Ignition interlock devices, further provisions - 41.3 Parties to judicial review (1) The parties to any judicial review brought in respect of section 41.2 are the Registrar and the person whose drivers licence is subject to the condition prohibiting him or her from driving any motor vehicle that is not equipped with an approved ignition interlock device. 2000, c. 35, s. 1. Documents privileged (2) Documents filed with the Ministry for the purposes of section 41.2 are privileged for the information of the Ministry only and shall not be open for public inspection. 2000, c. 35, s. 1. Protection from personal liability (3) No action or other proceeding for damages shall be instituted against a person authorized under subsection 41.2 (14) to install or maintain an approved ignition interlock device, unless the person was negligent in the performance of his or her duties and responsibilities under section 41.2. 2000, c. 35, s. 1. Same (4) No action or other proceeding for damages shall be instituted against the Registrar or any employee of the Ministry for the removal of a condition prohibiting a person from driving a motor vehicle that is not equipped with an approved ignition interlock device or for the failure to remove the condition, if the Registrar or employee acted in good faith in the execution or intended execution of his or her duties under section 41.2. 2000, c. 35, s. 1. Crown not relieved of liability (5) Despite subsections 5 (2) and (4) of the Proceedings Against the Crown Act, subsections (3) and (4) do not relieve the Crown of liability in respect of a tort committed by a person mentioned in subsection (3) and (4) to which it would otherwise be subject. 2000, c. 35, s. 1.
Ignition interlock devices, further provisions - 41.3
Parties to judicial review
(1) The parties to any judicial review brought in respect of section 41.2 are the Registrar and the person whose drivers licence is subject to the condition prohibiting him or her from driving any motor vehicle that is not equipped with an approved ignition interlock device. 2000, c. 35, s. 1.
Documents privileged
(2) Documents filed with the Ministry for the purposes of section 41.2 are privileged for the information of the Ministry only and shall not be open for public inspection. 2000, c. 35, s. 1.
Protection from personal liability
(3) No action or other proceeding for damages shall be instituted against a person authorized under subsection 41.2 (14) to install or maintain an approved ignition interlock device, unless the person was negligent in the performance of his or her duties and responsibilities under section 41.2. 2000, c. 35, s. 1.
Same
(4) No action or other proceeding for damages shall be instituted against the Registrar or any employee of the Ministry for the removal of a condition prohibiting a person from driving a motor vehicle that is not equipped with an approved ignition interlock device or for the failure to remove the condition, if the Registrar or employee acted in good faith in the execution or intended execution of his or her duties under section 41.2. 2000, c. 35, s. 1.
Crown not relieved of liability
(5) Despite subsections 5 (2) and (4) of the Proceedings Against the Crown Act, subsections (3) and (4) do not relieve the Crown of liability in respect of a tort committed by a person mentioned in subsection (3) and (4) to which it would otherwise be subject. 2000, c. 35, s. 1.
I got a speeding ticket on the 401 by Cornwall. The officer said I was going 140 initially then dropped it to 130 (for the record I don't believe for a second I was going 140, that's way faster than I would ever intentionally drive). I filled out the info on the back of the notice to request a…
I was recently charged with stunt driving on a 60kmh road. When I was pulled over, the officer told me I was going almost 100kmh (still 40kmh above the limit) but was charging me for stunt driving because I accelerated quickly from an intersection on an empty road (in a straight line). I know…
what to do about a an illegal right turn onto steeles from staines rd
got the ticket around october of last year
put it to trial
so there is a big mess of cars at this intersection and I see a cop outside standing directing traffic with a huge row of cars pulled over to the side, through…
Are any non-domestic vehicles "pursuit-rated" in North America? Also have the Michigan State Police (this is relevant because apparently they have the most accepted selection/testing process) tested any of them to see if they meet their criteria? Just curious...
Ottawa, Canada (AHN) - Beginning Tuesday, or April Fool's Day 2008, fines on Quebec drivers caught overspeeding will be doubled. It is not only the money penalty that will go up, but also demerit points.
The new law, Bill 42, is similar to Ontario's street racing rule. It stipulates fines for…
A friend got a ticket Jan. 9th of this year for doing 110 kph in a 90 kph zone, so 20 over.
What should the set fine and total payable read?
It's confusing to me, as the prescribed fine under HTA s.128 is different than the set fine enumerated by the Chief Justice of the Ontario Court of Justice.
An OPP officer ticketed me claiming I was going 40km/h over the limit (140km/km) on my way home with a few friends on the 401. This is my first ever speeding offense. Although I am sure I was over the limit, I am almost certain that I was not going 40 over, more realistically closer to 30 over. The…
Yesterday night I was charged for stunt driving (excess over 50km/h) and I have a few inquiries. I'm sure you've all heard the same story, but the unmarked cop in an SUV was tailing me for a good 2-3 minutes as I was travelling 120~135 km/h. Then as he came close I decided to boot it up…
I had a speeding ticket in May 2013 which brought me to 9 demerit points out of 15. I received a letter and had to attend an interview. Due to a history of speeding tickets and a previous interview a few years prior, the interviewer decided to put me on zero tolerance for a year. Meaning if I…