Ontario Highway Traffic Act

Great idea, save time and money for everyone

When you renew your validation there are 2 stickers that need to be affixed. One on the plate and the other onto the back of the permit. The offence is for no currently validated permit, is for not having the current validation affixed to the back of the permit (aka ownership). Hence for those that photocopy their ownerships, they need to copy the ...

There was a lot of traffic on the highway that day. He could have easily confused another car for mine.
It is very easy to view vehicles speeding, picture an assembly line and all of a sudden a box on that assembly line just easily moves past the other boxes. It is easy to watch the one vehicle and communicate to ground units to stop the correct ...

Blue car = fail to yield to traffic on a thru highway
Red car = would consider distance travelled, such as drove over more than one turn arrow painted on area, then would consider - improper use of centre turn lane

Bump

A 75-year-old relative who hasn't had an accident in 40-plus years was driving his vehicle in a lawful manner, with a valid license sticker and insurance, when he was pulled over by a police officer -- the officer said my relative was pulled over because his driver's license was expired.

You told us your relative was driving with an expired ...

New this spring, tow trucks are included in move over law....have to find the amendment and post link

You need to know the effective date of the suspension and not the issue date at the report in centre, unless you know for sure it is one and the same date.

Most if not all insurance companies always ask if you have fines and/or have been suspended, and other questions, any incorrect answer can have your insurance voided. Just a heads up

HTA 41.2(13)(b) - drive motor vehicle - not equipped with ignition interlock device
NSF - no set fine, which means a court date, fine of $200 - $1000

Interfering with traffic is an HTA offence....section 170

Your thread does not make sense.....your very first post has the notes of the officer from the back of the ticket....and your last post says you just picked up disclosure, the posts are a few months apart.

The notes are very easy to decipher....top one is the back of one of your tickets and refers you to the middle ticket. The middle ticket refers ...

That's funny, if someone was in error and scratched my car, I would want them charged, if there was an applicable charge.

This person could do this often and keep getting away with it, where enough offences the MTO can pull the licence

The charging document is what you got at roadside and should be accurate.

The notice of trial just advises of the court date.

You might want to double check your request letter to ensure you indicated the correct offence number on it.

iFly55 wrote:

viper1 wrote:I think that your set-fine is wrong.

Cheers
Viper1

OP suggests that the officer gave him a reduction, and the set fine and total payable is consistent with a +10km/hr charge.

OP states no numerical values for speed or zone

Others more savvy in the steps will help, but I think when the ticket is filed the JP will quash it as face value is not correct?

The electronic signature/print has been around for several years, no issue with that