Given that I have had a clean driving record up until this point
You still have a clean record. Red light camera offenses don't follow you once they are paid off.
I read through other posts and the consensus seems to be that Option 1 is the best bet by trying to negotiate with the prosecutor before the trial. However, I couldn't find a post ...
Search found 1400 matches
- Tue Nov 18, 2014 3:45 pm
- Forum: Red Light Camera Ticket
- Topic: Red Light Camera Ticket - Ottawa
- Replies: 4
- Views: 14308
- Sat Nov 15, 2014 11:02 pm
- Forum: Stunt Driving
- Topic: Entering the USA with stunt driving conviction
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4668
Re: Entering the USA with stunt driving conviction
Stunt Driving isn't a criminal offense.
- Fri Nov 14, 2014 12:25 am
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 30 to 49 km/h
- Topic: Highway 17, Ontario - Kenora Region 120 in a 90
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2119
Re: Highway 17, Ontario - Kenora Region 120 in a 90
Any particular reason why you wont attend the courthouse yourself? It's not really a charge where you couldn't just take it on yourself.
I don't really see any of these "ticket fighters" doing much more than getting your ticket reduced. If you're happy with that outcome, you can do that yourself. If you're looking for someone to go through a full ...
I don't really see any of these "ticket fighters" doing much more than getting your ticket reduced. If you're happy with that outcome, you can do that yourself. If you're looking for someone to go through a full ...
- Thu Nov 13, 2014 12:58 am
- Forum: Failing to obey a stop sign, traffic control stop/slow sign, traffic light or railway crossing signal
- Topic: Red Light - Fail to stop HTA 144(18)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2603
Re: Red Light - Fail to stop HTA 144(18)
Anyway I am just wondering if should try meeting with a prosecutor to reduce the demerit points.
It is eating up my mind, though if I keep both the fine and the demerit points I will have ultimately deserved it.
It sounds like you're content with pleading guilty anyways, so you've got nothing to lose by attending a resolution meeting. They will ...
It is eating up my mind, though if I keep both the fine and the demerit points I will have ultimately deserved it.
It sounds like you're content with pleading guilty anyways, so you've got nothing to lose by attending a resolution meeting. They will ...
- Mon Nov 10, 2014 12:21 am
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 30 to 49 km/h
- Topic: Speeding ticket advice
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5004
Re: Speeding ticket advice
A 3 point ticket reduced to a 3 point ticket so I found out later. Who cares about a km reduction when it does nothing
about the points!
Saving the $30-$40 in a fine is probably more useful than avoiding the points. For the everyday driver, points are useless. They expire within 2 years. Unless you are a novice driver or you plan on getting ...
about the points!
Saving the $30-$40 in a fine is probably more useful than avoiding the points. For the everyday driver, points are useless. They expire within 2 years. Unless you are a novice driver or you plan on getting ...
- Fri Nov 07, 2014 5:30 pm
- Forum: Driving While Suspended
- Topic: Driving While Suspended
- Replies: 9
- Views: 4733
Re: Driving While Suspended
1. We never received any notice
Technically, they don't need to serve you with a notice. Usually, you get people who post here, ignore their tickets, and act shocked when they are pulled over. The other side will argue that anyone who ignores their fines should know their license will be suspended, notice or not.
If I understood correctly, you ...
Technically, they don't need to serve you with a notice. Usually, you get people who post here, ignore their tickets, and act shocked when they are pulled over. The other side will argue that anyone who ignores their fines should know their license will be suspended, notice or not.
If I understood correctly, you ...
- Wed Nov 05, 2014 4:42 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: questions about being arrested, searched
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1582
Re: questions about being arrested, searched
He did not read our rights nor ask if he can search the truck. Was my rights being violated?
He doesn't have to ask you to search if he has a reasonable suspicion to do so. The smell of weed is enough for him to search, not to mention your passenger gave up his drugs.
As for whether or not you can play innocent and blame your passenger just ...
He doesn't have to ask you to search if he has a reasonable suspicion to do so. The smell of weed is enough for him to search, not to mention your passenger gave up his drugs.
As for whether or not you can play innocent and blame your passenger just ...
- Wed Nov 05, 2014 12:37 pm
- Forum: Traffic Offences Outside Ontario
- Topic: Nova scotia DUI, Quebec License?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3826
Re: Nova scotia DUI, Quebec License?
All Canadian provinces have a Reciprocal Licensing Agreement. If you have a valid license, it's pretty much a straight swap if you are eligible under the terms.
Each province has their own set of terms (example: How long new residents can use an out of province license before having to exchange).
That being said, your license must be valid. You ...
Each province has their own set of terms (example: How long new residents can use an out of province license before having to exchange).
That being said, your license must be valid. You ...
- Mon Nov 03, 2014 9:32 pm
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Disobey Stop Sign - Video isn't concise?!
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2307
Re: Disobey Stop Sign - Video isn't concise?!
#1, you cannot tell from the video for sure if I stopped or not, because there's a snow bank that's blocking the view of the road before the sign, you can only see me driving from just before the sign, away - which means it's entirely possible that I stopped before the sign before continuing. This makes me a little bit annoyed with what the cop ...
- Sat Nov 01, 2014 12:37 pm
- Forum: Courts and Procedure
- Topic: Disclosure not received yet - trial date soon
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2818
Re: Disclosure not received yet - trial date soon
It's normal to wait up to 8 weeks for disclosure.
Most likely you will be offered disclosure on your trial date and they will put off your trial to another time. Neither side is considered at fault because your trial date just happened to be too close in time to fulfill a disclosure request.
You can send another request if it makes you feel more ...
Most likely you will be offered disclosure on your trial date and they will put off your trial to another time. Neither side is considered at fault because your trial date just happened to be too close in time to fulfill a disclosure request.
You can send another request if it makes you feel more ...
- Tue Oct 28, 2014 11:25 pm
- Forum: Motor vehicle equipped with or carrying a speed measuring warning device
- Topic: Radar detector offense
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6159
Re: Radar detector offense
Reviving from the graveyard, could you in theory choose option 2 (as I recently learned, option 2 does not forfeit your right to a trial), get disclosure beforehand, and then use it at the meeting with the JP?
There's no use for disclosure at a resolution meeting. A resolution meeting is not a trial. They wont hear your arguments against the ...
There's no use for disclosure at a resolution meeting. A resolution meeting is not a trial. They wont hear your arguments against the ...
- Thu Oct 23, 2014 2:22 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: hand held device, it was only an ear attached bluetooth
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1885
Re: hand held device, it was only an ear attached bluetooth
1. Is there any legal line that would allow me to read the officer's notes before the trial if I initially did not make any written request?
You've had what I'm assuming is several months to make a request. Your trial is not a place to start preparing for your case. You chose to not request disclosure and waited until your trial to make that ...
You've had what I'm assuming is several months to make a request. Your trial is not a place to start preparing for your case. You chose to not request disclosure and waited until your trial to make that ...
- Tue Oct 21, 2014 2:06 pm
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 16 to 29 km/h
- Topic: 107 in 80 zone
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2149
Re: 107 in 80 zone
I'm guessing this may be more likely from meeting at the crest of the hill as I've heard tickets on curves and hills have been thrown out on multiple occasions because some devices can't get accurate readings on non-flat/straight surfaces.
Readings on curves and hills benefit the driver, not the other way around. It'll read your speed lower than ...
Readings on curves and hills benefit the driver, not the other way around. It'll read your speed lower than ...
- Fri Oct 17, 2014 10:42 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Ticket In RIDE program?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 6530
Re: Ticket In RIDE program?
An officer doesn't need the ride program to pull you over and ask for license and registration. He can do that anytime anyone is on the road driving a vehicle.
As for the "drunk drivers are getting away" argument, you can make that argument with any ticket in the history of pulling people over.
I might add, I am a young male who was driving an ...
As for the "drunk drivers are getting away" argument, you can make that argument with any ticket in the history of pulling people over.
I might add, I am a young male who was driving an ...
- Thu Oct 09, 2014 3:04 pm
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 16 to 29 km/h
- Topic: 80Km/h in posted 60KM/h - Radar reading 91 - Disclosure attc
- Replies: 15
- Views: 8382
Re: 80Km/h in posted 60KM/h - Radar reading 91 - Disclosure
Speeding is an absolute liability offense. If you're going to argue there's "technically no sign", then the speed limit is 50km. Now you're doing 91 in a 50.
- Wed Oct 08, 2014 1:07 pm
- Forum: Courts and Procedure
- Topic: Section 7 & 11B
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2431
Re: Section 7 & 11B
I checked the disclosure they gave me and it was missing some of the items I requested. I again requested disclosure of the missing items twice without any answer.
All requested items don't need to be fulfilled, only what is considered enough to satisfy your disclosure request. Be prepared for anything because there's a chance your requests will ...
All requested items don't need to be fulfilled, only what is considered enough to satisfy your disclosure request. Be prepared for anything because there's a chance your requests will ...
- Wed Oct 08, 2014 11:33 am
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 16 to 29 km/h
- Topic: Speed Trap - 79 in 50 zone
- Replies: 8
- Views: 5455
Re: Speed Trap - 79 in 50 zone
Good morning, I am a new member here. Talk about speed traps, I live in Ottawa. This morning on the River Parkway there was a flashing speeding sign (for lack of a better word)…. Are these signs equipped with cameras to give tickets?.... If so, there must have been tons of drivers who will get tickets. I guess they just started doing this today ...
- Tue Oct 07, 2014 9:19 pm
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 16 to 29 km/h
- Topic: 80Km/h in posted 60KM/h - Radar reading 91 - Disclosure attc
- Replies: 15
- Views: 8382
Re: 80Km/h in posted 60KM/h - Radar reading 91 - Disclosure
Sorry, not excel 90. That wouldn't make any sense. I'm not sure what he wrote there.bend wrote:Either way, the officer writes "excel 90.....
- Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:17 pm
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 16 to 29 km/h
- Topic: 80Km/h in posted 60KM/h - Radar reading 91 - Disclosure attc
- Replies: 15
- Views: 8382
Re: 80Km/h in posted 60KM/h - Radar reading 91 - Disclosure
I'd assume it's the officers abbreviation for "only vehicle inbound".
Either way, the officer writes "excel 90. activ.@ 91, locked @ 90. Sustained until pulled over. Driver said he didn't realize"
He didn't lose track of you. He got all his evidence while following you, which kills that argument.
Either way, the officer writes "excel 90. activ.@ 91, locked @ 90. Sustained until pulled over. Driver said he didn't realize"
He didn't lose track of you. He got all his evidence while following you, which kills that argument.
- Tue Oct 07, 2014 5:31 pm
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 16 to 29 km/h
- Topic: 80Km/h in posted 60KM/h - Radar reading 91 - Disclosure attc
- Replies: 15
- Views: 8382
Re: 80Km/h in posted 60KM/h - Radar reading 91 - Disclosure
The notes are missing time stamps / date and time
His notes don't need a date at the top. If you need a date and time, it's listed on your ticket.
Further, the police officer was travelling SB and I was travelling NB.
There were no street lights... the officer had to turn around on the two lane road. One for NB and One for SB traffic before ...
His notes don't need a date at the top. If you need a date and time, it's listed on your ticket.
Further, the police officer was travelling SB and I was travelling NB.
There were no street lights... the officer had to turn around on the two lane road. One for NB and One for SB traffic before ...
- Fri Oct 03, 2014 7:07 pm
- Forum: Parking Tickets
- Topic: Parking Ticket & Unjustly Towed from Private Property
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4736
Re: Parking Ticket & Unjustly Towed from Private Property
b) what will happen if I don't pay the tow truck storage fee? Will it just keep running?
Anyone, whether a company or individual, has a responsibility to mitigate their damages. They can't let your car sit there for years and turn around and sue you for $1 million. They'll take action sooner or later.
c) is there some type of grace period ...
Anyone, whether a company or individual, has a responsibility to mitigate their damages. They can't let your car sit there for years and turn around and sue you for $1 million. They'll take action sooner or later.
c) is there some type of grace period ...
- Mon Sep 29, 2014 2:28 pm
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: 182(2) Disobey Sign - Have disclosure, need Help!
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3745
Re: 182(2) Disobey Sign - Have disclosure, need Help!
For what its worth, the parts of the officers notes that are understandable include some major errors. He noted that my truck is Gold (it is actually silver) and that the date was a Saturday (it was a Sunday). In a trial, can I use these errors to discredit the officer and perhaps raise a doubt to whether he actually saw my car make the prohibited ...
- Fri Sep 19, 2014 3:44 pm
- Forum: Parking Tickets
- Topic: Fire Hydrant...to measure or not to measure
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3704
Re: Fire Hydrant...to measure or not to measure
Principle or not, you haven't made a defense.Teresa Hardlyy wrote:Needless to say..I am going to fight this just on principle.
- Thu Sep 18, 2014 6:00 pm
- Forum: Failing to obey a stop sign, traffic control stop/slow sign, traffic light or railway crossing signal
- Topic: Early resolution meeting SOS
- Replies: 9
- Views: 4517
Re: Early resolution meeting SOS
The time spent waiting for an early resolution meeting is considered a "neutral intake period" and doesn't count towards the overall length of delay.
- Wed Sep 17, 2014 8:04 pm
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 16 to 29 km/h
- Topic: Speeding in Construction Zone, Fine Double but No Workers
- Replies: 7
- Views: 5667
Re: Speeding in Construction Zone, Fine Double but No Worker
Not sure I understand. The question I'm asking is whether the fine being doubled only applies when workers are actually *at* the site. There were no workers present at the site on the day/time of the ticket.
You haven't proved anything. You say there were no workers and the officer disagrees. You have been given the opportunity to request a ...
You haven't proved anything. You say there were no workers and the officer disagrees. You have been given the opportunity to request a ...
- Tue Sep 16, 2014 2:25 pm
- Forum: Failing to obey a stop sign, traffic control stop/slow sign, traffic light or railway crossing signal
- Topic: Early resolution meeting SOS
- Replies: 9
- Views: 4517
Re: Early resolution meeting SOS
Back from the courthouse. The Crown was nice. Did not ask what I plea. Looked through the file. I told him that I don't think that I did it. He looked at the accident report. Told me to go to trial. Told me to order the disclosure package.
He told you to go to trial because you told him you didn't do it. You basically said you weren't guilty. At ...
He told you to go to trial because you told him you didn't do it. You basically said you weren't guilty. At ...
- Tue Sep 16, 2014 2:05 pm
- Forum: Following too closely
- Topic: Spelling mistake on ticket
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3072
Re: Spelling mistake on ticket
noshuang05 wrote:Is there any chance if can argue that in court? Thanks
- Mon Sep 15, 2014 12:40 pm
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 16 to 29 km/h
- Topic: Speeding in Construction Zone, Fine Double but No Workers
- Replies: 7
- Views: 5667
Re: Speeding in Construction Zone, Fine Double but No Worker
You're misunderstanding a bit here.
Just because you are in disagreement with the charge, doesn't mean the fine is incorrect. You were charged with speeding in a construction zone and the fine should reflect that.
Just because you are in disagreement with the charge, doesn't mean the fine is incorrect. You were charged with speeding in a construction zone and the fine should reflect that.
- Mon Sep 08, 2014 5:02 pm
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 16 to 29 km/h
- Topic: 60KM/H in a 40KM/H School Zone - School Zone Dropped.
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2878
Re: 60KM/H in a 40KM/H School Zone - School Zone Dropped.
Speeding carries its own set of demerit points. Speeding in designated zones will increase the fine, but wont change the points.
Your charge carries 3 demerit points. As it seems you are aware, any charge with 4 or more demerit points carries an automatic suspension for a novice driver. You are safe on that front.
I'm pretty sure any 4 or more ...
Your charge carries 3 demerit points. As it seems you are aware, any charge with 4 or more demerit points carries an automatic suspension for a novice driver. You are safe on that front.
I'm pretty sure any 4 or more ...
- Wed Sep 03, 2014 6:22 pm
- Forum: Other Ontario Provincial Acts Related to Traffic
- Topic: 2 UP ATV/ORV Tickets
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6301
Re: 2 UP ATV/ORV Tickets
My apologies if you misunderstood but we are well aware of the requirements to licence and insure our off road vehicles. Yes we do have a plate (green) and yes we do have insurance through our auto insurance company. As I explained a 2 UP machine defined under the HTA Regulation 316-3 it is considered an ORV and not an ATV even though the only ...