I received a ticket the other day that has my wrong name, wrong address and wrong set fine amount. Is the best thing to do default on it and hope it is quashed and if it isn't file for appeal as per London v. Young ? Also for an incorrect offence or an offence "not known to law." as an example : "Speeding 60kmh in a 50kmh limit" Should it not say in a 50kmh ZONE? is the above an offence not known to law? Thanks
I received a ticket the other day that has my wrong name, wrong address and wrong set fine amount. Is the best thing to do default on it and hope it is quashed and if it isn't file for appeal as per London v. Young ?
Also for an incorrect offence or an offence "not known to law." as an example :
"Speeding 60kmh in a 50kmh limit"
Should it not say in a 50kmh ZONE? is the above an offence not known to law?
Reflections covered it. The set fine amount being inaccurate is a fatal error... but, as hwybear says, that has to be the set fine amount as per the Chief Justice of Ontario, not the statutory amount in the HTA. What was the set fine amount on your ticket? I can't answer for ticketcombat, but London v. Young was quite clear, and people on this forum have won cases for having incorrect set fines. No. An offence not known to law would be, for example: "Speeding 50 km/h in a 60 km/h zone," which, on the face of the ticket would read that the driver was going 10 km/h under the limit - therefore not speeding. Or, "passing on a double-yellow line," whch is also not illegal in Ontario. The best strategy for this one is to simply default - if the set fine is truly incorrect.
Reflections covered it. The set fine amount being inaccurate is a fatal error... but, as hwybear says, that has to be the set fine amount as per the Chief Justice of Ontario, not the statutory amount in the HTA. What was the set fine amount on your ticket?
turbodish wrote:
Why is it that ticketcombat says wrong set fine amount is not a fatal error?
I can't answer for ticketcombat, but London v. Young was quite clear, and people on this forum have won cases for having incorrect set fines.
turbodish wrote:
Should it not say in a 50kmh ZONE? is the above an offence not known to law?
No. An offence not known to law would be, for example: "Speeding 50 km/h in a 60 km/h zone," which, on the face of the ticket would read that the driver was going 10 km/h under the limit - therefore not speeding. Or, "passing on a double-yellow line," whch is also not illegal in Ontario.
The best strategy for this one is to simply default - if the set fine is truly incorrect.
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
the set fine amount was $20.00 and if I understand correctly as per ontario or the HTA it should be $25 or $30 for a 10 over ticket. It's almost as if the officer was subtly giving me a break. How could you make 3 obvious mistakes on simple information on a simple ticket?
the set fine amount was $20.00 and if I understand correctly as per ontario or the HTA it should be $25 or $30 for a 10 over ticket.
It's almost as if the officer was subtly giving me a break. How could you make 3 obvious mistakes on simple information on a simple ticket?
Set fine amount for 10 km/h over the limit should have been $25, so yes, your ticket does have a fatal error. As for why the officer made as many mistakes as he did - who knows? Maybe didn't bring his "A game" to work that day.
Set fine amount for 10 km/h over the limit should have been $25, so yes, your ticket does have a fatal error. As for why the officer made as many mistakes as he did - who knows? Maybe didn't bring his "A game" to work that day.
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
update So I did the failure to respond option and then received notice of conviction many months later. So I took the notice down to the courthouse and asked for case to be reopened. The clerk didn't understand what I was saying and sent me to see the JP. Filled out forms and wrote that ticket was not "complete and valid on its face", im guessing at the actual wording it was awhile ago now. Met with him and he wanted to help me but I had to explicitly say the set fine amount was wrong, i guess for whatever reason he isn't allowed to point out the specific error. So long story short instead of making me re-open the case filing the forms waiting another year or so and then going back to court, he went off record and told me to plea guilty and then he will "find" the error. So back on record I plea and he quashes the charge due to wrong set fine amount. Nice JP, glad he knew what was up.
update
So I did the failure to respond option and then received notice of conviction many months later. So I took the notice down to the courthouse and asked for case to be reopened. The clerk didn't understand what I was saying and sent me to see the JP. Filled out forms and wrote that ticket was not "complete and valid on its face", im guessing at the actual wording it was awhile ago now. Met with him and he wanted to help me but I had to explicitly say the set fine amount was wrong, i guess for whatever reason he isn't allowed to point out the specific error.
So long story short instead of making me re-open the case filing the forms waiting another year or so and then going back to court, he went off record and told me to plea guilty and then he will "find" the error. So back on record I plea and he quashes the charge due to wrong set fine amount. Nice JP, glad he knew what was up.
A judge or JP must remain from real or percevied bias. It would be as much a bias towards the crown if he helped you out as it would be to you if he gave answers to the crown. They are supposed to be a neutral arbiter, but it's nice to hear that they were able to help you out in a round about way.
turbodish wrote:
i guess for whatever reason he isn't allowed to point out the specific error
A judge or JP must remain from real or percevied bias. It would be as much a bias towards the crown if he helped you out as it would be to you if he gave answers to the crown. They are supposed to be a neutral arbiter, but it's nice to hear that they were able to help you out in a round about way.
If fatal error exists on ticket and I already asked for trial what should I do next? Is my best option wait for trial and not show up, get convicted then head to JP for reopening?
If fatal error exists on ticket and I already asked for trial what should I do next? Is my best option wait for trial and not show up, get convicted then head to JP for reopening?
I got a speeding ticket on the 401 by Cornwall. The officer said I was going 140 initially then dropped it to 130 (for the record I don't believe for a second I was going 140, that's way faster than I would ever intentionally drive). I filled out the info on the back of the notice to request a…
I was recently charged with stunt driving on a 60kmh road. When I was pulled over, the officer told me I was going almost 100kmh (still 40kmh above the limit) but was charging me for stunt driving because I accelerated quickly from an intersection on an empty road (in a straight line). I know…
what to do about a an illegal right turn onto steeles from staines rd
got the ticket around october of last year
put it to trial
so there is a big mess of cars at this intersection and I see a cop outside standing directing traffic with a huge row of cars pulled over to the side, through…
Are any non-domestic vehicles "pursuit-rated" in North America? Also have the Michigan State Police (this is relevant because apparently they have the most accepted selection/testing process) tested any of them to see if they meet their criteria? Just curious...
Ottawa, Canada (AHN) - Beginning Tuesday, or April Fool's Day 2008, fines on Quebec drivers caught overspeeding will be doubled. It is not only the money penalty that will go up, but also demerit points.
The new law, Bill 42, is similar to Ontario's street racing rule. It stipulates fines for…
A friend got a ticket Jan. 9th of this year for doing 110 kph in a 90 kph zone, so 20 over.
What should the set fine and total payable read?
It's confusing to me, as the prescribed fine under HTA s.128 is different than the set fine enumerated by the Chief Justice of the Ontario Court of Justice.
An OPP officer ticketed me claiming I was going 40km/h over the limit (140km/km) on my way home with a few friends on the 401. This is my first ever speeding offense. Although I am sure I was over the limit, I am almost certain that I was not going 40 over, more realistically closer to 30 over. The…
Yesterday night I was charged for stunt driving (excess over 50km/h) and I have a few inquiries. I'm sure you've all heard the same story, but the unmarked cop in an SUV was tailing me for a good 2-3 minutes as I was travelling 120~135 km/h. Then as he came close I decided to boot it up…
I had a speeding ticket in May 2013 which brought me to 9 demerit points out of 15. I received a letter and had to attend an interview. Due to a history of speeding tickets and a previous interview a few years prior, the interviewer decided to put me on zero tolerance for a year. Meaning if I…