My wife, who has never had a traffic ticket in her life, just got 11 points. Two tickets: "following too closely" and "failure to stop" She was on a residential street and was behind a car at a crosswalk waiting for a pedestrian. Pedestrian crossed, they continued. Cop was drivig towards them down a side street , and as they passed he went after my wife. At the next block there was a red light. Cop was behind my wife lights flashing - car infront of my wife - she was boxed in, stopped, and had nowhere to go but the Cop made no attempt to get out of his car. She saw him and figured he wanted the two cars to clear the intersection. So when the light turned green, my wife made a right hand turn, cop followed zapped the siren and she stopped. Totally bogus. He told her she had to be a minimum 5 car lengths behind the car infront of her. Was she supposed to stay stopped at the crosswalk and wait for the car in front to get 5 lengths away before proceeding? It's totally a case of him seeing them after they were stopped at the crosswalk, but he had no idea that's what had happened. Then he said sorry about the points, "maybe you can go to court and I can help you there". So why bother in the first place? Any help with this would be apreciated
My wife, who has never had a traffic ticket in her life, just got 11 points.
Two tickets: "following too closely" and "failure to stop"
She was on a residential street and was behind a car at a crosswalk waiting for a pedestrian. Pedestrian crossed, they continued. Cop was drivig towards them down a side street , and as they passed he went after my wife.
At the next block there was a red light. Cop was behind my wife lights flashing - car infront of my wife - she was boxed in, stopped, and had nowhere to go but the Cop made no attempt to get out of his car. She saw him and figured he wanted the two cars to clear the intersection. So when the light turned green, my wife made a right hand turn, cop followed zapped the siren and she stopped.
Totally bogus. He told her she had to be a minimum 5 car lengths behind the car infront of her. Was she supposed to stay stopped at the crosswalk and wait for the car in front to get 5 lengths away before proceeding? It's totally a case of him seeing them after they were stopped at the crosswalk, but he had no idea that's what had happened.
Then he said sorry about the points, "maybe you can go to court and I can help you there". So why bother in the first place?
Demerit Points: If a person is convicted of two or more offences arising out of the same time/date and the penalty imposed by the court in respect of any of the convictions does not include a period of licence suspension, demerit points shall only be recorded for the conviction carrying the greatest number of points and, if that number is the same for two or more convictions, points shall be recorded for one conviction only. - follow too close = 4 points - fail to stop on right = 3 points (hta sec 159) - fail to stop = 7 points (hta sec 216)
Demerit Points: If a person is convicted of two or more offences arising out of the same time/date and the penalty imposed by the court in respect of any of the convictions does not include a period of licence suspension, demerit points shall only be recorded for the conviction carrying the greatest number of points and, if that number is the same for two or more convictions, points shall be recorded for one conviction only.
- follow too close = 4 points
- fail to stop on right = 3 points (hta sec 159)
- fail to stop = 7 points (hta sec 216)
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
doesn't help the fact the whole thing is bogus. Following too close is relative to speed and circumstance. There is an 8 foot fence on the corner of his street and the street my wife was travelling on. From his vantage point he couldn't possibly see the crosswalk my wife and the car infront of her were stopped at just prior. He cant even see those two lanes of traffic (we have pictures) And, my wife did stop at within a block of where he picked her up. She was at a red light with actually not one but 2 cars in front of her. it was a two lane street she was far enough back from the intersection not to cause a hazard if the cop wanted to get out of his car and approach. Instead he waited until the light turned green, she turned the corner and stopped when he followed. Again within a block. Infact she didn't drive more than 200 metres from where he was parked originally. It seems like the guy was pissed his school zone speed trap was going nowhere and needed to trump something up to meet his quota. yes, i know there are no "quotas" ... but there are suggestions and peer pressure to "ensure the streets are safe" especially when the amount of tickets handed out have declined.
doesn't help the fact the whole thing is bogus. Following too close is relative to speed and circumstance. There is an 8 foot fence on the corner of his street and the street my wife was travelling on. From his vantage point he couldn't possibly see the crosswalk my wife and the car infront of her were stopped at just prior. He cant even see those two lanes of traffic (we have pictures)
And, my wife did stop at within a block of where he picked her up. She was at a red light with actually not one but 2 cars in front of her. it was a two lane street she was far enough back from the intersection not to cause a hazard if the cop wanted to get out of his car and approach. Instead he waited until the light turned green, she turned the corner and stopped when he followed. Again within a block. Infact she didn't drive more than 200 metres from where he was parked originally.
It seems like the guy was pissed his school zone speed trap was going nowhere and needed to trump something up to meet his quota.
yes, i know there are no "quotas" ... but there are suggestions and peer pressure to "ensure the streets are safe" especially when the amount of tickets handed out have declined.
So write out a list of questions for the officer, prepare a closing statement summing up all your valid points, and go to court and have a JP rule. The new strategy appears to write lots of tickets per stop, go to court where the Crown will drop one or two of them. The cop is happy to get his overtime pay for court attendance (that's why he suggested going to court). The court is happy to get some money when the poor lamb pleads guilty to something (thinking they got a good deal). Eventually the insurance company is happy to double rates for three years based on the conviction. See? EVERYONE is HAPPY! ('cept you!) Welcome to Ontario ;) OR... just fight each charge. At the first trial, ask for a continuance for more time, and ask for all charges to be tried separately (individual court dates). I find JP's are VERY much aware of police and prosecution tactics, and seem quite anxious to rule in the defendants favor if they have a remotely viable defense.
So write out a list of questions for the officer, prepare a closing statement summing up all your valid points, and go to court and have a JP rule.
The new strategy appears to write lots of tickets per stop, go to court where the Crown will drop one or two of them. The cop is happy to get his overtime pay for court attendance (that's why he suggested going to court). The court is happy to get some money when the poor lamb pleads guilty to something (thinking they got a good deal). Eventually the insurance company is happy to double rates for three years based on the conviction.
See? EVERYONE is HAPPY!
('cept you!)
Welcome to Ontario
OR... just fight each charge. At the first trial, ask for a continuance for more time, and ask for all charges to be tried separately (individual court dates). I find JP's are VERY much aware of police and prosecution tactics, and seem quite anxious to rule in the defendants favor if they have a remotely viable defense.
My wife is going to court next week and we have disclosure. She was driving in 50 and had just stopped behind another vehicle at a crosswalk for a pedestrian. After starting up again, the passed an intersection where a cruiser was sitting. He couldn't see the crosswalk from his vantage point (we have pictures) he pulls out and gets behind my wife. The drive a block where there is a red light. My wife is third in the stopped line of traffic. Cop makes no move to get out of his car (his notes say his siren was on but strangely enough no one made a move to clear the intersection). The light turns green, my wife makes a right hand turn - she was in the right hand lane. After turning she sees the cop still behind her so she stops. He gives her a ticket for following too close and failure to stop for a police officer. Only tickets she has ever had in almost 30 yrs driving. 14 points. Totally bogus. How should we defend? Thanks
My wife is going to court next week and we have disclosure. She was driving in 50 and had just stopped behind another vehicle at a crosswalk for a pedestrian. After starting up again, the passed an intersection where a cruiser was sitting. He couldn't see the crosswalk from his vantage point (we have pictures) he pulls out and gets behind my wife. The drive a block where there is a red light. My wife is third in the stopped line of traffic. Cop makes no move to get out of his car (his notes say his siren was on but strangely enough no one made a move to clear the intersection). The light turns green, my wife makes a right hand turn - she was in the right hand lane. After turning she sees the cop still behind her so she stops. He gives her a ticket for following too close and failure to stop for a police officer. Only tickets she has ever had in almost 30 yrs driving. 14 points. Totally bogus.
Sorry for the typos in the first post ... lol. To add more detail there is no evidence as to estimated speed or the distance my wife was travelling behind the vehicle in front of her. He only says he told my wife she has to maintain a "minimum" distance of three car lengths. It says so in his notes. Nowhere, is this stated in the HTA. The fact he states she came to a stop at the next block at a traffic light without incident almost seems to contradict his testimony that she was unsafely following the vehicle in front of her, doesn't it? Where does common sense come in? I know ignorance of the law is not a defence but if you are not speeding, and there is no evidence or accusation you were, you haven't rear-ended anyone do you automatically assume the cop, who made no effort to get out of his car when you were stopped, is after you?
Sorry for the typos in the first post ... lol. To add more detail there is no evidence as to estimated speed or the distance my wife was travelling behind the vehicle in front of her. He only says he told my wife she has to maintain a "minimum" distance of three car lengths. It says so in his notes. Nowhere, is this stated in the HTA. The fact he states she came to a stop at the next block at a traffic light without incident almost seems to contradict his testimony that she was unsafely following the vehicle in front of her, doesn't it? Where does common sense come in? I know ignorance of the law is not a defence but if you are not speeding, and there is no evidence or accusation you were, you haven't rear-ended anyone do you automatically assume the cop, who made no effort to get out of his car when you were stopped, is after you?
Have you looked up any case law regarding "follow too close" on CanLII? Regardless, like Simon Borys, I'd also recommend a paralegal. If she gets convicted of these charges, she will almost surely have her insurance cancelled and be forced to use the Facility Association, which, generally, runs $12 000 to $25 000 per year.
Have you looked up any case law regarding "follow too close" on CanLII?
Regardless, like Simon Borys, I'd also recommend a paralegal. If she gets convicted of these charges, she will almost surely have her insurance cancelled and be forced to use the Facility Association, which, generally, runs $12 000 to $25 000 per year.
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
Hi everyone. I'm asking for a friend who has a question of interpretation.
He was ticketed for using a hand-held device. He contends that he was acting within the exemption provided under Subsection 14 (1) of O. Reg. 366/09, which reads as follows (emphasis added):
Hey guys i just wanted to know what speeds you see others do on the roads on a regular basis. As we all know no body drives 100 km. It seems they only hit that speed twice once on the way up and once on the way down.
it seems the De Facto limit on the 401 is about 120-130. But lately i dont know if…
On June 10, 2017, I was pulled over by an OPP on the 403 heading WB and told I registered 136km/hr. I kept chit chat to a minimum and took my ticket and went on with my day. I later requested my disclosure and did not receive it until a week before my Oct. 27 court date, and so I had my date…
Anyone know any more information? Apparently kathleen wynne mentioned trying to introduce legislation after more than 20 years of no speed cameras. My guess is that it wont happen, since they've tried before many times to bring it back after it was abolished.
The other day I was given a ticket for speeding 119 in a 90, on highway 17 near Marathon, ON (Speeding ticket capital of the universe, BTW). The officer claims to have "clocked" me using the vehicle mounted radar at 121 KMH and dropped it (presumably to lower fine and demerits).
I posted this in the 3 Demerit Section and haven't received any
responses.
I received a failure to stop at an amber light ticket on April 17, 2009. At my First Attendance Meeting I asked to read the police officer's notes and remember thinking how ridiculous they were and the difficulty…
I was on the right side of the road going straight when a pedestrian waved down the taxi driver in the lane next to me. He pulled over to the right without any notice or signalling and hit me with the side of his car.
There were many witnesses but I immediately had a concussion and did not think of…
My mother was driving EB on a 4 lane street (2 lanes EB, 2 lanes WB).
She was in the left hand lane and started a left hand turn so as to enter a side street, crossing WB traffic. There was NO intersection. She hit a cyclist who was heading WB. Police where called but none showed up. My…
If the speed limit is 50, and you do 100+, not only do you get 6 points. Your car gets impounded for a week, and your license suspended for 7 days, along with a hefty fine of at least $2000. The penalty is actually the same as for racing. The law came in effect on October 1, 2007. Remember -…
I was driving westbound on Hwy. 8 earlier this month in North Dumfries Township, approaching the Cambridge city limits. The weather was clear and the roads were dry. I noticed a vehicle on the shoulder on my side of the road, pointing towards me. This didn't concern me right away, as it is a rural…
