go back to court admin office and serve the court.
I got ticket for failing to stop at stop sign in Toronto. i heard that the police officer must see the stop line, if there is one, from where he was sitting. That is exactly my case, Is it a strong case? If so do i need a picture to show that there is a stop line and a picture to show that he could not see the stop line from where he was sitting?
I got a ticket, Disobey stop sign, sec 136.1.a on dec 6th
I made a left in an intersection and was pulled over by a police officer in an unmarked car who had been sitting down the road. A classic fishing hole situation. I was genuinely surprised when he stopped me and told me I went through a stop sign without even slowing down. I know to shut up and be polite and take the ticket. I…
Yesterday morning, I rear-ended someone. I was going the speed limit. The sun was directly in front of me and it blinded my windshield and my eyes. At the same time, the person in front of me stopped/slowed down (also due to the sun). I started to slow down but didn't stop and I hit them since I couldn't see anything. I was not driving too close initially. I…
I was driving in the county at night and hit a limousine stretched out side ways across the road. The limo had its lights on and had side lighting as well. The police officer charged me with careless driving because it was "fully lit up".
It took me to the next day to figure out what had happened - what I remember made no sense. What I had run across was a "false visual reference" illusion.
I was on hwy 37 trying to make my girlfriends ganadmas mass and I live an hour away and I had an hour to get there so I was going fast but not 50 over untill some idiot got on my tail soo close that I was to concentrated on him that I kept going faster untill I got pulled over at 147 on an 80 km hwy.
I alreaddy lost 3 points and this time was just the…
Hello, got stopped today for rolling a stop sign. Ticket says failure to stop, but quotes hta 1361b.
Doesn't 1361b mean failure to yield?
Is this a fatal error? Or could it be amended at trial. How can I prepare a defence if I don't know if I'm defending the failure to stop or the failure to yield?
After he was providing me with a ticket for failure to obey to the stop sign (I am pretty sure I stopped but less than 3 seconds recommended by my driver ed. instructor), I know everybody say that..as an excuse.
Then he stopped me again to return the documents.
Any advice and feed back would be really appreciated.
Can you get evidence for whether someone had an advanced green at an intersection? My dad was making a right turn on a red (after stopping) into a plaza parking lot. He got hit by someone making a left turn from the opposite lane. The driver told the officer called to the collision that he had an advance green. My dad said he came out of nowhere which makes me…
So i was driving on Eglinton Avenue East near Rosemount Ave.
The school bus was on the the curb on the opposite side of the road while i was travelling on the middle lane of the three-laned Eglinton Avenue East (five lanes apart plus a raised median island seperating the traffic)
I could not see the school bus as my view of the bus was being obstructed by the cars in front of me and on my left hand…
Lots of good information on getting disclosure from the Crown here.
Now, I am just wondering if I will be relying upon evidence of my own at trial... do I have to voluntarily send this material to the Crown in a reasonable time before the trial, or only if they request disclosure from me?
This morning I had an exam for university. I was studying the entire night and i wanted to catch like maybe 1-2 hours of sleep before the exam so i went to sleep. I woke up like 5 hrs after and realize that I was about to miss my exam. I still could have made it so I asked my dad for his car since I was in a huge rush and he gave it to me.
I went on the highway and I was going at 135 km/h but…
the police officer was in in the opesite oncumming lane he was fallowing another car so close that i was not even able to see his cruser till he was buy he said that i was going 111 in a 80 he said he hade me on radar he only asked for me drivers licencs and never asked for my insurence so on the ticket there no insurence dose enyone think i can beat this i wana take it to cort becuse he was…
Hi I have a couple questions so I'll explain my situation and any advice would be appreciated.
Can't remember exact date so lets call it some time in 2008 I got a fine for $5000.00 for driving without in insurance. I never paid the fine and in 2012 I was pulled over and the officer asked to see my license. Although I had it on me I figured it would be under suspension for the unpaid fine from…
Alright, so I did something really stupid the other day, I was driving down a country road and wanted to hit the curves so I passed 3 cars at once, inadvertently making it up to very much past 50 over (80 limit)... Much to my chagrin there was a cop coming in the opposite direction who immediately skidded on the gravel shoulder and who I thought was 100% going to turn around and pull me over,…
Anyone know how backed this courthouse is? I submitted my ticket for trial at the end of August, and still no letter. Im scared it got lost in the mail, can i call the courthouse and find out my courtdate? Or would i have to go in personally?
I recently received a ticket for failure to use low beams - while following - Ticket was issued Sec 168 (
- it was on the 401 and no one was within 500 meters of me, I was warning a oncoming vehicle that there was an officer hiding (which is not illegal or I could not find a law against it) it was a police vehicle travelling at very high rate of speed in the opposite direction with no lights on…
I received a warning letter from MTO for a 2pts ticket.What happened is that the police officer issued a "unsafe left turn" and then changed the ticket to "failed to signal" at the scene, but she submitted both tickets!!! And I !!!ONLY!!! received the latter ticket from her(I requested trial for "failed to signal"). I recently received notice from MTO that I'm convicted for "unsafe left turn".
Hello everyone! I was given a ticket for using a hand-held communication device while driving. It was 3 am, I was at a stop light and the cop saw me with the my phone in my hand. I told him i was just checking the time on it. I received the notes a few weeks ago ill copy them down below. Any help is appreciated although i believe there's no hope for me. The cop recorded me saying what phone i…
I got pulled over about 15 or so days ago the court till this date has not received the summons what is the legal time period that the court has to follow to accept the summons from the office court says its 15 days is the legal timeframe the officer has to serve it on the court
I requested for disclosure of information two months ago.
I received the radar manual after one month, but not others (including maintenance/calibration record of the radar, certificate of police training). On further pursuit, the prosecutor told me that he did not have them and he did not see why I needed these documents. He said he did not know where to get them when I asked.
Last Friday I was pulled over by an OPP motorcycle cop who informed me I was going 134. I was on the SB 404, I did see him parked under a bridge and when I passed him he was not on his bike.
I'm hoping to get some insight for a defense in this case.
I was in lane 1 and I had a car in front of me, and a car behind me, also there was a car speeding down Lane 3 passing everyone and moved quickly into…