Would this be the charge for the John Q. Public?

Moderators: Reflections, admin, hwybear, Radar Identified, Decatur, bend

Would this be the charge for the John Q. Public?

Yes it would
3
60%
No it would not
2
40%
Don't know
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 5

ME AGAIN
Jr. Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 30
Joined:

Would this be the charge for the John Q. Public?

Unread post by ME AGAIN on

OPP Constable Alexander Smith was issued a provincial offence notice for an unsafe "start from stopped position.".

No demerit points. Me thinks John Q. Public would have a Careless Driving charge applied, as how can you not see a big yellow school bus?

Charges were only laid after public outcry as initially the statement was no charges would be laid.

http://www.wellingtonadvertiser.com/com ... leID=24304


Stanton
High Authority
High Authority
Posts: 2111
Joined:
Location: Ontario

Unread post by Stanton on

If the evidence suggests the officer accelerated from a stopped position into the back of the bus, the charge is correct. The offence carries 2 demerit points. I don't see where in the article is says the charge was only laid after public outcry.


ME AGAIN
Jr. Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 30
Joined:

Unread post by ME AGAIN on

http://www.wellingtonadvertiser.com/com ... leID=24272

Above is the original news article, and social media lit up with comments of how he may have been texting, and how at time of press no charges had been laid. Full television media coverage and questions being asked, until the charges were announced.


Stanton
High Authority
High Authority
Posts: 2111
Joined:
Location: Ontario

Unread post by Stanton on

I understand the perceived favouritism considering rear end collisions typically result in a careless driving charge. But the notion that charges were only laid after public outcry is not supported by either article. The second article states the accident was still under investigation at press time, not that no charges were pending. Social media speculation is just that, speculation. Without some evidence to support that the officer was text messaging on this phone at the time of the collision a distracted driving charge would not be supported.






Post Reply

Return to “General Talk”