So yesterday late afternoon i was going south on Prince Phillips road and made a left on the intersection on Dixon Road, merge on the leftest lane and switch to the right drive and 460meters after the cop pulled me over, i must have gone around 65km/h. He said i was traveling at 69km/h and he dropped to 15kmh over with no points anyway, this is my 2nd speeding ticket and the first one was for 5km/h over on a 40km zone. I know thst dixon is a 60km/h zone but i wasnt aware that after royal york it drops down to 50kmh. So i figure it was the same speed. Today i did the same route and confirmed that at night and when youre turning left you cant see directly tht 50km sign, since youre on the look out for traffic and others cars and pedestrians when turning on an intersection. I called my broker and they said if my insurance sees these 2tickets im getting a 15% increase. So legally what can i do to dismiss this ticket? We are all humans and stuff happens. Also my record is clean besides that 5kmh over ticket. I really want to avoid a $400 annual increase for a $50 ticket.
Can someone who is familiar with the new system of typing notes into the system when e-ticket is issued please answer this?
ynotp wrote:
Question for others: Is it possible that the officer wrote the test time in his notes before he actually did? If you can get the officer to admit he wrote that he tested the device at the end of his shift before he actually did it, it could potentially give you reasonable doubt as to if the device was tested at all.
Can someone who is familiar with the new system of typing notes into the system when e-ticket is issued please answer this?
Can someone who is familiar with the new system of typing notes into the system when e-ticket is issued please answer this? I would like to know that too. I think im going to wait until after my renewal and just pay it and avoid going to court and thats it. I dont see a better choice.
ynotp wrote:
ynotp wrote:
Question for others: Is it possible that the officer wrote the test time in his notes before he actually did? If you can get the officer to admit he wrote that he tested the device at the end of his shift before he actually did it, it could potentially give you reasonable doubt as to if the device was tested at all.
Can someone who is familiar with the new system of typing notes into the system when e-ticket is issued please answer this?
I would like to know that too. I think im going to wait until after my renewal and just pay it and avoid going to court and thats it. I dont see a better choice.
OP. That is a pretty miserable ticket and yes people drive like that all the time. The officer is wrong about the stunt driving, that applies when you gun it as soon as the lights turn green to beat the traffic that is going straight ahead opposite you. If it was 144(18) I don't think that applies to you as it talks about entering the intersection: "Red light (18) Every driver approaching a traffic control signal showing a circular red indication and facing the indication shall stop his or her vehicle and shall not proceed until a green indication is shown. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 144 (18)." The light wasn't red when you entered the intersection. I would suspect the prosecutor will drop it.
OP. That is a pretty miserable ticket and yes people drive like that all the time. The officer is wrong about the stunt driving, that applies when you gun it as soon as the lights turn green to beat the traffic that is going straight ahead opposite you.
If it was 144(18) I don't think that applies to you as it talks about entering the intersection:
"Red light
(18) Every driver approaching a traffic control signal showing a circular red indication and facing the indication shall stop his or her vehicle and shall not proceed until a green indication is shown. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 144 (18)."
The light wasn't red when you entered the intersection. I would suspect the prosecutor will drop it.
Former Ontario Police Officer. Advice will become less relevant as the time goes by !
If the system works the same way as other mobile report entry systems, you can go into any report that you make and modify it prior to it being sent. Your password will only let this happen if it's your own report or statement. After its sent it becomes locked and can not be modified.
If the system works the same way as other mobile report entry systems, you can go into any report that you make and modify it prior to it being sent.
Your password will only let this happen if it's your own report or statement. After its sent it becomes locked and can not be modified.
I think it's worth looking into and finding out exactly how this system works. In the electronic world there must be electronic logs showing every access to the system itself. If the notes are tied to the ticket and is submitted at the same time via electronic transmission I would make another disclosure request for the exact time the ticket and the notes were transmitted into the system and compare that to the time of the actual ticket itself. I would also include any record of edits to the notes. You can do this before the start of trial. If the JP agrees with your rationale you'll get an adjournment until the records are provided. If he disagrees and you don't want it to go to trial just plead guilty at that point. If the ticket and notes were transmitted prior to 22:00 I would make a stink about officer writing down things as fact in his notes that haven't actually happened.
I think it's worth looking into and finding out exactly how this system works. In the electronic world there must be electronic logs showing every access to the system itself. If the notes are tied to the ticket and is submitted at the same time via electronic transmission I would make another disclosure request for the exact time the ticket and the notes were transmitted into the system and compare that to the time of the actual ticket itself. I would also include any record of edits to the notes.
You can do this before the start of trial. If the JP agrees with your rationale you'll get an adjournment until the records are provided. If he disagrees and you don't want it to go to trial just plead guilty at that point.
If the ticket and notes were transmitted prior to 22:00 I would make a stink about officer writing down things as fact in his notes that haven't actually happened.
You could also make another disclosure request and specifically ask if the officer has other notes (electronic or hand written) besides what was provided to you.
You could also make another disclosure request and specifically ask if the officer has other notes (electronic or hand written) besides what was provided to you.
I won't say it happens everywhere but around here most police service don't provide notes in the e-ticket system. The e-ticket is submitted without evidence on it and all notes are in notebook.
I won't say it happens everywhere but around here most police service don't provide notes in the e-ticket system. The e-ticket is submitted without evidence on it and all notes are in notebook.
its 3 years on the system and your insurance will want to know about it for 5, although after 3, it will be less of an issue, assuming your still clean
its 3 years on the system and your insurance will want to know about it for 5, although after 3, it will be less of an issue, assuming your still clean
Robfer wrote:
I see that Im pretty much screwed then. Its so ridiculous, something so small will affect your insurance by 15%. So if i pay for example this ticket right after my insurance renewal which is in May, will the court appearance to be dropped? Because my insurance company only keeps for 1 year your first mistake on the record, or it probably didn't even went to my record with my insurance company. So if i pay this after the renewal my record will be clean and this will be my 1st infraction again and i wont have an increase on my insurance. Or maybe if i plea compassion maybe? Im in a pickle now.
--------------------------------------------------------------
* NO you cant touch your phone
* Speeding is speeding
* Challenge every ticket
* Impaired driving, you should be locked up UNDER the jail
Ok, so today i was driving down steeles ave and i got pulled over, the officer approached me and got my license and pulled it up.
he came back and said my license is suspended :O i had no idea or else i wouldnt be driving at all.....the reason for the license suspension was unpaid fines....
Hi everyone, after 12 years of clean driving, I got my first ticket. I had stepped out to grab a bite and left my valid licence in my other pocket. I had an expired "valid photo ID" licence in my vehicle that I keep just in case I need photo ID. I gave the officer that one and I told him my valid…
My teenager was in an accident last Sept where another car was rear-ended.
It was an accident in every sense...it was the middle of the weekday and the kids were looking for a chip truck in durham region. No speeding or racing, they were distracted trying to find it in an unfamiliar town and…
I was served with a Fail to Surrender Insurance Card (S3(1) of Compulsory Auto Insurance Act). He received it within the jurisdiction of Barrie POA. The trial is scheduled for November 14 2017.
I was stopped by Barrie OPP on my way back from a weekend up in Midland ON on June 28, 2017 and…
this is ALL I got in terms of notes. No record of calibration before or after.
my question is, should I send a second request for the officer's notes from the day? or can I run with this and press the point that he didn't test the unit before or after?
Friend of mine was stopped and asked to blow into alcohol test meter just because he said he had 2 drinks earlier in the night (like 4,5 hours before being stopped). He wasn't behaving erratic or driving out of line. The officer said he noted him to pull behind few parked cars and then…
Hello everyone I'm not sure if this is the right place to put it but I need some answers as I'm very scared and don't know what to do. Recently if got a Novice Driver B.A.C Above zero I am 23 years old and I'm pretty due to get my G class license in a couple of weeks. I understand that I was wrong…