I know this is going to be a big topic and I will be as thorough as possible for those who are interested in taking back their rights that have been taken from them. One thing you must know is that it in fact is a privelege to drive, HOWEVER, it is a right to travel. When you drive, you don't have the right to be on the roads. It is a privelege. Huh? Let me continue. This is a very deep and profound topic that is very difficult to digest, however, check anything that I say and if you can prove me wrong, then you will have done what no cop, judge or any other official has been able to do. The Highway Traffic Act was created to dupe you and enslave you without you knowing it, and during all the processes that take place, the government commits 5 indictable offences...and gets away with it! Why? How? Because you volunteered everything and gave up your rights. How? First you bought a vehicle. Great! Is it yours? I mean you payed for it right? Well, guess what...it's not your car. When you go into the MTO office and you register your vehicle, you offer them the true title to the car...The Title of Origin. What you get back is a Provincial Permit. When you are asked for the ownership, that is what you hand to the requestor. Guess what! You just gave up the absolute title of your vehicle to the government and now that it is their car, not yours, you become a driver, not a traveller, and you are subject to the HTA which has absolutely nothing to do with travelling as it ONLY applies to commercial activities on the road...oh yeah, when you registered your vehicle, it became property of the government which is a corporation which makes your car a commercial vehicle. Again, this is why you are at the mercy of the HTA. So, what are the crimes committed by the government? 1) You were forced to do this therefore if you look at legal definitions, this is robbery. 2) If your property ( car ) has been stolen away without your knowledge or consent, it is called conversion. 3) To have been duped into a situation where you unwittingly waive your rights nd ownership of property and convert those precious belongings into a paid-for privelege is fraud. 4) To be held before a judge or by armed police and to be forced to pay fines or suffer imprisonment is coercion, racketeering and extortion. Look it up if you want. Let's look at definitions and such. The Canadian Constitution defines such guaranteed rights as the right to travel freely. See that? RIGHT...not privelege. See the word games going on here? When you registered your car, it became a commercial vehicle and you unwittingly gave up your rights therefore you no longer are a traveller, you are a driver. People riding in the car with you are no longer GUESTS, they are passengers and your vehicle is no longer an automobile, it is a car, or van or whatever. Words are everything here. Driving is applicable ONLY to the engagement of operating a motor vehicle for the purpose of commerce on a public highway. Commerce is the moving of freight or persons in a motor vehicle on a public highway. You were just going to work, or shopping...you were not engaged in commerce, so why are you driving and not travelling? Why do you even have a drivers licence? That is not required to travel. Begging for a licence to engage in a lawful action is odd, don't you think? I will end there for now as an introduction to the fact that you (we) have all unknowingly given up our rights and we're being screwed. If you are interested in how to escape this, I will continue. If I see nothing, I'll leave it alone.
I know this is going to be a big topic and I will be as thorough as possible for those who are interested in taking back their rights that have been taken from them. One thing you must know is that it in fact is a privelege to drive, HOWEVER, it is a right to travel. When you drive, you don't have the right to be on the roads. It is a privelege. Huh? Let me continue.
This is a very deep and profound topic that is very difficult to digest, however, check anything that I say and if you can prove me wrong, then you will have done what no cop, judge or any other official has been able to do.
The Highway Traffic Act was created to dupe you and enslave you without you knowing it, and during all the processes that take place, the government commits 5 indictable offences...and gets away with it! Why? How? Because you volunteered everything and gave up your rights. How?
First you bought a vehicle. Great! Is it yours? I mean you payed for it right? Well, guess what...it's not your car. When you go into the MTO office and you register your vehicle, you offer them the true title to the car...The Title of Origin. What you get back is a Provincial Permit. When you are asked for the ownership, that is what you hand to the requestor. Guess what! You just gave up the absolute title of your vehicle to the government and now that it is their car, not yours, you become a driver, not a traveller, and you are subject to the HTA which has absolutely nothing to do with travelling as it ONLY applies to commercial activities on the road...oh yeah, when you registered your vehicle, it became property of the government which is a corporation which makes your car a commercial vehicle. Again, this is why you are at the mercy of the HTA.
So, what are the crimes committed by the government?
1) You were forced to do this therefore if you look at legal definitions, this is robbery.
2) If your property ( car ) has been stolen away without your knowledge or consent, it is called conversion.
3) To have been duped into a situation where you unwittingly waive your rights nd ownership of property and convert those precious belongings into a paid-for privelege is fraud.
4) To be held before a judge or by armed police and to be forced to pay fines or suffer imprisonment is coercion, racketeering and extortion.
Look it up if you want.
Let's look at definitions and such.
The Canadian Constitution defines such guaranteed rights as the right to travel freely. See that? RIGHT...not privelege. See the word games going on here? When you registered your car, it became a commercial vehicle and you unwittingly gave up your rights therefore you no longer are a traveller, you are a driver. People riding in the car with you are no longer GUESTS, they are passengers and your vehicle is no longer an automobile, it is a car, or van or whatever. Words are everything here.
Driving is applicable ONLY to the engagement of operating a motor vehicle for the purpose of commerce on a public highway. Commerce is the moving of freight or persons in a motor vehicle on a public highway. You were just going to work, or shopping...you were not engaged in commerce, so why are you driving and not travelling? Why do you even have a drivers licence? That is not required to travel. Begging for a licence to engage in a lawful action is odd, don't you think?
I will end there for now as an introduction to the fact that you (we) have all unknowingly given up our rights and we're being screwed. If you are interested in how to escape this, I will continue. If I see nothing, I'll leave it alone.
This forum does not allow anarchy posts. If you have an issue with how the System works, then please take it up with the proper government body. Do not post your complaints here, as this is not the place for such topics. Maybe get a spot on the news and explain how our laws do not apply to you :lol: . This is a public forum about fighting traffic tickets and the OHTA. I really don't understand the motives to such posts. Please note all posts talking about anarchy will be locked.
This forum does not allow anarchy posts.
If you have an issue with how the System works, then please take it up with the proper government body. Do not post your complaints here, as this is not the place for such topics.
Maybe get a spot on the news and explain how our laws do not apply to you .
This is a public forum about fighting traffic tickets and the OHTA.
I really don't understand the motives to such posts. Please note all posts talking about anarchy will be locked.
I got ticket for failing to stop at stop sign in Toronto. i heard that the police officer must see the stop line, if there is one, from where he was sitting. That is exactly my case, Is it a strong case? If so do i need a picture to show that there is a stop line and a picture to show that he could not see the stop line from where he was sitting?
I got a ticket, Disobey stop sign, sec 136.1.a on dec 6th
I made a left in an intersection and was pulled over by a police officer in an unmarked car who had been sitting down the road. A classic fishing hole situation. I was genuinely surprised when he stopped me and told me I went through a stop sign without even slowing down. I know to shut up and be polite and take the ticket. I…
Yesterday morning, I rear-ended someone. I was going the speed limit. The sun was directly in front of me and it blinded my windshield and my eyes. At the same time, the person in front of me stopped/slowed down (also due to the sun). I started to slow down but didn't stop and I hit them since I couldn't see anything. I was not driving too close initially. I…
I was driving in the county at night and hit a limousine stretched out side ways across the road. The limo had its lights on and had side lighting as well. The police officer charged me with careless driving because it was "fully lit up".
It took me to the next day to figure out what had happened - what I remember made no sense. What I had run across was a "false visual reference" illusion.
I was on hwy 37 trying to make my girlfriends ganadmas mass and I live an hour away and I had an hour to get there so I was going fast but not 50 over untill some idiot got on my tail soo close that I was to concentrated on him that I kept going faster untill I got pulled over at 147 on an 80 km hwy.
I alreaddy lost 3 points and this time was just the…
Hello, got stopped today for rolling a stop sign. Ticket says failure to stop, but quotes hta 1361b.
Doesn't 1361b mean failure to yield?
Is this a fatal error? Or could it be amended at trial. How can I prepare a defence if I don't know if I'm defending the failure to stop or the failure to yield?
After he was providing me with a ticket for failure to obey to the stop sign (I am pretty sure I stopped but less than 3 seconds recommended by my driver ed. instructor), I know everybody say that..as an excuse.
Then he stopped me again to return the documents.
Any advice and feed back would be really appreciated.
Can you get evidence for whether someone had an advanced green at an intersection? My dad was making a right turn on a red (after stopping) into a plaza parking lot. He got hit by someone making a left turn from the opposite lane. The driver told the officer called to the collision that he had an advance green. My dad said he came out of nowhere which makes me…
So i was driving on Eglinton Avenue East near Rosemount Ave.
The school bus was on the the curb on the opposite side of the road while i was travelling on the middle lane of the three-laned Eglinton Avenue East (five lanes apart plus a raised median island seperating the traffic)
I could not see the school bus as my view of the bus was being obstructed by the cars in front of me and on my left hand…
Lots of good information on getting disclosure from the Crown here.
Now, I am just wondering if I will be relying upon evidence of my own at trial... do I have to voluntarily send this material to the Crown in a reasonable time before the trial, or only if they request disclosure from me?
This morning I had an exam for university. I was studying the entire night and i wanted to catch like maybe 1-2 hours of sleep before the exam so i went to sleep. I woke up like 5 hrs after and realize that I was about to miss my exam. I still could have made it so I asked my dad for his car since I was in a huge rush and he gave it to me.
I went on the highway and I was going at 135 km/h but…
the police officer was in in the opesite oncumming lane he was fallowing another car so close that i was not even able to see his cruser till he was buy he said that i was going 111 in a 80 he said he hade me on radar he only asked for me drivers licencs and never asked for my insurence so on the ticket there no insurence dose enyone think i can beat this i wana take it to cort becuse he was…
Hi I have a couple questions so I'll explain my situation and any advice would be appreciated.
Can't remember exact date so lets call it some time in 2008 I got a fine for $5000.00 for driving without in insurance. I never paid the fine and in 2012 I was pulled over and the officer asked to see my license. Although I had it on me I figured it would be under suspension for the unpaid fine from…
Alright, so I did something really stupid the other day, I was driving down a country road and wanted to hit the curves so I passed 3 cars at once, inadvertently making it up to very much past 50 over (80 limit)... Much to my chagrin there was a cop coming in the opposite direction who immediately skidded on the gravel shoulder and who I thought was 100% going to turn around and pull me over,…
Anyone know how backed this courthouse is? I submitted my ticket for trial at the end of August, and still no letter. Im scared it got lost in the mail, can i call the courthouse and find out my courtdate? Or would i have to go in personally?
I recently received a ticket for failure to use low beams - while following - Ticket was issued Sec 168 (
- it was on the 401 and no one was within 500 meters of me, I was warning a oncoming vehicle that there was an officer hiding (which is not illegal or I could not find a law against it) it was a police vehicle travelling at very high rate of speed in the opposite direction with no lights on…
I received a warning letter from MTO for a 2pts ticket.What happened is that the police officer issued a "unsafe left turn" and then changed the ticket to "failed to signal" at the scene, but she submitted both tickets!!! And I !!!ONLY!!! received the latter ticket from her(I requested trial for "failed to signal"). I recently received notice from MTO that I'm convicted for "unsafe left turn".
Hello everyone! I was given a ticket for using a hand-held communication device while driving. It was 3 am, I was at a stop light and the cop saw me with the my phone in my hand. I told him i was just checking the time on it. I received the notes a few weeks ago ill copy them down below. Any help is appreciated although i believe there's no hope for me. The cop recorded me saying what phone i…
I got pulled over about 15 or so days ago the court till this date has not received the summons what is the legal time period that the court has to follow to accept the summons from the office court says its 15 days is the legal timeframe the officer has to serve it on the court
I requested for disclosure of information two months ago.
I received the radar manual after one month, but not others (including maintenance/calibration record of the radar, certificate of police training). On further pursuit, the prosecutor told me that he did not have them and he did not see why I needed these documents. He said he did not know where to get them when I asked.
Last Friday I was pulled over by an OPP motorcycle cop who informed me I was going 134. I was on the SB 404, I did see him parked under a bridge and when I passed him he was not on his bike.
I'm hoping to get some insight for a defense in this case.
I was in lane 1 and I had a car in front of me, and a car behind me, also there was a car speeding down Lane 3 passing everyone and moved quickly into…