Hi there everyone, I have been a frequent visitor of this site for a while now but I just made an account today to ask a question that I have gotten no real clear cut answer on in the past. What I'm talking about here is H.I.D. (High Intensity Discharge) Headlight Conversion Kits. For those of you who don't know what they are all about you can just google it and you will receive more than enough info on them. HID's come in different Kelvin ratings that determine the colour of light output of the bulb. Ranging from 3000k (Yellow) to 4500-6000k (White) to 8000-12000k (Blue to Purple) and then exotic colours like red, green, pink, purple, dark blue. Most of all HID's, including the 12000k bulbs have a much higher Lumen output then halogen bulbs do. But the short and quick is that they are extremely bright headlights that can be put on just about any car out there and most of the time result in a blinding bright white light. Legal or illegal? And what is the offence one could face for having them? I, myself, have used 12000K HID's for one full year now and never had a problem with local Police here in Durham Region. I admit, they are quite bright and probably somewhat blinding for oncoming drivers, sorry, but I can see a whole lot more than my stock halogens offered. Just last week I installed Green bulbs...thats right, Green. They are significantly less blinding than the 12000k bulbs...in fact my friend who I was driving behind the other night says that they aren't blinding at all anymore. I have driven past NUMEROUS police cruisers, even had one officer stare me down through the intersection but I have not had any trouble as of yet. On top of HID's being illegal, what could Green headlights get me in trouble for? Any help is greatly appreciated, Joe. P.S. Thanks for the help but please don't try to educate me on how to properly install H.I.D. systems..about projector headlights and OEM installations and all the differences and how the light will scatter in non-OEM HID installations. I know, I know, I know.
Hi there everyone,
I have been a frequent visitor of this site for a while now but I just made an account today to ask a question that I have gotten no real clear cut answer on in the past.
What I'm talking about here is H.I.D. (High Intensity Discharge) Headlight Conversion Kits. For those of you who don't know what they are all about you can just google it and you will receive more than enough info on them. HID's come in different Kelvin ratings that determine the colour of light output of the bulb. Ranging from 3000k (Yellow) to 4500-6000k (White) to 8000-12000k (Blue to Purple) and then exotic colours like red, green, pink, purple, dark blue. Most of all HID's, including the 12000k bulbs have a much higher Lumen output then halogen bulbs do. But the short and quick is that they are extremely bright headlights that can be put on just about any car out there and most of the time result in a blinding bright white light.
Legal or illegal? And what is the offence one could face for having them?
I, myself, have used 12000K HID's for one full year now and never had a problem with local Police here in Durham Region. I admit, they are quite bright and probably somewhat blinding for oncoming drivers, sorry, but I can see a whole lot more than my stock halogens offered.
Just last week I installed Green bulbs...thats right, Green. They are significantly less blinding than the 12000k bulbs...in fact my friend who I was driving behind the other night says that they aren't blinding at all anymore. I have driven past NUMEROUS police cruisers, even had one officer stare me down through the intersection but I have not had any trouble as of yet.
On top of HID's being illegal, what could Green headlights get me in trouble for?
Any help is greatly appreciated,
Joe.
P.S. Thanks for the help but please don't try to educate me on how to properly install H.I.D. systems..about projector headlights and OEM installations and all the differences and how the light will scatter in non-OEM HID installations. I know, I know, I know.
I think the same charge as too bright of a light. If your's is a light that throws to much light and the green cover reduces it then you are ok. Cheers Viper1
joe1212 wrote:
Hi there everyone,
I have been a frequent visitor of this site for a while now but I just made an account today to ask a question that I have gotten no real clear cut answer on in the past.
What I'm talking about here is H.I.D. (High Intensity Discharge) Headlight Conversion Kits. For those of you who don't know what they are all about you can just google it and you will receive more than enough info on them. HID's come in different Kelvin ratings that determine the colour of light output of the bulb. Ranging from 3000k (Yellow) to 4500-6000k (White) to 8000-12000k (Blue to Purple) and then exotic colours like red, green, pink, purple, dark blue. Most of all HID's, including the 12000k bulbs have a much higher Lumen output then halogen bulbs do. But the short and quick is that they are extremely bright headlights that can be put on just about any car out there and most of the time result in a blinding bright white light.
Legal or illegal? And what is the offence one could face for having them?
I, myself, have used 12000K HID's for one full year now and never had a problem with local Police here in Durham Region. I admit, they are quite bright and probably somewhat blinding for oncoming drivers, sorry, but I can see a whole lot more than my stock halogens offered.
Just last week I installed Green bulbs...thats right, Green. They are significantly less blinding than the 12000k bulbs...in fact my friend who I was driving behind the other night says that they aren't blinding at all anymore. I have driven past NUMEROUS police cruisers, even had one officer stare me down through the intersection but I have not had any trouble as of yet.
On top of HID's being illegal, what could Green headlights get me in trouble for?
Any help is greatly appreciated,
Joe.
P.S. Thanks for the help but please don't try to educate me on how to properly install H.I.D. systems..about projector headlights and OEM installations and all the differences and how the light will scatter in non-OEM HID installations. I know, I know, I know.
I think the same charge as too bright of a light.
If your's is a light that throws to much light and the green cover reduces it then you are ok.
Cheers
Viper1
"hang onto your chair when reading my posts
use at your own risk"
They are not illegal. Refresh me i thought the 12 000 k didnt refer to a brightness but dont those lights give off a purple glow? I believe the 4300 k are the stock they are a crystal white. The 6 k are like a diamond blue i think or a blue-diamond white. 12 k must be purple? I forget but they arent illegal or blinding. Infact they have less glow then halogens they are just brighter and sharper, from what i heard there is less "glare"
They are not illegal.
Refresh me i thought the 12 000 k didnt refer to a brightness but dont those lights give off a purple glow?
I believe the 4300 k are the stock they are a crystal white.
The 6 k are like a diamond blue i think or a blue-diamond white.
12 k must be purple?
I forget but they arent illegal or blinding. Infact they have less glow then halogens they are just brighter and sharper, from what i heard there is less "glare"
I was under the impression that only so many watts are allowed 1 # for low beam and another for high.? It has bean a while since I was setting these up. Cheers Viper1
I was under the impression that only so many watts are allowed 1 # for low beam and another for high.?
It has bean a while since I was setting these up.
Cheers
Viper1
"hang onto your chair when reading my posts
use at your own risk"
As far as the HTA goes, headlights are covered by the lumens they produce. However, I have noticed on my Mazda3 that the lights basically cut off at a certain height. All those lumens are tremendously focused, which is why they are so bright. Now the standard wattage for the ballist is 35, but that includes running the ballist as well, pretty much the same as CFL bulbs for your house. I think you can find your answer here http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statut ... .htm#BK116, look in section 62. Just reread that, 300 candelas and 110m. You'll have to google that one.
As far as the HTA goes, headlights are covered by the lumens they produce. However, I have noticed on my Mazda3 that the lights basically cut off at a certain height. All those lumens are tremendously focused, which is why they are so bright. Now the standard wattage for the ballist is 35, but that includes running the ballist as well, pretty much the same as CFL bulbs for your house. I think you can find your answer here http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statut ... .htm#BK116,
look in section 62.
Just reread that, 300 candelas and 110m. You'll have to google that one.
http://www.OHTA.ca OR http://www.OntarioTrafficAct.com
Green is perhaps the easiest colour on eyes, and is often utilized by people who read a lot. Also, human eye's sensor is the most sensitive in green colour-space (as opposed to blues and reds, human eye can only see these 3 basic colours), so it does make it easier to see better. I have been blinded multiple times by people with too bright a lights, but those with regular cars (aka NOT pickups/minivans/SUVs) have their headlights sitting rather low, and the only thing that's lit up is the road... Heck, I've been blinded when some idiot on a pickup truck decided to tailgate me with powerful bulbs, reflection from the rearview mirror was strong enough... Kelvin is temperature (of emitted light) that corresponds to certain values. You can have a very high-output IR and very low-output UV, although they correspond to 2 completely different Kelvin temperatures. Truth is that a green cover plate will block any other colours, except the green ones, so the total power output is reduced by the amount of all the colours that were blocked out. So, in all likelihood, you did, in fact, reduce intensity. The regulations do say "No more than 300 lumens". See here: http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic610.html
Green is perhaps the easiest colour on eyes, and is often utilized by people who read a lot. Also, human eye's sensor is the most sensitive in green colour-space (as opposed to blues and reds, human eye can only see these 3 basic colours), so it does make it easier to see better. I have been blinded multiple times by people with too bright a lights, but those with regular cars (aka NOT pickups/minivans/SUVs) have their headlights sitting rather low, and the only thing that's lit up is the road... Heck, I've been blinded when some idiot on a pickup truck decided to tailgate me with powerful bulbs, reflection from the rearview mirror was strong enough...
Kelvin is temperature (of emitted light) that corresponds to certain values. You can have a very high-output IR and very low-output UV, although they correspond to 2 completely different Kelvin temperatures.
Truth is that a green cover plate will block any other colours, except the green ones, so the total power output is reduced by the amount of all the colours that were blocked out. So, in all likelihood, you did, in fact, reduce intensity.
Thanks for all the replies everyone, just so everyone is clear, these aren't green covers over the headlights, it as the actual bulb with different gases that creates a green light to be projected. For tdrive2: You are right, the Kelvin rating doesn't refer to brightness, and the 12000K does give off a purple glow. But installing HID's into cars that weren't made for them does give off a lot of glare and tend to be quite blinding for other drivers at night. For Reflections: Thanks for that link, I read it and the only 2 things I may be in conflict with are 62. (1) ....white or amber light only. My lights are very green, I couldn't even play it off as being white or yellow with a hint of green. As far as 300 candelas...I only know the rough amount of lumens my lights put out. I don't know how to convert that..anyone? If it is roughly the same then that doesn't make any sense. Even my 12 000k lights that produce a very low amount of lumens compared to other Kelvin ratings produce over 2000lm which is almost 7 times the legal limit of Candela. http://avexracing.com/shop/index.php?main_page=page_3 Go to that link and scroll to the bottom for a small list of Kelvin ratings and the Lumens they produce. Stock HID's on BMW's, Mercedes...lots of new cars...are all 4300k which is 3600lm!!! So they have tons more light output than mine. What sort of fine am I looking at for having these green lights though? $110? $200? Demerit points? Thanks everyone!
Thanks for all the replies everyone, just so everyone is clear, these aren't green covers over the headlights, it as the actual bulb with different gases that creates a green light to be projected.
For tdrive2: You are right, the Kelvin rating doesn't refer to brightness, and the 12000K does give off a purple glow. But installing HID's into cars that weren't made for them does give off a lot of glare and tend to be quite blinding for other drivers at night.
For Reflections: Thanks for that link, I read it and the only 2 things I may be in conflict with are 62. (1) ....white or amber light only. My lights are very green, I couldn't even play it off as being white or yellow with a hint of green.
As far as 300 candelas...I only know the rough amount of lumens my lights put out. I don't know how to convert that..anyone? If it is roughly the same then that doesn't make any sense. Even my 12 000k lights that produce a very low amount of lumens compared to other Kelvin ratings produce over 2000lm which is almost 7 times the legal limit of Candela.
The green may throw off other drivers, expecting the front of other vehicles to have white or yellow.....Are your marker lights the correct colours?? As far as the lumen or candela count goes, I have yet to see an officer with any sort of measurement device and don't think there would be a practical application of it road side. And just for you halogen headlighters out there, once you drive with HID's, you won't go back.........I OWN THE NIGHT, hahaha :D
these aren't green covers over the headlights, it as the actual bulb with different gases that creates a green light to be projected.
The green may throw off other drivers, expecting the front of other vehicles to have white or yellow.....Are your marker lights the correct colours??
As far as the lumen or candela count goes, I have yet to see an officer with any sort of measurement device and don't think there would be a practical application of it road side.
And just for you halogen headlighters out there, once you drive with HID's, you won't go back.........I OWN THE NIGHT, hahaha
http://www.OHTA.ca OR http://www.OntarioTrafficAct.com
Yeah my marker lights are all the right colours. I have the 2 amber side markers up front, 2 red side markers near the rear and my front turn signals are amber as well. If the green lights "throw you off" and you cant tell a vehicle is heading your way...you shouldn't be on the road in the first place. And I just wanted to mention, the cops here in Durham seem to be pretty lax about these lighting laws and what not. I drove around with solid green and sometimes solid purple underglow on my car last year for about 3 months with no problems from the police. I think this is the way it should be, if anything, it is making my car more visible to other people and thus creating a safer driving environment. If you get distracted to the point of losing control of your vehicle...I'll say it again, you shouldn't be on the road in the first place.
Yeah my marker lights are all the right colours. I have the 2 amber side markers up front, 2 red side markers near the rear and my front turn signals are amber as well.
If the green lights "throw you off" and you cant tell a vehicle is heading your way...you shouldn't be on the road in the first place.
And I just wanted to mention, the cops here in Durham seem to be pretty lax about these lighting laws and what not. I drove around with solid green and sometimes solid purple underglow on my car last year for about 3 months with no problems from the police. I think this is the way it should be, if anything, it is making my car more visible to other people and thus creating a safer driving environment. If you get distracted to the point of losing control of your vehicle...I'll say it again, you shouldn't be on the road in the first place.
We have all gotten used to understanding the direction a vehicle by which lights we see, red or white/yellow. Green is for firefighters. I understand you desire to be an individual and personalizing your car, but don't go too far too fast.....you'll confuse the rest of us...... :D
If the green lights "throw you off" and you cant tell a vehicle is heading your way...you shouldn't be on the road in the first place.
We have all gotten used to understanding the direction a vehicle by which lights we see, red or white/yellow. Green is for firefighters. I understand you desire to be an individual and personalizing your car, but don't go too far too fast.....you'll confuse the rest of us......
http://www.OHTA.ca OR http://www.OntarioTrafficAct.com
lol intermittent flashes of green is for firefighters. Says that right in the Highway Traffic Act, I checked it when I had my underglow. Just to give everyone a better "picture" of the situation, here is a picture taken at night of my headlight... Still though, is there an active police officer that could tell me the ticket he would write me if he felt it necessary to charge me with something? I would really like to way the risk associated with these lights to decide if I keep them or not, thanks.
We have all gotten used to understanding the direction a vehicle by which lights we see, red or white/yellow. Green is for firefighters. I understand you desire to be an individual and personalizing your car, but don't go too far too fast.....you'll confuse the rest of us......
lol intermittent flashes of green is for firefighters. Says that right in the Highway Traffic Act, I checked it when I had my underglow.
Just to give everyone a better "picture" of the situation, here is a picture taken at night of my headlight...
Still though, is there an active police officer that could tell me the ticket he would write me if he felt it necessary to charge me with something?
I would really like to way the risk associated with these lights to decide if I keep them or not, thanks.
Joe1212 Thanks for the picture, however that alone is not enough. Such as the blue lights we see, they look blue at them, however still transmit a white light onto the road surface, hence those are still legal. Improper headlights is $110 no points. An officer could take this further, that since the vehicle does not have proper headlights (same as driving without headlights or one headlight out), it can no longer proceed down the highway at times when lights are required. So option for driver (pending location stopped) is to leave it and pick the vehicle back up in daylight or have it towed.
Joe1212
Thanks for the picture, however that alone is not enough. Such as the blue lights we see, they look blue at them, however still transmit a white light onto the road surface, hence those are still legal.
Improper headlights is $110 no points.
An officer could take this further, that since the vehicle does not have proper headlights (same as driving without headlights or one headlight out), it can no longer proceed down the highway at times when lights are required. So option for driver (pending location stopped) is to leave it and pick the vehicle back up in daylight or have it towed.
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
hwybear Thanks a lot for letting me know that. It helps a lot, I will keep it all in mind, at least I know what I'm looking at now in terms of a monetary fine. Thanks.
hwybear
Thanks a lot for letting me know that. It helps a lot, I will keep it all in mind, at least I know what I'm looking at now in terms of a monetary fine.
hwybear are you saying the only "legal" HID lights are those 4300 k OEM bulbs. They are pure crystal white. What about the 6 k they are like a whitish diamond blue. but are the 8k and the 12k illegal? Thanks! I thought many BMW's and other high end european cars have that blue tint dont they ship with the 6 k HID's?
hwybear are you saying the only "legal" HID lights are those 4300 k OEM bulbs. They are pure crystal white.
What about the 6 k they are like a whitish diamond blue.
but are the 8k and the 12k illegal?
Thanks!
I thought many BMW's and other high end european cars have that blue tint dont they ship with the 6 k HID's?
it is my understanding that installing HID onto a car using aftermarket kits is illegal. the car must be designed from manufacturer to had HID kits.. HID designed cars have projector headlights, which focus the light into a small area. whereas halogen styled headlights refract the light in all directions. Putting a HID kit into a Traditional styled headlight will cause the whole thing to light up like a lighthouse and hurt the eyes of oncoming traffic. now if you car has projector styled headlights from the manufacturer, i dont think it should be illegal to upgrade them yourself. especially if the higher model such as GT or whatever comes with them.
it is my understanding that installing HID onto a car using aftermarket kits is illegal.
the car must be designed from manufacturer to had HID kits..
HID designed cars have projector headlights, which focus the light into a small area. whereas halogen styled headlights refract the light in all directions. Putting a HID kit into a Traditional styled headlight will cause the whole thing to light up like a lighthouse and hurt the eyes of oncoming traffic.
now if you car has projector styled headlights from the manufacturer, i dont think it should be illegal to upgrade them yourself. especially if the higher model such as GT or whatever comes with them.
That section was written well before HID's were even thought of...what do you know, an outdated law that is still on the books. Is it still illegal to pay for something more then 25 cents in pennies?????????
That section was written well before HID's were even thought of...what do you know, an outdated law that is still on the books. Is it still illegal to pay for something more then 25 cents in pennies?????????
http://www.OHTA.ca OR http://www.OntarioTrafficAct.com
That section was written well before HID's were even thought of...what do you know, an outdated law that is still on the books. Is it still illegal to pay for something more then 25 cents in pennies?????????
No, they moved it up to 50 cents...
"The more laws, the less justice" - Marcus Tullius Cicero
"The hardest thing to explain is the obvious"
Legal tender laws are funny. They're is laws so you can not ask for payment in a certain type of money like quarters or pennies or nickles. This is one way the government loves to hide inflation. In other countries as the government began to inflate the money supply people began to realize the money itself had more intrinsic value in the worth of the metal then the nominal value of the coin!
Legal tender laws are funny.
They're is laws so you can not ask for payment in a certain type of money like quarters or pennies or nickles.
This is one way the government loves to hide inflation. In other countries as the government began to inflate the money supply people began to realize the money itself had more intrinsic value in the worth of the metal then the nominal value of the coin!
Yeah, a penny costs 3.9 cents to make, so stock up on pennies!!!
tdrive2 wrote:
Legal tender laws are funny.
They're is laws so you can not ask for payment in a certain type of money like quarters or pennies or nickles.
This is one way the government loves to hide inflation. In other countries as the government began to inflate the money supply people began to realize the money itself had more intrinsic value in the worth of the metal then the nominal value of the coin!
Yeah, a penny costs 3.9 cents to make, so stock up on pennies!!!
"The more laws, the less justice" - Marcus Tullius Cicero
"The hardest thing to explain is the obvious"
Ya they're gonna be worth alot more to. I want to see the balance sheet of the Bank of Canada this year. Go look at the federal reserves balance sheet for this year along with m1. Disgusting. Anyways what HID's are legal to use? I am guessing anything over 10 k is illegal. I know many European cars come with 6000k lights. the 4300 k are stock white OEM. I like the look of the 6000k and the 8000k. IMO i dont like the purplish tint to them. A small hint of blue is nice.
Ya they're gonna be worth alot more to.
I want to see the balance sheet of the Bank of Canada this year.
Go look at the federal reserves balance sheet for this year along with m1. Disgusting.
Anyways what HID's are legal to use? I am guessing anything over 10 k is illegal. I know many European cars come with 6000k lights. the 4300 k are stock white OEM. I like the look of the 6000k and the 8000k. IMO i dont like the purplish tint to them. A small hint of blue is nice.
Printing 20's costs the same as 5's or 100's... With these inflation rates they need re-introduce the $1000 bills though, we will need them soon enough. This year they'll go into debt to the tune of 90 bln. There goes whatever Chretien/Martin governments had paid off in 13 years (before this year we had a national debt of 490 bln). 90 bln translates into additional 5 bln per year in interest payments alone. Read more tickets.
Printing 20's costs the same as 5's or 100's... With these inflation rates they need re-introduce the $1000 bills though, we will need them soon enough.
This year they'll go into debt to the tune of 90 bln. There goes whatever Chretien/Martin governments had paid off in 13 years (before this year we had a national debt of 490 bln). 90 bln translates into additional 5 bln per year in interest payments alone. Read more tickets.
"The more laws, the less justice" - Marcus Tullius Cicero
"The hardest thing to explain is the obvious"
Its good to find someone who thinks the same on this stuff. Keynes and Fischer were wrong. Deficits to matter so does printing money. Inflation is the increase the money supply prices rise as a result. Mises was right. Many people know this to. So do others such as F.A Hayek, Henry Hazlitt, Murray Rothbard. Everyone else has been wrong. The austrian economists were right since day one. So was ron paul, peter schiff, and gary north. They do are Austrian economists. I laugh when someone says we wont get inflation from this. It will come that is the nature of fractional reserve banking. The fed is so terrified of their own policies they began paying interest on reserves held with them. Anyways if your worried about inflation you need not know more. The Central Banks balance sheet, the monetary base, and the price of gold tell you all you need to know.
Its good to find someone who thinks the same on this stuff.
Keynes and Fischer were wrong. Deficits to matter so does printing money. Inflation is the increase the money supply prices rise as a result.
Mises was right. Many people know this to. So do others such as F.A Hayek, Henry Hazlitt, Murray Rothbard. Everyone else has been wrong. The austrian economists were right since day one. So was ron paul, peter schiff, and gary north. They do are Austrian economists.
I laugh when someone says we wont get inflation from this. It will come that is the nature of fractional reserve banking. The fed is so terrified of their own policies they began paying interest on reserves held with them.
Anyways if your worried about inflation you need not know more. The Central Banks balance sheet, the monetary base, and the price of gold tell you all you need to know.
Reflectors are made differently. The main thing about an HID conversion and glare is the cutoff point - E-code headlamp units tend to have sharper cutoffs, as do factory HIDs (that's why most of them look like they're flashing highbeams at you on a bumpy road). The HID bulbs can emit much more light yet limit glare because they reflect pretty much all of that light onto the road, while SAE halogen headlamps tend to scatter some light upwards for reading signs. I have seen some conversions on Ford Escapes and the glare isn't bad at all. I have seen conversions on Cavaliers where the glare is worse than a normal vehicle using highbeams. My answer would be - if you want to do an HID conversion, be prepared to scrap the project and eat the cost if your reflectors can't be made to handle the increased brightness. I highly doubt you would be pulled over for an HID conversion in a proper "white on road" colour temperature that does not give off excessive glare. In most cases you would just look like you installed some Cool Blue bulbs.
Reflectors are made differently. The main thing about an HID conversion and glare is the cutoff point - E-code headlamp units tend to have sharper cutoffs, as do factory HIDs (that's why most of them look like they're flashing highbeams at you on a bumpy road). The HID bulbs can emit much more light yet limit glare because they reflect pretty much all of that light onto the road, while SAE halogen headlamps tend to scatter some light upwards for reading signs. I have seen some conversions on Ford Escapes and the glare isn't bad at all. I have seen conversions on Cavaliers where the glare is worse than a normal vehicle using highbeams.
My answer would be - if you want to do an HID conversion, be prepared to scrap the project and eat the cost if your reflectors can't be made to handle the increased brightness. I highly doubt you would be pulled over for an HID conversion in a proper "white on road" colour temperature that does not give off excessive glare. In most cases you would just look like you installed some Cool Blue bulbs.
Well, I'm the one who started this thread months ago. I have been driving with the Green HID's for almost a full 3 months now, driven past dozens upon dozens of Police officers because i drive past 2 stations 2 times a day to and from school. I have been pulled over for speeding (verbal warning / no ticket) and no mention of the lights. My conclusion is that the Police in Durham Region have better things to do than to bother me about some off colour headlights, as they should. I'm not selling drugs, I'm not hurting other people, the green is actually easier on the eyes than halogen or blue/white HID's so I think it is all good. I'm studying to be a Police Officer and I have to say, knowing everything else that goes on in our community, the last thing I would do is waste time to write some kid a ticket for his headlights. The peoples tax money should be put to better use than that, seriously.
Well, I'm the one who started this thread months ago. I have been driving with the Green HID's for almost a full 3 months now, driven past dozens upon dozens of Police officers because i drive past 2 stations 2 times a day to and from school. I have been pulled over for speeding (verbal warning / no ticket) and no mention of the lights.
My conclusion is that the Police in Durham Region have better things to do than to bother me about some off colour headlights, as they should. I'm not selling drugs, I'm not hurting other people, the green is actually easier on the eyes than halogen or blue/white HID's so I think it is all good.
I'm studying to be a Police Officer and I have to say, knowing everything else that goes on in our community, the last thing I would do is waste time to write some kid a ticket for his headlights. The peoples tax money should be put to better use than that, seriously.
I got ticket for failing to stop at stop sign in Toronto. i heard that the police officer must see the stop line, if there is one, from where he was sitting. That is exactly my case, Is it a strong case? If so do i need a picture to show that there is a stop line and a picture to show that he could not see the stop line from where he was sitting?
I got a ticket, Disobey stop sign, sec 136.1.a on dec 6th
I made a left in an intersection and was pulled over by a police officer in an unmarked car who had been sitting down the road. A classic fishing hole situation. I was genuinely surprised when he stopped me and told me I went through a stop sign without even slowing down. I know to shut up and be polite and take the ticket. I…
Yesterday morning, I rear-ended someone. I was going the speed limit. The sun was directly in front of me and it blinded my windshield and my eyes. At the same time, the person in front of me stopped/slowed down (also due to the sun). I started to slow down but didn't stop and I hit them since I couldn't see anything. I was not driving too close initially. I…
I was driving in the county at night and hit a limousine stretched out side ways across the road. The limo had its lights on and had side lighting as well. The police officer charged me with careless driving because it was "fully lit up".
It took me to the next day to figure out what had happened - what I remember made no sense. What I had run across was a "false visual reference" illusion.
I was on hwy 37 trying to make my girlfriends ganadmas mass and I live an hour away and I had an hour to get there so I was going fast but not 50 over untill some idiot got on my tail soo close that I was to concentrated on him that I kept going faster untill I got pulled over at 147 on an 80 km hwy.
I alreaddy lost 3 points and this time was just the…
Hello, got stopped today for rolling a stop sign. Ticket says failure to stop, but quotes hta 1361b.
Doesn't 1361b mean failure to yield?
Is this a fatal error? Or could it be amended at trial. How can I prepare a defence if I don't know if I'm defending the failure to stop or the failure to yield?
After he was providing me with a ticket for failure to obey to the stop sign (I am pretty sure I stopped but less than 3 seconds recommended by my driver ed. instructor), I know everybody say that..as an excuse.
Then he stopped me again to return the documents.
Any advice and feed back would be really appreciated.
Can you get evidence for whether someone had an advanced green at an intersection? My dad was making a right turn on a red (after stopping) into a plaza parking lot. He got hit by someone making a left turn from the opposite lane. The driver told the officer called to the collision that he had an advance green. My dad said he came out of nowhere which makes me…
So i was driving on Eglinton Avenue East near Rosemount Ave.
The school bus was on the the curb on the opposite side of the road while i was travelling on the middle lane of the three-laned Eglinton Avenue East (five lanes apart plus a raised median island seperating the traffic)
I could not see the school bus as my view of the bus was being obstructed by the cars in front of me and on my left hand…
Lots of good information on getting disclosure from the Crown here.
Now, I am just wondering if I will be relying upon evidence of my own at trial... do I have to voluntarily send this material to the Crown in a reasonable time before the trial, or only if they request disclosure from me?
This morning I had an exam for university. I was studying the entire night and i wanted to catch like maybe 1-2 hours of sleep before the exam so i went to sleep. I woke up like 5 hrs after and realize that I was about to miss my exam. I still could have made it so I asked my dad for his car since I was in a huge rush and he gave it to me.
I went on the highway and I was going at 135 km/h but…
the police officer was in in the opesite oncumming lane he was fallowing another car so close that i was not even able to see his cruser till he was buy he said that i was going 111 in a 80 he said he hade me on radar he only asked for me drivers licencs and never asked for my insurence so on the ticket there no insurence dose enyone think i can beat this i wana take it to cort becuse he was…
Hi I have a couple questions so I'll explain my situation and any advice would be appreciated.
Can't remember exact date so lets call it some time in 2008 I got a fine for $5000.00 for driving without in insurance. I never paid the fine and in 2012 I was pulled over and the officer asked to see my license. Although I had it on me I figured it would be under suspension for the unpaid fine from…
Alright, so I did something really stupid the other day, I was driving down a country road and wanted to hit the curves so I passed 3 cars at once, inadvertently making it up to very much past 50 over (80 limit)... Much to my chagrin there was a cop coming in the opposite direction who immediately skidded on the gravel shoulder and who I thought was 100% going to turn around and pull me over,…
Anyone know how backed this courthouse is? I submitted my ticket for trial at the end of August, and still no letter. Im scared it got lost in the mail, can i call the courthouse and find out my courtdate? Or would i have to go in personally?
I recently received a ticket for failure to use low beams - while following - Ticket was issued Sec 168 (
- it was on the 401 and no one was within 500 meters of me, I was warning a oncoming vehicle that there was an officer hiding (which is not illegal or I could not find a law against it) it was a police vehicle travelling at very high rate of speed in the opposite direction with no lights on…
I received a warning letter from MTO for a 2pts ticket.What happened is that the police officer issued a "unsafe left turn" and then changed the ticket to "failed to signal" at the scene, but she submitted both tickets!!! And I !!!ONLY!!! received the latter ticket from her(I requested trial for "failed to signal"). I recently received notice from MTO that I'm convicted for "unsafe left turn".
Hello everyone! I was given a ticket for using a hand-held communication device while driving. It was 3 am, I was at a stop light and the cop saw me with the my phone in my hand. I told him i was just checking the time on it. I received the notes a few weeks ago ill copy them down below. Any help is appreciated although i believe there's no hope for me. The cop recorded me saying what phone i…
I got pulled over about 15 or so days ago the court till this date has not received the summons what is the legal time period that the court has to follow to accept the summons from the office court says its 15 days is the legal timeframe the officer has to serve it on the court
I requested for disclosure of information two months ago.
I received the radar manual after one month, but not others (including maintenance/calibration record of the radar, certificate of police training). On further pursuit, the prosecutor told me that he did not have them and he did not see why I needed these documents. He said he did not know where to get them when I asked.
Last Friday I was pulled over by an OPP motorcycle cop who informed me I was going 134. I was on the SB 404, I did see him parked under a bridge and when I passed him he was not on his bike.
I'm hoping to get some insight for a defense in this case.
I was in lane 1 and I had a car in front of me, and a car behind me, also there was a car speeding down Lane 3 passing everyone and moved quickly into…