Hi all, I live in the Kitchener area, and I recently (about 2 months ago) got a ticket for failing to stop for a stop sign. As soon as I got the ticket, following TicketCombat's suggestions, I made a request for disclosure. The thing is, I didn't leave my phone number, once again, as suggested by TicketCombat. About a week or two later, I got the actual disclosure request notice, stating the procedure for applying for a disclosure. In it, they clearly state that we need to leave a telephone or a fax number, and they also say in the paper that incomplete requests will not be processed. As soon as I got this notice, I sent a follow-up to my previous request, but once again, I still didn't leave my phone number in the follow-up request. Now, according to TicketCombat in this thread: http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic1094.html , even if I didn't leave the phone number, they should still provide me with disclosure, and notify me via mail. Is there a law that I can cite for this case? Since the offense, I have made in total 3 requests for disclosure (and have not receive any notification to pick it up yet), in each of which I didn't leave my phone number. I can't help but worry that they'd say I have made incomplete requests, and it was my own fault that they couldn't get to me. Should I give in and leave my phone number in my next follow-up? Also, since I have sent 3 disclosure requests, should I keep following up with them? Thank you in advance, and I'm looking forward for replies :D
Hi all, I live in the Kitchener area, and I recently (about 2 months ago) got a ticket for failing to stop for a stop sign. As soon as I got the ticket, following TicketCombat's suggestions, I made a request for disclosure. The thing is, I didn't leave my phone number, once again, as suggested by TicketCombat.
About a week or two later, I got the actual disclosure request notice, stating the procedure for applying for a disclosure. In it, they clearly state that we need to leave a telephone or a fax number, and they also say in the paper that incomplete requests will not be processed. As soon as I got this notice, I sent a follow-up to my previous request, but once again, I still didn't leave my phone number in the follow-up request.
even if I didn't leave the phone number, they should still provide me with disclosure, and notify me via mail. Is there a law that I can cite for this case?
Since the offense, I have made in total 3 requests for disclosure (and have not receive any notification to pick it up yet), in each of which I didn't leave my phone number. I can't help but worry that they'd say I have made incomplete requests, and it was my own fault that they couldn't get to me.
Should I give in and leave my phone number in my next follow-up? Also, since I have sent 3 disclosure requests, should I keep following up with them?
Thank you in advance, and I'm looking forward for replies
I just realized that they sent me a notice, saying that they (the prosecutor) couldn't process my request due to the lack of contact information (no fax number or telephone number, even though I left my address). In the notice that they faxed to my office on Christmas eve (I was out on vacation since the 23rd), they basically told me to contact them, and provide more thorough contact information (email, fax or telephone number) to them. Note that this notice was sent by the prosecutor directly. Now I wonder, am I really entitled for a disclosure, even though I didn't leave my phone number? Can I somehow use this to my advantage or should I just give in and give them my contact information? Thank you in advance
I just realized that they sent me a notice, saying that they (the prosecutor) couldn't process my request due to the lack of contact information (no fax number or telephone number, even though I left my address).
In the notice that they faxed to my office on Christmas eve (I was out on vacation since the 23rd), they basically told me to contact them, and provide more thorough contact information (email, fax or telephone number) to them. Note that this notice was sent by the prosecutor directly.
Now I wonder, am I really entitled for a disclosure, even though I didn't leave my phone number? Can I somehow use this to my advantage or should I just give in and give them my contact information?
There's no "law" about leaving your telephone/fax number. It would probably be accepted as a valid request by the JP, especially since they mailed a reply to you. Personally, I'd include the telephone number. It is of no benefit to leave it out. The theory is that the Crown could claim that "we called him and he never picked it up," but they could just as easily claim "we mailed him and he never picked it up." BTW, what did you ask for in the disclosure request?
There's no "law" about leaving your telephone/fax number. It would probably be accepted as a valid request by the JP, especially since they mailed a reply to you. Personally, I'd include the telephone number. It is of no benefit to leave it out. The theory is that the Crown could claim that "we called him and he never picked it up," but they could just as easily claim "we mailed him and he never picked it up."
BTW, what did you ask for in the disclosure request?
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
No one is required to have an email address or even Internet access. They have your mailing address and with your response to their letter they have proof that you were in communication with you. They just prefer not to use the mail. If you give your phone number and have callerID/voicemail you can have fun with it and play the same game as they are playing. The prosecutor and the police (ie. both may call you to tell you your disclosure can be picked up) do not seem to like to leave voicemail messages. If you don't answer their calls they will probably ignore the voicemail prompt and will just try to call you again. If they state they tried to call you in court, you can say that you didn't receive any messages from them. Respond by asking them when they called and when did they leave a message? Just say you are never at home so unless they left you a message they wouldn't be able to get you. Ask why they didn't leave a message? If they say they called you 50 times, just ask them why they ignored your instructions to leave a message 50 times? They have a way of communicating with you via phone and mail, they just chose not to. In front of the JP you want to look like you provided them with everything they needed to meet their obligation to get their disclosure to you but it is the prosecutor that is the one that is being hard to deal with. Note that the police like to call you early in the morning (ie. 5-6am) thinking you will be home then. Also watch for different numbers calling you or "Private Call" which means they hit *67 first. Eventually they will probably mail the disclosure to you (if they don't forget). But if it close enough to the court date you can ask that it be stayed because it took them so long to get you disclosure. The other thing they like to do is respond that they can't process your request without you filling out their request form. Surprisingly enough, it doesn't leave space for you to put in any specific information that you need. They just want to give you the minimum amount so that if asked by the JP in court, they can say that they provided disclosure. I have filled out and returned their form with a note indicating that my specific request letter is stapled to it which defeats this. In general, don't make the process simple for them. The more complicated it is, the more chance there is for the prosecutor to screw up.
No one is required to have an email address or even Internet access. They have your mailing address and with your response to their letter they have proof that you were in communication with you. They just prefer not to use the mail.
If you give your phone number and have callerID/voicemail you can have fun with it and play the same game as they are playing. The prosecutor and the police (ie. both may call you to tell you your disclosure can be picked up) do not seem to like to leave voicemail messages. If you don't answer their calls they will probably ignore the voicemail prompt and will just try to call you again. If they state they tried to call you in court, you can say that you didn't receive any messages from them. Respond by asking them when they called and when did they leave a message? Just say you are never at home so unless they left you a message they wouldn't be able to get you. Ask why they didn't leave a message? If they say they called you 50 times, just ask them why they ignored your instructions to leave a message 50 times? They have a way of communicating with you via phone and mail, they just chose not to. In front of the JP you want to look like you provided them with everything they needed to meet their obligation to get their disclosure to you but it is the prosecutor that is the one that is being hard to deal with.
Note that the police like to call you early in the morning (ie. 5-6am) thinking you will be home then. Also watch for different numbers calling you or "Private Call" which means they hit *67 first. Eventually they will probably mail the disclosure to you (if they don't forget). But if it close enough to the court date you can ask that it be stayed because it took them so long to get you disclosure.
The other thing they like to do is respond that they can't process your request without you filling out their request form. Surprisingly enough, it doesn't leave space for you to put in any specific information that you need. They just want to give you the minimum amount so that if asked by the JP in court, they can say that they provided disclosure. I have filled out and returned their form with a note indicating that my specific request letter is stapled to it which defeats this.
In general, don't make the process simple for them. The more complicated it is, the more chance there is for the prosecutor to screw up.
I asked for a copy of the officer's notes, and also notes about my statement. I probably should've asked for more, but in the request for disclosure, I asked for all other things related to the case as well (though I don't know if they will honor this). Any recommendation as to what to ask for disobeying a stop sign? Since they 'couldn't' process my earlier requests, I might as well just make a new request with more items in it. I have been contacting them so far via fax, but I didn't use personal fax. They replied (the notice) to the exact same number I used, which luckily, was my office fax so I had access to it. But what if I had used a commercial fax service? There would be no way that I could get to it. I actually find this action a bit irresponsible, since I have actually left my contact information (my address), and they still chose to send it through fax which might or might not be my personal fax. Should I ignore this notice, and act as if they never sent it? For all practical purposes, I could've missed the notice they faxed, and nowhere in the request I specified 'my' fax number. I don't have a phone with a caller ID or voice mail, so it would be kind of hard to pull. I could probably, however, try giving them my lab/office phone number, which has the ability to take messages. But then again, there is no way to tell who's calling, so it'd still be pretty hard. I'm actually still against giving them my phone number, but it seems at this point, there is no other choice. Most likely right now, I would not be able to make any excuse with regard to delayed disclosure, since they would just say it was my negligence not to put 'enough' contact information...
I asked for a copy of the officer's notes, and also notes about my statement. I probably should've asked for more, but in the request for disclosure, I asked for all other things related to the case as well (though I don't know if they will honor this). Any recommendation as to what to ask for disobeying a stop sign? Since they 'couldn't' process my earlier requests, I might as well just make a new request with more items in it.
I have been contacting them so far via fax, but I didn't use personal fax. They replied (the notice) to the exact same number I used, which luckily, was my office fax so I had access to it. But what if I had used a commercial fax service? There would be no way that I could get to it. I actually find this action a bit irresponsible, since I have actually left my contact information (my address), and they still chose to send it through fax which might or might not be my personal fax. Should I ignore this notice, and act as if they never sent it? For all practical purposes, I could've missed the notice they faxed, and nowhere in the request I specified 'my' fax number.
I don't have a phone with a caller ID or voice mail, so it would be kind of hard to pull. I could probably, however, try giving them my lab/office phone number, which has the ability to take messages. But then again, there is no way to tell who's calling, so it'd still be pretty hard. I'm actually still against giving them my phone number, but it seems at this point, there is no other choice. Most likely right now, I would not be able to make any excuse with regard to delayed disclosure, since they would just say it was my negligence not to put 'enough' contact information...
Hi so I have a bizzare situation. Today I received a summons for "being the owner of a motor vehicle bearing Vehicle Identification Number ###, failed to submit the vehicle, equipment or drawn vehicle for inspection or tests as required by an officer" for a vehicle I previously owned. Apparently a violation of HTA 82(9).
The date of offense is June 15, the summons was issued on October 26th and I…
Hi, I need some help for the ticket of lmproper left turn.
When i drove my car from east to west, intending to make a left turn and stop in front of stop line. There was a car in front of me, which has turn on yellow light. The light was turning red and then I thought I cannot leave in the intersection and turned, an incoming car was runing the light and hit me. No one got hurt but both cars had…
Have a ticket in which the radar used was a Genesis VP Directional. I had downloaded the manual for a Genesis VP but I now realize that the unit is not the same so it is the wrong manual. My trial is very soon so I do not have time to ask for disclosure of the manual.
Does anyone have access to an electronic version of the manual for Genesis VP Directional?
I was pulled over today in the city of Oakville for going 75 in a 40 zone. However, I am 100 percent certain that I was going only 50 in the 40 zone. When I was pulled over, I was driving my Dad's car which I felt was the reason I was getting stopped since two teenagers driving a 2013 S Class. He asked does I know why I am being pulled over and I…
I really need help on fighting my 9 tickets i received from one police officer. Here is some background of what happened!
I was caught speeding 66km on a 40km (school zone) on January 29, 2010. I was driving my friend's car and turns out she didnt renew the validation on the vehicle and didnt leave the up to date insurance paper on the car.
Hey question that I think here's probably the best place to get the answer:
I was charged with a careless driving offence in oct, trail in early april, so as of right now my insurance record is 100% clean... except the officer did file an accident report at the scene where I was classified at fault due to it being PI (although very minor). The person I hit did not sue etc, so the insurance company…
Very much unintentionally passed a stopped bus, with sign and flashing lights. Didn't realize I had done it until I was at the end of the bus. I'll save you my sob story, but it was truly accidental. I'm generally very cautious and have a perfect driving record. Never been stopped.
While I realize if a cop had seen me that I would have gotten a ticket, there were none in sight. Though I may very…
I was recently pulled over for running a red and I wasnt able to find my wallet in the car at the time to hand over my license. I had a passport in the vehicle that he used. The wallet was in the vehicle, it just fell through the seats. (Tough to find a black leather wallet in a black/black leather truck at night).
The officer still wrote the tickets for both he signed the one ticket (failure to…
I was passing a vehicle that was going slow for me and there was an oncoming vehicle coming at me. I speed up to get around the person I was passing and the oncoming vehicle turns out to be a cop who turns around and tickets me for going 110km in a 80km zone. How does it work with passing a vehicle? Once I passed the vehicle I went back down to my original speed of just under 100. The officer…
I picked up a brand new (old stock) Fuzzbuster a while ago at auction (wopping $5!!) and I want to mount it on the dash of my old GTO as a cool accessory when I show it at car shows. But I'm not sure if it's legal or not.
Here's my thoughts:
- It is early 70's technology (x-band) so it won't detect modern police radar. That's assuming no police force uses the old x-band frequency.
Hi guys, I'm still a little in shock of getting my first traffic ticket...
On Monday afternoon, I was returning from Toronto to Ottawa on HW416, I was driving about 15 over 100 like always. Then a car came very close to me on the left lane and made me nervous, I speed up unintentionally to pass the car and change lane, but while doing that a police car pull out of the median. He was hiding in…
May i ask this question regarding transport trucks limited to 105 km/h. Moving road blocks or safety?
IMO it isnt speed that kills. I find transport trucks infact help keep the road going. With cars that choose to not move to the right and slow down the middle lane the trucks would try to pass in their passing lane therefore the slower traffic would move right.
Received a notice from the police that a motion is being put forward to adjourn upcoming trial date. Notice indicates that an officer has sworn an affidavit that the crucial witness cannot attend date trial is set for (we know there is a social engagement at 7:30 pm for the witness, trial time is 1:30 pm). This further delay is a big problem to my daughter's case. She is moving away to…
This is what happened. I was travelling west on a four lane city street that was very light with traffic. I was making a left hand turn into a wide driveway of a business. There was traffic lights about 100 yards past the driveway and were red for the east-west traffic. I was in the left lane with my signal on and there was no oncoming traffic due to the red light. I was slowed right down…
I was driving my families older car and got pulled over, and the police officer informed me my plate was dirty. He issued me a ticket of $110 for the 13(2) act and obstruct plate as the offense. He informed me that such a plate could be used to avoid red lights as well as 407 tolls, also that buying a new plate can help to lower the ticket if I fight the charge, and that he also took a picture…
I received a red light camera ticket. In the picture, you see an ambulance in front of me with flashing lights. I had moved to alleviate the traffic behind me for the emergency vehicles coming behind it.
Is this a possible defense, if so, does anyone know any good case law to justify this position?
what happens if they charge someone for driving at 151Km/hr in montreal and they put for trial, appear after some months and sadly lost the trial ?
In montreal its $300 fine and 5demerit points ...
I heard Ontario and Qubec share the information. So once the trial is over ( and when the file moved to ontario) will his car gets towed and licence get suspended for 7days (later to 30 days ) ? and he…
I got a notice in the mail that trial is set four weeks from today, so it's time to request disclosure. I have zero chance of getting an 11b since trial is less than two months after the offense date and the officer did not reduce the charge. I really want to try and create delays on the trial, to reduce the chance of the officer showing up on multiple occasions. Is there any known loop-holes…
This weekend my father was involved in an accident with a transit bus in Burlington, ON. After the police showed up he was charged with "Fail to obey stop sign" Sec. 136(1)(a). At this particular intersection there NO stop signs but there are traffic lights. There is construction going on there so one of the light posts is smaller.
Driving conditions were terribly wet and visibility was low.…
So my boyfriend and I recently started dating. I have a vehicle that was insured. Insurance cost too much and I found it was just as easy to walk to work due to how close it was. But I didn't want to get rid of my car just yet, plus I'm still making payments on it as well. When we moved into our appartment together, I had it towed to my parking spot out back.
I was making a left hand legal turn on a green light, a driver came through the lane I was supposed to be going into ran the red and hit me head on as I was turning into my lane. When the officer came he was telling me that I was racing and driving recklessly because apparently there was reports of street racing in the area. I was not charged on the scene for this but I'm scared i am going to be…
I got a ticket for failure to surrender insurance because I did not have my new insurance stubs with me, just a bunch of expired ones. My policy number has not changed, so I asked the officer to just run the policy number so I could prove that I was in fact insured. He said they don't have that ability, handed me the ticket and reminded me that my car could have been impounded.
So I'm in a bit of a pickle and would appreciate if someone could clarify something for me.
I'm less than a month away (test on April 6th) from getting my full G license, and got a speeding ticket recently. The ticket was for 49km/h over the posted limit of 100km/h on the 403 in Oakville/Halton region, but was reduced from the initial ~60km/h over.