I received a ticket the other day that has my wrong name, wrong address and wrong set fine amount. Is the best thing to do default on it and hope it is quashed and if it isn't file for appeal as per London v. Young ? Also for an incorrect offence or an offence "not known to law." as an example : "Speeding 60kmh in a 50kmh limit" Should it not say in a 50kmh ZONE? is the above an offence not known to law? Thanks
I received a ticket the other day that has my wrong name, wrong address and wrong set fine amount. Is the best thing to do default on it and hope it is quashed and if it isn't file for appeal as per London v. Young ?
Also for an incorrect offence or an offence "not known to law." as an example :
"Speeding 60kmh in a 50kmh limit"
Should it not say in a 50kmh ZONE? is the above an offence not known to law?
Reflections covered it. The set fine amount being inaccurate is a fatal error... but, as hwybear says, that has to be the set fine amount as per the Chief Justice of Ontario, not the statutory amount in the HTA. What was the set fine amount on your ticket? I can't answer for ticketcombat, but London v. Young was quite clear, and people on this forum have won cases for having incorrect set fines. No. An offence not known to law would be, for example: "Speeding 50 km/h in a 60 km/h zone," which, on the face of the ticket would read that the driver was going 10 km/h under the limit - therefore not speeding. Or, "passing on a double-yellow line," whch is also not illegal in Ontario. The best strategy for this one is to simply default - if the set fine is truly incorrect.
Reflections covered it. The set fine amount being inaccurate is a fatal error... but, as hwybear says, that has to be the set fine amount as per the Chief Justice of Ontario, not the statutory amount in the HTA. What was the set fine amount on your ticket?
turbodish wrote:
Why is it that ticketcombat says wrong set fine amount is not a fatal error?
I can't answer for ticketcombat, but London v. Young was quite clear, and people on this forum have won cases for having incorrect set fines.
turbodish wrote:
Should it not say in a 50kmh ZONE? is the above an offence not known to law?
No. An offence not known to law would be, for example: "Speeding 50 km/h in a 60 km/h zone," which, on the face of the ticket would read that the driver was going 10 km/h under the limit - therefore not speeding. Or, "passing on a double-yellow line," whch is also not illegal in Ontario.
The best strategy for this one is to simply default - if the set fine is truly incorrect.
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
the set fine amount was $20.00 and if I understand correctly as per ontario or the HTA it should be $25 or $30 for a 10 over ticket. It's almost as if the officer was subtly giving me a break. How could you make 3 obvious mistakes on simple information on a simple ticket?
the set fine amount was $20.00 and if I understand correctly as per ontario or the HTA it should be $25 or $30 for a 10 over ticket.
It's almost as if the officer was subtly giving me a break. How could you make 3 obvious mistakes on simple information on a simple ticket?
Set fine amount for 10 km/h over the limit should have been $25, so yes, your ticket does have a fatal error. As for why the officer made as many mistakes as he did - who knows? Maybe didn't bring his "A game" to work that day.
Set fine amount for 10 km/h over the limit should have been $25, so yes, your ticket does have a fatal error. As for why the officer made as many mistakes as he did - who knows? Maybe didn't bring his "A game" to work that day.
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
update So I did the failure to respond option and then received notice of conviction many months later. So I took the notice down to the courthouse and asked for case to be reopened. The clerk didn't understand what I was saying and sent me to see the JP. Filled out forms and wrote that ticket was not "complete and valid on its face", im guessing at the actual wording it was awhile ago now. Met with him and he wanted to help me but I had to explicitly say the set fine amount was wrong, i guess for whatever reason he isn't allowed to point out the specific error. So long story short instead of making me re-open the case filing the forms waiting another year or so and then going back to court, he went off record and told me to plea guilty and then he will "find" the error. So back on record I plea and he quashes the charge due to wrong set fine amount. Nice JP, glad he knew what was up.
update
So I did the failure to respond option and then received notice of conviction many months later. So I took the notice down to the courthouse and asked for case to be reopened. The clerk didn't understand what I was saying and sent me to see the JP. Filled out forms and wrote that ticket was not "complete and valid on its face", im guessing at the actual wording it was awhile ago now. Met with him and he wanted to help me but I had to explicitly say the set fine amount was wrong, i guess for whatever reason he isn't allowed to point out the specific error.
So long story short instead of making me re-open the case filing the forms waiting another year or so and then going back to court, he went off record and told me to plea guilty and then he will "find" the error. So back on record I plea and he quashes the charge due to wrong set fine amount. Nice JP, glad he knew what was up.
A judge or JP must remain from real or percevied bias. It would be as much a bias towards the crown if he helped you out as it would be to you if he gave answers to the crown. They are supposed to be a neutral arbiter, but it's nice to hear that they were able to help you out in a round about way.
turbodish wrote:
i guess for whatever reason he isn't allowed to point out the specific error
A judge or JP must remain from real or percevied bias. It would be as much a bias towards the crown if he helped you out as it would be to you if he gave answers to the crown. They are supposed to be a neutral arbiter, but it's nice to hear that they were able to help you out in a round about way.
If fatal error exists on ticket and I already asked for trial what should I do next? Is my best option wait for trial and not show up, get convicted then head to JP for reopening?
If fatal error exists on ticket and I already asked for trial what should I do next? Is my best option wait for trial and not show up, get convicted then head to JP for reopening?
i lost my license in an accident i had to due my exceeding amount of demerit points. i went to jail and made bail i was put on a curfew of 9am to 9pm stupidly enough i did not follow and i got pulled over for driving with a different cars license plates, no insurance, and violating my curfew... i…
I was charged for disobey sign (no left turn) in a winter noon time around Bay/Edward (the prosecutor/judge said it to be a Absolute liability offences but disobey sign is actually a strict liability offence, right? And I found this: For example, if you made an illegal left-turn where there were…
so got fined with 69km in a 50km, at bottom of hill...didn't even have foot on the gas. first ticket ever in over 10 years of driving. fine was 62$ and 3 points.
cop says take to court and get demerit points reduced. didn't even let me speak and walks away.
On my way to work today I got a 110 dollar ticket + 2 demerit points.
I was driving north on Bathurst and turned left onto a side street into a residential area before hitting the lights at Eglinton and Bathurst. I normally do this to avoid the big line up to turn left onto Eglinton.
On the 400 extension EB towards Barrie cops like to hide out under an over pass that is Ski Trails Rd. They tag people as the come over the crest of the hill and that is 900m from where this officer was standing.
I'm confused because I knew this, saw the cop, and checked my…
I was making a left hand legal turn on a green light, a driver came through the lane I was supposed to be going into ran the red and hit me head on as I was turning into my lane. When the officer came he was telling me that I was racing and driving recklessly because apparently there was reports of…
Today i got caught doing 115 in a 90 at Mayfield and 410 and what I have been reading is that this offence is 3 points. Seeing this is my first offence I'm unsure if the ticket is supposed to I lost 3 points or is that just automatic. Also should I go to fight it to drop the points and just pay the…
I was (recently) involved in a traffic accident where, due to icy road conditions, I slid into oncoming traffic while making a right turn, while they were coming towards me and stopping at a stop sign. This was a residential area and there's no way I was exceeding anything over 20KM/h on…