I was driving on left lane and I needed to take right turn. so, I crossed the speed limit to overtake a civil car which was driven by a police man on my right hand lane. He followed me and gave me a ticket. It seemed like he was not on duty and the ticket says "interfere with trafic". Can someone help me by answering the following question, i would really appreciate it. 1)Can a police man issue a ticket, who is not on duty? 2)What kind of trafic violation ticket it is? 3)I was driving in Mississauga close to Brampton but not in Brampton. However the ticket shows that I was driving in Brampton. 4)Please give me your best advice? Thanks
I was driving on left lane and I needed to take right turn. so, I crossed the speed limit to overtake a civil car which was driven by a police man on my right hand lane. He followed me and gave me a ticket. It seemed like he was not on duty and the ticket says "interfere with trafic". Can someone help me by answering the following question, i would really appreciate it.
1)Can a police man issue a ticket, who is not on duty?
2)What kind of trafic violation ticket it is?
3)I was driving in Mississauga close to Brampton but not in Brampton. However the ticket shows that I was driving in Brampton.
Amendments to a charging document have been allowed when the correct Section No. has been omitted, as long as the offense has been adequately described in words. It's possible, the officer wasn't sure of the correct Section No. so he just wrote a vague description. Personally, I think it's TOO vague. I would (before any testimony is taken) motion for dismissal based on inadequate description of the alleged offense. If this fails, I would motion for a continuance in order that I may prepare a proper defense based on a specified statute.
Amendments to a charging document have been allowed when the correct Section No. has been omitted, as long as the offense has been adequately described in words. It's possible, the officer wasn't sure of the correct Section No. so he just wrote a vague description. Personally, I think it's TOO vague.
I would (before any testimony is taken) motion for dismissal based on inadequate description of the alleged offense. If this fails, I would motion for a continuance in order that I may prepare a proper defense based on a specified statute.
Thanks for attention and comments. ---I think he was not on duty cuz he was not wearing police uniform and neither he was driving police car but he was on civil van. ---OHTA section is: 170 (12) Ist he wrote 175 (14) and then cut it and rewrote 170 (12). At the end he told me, "just pay for the ticket and it will not effect your points and insurance". What do you recommend now?
CHAND wrote:
I was driving on left lane and I needed to take right turn. so, I crossed the speed limit to overtake a civil car which was driven by a police man on my right hand lane. He followed me and gave me a ticket. It seemed like he was not on duty and the ticket says "interfere with trafic". Can someone help me by answering the following question, i would really appreciate it.
1)Can a police man issue a ticket, who is not on duty?
2)What kind of trafic violation ticket it is?
3)I was driving in Mississauga close to Brampton but not in Brampton. However the ticket shows that I was driving in Brampton.
4)Please give me your best advice?
Thanks
Thanks for attention and comments.
---I think he was not on duty cuz he was not wearing police uniform and neither he was driving police car but he was on civil van.
---OHTA section is: 170 (12)
Ist he wrote 175 (14) and then cut it and rewrote 170 (12).
At the end he told me, "just pay for the ticket and it will not effect your points and insurance".
Here is the clause: Parking on roadway 170. (12) Vehicles interfering with traffic (12) Despite the other provisions of this section, no person shall park or stand a vehicle on a highway in such a manner as to interfere with the movement of traffic or the clearing of snow from the highway. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 170 (12). This basically states that you can't park your vehicle on the road so that it interferes with traffic. If you were simply overtaking him, then this doesn't describe that action. This ticket doesn't seem right. It actually makes no sense, but moreover seems like a deliberate action to waste your time, by the officer. He didn't cite you correctly, because if you were already driving, and he pulled you over, this law would not apply. Unless you parked in the middle of the highway for no reason at all, then it makes no sense for him to even cite that violation. The violation doesn't fit the crime. It makes no sense, since you were already driving.
Here is the clause:
Parking on roadway 170. (12)
Vehicles interfering with traffic
(12) Despite the other provisions of this section, no person shall park or stand a vehicle on a highway in such a manner as to interfere with the movement of traffic or the clearing of snow from the highway. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 170 (12).
This basically states that you can't park your vehicle on the road so that it interferes with traffic.
If you were simply overtaking him, then this doesn't describe that action. This ticket doesn't seem right. It actually makes no sense, but moreover seems like a deliberate action to waste your time, by the officer.
He didn't cite you correctly, because if you were already driving, and he pulled you over, this law would not apply. Unless you parked in the middle of the highway for no reason at all, then it makes no sense for him to even cite that violation.
The violation doesn't fit the crime. It makes no sense, since you were already driving.
I got a ticket for "interfere with traffic" last night. I was on Queen St looking for a parking spot and a girl had disabled her car alarm signaling she was leaving. I pulled close and turned on my right signal. Seems the girl had some items to throw in her trunk and when she popped it, an unmarked cruiser pulled up behind me and started honking his horn (not the distinctive emergency horn but the regular car horn) - for all I knew it was an impatient cabbie. My indicator was still on and honestly other cars had gone around but the guy decided to make an example of me. He jumped out of his car and slammed on my trunk stating I'd better move or he'd write me a ticket - to which I replied that I was waiting for the spot - which by now the girl was signaling to pull out of . He said "well pull in and you'll get a ticket". Funny thing is he's sitting in the same spot - interfering with traffic as he's writing the ticket. Probably took him twice as long to write it than the time I was waiting for the spot. How is that even fair?
I got a ticket for "interfere with traffic" last night. I was on Queen St looking for a parking spot and a girl had disabled her car alarm signaling she was leaving. I pulled close and turned on my right signal.
Seems the girl had some items to throw in her trunk and when she popped it, an unmarked cruiser pulled up behind me and started honking his horn (not the distinctive emergency horn but the regular car horn) - for all I knew it was an impatient cabbie. My indicator was still on and honestly other cars had gone around but the guy decided to make an example of me.
He jumped out of his car and slammed on my trunk stating I'd better move or he'd write me a ticket - to which I replied that I was waiting for the spot - which by now the girl was signaling to pull out of . He said "well pull in and you'll get a ticket". Funny thing is he's sitting in the same spot - interfering with traffic as he's writing the ticket. Probably took him twice as long to write it than the time I was waiting for the spot.
yngblk.. This is called "highjacking" a thread, which is bad. You need to create a new thread with a new Subject. Typically, others won't Reply to a highjacked thread.
yngblk..
This is called "highjacking" a thread, which is bad. You need to create a new thread with a new Subject. Typically, others won't Reply to a highjacked thread.
Hi everyone. I'm asking for a friend who has a question of interpretation.
He was ticketed for using a hand-held device. He contends that he was acting within the exemption provided under Subsection 14 (1) of O. Reg. 366/09, which reads as follows (emphasis added):
Hey guys i just wanted to know what speeds you see others do on the roads on a regular basis. As we all know no body drives 100 km. It seems they only hit that speed twice once on the way up and once on the way down.
it seems the De Facto limit on the 401 is about 120-130. But lately i dont know if…
On June 10, 2017, I was pulled over by an OPP on the 403 heading WB and told I registered 136km/hr. I kept chit chat to a minimum and took my ticket and went on with my day. I later requested my disclosure and did not receive it until a week before my Oct. 27 court date, and so I had my date…
Anyone know any more information? Apparently kathleen wynne mentioned trying to introduce legislation after more than 20 years of no speed cameras. My guess is that it wont happen, since they've tried before many times to bring it back after it was abolished.
The other day I was given a ticket for speeding 119 in a 90, on highway 17 near Marathon, ON (Speeding ticket capital of the universe, BTW). The officer claims to have "clocked" me using the vehicle mounted radar at 121 KMH and dropped it (presumably to lower fine and demerits).
I posted this in the 3 Demerit Section and haven't received any
responses.
I received a failure to stop at an amber light ticket on April 17, 2009. At my First Attendance Meeting I asked to read the police officer's notes and remember thinking how ridiculous they were and the difficulty…
I was on the right side of the road going straight when a pedestrian waved down the taxi driver in the lane next to me. He pulled over to the right without any notice or signalling and hit me with the side of his car.
There were many witnesses but I immediately had a concussion and did not think of…
My mother was driving EB on a 4 lane street (2 lanes EB, 2 lanes WB).
She was in the left hand lane and started a left hand turn so as to enter a side street, crossing WB traffic. There was NO intersection. She hit a cyclist who was heading WB. Police where called but none showed up. My…
If the speed limit is 50, and you do 100+, not only do you get 6 points. Your car gets impounded for a week, and your license suspended for 7 days, along with a hefty fine of at least $2000. The penalty is actually the same as for racing. The law came in effect on October 1, 2007. Remember -…
I was driving westbound on Hwy. 8 earlier this month in North Dumfries Township, approaching the Cambridge city limits. The weather was clear and the roads were dry. I noticed a vehicle on the shoulder on my side of the road, pointing towards me. This didn't concern me right away, as it is a rural…