Hi, I recently hit a van from behind, at a busy cross section. The reason was my lunch bag and coffee dropped to floor with a 'bang', so I did not fully stop. The police came and charge me with HTA 130 (careless driving), is this too much for me? BTW I did not mention the coffee thing to the police since I thought this would only involve insurance company (I was hit by somebody a few years ago, the police just came and gave us a report number, did not charge anyone). I plan to fight on trial, any suggestions? Thanks in advance Ming
Hi,
I recently hit a van from behind, at a busy cross section. The reason was my lunch bag and coffee dropped to floor with a 'bang', so I did not fully stop. The police came and charge me with HTA 130 (careless driving), is this too much for me?
BTW I did not mention the coffee thing to the police since I thought this would only involve insurance company (I was hit by somebody a few years ago, the police just came and gave us a report number, did not charge anyone).
How much damage was done? A fender-bender bump with no injuries where you were otherwise driving somewhat normally does not qualify for a careless driving conviction. To use some technical jargon, careless driving requires a large departure from the standard of driving of a reasonable and prudent driver. The courts have ruled that momentary inattention that resulted in a fender-bender is not sufficient to count as careless driving. If the van ahead of you was stopped and you hit it, generally you will get the careless driving charge, but it can be beaten in court. Couple of relevant cases here: R. v. Erredia: http://www.canlii.org/en/on/oncj/doc/20 ... cj303.html R. v. Morgan: http://www.canlii.org/en/on/oncj/doc/20 ... cj336.html You should know that, more than anything in your case, careless driving has disastrous implications for your insurance. You may want to consider hiring a paralegal on this one. It is beatable, in that careless driving is one of the hardest Highway Traffic Act offences to get a conviction on, but with severe consequences possible I'd recommend professional help.
How much damage was done? A fender-bender bump with no injuries where you were otherwise driving somewhat normally does not qualify for a careless driving conviction. To use some technical jargon, careless driving requires a large departure from the standard of driving of a reasonable and prudent driver. The courts have ruled that momentary inattention that resulted in a fender-bender is not sufficient to count as careless driving. If the van ahead of you was stopped and you hit it, generally you will get the careless driving charge, but it can be beaten in court.
You should know that, more than anything in your case, careless driving has disastrous implications for your insurance. You may want to consider hiring a paralegal on this one. It is beatable, in that careless driving is one of the hardest Highway Traffic Act offences to get a conviction on, but with severe consequences possible I'd recommend professional help.
Thanks for all your info. will study them later. The police said the damage is over $1000, the van (Taxi) was actually modified on the bumper for picking up disability people, the driver tried but could not open the door. My sedan has a couple of dents and scratches on the hood. The van was stopping before a traffic light (the van is the 3rd car before the light), not sure if it is fully stopped! No witness mentioned in police's ticket. If at trial, will the judge believe 'the bag&coffee droping' caused my "momentary inattention"? Do you know the cost to hire a paralegal? Ming
Thanks for all your info. will study them later.
The police said the damage is over $1000, the van (Taxi) was actually modified on the bumper for picking up disability people, the driver tried but could not open the door. My sedan has a couple of dents and scratches on the hood.
The van was stopping before a traffic light (the van is the 3rd car before the light), not sure if it is fully stopped! No witness mentioned in police's ticket.
If at trial, will the judge believe 'the bag&coffee droping' caused my "momentary inattention"?
It will also depend on how long the light was red. If it was just turning red and traffic started slowing, then yes it could be momentary inattention. If the light was red for a minute then you were driving up to a red light and should have been preparing to stop in which case the coffee excuse is worthless.
It will also depend on how long the light was red. If it was just turning red and traffic started slowing, then yes it could be momentary inattention. If the light was red for a minute then you were driving up to a red light and should have been preparing to stop in which case the coffee excuse is worthless.
Would also like to add... those two cases basically say that minor misjudgments and momentary inattention are not grounds for careless driving. Also in Erredia, the officer charged the driver with careless "because no other charge fit." (This was due to a cracked mirror where a transport truck tried to squeeze by a parked garbage truck on a narrow road under construction.) The JP at trial agreed that it had to be careless because no other charge fit, but the appeal Judge ruled that was wrong and that a person must exhibit a departure from the standard of care of a reasonable and prudent driver, not just make a minor mistake, to be convicted of careless driving.
Would also like to add... those two cases basically say that minor misjudgments and momentary inattention are not grounds for careless driving. Also in Erredia, the officer charged the driver with careless "because no other charge fit." (This was due to a cracked mirror where a transport truck tried to squeeze by a parked garbage truck on a narrow road under construction.) The JP at trial agreed that it had to be careless because no other charge fit, but the appeal Judge ruled that was wrong and that a person must exhibit a departure from the standard of care of a reasonable and prudent driver, not just make a minor mistake, to be convicted of careless driving.
I had kind of the same issue. Last week I was driving in Guelph Ontario to work. There was a truck in front of me and a car in front of her. The car slowed down because he was going to turn. sHE APPLED HER BRAKES BUT DID NOT STOP.As a result I applied my brakes. The cart did not turn and she then had to slam on her brakes to avoid hitting him(which she admitted to) i then hit my brakes and i wouldve been able to not hit her but the road was wet and my brakes locked and I skid into her. I hit her hitch and my car has all of the damage. She was a real piece of work trying to say that I was riding her bumper and driving out of control. i was going 50 which is the speed limit and if I was riding her bumper like she said the damage would have been much worse. I got charged with careless and got a fine of $500 and 6 points. The cop said that now the new rules is that if the cop does not see it happen they have no choice but to charge you with careless. I have been driving for 8 years and have never even had a parking ticket. He then told me not to go thru insurence because she wasnt going to. I then found out that I had to cause the police would send the charge to my company and would would have to report it. I just want to know why i got such a heavy fine when i was following the rules of the road but i still get screwed? I have a court date in Jan and i really dont want this charge. I just dont fully believe that i should have been charged with careless when I was not speeding,I was wearing my seatbelt and the roads were wet and cold due to weather. He said he didnt care about my side. Is this fair? I dont think he shouldve been giving me insurence advice when obvisally he did not know what he was talking about. Luckly i know an insurence broker who told me the truth and my uncle is a lawer so he is gunna try to help me.
I had kind of the same issue. Last week I was driving in Guelph Ontario to work. There was a truck in front of me and a car in front of her. The car slowed down because he was going to turn. sHE APPLED HER BRAKES BUT DID NOT STOP.As a result I applied my brakes. The cart did not turn and she then had to slam on her brakes to avoid hitting him(which she admitted to) i then hit my brakes and i wouldve been able to not hit her but the road was wet and my brakes locked and I skid into her. I hit her hitch and my car has all of the damage. She was a real piece of work trying to say that I was riding her bumper and driving out of control. i was going 50 which is the speed limit and if I was riding her bumper like she said the damage would have been much worse. I got charged with careless and got a fine of $500 and 6 points. The cop said that now the new rules is that if the cop does not see it happen they have no choice but to charge you with careless. I have been driving for 8 years and have never even had a parking ticket. He then told me not to go thru insurence because she wasnt going to. I then found out that I had to cause the police would send the charge to my company and would would have to report it. I just want to know why i got such a heavy fine when i was following the rules of the road but i still get screwed? I have a court date in Jan and i really dont want this charge. I just dont fully believe that i should have been charged with careless when I was not speeding,I was wearing my seatbelt and the roads were wet and cold due to weather. He said he didnt care about my side. Is this fair? I dont think he shouldve been giving me insurence advice when obvisally he did not know what he was talking about. Luckly i know an insurence broker who told me the truth and my uncle is a lawer so he is gunna try to help me.
Well, I'm sure then that your uncle will tell you that following the speed limit does not mean you can not be guilty of careless, nor does wearing your seatbelt. You were ticketed for careless for one of 2 reasons: either the officer felt you were guilty of careless driving or they didn't know what other charge to lay but felt you needed to be charged with something. There is no such rule, new or old, that says an officer must charge you with anything, whether they saw the collision or not. If you feel that, given the totality of the circumstances, you were not guilty of careless driving, then your option is, of course, to fight it.
Well, I'm sure then that your uncle will tell you that following the speed limit does not mean you can not be guilty of careless, nor does wearing your seatbelt. You were ticketed for careless for one of 2 reasons: either the officer felt you were guilty of careless driving or they didn't know what other charge to lay but felt you needed to be charged with something. There is no such rule, new or old, that says an officer must charge you with anything, whether they saw the collision or not.
If you feel that, given the totality of the circumstances, you were not guilty of careless driving, then your option is, of course, to fight it.
Then why would he tell me that he had to charge me with careless cause that was the law? I just dont get how someone with not even a parking ticket get such a harsh penalty?
Then why would he tell me that he had to charge me with careless cause that was the law? I just dont get how someone with not even a parking ticket get such a harsh penalty?
So your saying I deserve this charge? I was not driving out of control... i know I hit her from behind and it is my fault but I would like to fight the charge of careless
So your saying I deserve this charge? I was not driving out of control... i know I hit her from behind and it is my fault but I would like to fight the charge of careless
Careless driving does not mean you were driving out of control. Careless driving means, as OTTLegal says, you were driving without DUE care and attention. You could be "out of control," but you do not have to be in order to be charged/convicted of careless. If you really were driving out of control, that's beyond careless driving - that is Dangerous Driving, a criminal charge. Your options include: - Pleading guilty to a lesser charge (e.g. following too closely, fail to turn left to avoid a collision, etc) - Fighting it in court (prepare for a full-on battle) It is one of the most serious HTA charges, but also one of the hardest to prove. I would recommend getting professional legal help from someone who is familiar with dealing with traffic court. You said your relative is a lawyer, so he should be able to point you in the right direction.
Careless driving does not mean you were driving out of control. Careless driving means, as OTTLegal says, you were driving without DUE care and attention. You could be "out of control," but you do not have to be in order to be charged/convicted of careless. If you really were driving out of control, that's beyond careless driving - that is Dangerous Driving, a criminal charge.
Your options include:
- Pleading guilty to a lesser charge (e.g. following too closely, fail to turn left to avoid a collision, etc)
- Fighting it in court (prepare for a full-on battle)
It is one of the most serious HTA charges, but also one of the hardest to prove. I would recommend getting professional legal help from someone who is familiar with dealing with traffic court. You said your relative is a lawyer, so he should be able to point you in the right direction.
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
Hi so I have a bizzare situation. Today I received a summons for "being the owner of a motor vehicle bearing Vehicle Identification Number ###, failed to submit the vehicle, equipment or drawn vehicle for inspection or tests as required by an officer" for a vehicle I previously owned. Apparently a violation of HTA 82(9).
The date of offense is June 15, the summons was issued on October 26th and I…
Hi, I need some help for the ticket of lmproper left turn.
When i drove my car from east to west, intending to make a left turn and stop in front of stop line. There was a car in front of me, which has turn on yellow light. The light was turning red and then I thought I cannot leave in the intersection and turned, an incoming car was runing the light and hit me. No one got hurt but both cars had…
Have a ticket in which the radar used was a Genesis VP Directional. I had downloaded the manual for a Genesis VP but I now realize that the unit is not the same so it is the wrong manual. My trial is very soon so I do not have time to ask for disclosure of the manual.
Does anyone have access to an electronic version of the manual for Genesis VP Directional?
I was pulled over today in the city of Oakville for going 75 in a 40 zone. However, I am 100 percent certain that I was going only 50 in the 40 zone. When I was pulled over, I was driving my Dad's car which I felt was the reason I was getting stopped since two teenagers driving a 2013 S Class. He asked does I know why I am being pulled over and I…
I really need help on fighting my 9 tickets i received from one police officer. Here is some background of what happened!
I was caught speeding 66km on a 40km (school zone) on January 29, 2010. I was driving my friend's car and turns out she didnt renew the validation on the vehicle and didnt leave the up to date insurance paper on the car.
Hey question that I think here's probably the best place to get the answer:
I was charged with a careless driving offence in oct, trail in early april, so as of right now my insurance record is 100% clean... except the officer did file an accident report at the scene where I was classified at fault due to it being PI (although very minor). The person I hit did not sue etc, so the insurance company…
Very much unintentionally passed a stopped bus, with sign and flashing lights. Didn't realize I had done it until I was at the end of the bus. I'll save you my sob story, but it was truly accidental. I'm generally very cautious and have a perfect driving record. Never been stopped.
While I realize if a cop had seen me that I would have gotten a ticket, there were none in sight. Though I may very…
I was recently pulled over for running a red and I wasnt able to find my wallet in the car at the time to hand over my license. I had a passport in the vehicle that he used. The wallet was in the vehicle, it just fell through the seats. (Tough to find a black leather wallet in a black/black leather truck at night).
The officer still wrote the tickets for both he signed the one ticket (failure to…
I was passing a vehicle that was going slow for me and there was an oncoming vehicle coming at me. I speed up to get around the person I was passing and the oncoming vehicle turns out to be a cop who turns around and tickets me for going 110km in a 80km zone. How does it work with passing a vehicle? Once I passed the vehicle I went back down to my original speed of just under 100. The officer…
I picked up a brand new (old stock) Fuzzbuster a while ago at auction (wopping $5!!) and I want to mount it on the dash of my old GTO as a cool accessory when I show it at car shows. But I'm not sure if it's legal or not.
Here's my thoughts:
- It is early 70's technology (x-band) so it won't detect modern police radar. That's assuming no police force uses the old x-band frequency.
Hi guys, I'm still a little in shock of getting my first traffic ticket...
On Monday afternoon, I was returning from Toronto to Ottawa on HW416, I was driving about 15 over 100 like always. Then a car came very close to me on the left lane and made me nervous, I speed up unintentionally to pass the car and change lane, but while doing that a police car pull out of the median. He was hiding in…
May i ask this question regarding transport trucks limited to 105 km/h. Moving road blocks or safety?
IMO it isnt speed that kills. I find transport trucks infact help keep the road going. With cars that choose to not move to the right and slow down the middle lane the trucks would try to pass in their passing lane therefore the slower traffic would move right.
Received a notice from the police that a motion is being put forward to adjourn upcoming trial date. Notice indicates that an officer has sworn an affidavit that the crucial witness cannot attend date trial is set for (we know there is a social engagement at 7:30 pm for the witness, trial time is 1:30 pm). This further delay is a big problem to my daughter's case. She is moving away to…
This is what happened. I was travelling west on a four lane city street that was very light with traffic. I was making a left hand turn into a wide driveway of a business. There was traffic lights about 100 yards past the driveway and were red for the east-west traffic. I was in the left lane with my signal on and there was no oncoming traffic due to the red light. I was slowed right down…
I was driving my families older car and got pulled over, and the police officer informed me my plate was dirty. He issued me a ticket of $110 for the 13(2) act and obstruct plate as the offense. He informed me that such a plate could be used to avoid red lights as well as 407 tolls, also that buying a new plate can help to lower the ticket if I fight the charge, and that he also took a picture…
I received a red light camera ticket. In the picture, you see an ambulance in front of me with flashing lights. I had moved to alleviate the traffic behind me for the emergency vehicles coming behind it.
Is this a possible defense, if so, does anyone know any good case law to justify this position?
what happens if they charge someone for driving at 151Km/hr in montreal and they put for trial, appear after some months and sadly lost the trial ?
In montreal its $300 fine and 5demerit points ...
I heard Ontario and Qubec share the information. So once the trial is over ( and when the file moved to ontario) will his car gets towed and licence get suspended for 7days (later to 30 days ) ? and he…
I got a notice in the mail that trial is set four weeks from today, so it's time to request disclosure. I have zero chance of getting an 11b since trial is less than two months after the offense date and the officer did not reduce the charge. I really want to try and create delays on the trial, to reduce the chance of the officer showing up on multiple occasions. Is there any known loop-holes…
This weekend my father was involved in an accident with a transit bus in Burlington, ON. After the police showed up he was charged with "Fail to obey stop sign" Sec. 136(1)(a). At this particular intersection there NO stop signs but there are traffic lights. There is construction going on there so one of the light posts is smaller.
Driving conditions were terribly wet and visibility was low.…
So my boyfriend and I recently started dating. I have a vehicle that was insured. Insurance cost too much and I found it was just as easy to walk to work due to how close it was. But I didn't want to get rid of my car just yet, plus I'm still making payments on it as well. When we moved into our appartment together, I had it towed to my parking spot out back.
I was making a left hand legal turn on a green light, a driver came through the lane I was supposed to be going into ran the red and hit me head on as I was turning into my lane. When the officer came he was telling me that I was racing and driving recklessly because apparently there was reports of street racing in the area. I was not charged on the scene for this but I'm scared i am going to be…
I got a ticket for failure to surrender insurance because I did not have my new insurance stubs with me, just a bunch of expired ones. My policy number has not changed, so I asked the officer to just run the policy number so I could prove that I was in fact insured. He said they don't have that ability, handed me the ticket and reminded me that my car could have been impounded.
So I'm in a bit of a pickle and would appreciate if someone could clarify something for me.
I'm less than a month away (test on April 6th) from getting my full G license, and got a speeding ticket recently. The ticket was for 49km/h over the posted limit of 100km/h on the 403 in Oakville/Halton region, but was reduced from the initial ~60km/h over.
