Hi all, I live in the Kitchener area, and I recently (about 2 months ago) got a ticket for failing to stop for a stop sign. As soon as I got the ticket, following TicketCombat's suggestions, I made a request for disclosure. The thing is, I didn't leave my phone number, once again, as suggested by TicketCombat. About a week or two later, I got the actual disclosure request notice, stating the procedure for applying for a disclosure. In it, they clearly state that we need to leave a telephone or a fax number, and they also say in the paper that incomplete requests will not be processed. As soon as I got this notice, I sent a follow-up to my previous request, but once again, I still didn't leave my phone number in the follow-up request. Now, according to TicketCombat in this thread: http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic1094.html , even if I didn't leave the phone number, they should still provide me with disclosure, and notify me via mail. Is there a law that I can cite for this case? Since the offense, I have made in total 3 requests for disclosure (and have not receive any notification to pick it up yet), in each of which I didn't leave my phone number. I can't help but worry that they'd say I have made incomplete requests, and it was my own fault that they couldn't get to me. Should I give in and leave my phone number in my next follow-up? Also, since I have sent 3 disclosure requests, should I keep following up with them? Thank you in advance, and I'm looking forward for replies :D
Hi all, I live in the Kitchener area, and I recently (about 2 months ago) got a ticket for failing to stop for a stop sign. As soon as I got the ticket, following TicketCombat's suggestions, I made a request for disclosure. The thing is, I didn't leave my phone number, once again, as suggested by TicketCombat.
About a week or two later, I got the actual disclosure request notice, stating the procedure for applying for a disclosure. In it, they clearly state that we need to leave a telephone or a fax number, and they also say in the paper that incomplete requests will not be processed. As soon as I got this notice, I sent a follow-up to my previous request, but once again, I still didn't leave my phone number in the follow-up request.
even if I didn't leave the phone number, they should still provide me with disclosure, and notify me via mail. Is there a law that I can cite for this case?
Since the offense, I have made in total 3 requests for disclosure (and have not receive any notification to pick it up yet), in each of which I didn't leave my phone number. I can't help but worry that they'd say I have made incomplete requests, and it was my own fault that they couldn't get to me.
Should I give in and leave my phone number in my next follow-up? Also, since I have sent 3 disclosure requests, should I keep following up with them?
Thank you in advance, and I'm looking forward for replies
I just realized that they sent me a notice, saying that they (the prosecutor) couldn't process my request due to the lack of contact information (no fax number or telephone number, even though I left my address). In the notice that they faxed to my office on Christmas eve (I was out on vacation since the 23rd), they basically told me to contact them, and provide more thorough contact information (email, fax or telephone number) to them. Note that this notice was sent by the prosecutor directly. Now I wonder, am I really entitled for a disclosure, even though I didn't leave my phone number? Can I somehow use this to my advantage or should I just give in and give them my contact information? Thank you in advance
I just realized that they sent me a notice, saying that they (the prosecutor) couldn't process my request due to the lack of contact information (no fax number or telephone number, even though I left my address).
In the notice that they faxed to my office on Christmas eve (I was out on vacation since the 23rd), they basically told me to contact them, and provide more thorough contact information (email, fax or telephone number) to them. Note that this notice was sent by the prosecutor directly.
Now I wonder, am I really entitled for a disclosure, even though I didn't leave my phone number? Can I somehow use this to my advantage or should I just give in and give them my contact information?
There's no "law" about leaving your telephone/fax number. It would probably be accepted as a valid request by the JP, especially since they mailed a reply to you. Personally, I'd include the telephone number. It is of no benefit to leave it out. The theory is that the Crown could claim that "we called him and he never picked it up," but they could just as easily claim "we mailed him and he never picked it up." BTW, what did you ask for in the disclosure request?
There's no "law" about leaving your telephone/fax number. It would probably be accepted as a valid request by the JP, especially since they mailed a reply to you. Personally, I'd include the telephone number. It is of no benefit to leave it out. The theory is that the Crown could claim that "we called him and he never picked it up," but they could just as easily claim "we mailed him and he never picked it up."
BTW, what did you ask for in the disclosure request?
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
No one is required to have an email address or even Internet access. They have your mailing address and with your response to their letter they have proof that you were in communication with you. They just prefer not to use the mail. If you give your phone number and have callerID/voicemail you can have fun with it and play the same game as they are playing. The prosecutor and the police (ie. both may call you to tell you your disclosure can be picked up) do not seem to like to leave voicemail messages. If you don't answer their calls they will probably ignore the voicemail prompt and will just try to call you again. If they state they tried to call you in court, you can say that you didn't receive any messages from them. Respond by asking them when they called and when did they leave a message? Just say you are never at home so unless they left you a message they wouldn't be able to get you. Ask why they didn't leave a message? If they say they called you 50 times, just ask them why they ignored your instructions to leave a message 50 times? They have a way of communicating with you via phone and mail, they just chose not to. In front of the JP you want to look like you provided them with everything they needed to meet their obligation to get their disclosure to you but it is the prosecutor that is the one that is being hard to deal with. Note that the police like to call you early in the morning (ie. 5-6am) thinking you will be home then. Also watch for different numbers calling you or "Private Call" which means they hit *67 first. Eventually they will probably mail the disclosure to you (if they don't forget). But if it close enough to the court date you can ask that it be stayed because it took them so long to get you disclosure. The other thing they like to do is respond that they can't process your request without you filling out their request form. Surprisingly enough, it doesn't leave space for you to put in any specific information that you need. They just want to give you the minimum amount so that if asked by the JP in court, they can say that they provided disclosure. I have filled out and returned their form with a note indicating that my specific request letter is stapled to it which defeats this. In general, don't make the process simple for them. The more complicated it is, the more chance there is for the prosecutor to screw up.
No one is required to have an email address or even Internet access. They have your mailing address and with your response to their letter they have proof that you were in communication with you. They just prefer not to use the mail.
If you give your phone number and have callerID/voicemail you can have fun with it and play the same game as they are playing. The prosecutor and the police (ie. both may call you to tell you your disclosure can be picked up) do not seem to like to leave voicemail messages. If you don't answer their calls they will probably ignore the voicemail prompt and will just try to call you again. If they state they tried to call you in court, you can say that you didn't receive any messages from them. Respond by asking them when they called and when did they leave a message? Just say you are never at home so unless they left you a message they wouldn't be able to get you. Ask why they didn't leave a message? If they say they called you 50 times, just ask them why they ignored your instructions to leave a message 50 times? They have a way of communicating with you via phone and mail, they just chose not to. In front of the JP you want to look like you provided them with everything they needed to meet their obligation to get their disclosure to you but it is the prosecutor that is the one that is being hard to deal with.
Note that the police like to call you early in the morning (ie. 5-6am) thinking you will be home then. Also watch for different numbers calling you or "Private Call" which means they hit *67 first. Eventually they will probably mail the disclosure to you (if they don't forget). But if it close enough to the court date you can ask that it be stayed because it took them so long to get you disclosure.
The other thing they like to do is respond that they can't process your request without you filling out their request form. Surprisingly enough, it doesn't leave space for you to put in any specific information that you need. They just want to give you the minimum amount so that if asked by the JP in court, they can say that they provided disclosure. I have filled out and returned their form with a note indicating that my specific request letter is stapled to it which defeats this.
In general, don't make the process simple for them. The more complicated it is, the more chance there is for the prosecutor to screw up.
I asked for a copy of the officer's notes, and also notes about my statement. I probably should've asked for more, but in the request for disclosure, I asked for all other things related to the case as well (though I don't know if they will honor this). Any recommendation as to what to ask for disobeying a stop sign? Since they 'couldn't' process my earlier requests, I might as well just make a new request with more items in it. I have been contacting them so far via fax, but I didn't use personal fax. They replied (the notice) to the exact same number I used, which luckily, was my office fax so I had access to it. But what if I had used a commercial fax service? There would be no way that I could get to it. I actually find this action a bit irresponsible, since I have actually left my contact information (my address), and they still chose to send it through fax which might or might not be my personal fax. Should I ignore this notice, and act as if they never sent it? For all practical purposes, I could've missed the notice they faxed, and nowhere in the request I specified 'my' fax number. I don't have a phone with a caller ID or voice mail, so it would be kind of hard to pull. I could probably, however, try giving them my lab/office phone number, which has the ability to take messages. But then again, there is no way to tell who's calling, so it'd still be pretty hard. I'm actually still against giving them my phone number, but it seems at this point, there is no other choice. Most likely right now, I would not be able to make any excuse with regard to delayed disclosure, since they would just say it was my negligence not to put 'enough' contact information...
I asked for a copy of the officer's notes, and also notes about my statement. I probably should've asked for more, but in the request for disclosure, I asked for all other things related to the case as well (though I don't know if they will honor this). Any recommendation as to what to ask for disobeying a stop sign? Since they 'couldn't' process my earlier requests, I might as well just make a new request with more items in it.
I have been contacting them so far via fax, but I didn't use personal fax. They replied (the notice) to the exact same number I used, which luckily, was my office fax so I had access to it. But what if I had used a commercial fax service? There would be no way that I could get to it. I actually find this action a bit irresponsible, since I have actually left my contact information (my address), and they still chose to send it through fax which might or might not be my personal fax. Should I ignore this notice, and act as if they never sent it? For all practical purposes, I could've missed the notice they faxed, and nowhere in the request I specified 'my' fax number.
I don't have a phone with a caller ID or voice mail, so it would be kind of hard to pull. I could probably, however, try giving them my lab/office phone number, which has the ability to take messages. But then again, there is no way to tell who's calling, so it'd still be pretty hard. I'm actually still against giving them my phone number, but it seems at this point, there is no other choice. Most likely right now, I would not be able to make any excuse with regard to delayed disclosure, since they would just say it was my negligence not to put 'enough' contact information...
ok well here is my story .. I had an old megaphone from alarm system and decided since my horns on my car were rusted and were not making a loud enough sound.. i connected the alarm megaphone to the horn wires and it sounded very cool. depending on how log i hold my horn down for . due to the size of the power horn.. and mhy car being a Honda.. meaning no room under the hood i had installed it…
So I got this ticket because the lady behind me was WAY too close and I had to back up before getting hit by another car and dented her bumper.
Offense is stated as follows: Start from Stopped position - Not in Safety
Highway Traffic Act 142 (2)
First of all, I don't really know what that means and if it says that I was not in safety (which I wasn't) why am I getting a ticket? And why didn't the…
This is my first time ever getting a ticket and I am completely frustrated and don't know what to do.
On July 7th, I was driving to work, taking my usual route and it's about a 15 minute drive for me. At the first red light, I noticed I had a bit of time thanks to the countdown so I quickly reached into my bag to grab a lip balm. I noticed I had brought the wrong one so I just kept it out and…
It happened last December. I was facing north in the middle of the intersection at Donmills and McNicoll waiting to make a left turn. There was a big white van on the other side of McNicoll facing south waiting to turn left too. When the light changed to amber, I checked and the road was clear, there was no upcoming vehicle. So slowly I made the left turn. Suddenly a small car dashed up from…
First off, the most similar case and HELPFUL thread has y far come from neo333: a great read and very similar and relevant to my case and of course ticketcombat.com
I'll cole's notes this so that it can be concise and can recap my experience with disclosure, notes and failed stay request and adjourned court date. Thank you for reading and leaving your opinion.
I got a notice in the mail that trial is set four weeks from today, so it's time to request disclosure. I have zero chance of getting an 11b since trial is less than two months after the offense date and the officer did not reduce the charge. I really want to try and create delays on the trial, to reduce the chance of the officer showing up on multiple occasions. Is there any known loop-holes…
Got my first ticket last Thursday and I have a couple of questions. I was driving westbound on Moore St. (west of Bayview) and made a left onto a residential street at a 4-way stop sign. It was my first time driving through that area - was driving my girlfriend to a wisdom tooth surgery.
The police were set up to catch people, as that intersection had a no left turn sign from 7-9 am (buses…
I was in a light collision with a police vehicle last November and will be having a trial by the end of the month. What happened was I was pulled over. I stopped and kept my right signal on. The cop car then tried to pull behind me when he was on my left but 2 cars pulled behind me. The cop wasn't too smart and instead of waiting for the two cars to pull away, he drove forward and boxed all the…
A friend of mine (who is from China and with no knowledge of English at all) asked me to interpret for him on court.
He got pulled over by a stealth patrol car last october, got 3 tickets (fail to show insurance card, using cell phones and fail to stop on right for emergency vehicle) , court date is next week. He told me his insurance expired for less than a month and other charges are false…
My husband was driving my car and passed a school bus with flashing lights. He did not realize this until he was past the bus. The driver honked at him but there were no cops nearby and he didn't get pulled over. I believe the driver or witnesses reported this and we got issued a ticket in the mail. The ticket is under my name as the registered owner: charged with Fail to Stop for…
I have just got a ticket (Fail to yield on through highway) and by the way it's me first ticket and this is how I got it.
Me driving in a residential neighborhood maybe 10-15 km/h approaching a stop sign completely stopped at the stop sign started moving again turning right and out of nowhere I was hit by this van. he went directly to the driver's side fender,wheel, and bumper. Since it was my…
Hi I'm new to this forum but I hope I'm bringing you all good news.
I recently wrote a book short titled ABUSE OF POWER
This book is all about how the Ontario government broke the law to enact the new street racing legislation.
To start with the denial of the right to remain innocent until proven guilty was enacted without due process under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. How it wasn't done…
So i lent my car to my gf the other day and she went to drop her friend at a Go station but when she was turning left into the parking lot at the Go station a bus hits her from behind while she was turning so now my rear fender is pushed in and more scrathes and my bumper is damaged...but the cop that showed up just kept telling my gf thats its her fault cause its private property...is that true…
Hi, thanks for reading. I've read a bunch of articles online and searched the forum to try and find my answers but I'm still unsure so I'm creating a new thread.
I was following a car that was going SUPER fast down the DVP but I got pulled over. I was speeding, too; however I don't want to use the "you got the wrong guy" defence because I'll probably lose.
I left my home at 4 am to pick up my daughter from downtown Toronto. When I passed the major intersection south of my house there were two police cars in the middle of the intersection and one officer waved me through the intersection.
When I returned with my daughter at 5:30 am the police cars were still in the intersection. I slowed down as I approached the intersection but the police were no…
I will be representing my wife at her speeding trial next week. Mostly everything is pretty much run of the mill but since she wasn't speeding we will be having her take the stand. Since this opens up the opportunity for the prosecutor to cross examine, I am just wondering if anyone here knows what kind of questions we should expect from the prosecutor in order to best prepare.
When the court sends out the notice of trial, do they use the address the officer wrote on the ticket, or the actual address in the MTO database? In the case of the former, what are the implications? The reason I ask is that my wife got a ticket last week and the officer wrote the wrong city on it.
This topic discusses the same thing but with CN police; is it any different for regular offences?
Driving onto ramp entering a major highway, posted limit is 100km/h, suggested ramp limit is 40km/h - I end up colliding with the concrete barrier on the passenger side of the vehicle.
Police arrive, suspect alcohol and breathalyze me with a result of 0.00 - I am asked for a statement and cautioned, however (stupidly) I proceed to provide the details anyways.
My friends and I were heading to Kelso Beach, I had signalled and i pulled off to the shoulder as my car seemed to be making noise, but after riding over the shoulder the noise stopped, i signalled back again and merged back into traffic after making sure it was safe, the officer which was ahead of me on the shoulder a few meters away pulled me over.…
I've decided to fight a traffic ticket for stop sign violation. The offense was 12 months ago, and I've got a court date for next Tuesday. I've requested disclosure and, although a bit last minute, received it two weeks before my court date.
Upon reviewing the case materials, there isn't much of a defense I can find -based on the cop having an obstructed view, or any mistakes in the…
I will be going to trial for my red light camera offence.
I'll be arguing two issues, centered on the fact that there are two essential elements of 144(18) - a) a vehicle approaching the intersection shall stop; and b) the vehicle shall not proceed until green. Both essential elements must be contravened beyond a reasonable doubt to be an offence.
1) My ticket says I (being the owner) am "charged…
I'm a newbie, so be kind if I'm messing up. Question: is it illegal to signal oncoming traffic that they are approaching a speed trap by flashing one's lights?
I ask because I was stopped for doing that yesterday evening, but did not end up with a ticket. The officer spend 5-10 minutes n his car, then sent me on my way. I'm wondering if he changed his mind or found out it was legal.