Search found 2576 matches

varrinb18c wrote:since I owned another vehicle my new truck was covered under the 14 day policy.

I just got my renewal last week, pulled it out, no mention of a 14 day policy anywhere in the fine print. I have never heard of this before this post either....so does anyone have a link to this information??

the unit will display the strongest target and also the next "faster" (not fastest) strongest target

and yes, that manual is not proper for canada

4am wrote: I am in a similar position - except I got a 12 hour suspension. ,

huh 12hr???
it is either a 24hr (only for novice/young driver with BAC above zero) or
WARN - 3 day or
FAIL = arrest

I have been researching R. v White as a possible defense at trial for a friend that has a drive suspended case. His initial statement was the only thing that identified him to police.
R v White is different as in the driver's are outside the vehicle upon police arriving at scene.
Appears your friend is behind the wheel, when stopped, therefore ...

RIC = ?
MVC = motor vehicle collision
E/S - east side
NB L2 R1 = northbound lane 2 road 1
YOR = ?

observe white toyota motor vehicle
Lane 2 of 3 centre lane
approach high rate
of speed
no vehicles adjacent lanes
target laser
speed 147km/hr
never lost sight
vehicle stop at ?
driver identified valid ontario photo licence
no valid excuse given
road - dry, traffic- light, ? - no , weather - clear
highway posted 100
signs clearly visible
Markham ...

. The officers that showed up the day of the accident had reported it as a non reportable accident
If it was a "non-reportable" the officers would not have handed you a pamphlet and told you to go the Collision Reporting Centre.

there are no CRC in my area, but what I find interesting reading on MTO site
http://www.mto.gov.on.ca/english/faq ...

HTA 62 sec 9
Strength of front lamps
No motor vehicle shall carry on the front thereof more than four lighted lamps that project a beam having an intensity of over 300 candela

HTA 62 sec 22
Spotlamps
No motor vehicle, other than a public utility emergency vehicle, shall be equipped with more than one spotlamp and every lighted spotlamp shall be so ...

or what about your Ontario Health card?

GVWR is set my the manufacturer.
However, what is the empty weight (kgs) of the trailer? should say on ownership
What is the loaded weight, with the garden tractor on the trailer?

warning!! do not type in "all caps", against forum rules and is considered "yelling"

thank you
HB
HTA moderator

Yes, you can drive on Hwy 11 as it is not listed in the prohibited highways

http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/roadsafety/safevehicles-mvstm_tsd-tsd-1080rev4_e-688.htm

scroll way down to technical standard III and it tells what colour lights is mandatory
turn signal lamps = amber
parking lamps = amber or white (inner lights)
side marker lamps = amber (outer most light
scroll to technical standard IV and it tells where the lights ...

Driver's handbook is not law, but a guideline only. What you have to do is research the actual law for the licence

and coming at you... (google is your friend)

Highway Traffic Act Ontario Regulation 340/94
NOVICE LICENCE CONDITIONS
section 5(1)(5)The motor vehicle may not be driven on a highway designated by subsection (4)
section 5(4)(4) The ...

If you had a valid dealer plate and permission to use it you had insurance.
Simple as that. :?

HTA OREG 628 13(2)
A dealer number plate may be used only on a motor vehicle that is owned, by the person to whom the Dealer permit corresponding to the number plate is issued, as part of the inventory.

OP stated it was his vehicle, not a vehicle that ...

once the police complete a "traffic report", which is a simply a collision report...from there it goes to the MTO where the info is uploaded on the driving history of those on the report.
I do not know the legalities of initial notification, but upon renewal you would have to answer "yes" that you have been in a collision as the insurance company ...

clover - thanks for giving an insight into the auctions to all of us

Still wonder why the MTO has an outlet there, but doesnt bother having a printer to provide a permit (ownership) for the vehicle, but spends more money to mail it out

well, looked over a bit of this and some things are both ways here

HTA 7(5)(A) permit for motor vehicle must be carried or a true photo copy thereof
HTA 11(2) you only have 6 days to transfer the vehicle into your name
HTA OREG 628 2(1)(a), prior to receiving a permit, a valid Safety has to be given to new owner. Safety has to have been done ...

Take the receipt from the court and then go to the MTO. I would think there should be some sort of reference to the suspension # on the court receipt, so the MTO will know that it is paid in full and you can then just pay the reinstatement fee.

ps...don't drive until this is resolved

For one, there's no information available online regarding anything to do with Toronto's Prosecutors on an official level.
http://www.toronto.ca/city_directory/pdf/divisions/court_services.pdf

A blanket court form is made available on the toronto.ca website which asks for a telephone number, but isn't an adequate defense request and shouldn't ...

i do not know why any # is wrote on the offence address either....seems unusual, unless of course on "Highway #"

did you request disclosure yet? ultimately the longer you wait to resolve the ticket the longer it will be on your record. It's from the conviction date not the date of the ticket. So if this doesn't get resolved until March 20, this ticket will be on your record from that date.

The driving record is added via the date of the offence and the ...

The offence location on the ticket should be where the offence took place, not where the vehicle is stopped.

And DUI -drive under influence is not a traffic offence, it is criminal offence which is much much worse than careless drive.
So, get some money and find a good lawyer.

this is NOT a criminal DUI case.
This is simply a 3 day suspension (Provincial) for being in the "warn" range which is 50 to 99mgs of alcohol in 100ml of blood.
(Which is ...

ok, think I got it now.....

OREG 108/11 sec 3(4)
an offence notice issued in proceedings based on evidence obtained through the use of a red light camera system shall be in Form 6 in those parts of Ontario designated for the purposes of section 5.1 of the Act

POA OREG 950
4(5) The parts of Ontario designated in the Table to this section are ...

As of right now my record shows 0 convictions.
You will have 3 convictions on your record right now. (as you indicated in your post). The records do not "go away". It is simply that insurance only goes back "X" number of years and points are only for 2 yrs.
of all 4 tickets I would have my Ontario license suspended. The number of points I could ...

Ok, read OREG 108/11 sec 3(4) is for red light camera offences and the notice shall be on a Form 6.

Is this a red light camera offence? If so, I can move this post to the red light camera area.

Off_Camber wrote:if the road was covered in snow/ slush--then theres an argument because the road was not "Marked" by failure of the MTO

the lines are always "marked", might suggest word of "obscured"

if you want to post the links to what you are looking at, so we can all review and discuss. thanks

I would think a wrong intersection would be a defence, however, you have to go to trial and convince the JP that, good luck