Topic

HTA 136 (1)(a) - requesting disclosure

by: on

23 Replies

Post Reply
diehard
Member
Member
Posts: 149
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:28 am

HTA 136 (1)(a) - requesting disclosure

Post by diehard »

So I got one two weeks ago on a nice Friday 13th... :roll: Last week I went to the Offences Office and submitted Option 3 (plead not guilty). Trial date to be sent in approximately 6 months. My intention is to delay as much as I can. When should I request the disclosure? According to Ticket Combat, it should be done right away. I called the office this morning and the lady said I should wait a few months before the trial date is set. How should I proceed? Thanks.

So I got one two weeks ago on a nice Friday 13th... :roll:

Last week I went to the Offences Office and submitted Option 3 (plead not guilty). Trial date to be sent in approximately 6 months.

My intention is to delay as much as I can.

When should I request the disclosure?

According to Ticket Combat, it should be done right away.

I called the office this morning and the lady said I should wait a few months before the trial date is set.

How should I proceed?

Thanks.

User avatar
Reflections
High Authority
High Authority
Posts: 1489
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:49 pm

Re: HTA 136 (1)(a) - requesting disclosure

Wait till you have a trial date then request disclosure.

Wait till you have a trial date then request disclosure.

http://www.OHTA.ca OR http://www.OntarioTrafficAct.com
diehard
Member
Member
Posts: 149
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:28 am

Re: HTA 136 (1)(a) - requesting disclosure

Thanks Reflections. What if the trial date is a few days after I receive the notification by mail? The disclosure request can take up to 8 weeks, right? Cheers.

Thanks Reflections.

What if the trial date is a few days after I receive the notification by mail?

The disclosure request can take up to 8 weeks, right?

Cheers.

User avatar
racer
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 957
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:27 pm

Posting Awards

Moderator

Re: HTA 136 (1)(a) - requesting disclosure

Yes, 8 weeks is roughly how long it takes, sometimes a little less.

Yes, 8 weeks is roughly how long it takes, sometimes a little less.

"The more laws, the less justice" - Marcus Tullius Cicero
"The hardest thing to explain is the obvious"

Ontario Traffic Ticket | Ontario Highway Traffic Act
User avatar
Reflections
High Authority
High Authority
Posts: 1489
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:49 pm

Re: HTA 136 (1)(a) - requesting disclosure

You can ask for an adjournment due to lack of disclosure........

diehard wrote:

Thanks Reflections.

What if the trial date is a few days after I receive the notification by mail?

The disclosure request can take up to 8 weeks, right?

Cheers.

You can ask for an adjournment due to lack of disclosure........

http://www.OHTA.ca OR http://www.OntarioTrafficAct.com
diehard
Member
Member
Posts: 149
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:28 am

Re: HTA 136 (1)(a) - requesting disclosure

Can prosecutor add charges if he reads the cop's notes? For example, the copy may have written in notes that I was following too closely another car before not obeying stop sign. Am I at risk at getting a second conviction if prosecutors sees this?

Can prosecutor add charges if he reads the cop's notes?

For example, the copy may have written in notes that I was following too closely another car before not obeying stop sign.

Am I at risk at getting a second conviction if prosecutors sees this?

diehard
Member
Member
Posts: 149
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:28 am

Re: HTA 136 (1)(a) - requesting disclosure

Anyone?

diehard wrote:

Can prosecutor add charges if he reads the cop's notes?

For example, the copy may have written in notes that I was following too closely another car before not obeying stop sign.

Am I at risk at getting a second conviction if prosecutors sees this?

Anyone?

User avatar
racer
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 957
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:27 pm

Posting Awards

Moderator

Re: HTA 136 (1)(a) - requesting disclosure

I believe that there is a 6 months window when a LEO can issue a ticket. After that not going to happen.

I believe that there is a 6 months window when a LEO can issue a ticket. After that not going to happen.

"The more laws, the less justice" - Marcus Tullius Cicero
"The hardest thing to explain is the obvious"

Ontario Traffic Ticket | Ontario Highway Traffic Act
User avatar
Reflections
High Authority
High Authority
Posts: 1489
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:49 pm

Re: HTA 136 (1)(a) - requesting disclosure

Anyone? Officers lay charges in the HTA, not the crown.

diehard wrote:

diehard wrote:

Can prosecutor add charges if he reads the cop's notes?

For example, the copy may have written in notes that I was following too closely another car before not obeying stop sign.

Am I at risk at getting a second conviction if prosecutors sees this?

Anyone?

Officers lay charges in the HTA, not the crown.

http://www.OHTA.ca OR http://www.OntarioTrafficAct.com
diehard
Member
Member
Posts: 149
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:28 am

Re: HTA 136 (1)(a) - requesting disclosure

Thanks guys. If the cop shows up and sees that I'm pleading guilty in an attempt to lower the fine and the charge, could he try to influence the prosecutor otherwise? In fact, could prosecutor increase charge and fine because of such notes?

Thanks guys.

If the cop shows up and sees that I'm pleading guilty in an attempt to lower the fine and the charge, could he try to influence the prosecutor otherwise?

In fact, could prosecutor increase charge and fine because of such notes?

User avatar
Reflections
High Authority
High Authority
Posts: 1489
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:49 pm

Re: HTA 136 (1)(a) - requesting disclosure

Officers have been known to "suggest" a sentence or offer their opinion of the accused.

diehard wrote:

Thanks guys.

If the cop shows up and sees that I'm pleading guilty in an attempt to lower the fine and the charge, could he try to influence the prosecutor otherwise?

In fact, could prosecutor increase charge and fine because of such notes?

Officers have been known to "suggest" a sentence or offer their opinion of the accused.

http://www.OHTA.ca OR http://www.OntarioTrafficAct.com
User avatar
Radar Identified
High Authority
High Authority
Posts: 2881
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:26 pm

Re: HTA 136 (1)(a) - requesting disclosure

As Reflections indicated, the officer could sway the Prosecutor to not accept a plea bargain. If you plea-bargain in this case, and it is accepted, the only thing the Justice can do is impose the set fine for the offence.

diehard wrote:

In fact, could prosecutor increase charge and fine because of such notes?

As Reflections indicated, the officer could sway the Prosecutor to not accept a plea bargain. If you plea-bargain in this case, and it is accepted, the only thing the Justice can do is impose the set fine for the offence.

* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
diehard
Member
Member
Posts: 149
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:28 am

Re: HTA 136 (1)(a) - requesting disclosure

Can JP accept a plea bargain on the first attendance date or is it only the prosecutor right before the trial date? Thanks guys.

Can JP accept a plea bargain on the first attendance date or is it only the prosecutor right before the trial date?

Thanks guys.

User avatar
Traffic Law
Member
Member
Posts: 162
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 5:28 pm

Re: HTA 136 (1)(a) - requesting disclosure

First attendance is a process where you can resolve your matter by pleading guilty or making submissions as to penalty. It is a process that does not require attendance of police officer and in most cases prosecutor is not in the position to review the notes of the officer. If you pursue first attendance option you certainly not going to ""win" your case but can save points, reduce fine, etc. If you choose to enter a guilty plea after discussions with prosecutor - you will have to appear in front of JP who will finalize the matter.

diehard wrote:

Can JP accept a plea bargain on the first attendance date or is it only the prosecutor right before the trial date?

Thanks guys.

First attendance is a process where you can resolve your matter by pleading guilty or making submissions as to penalty.

It is a process that does not require attendance of police officer and in most cases prosecutor is not in the position to review the notes of the officer.

If you pursue first attendance option you certainly not going to ""win" your case but can save points, reduce fine, etc. If you choose to enter a guilty plea after discussions with prosecutor - you will have to appear in front of JP who will finalize the matter.

diehard
Member
Member
Posts: 149
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:28 am

Re: HTA 136 (1)(a) - requesting disclosure

Will I receive a date for first attendance prior to the trial date? There is no mention of First Attendance date in the ticket when I chose Option 3. Thanks.

Will I receive a date for first attendance prior to the trial date?

There is no mention of First Attendance date in the ticket when I chose Option 3.

Thanks.

User avatar
Radar Identified
High Authority
High Authority
Posts: 2881
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:26 pm

Re: HTA 136 (1)(a) - requesting disclosure

A First Attendance date will be sent to you if the area you're in offers it (most do). Provincial Offences Notices (tickets) won't indicate if there is a First Attendance or not because some areas do not offer it. The First Attendance, by definition, will be in advance of the trial date. To find out if the area offers First Attendance, you can call the courthouse directly and ask them. If they do not offer First Attendance, you can still resolve the matter prior to trial by arranging a meeting with the Prosecutor or you can plea-bargain on the day of trial.

A First Attendance date will be sent to you if the area you're in offers it (most do). Provincial Offences Notices (tickets) won't indicate if there is a First Attendance or not because some areas do not offer it. The First Attendance, by definition, will be in advance of the trial date.

To find out if the area offers First Attendance, you can call the courthouse directly and ask them. If they do not offer First Attendance, you can still resolve the matter prior to trial by arranging a meeting with the Prosecutor or you can plea-bargain on the day of trial.

* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
diehard
Member
Member
Posts: 149
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:28 am

Re: HTA 136 (1)(a) - requesting disclosure

There's one last question: I checked the option "Request Interpreter". I am following TicketCombat's advice. I do speak English, however, I am a lot more fluent in the language I chose in option 3. I'm concerned that this may backfire on me. Should I simply forget English on the trial date and plead guilty? The cop may say that I spoke English with him on that day, even though it was just a few words. Or is there still time to change that option? Thanks.

There's one last question:

I checked the option "Request Interpreter". I am following TicketCombat's advice.

I do speak English, however, I am a lot more fluent in the language I chose in option 3.

I'm concerned that this may backfire on me.

Should I simply forget English on the trial date and plead guilty?

The cop may say that I spoke English with him on that day, even though it was just a few words.

Or is there still time to change that option?

Thanks.

User avatar
Radar Identified
High Authority
High Authority
Posts: 2881
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:26 pm

Re: HTA 136 (1)(a) - requesting disclosure

Many people who speak English reasonably well still request an interpreter for a trial. There is nothing wrong with this. It is one thing to be conversational in a language - being fluent is something else. Particularly where there are serious consequences like a trial, it is your right to have an interpreter. Your request for an interpreter is not unreasonable. Even if the officer says "hey, he's got an interpreter but he spoke English to me" (which he won't), the JP will probably look at him and say: "Your point is??"

Many people who speak English reasonably well still request an interpreter for a trial. There is nothing wrong with this. It is one thing to be conversational in a language - being fluent is something else. Particularly where there are serious consequences like a trial, it is your right to have an interpreter.

Your request for an interpreter is not unreasonable. Even if the officer says "hey, he's got an interpreter but he spoke English to me" (which he won't), the JP will probably look at him and say: "Your point is??"

* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
User avatar
Reflections
High Authority
High Authority
Posts: 1489
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:49 pm

Re: HTA 136 (1)(a) - requesting disclosure

Your understanding of your native tongue is the main concern for the court. They can put on the biggest horse and pony show, but if you don't fully understand even one word the whole thing gets tossed. Fortunately, we do allow accused people to stand up to the charges, which need to be fully explained and comprehended by the accused.

Should I simply forget English on the trial date and plead guilty?

Your understanding of your native tongue is the main concern for the court. They can put on the biggest horse and pony show, but if you don't fully understand even one word the whole thing gets tossed. Fortunately, we do allow accused people to stand up to the charges, which need to be fully explained and comprehended by the accused.

http://www.OHTA.ca OR http://www.OntarioTrafficAct.com
diehard
Member
Member
Posts: 149
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:28 am

Re: HTA 136 (1)(a) - requesting disclosure

Thanks guys. If the interpreter doesn't show up, I win the case. So I can wait until very last moment to plead not guilty to the judge, right?

Thanks guys.

If the interpreter doesn't show up, I win the case.

So I can wait until very last moment to plead not guilty to the judge, right?

User avatar
Reflections
High Authority
High Authority
Posts: 1489
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:49 pm

Re: HTA 136 (1)(a) - requesting disclosure

No, you get adjourned....unless it's the court appointed interpreter, then it's up to the JP.

diehard wrote:

Thanks guys.

If the interpreter doesn't show up, I win the case.

So I can wait until very last moment to plead not guilty to the judge, right?

No, you get adjourned....unless it's the court appointed interpreter, then it's up to the JP.

http://www.OHTA.ca OR http://www.OntarioTrafficAct.com
diehard
Member
Member
Posts: 149
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:28 am

Re: HTA 136 (1)(a) - requesting disclosure

It's been almost 7 months and I haven't heard anything...

It's been almost 7 months and I haven't heard anything...

diehard
Member
Member
Posts: 149
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:28 am

Re: HTA 136 (1)(a) - requesting disclosure

His point could be that I am clearly trying to delay proceedings, unnecessary costs to the court, etc. etc. :)

Radar Identified wrote:

Your request for an interpreter is not unreasonable. Even if the officer says "hey, he's got an interpreter but he spoke English to me" (which he won't), the JP will probably look at him and say: "Your point is??"

His point could be that I am clearly trying to delay proceedings, unnecessary costs to the court, etc. etc. :)

diehard
Member
Member
Posts: 149
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:28 am

Re: HTA 136 (1)(a) - requesting disclosure

It's been 9 months and still no trial date. No letter received. Should I ask for disclosure? Thansk.

It's been 9 months and still no trial date. No letter received.

Should I ask for disclosure?

Thansk.

Similar Topics