Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.

Ontario Highway Traffic Act

Discuss the Ontario Highway Traffic Act.


Post Your Traffic Ticket, and Get Help!


The Ontario Traffic Ticket Forum!


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Check It Out
No unread posts New Set Fines Starting Sept 1st, 2015! Read and Learn Here.
  Print view

HTA 136 (1)(a) - disobey stop; 'by-law defense', 60m
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:14 am 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 12:13 am
Posts: 9
Location: The Hammer!
My experience in court re: "by-law defense".

For reference, I'd posted some details about my ticket in the following threads:
-http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic2439.html
-http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/viewtopic.php?p=15702

There is a thread here "Do all signs require a by-law"
http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com ... 28-15.html

The ticketcombat site and other threads on this site seem to suggest that the prosecution must present the by-law supporting the municipal sign. I used the simple dislosure request template from ticketcombat, but I failed to expressly request "Explanation and Clarification of Charges", and I was not provided with a copy of the by-law (or even the number). Perhaps if I'd done that, they would have had to provide it.

But in court, I first moved for stay due to improper disclosure - denied. I argued that I needed to know the by-law in order to make a full answer to the charges. Judge said existence of the stop sign was taken to mean that a by-law exists (he didn't mention "prima facie", but I'm sure that's where he was going). I started to argue that but he cut me off (was going to mention the case in Ottawa, also afterwards I thought of all the stop signs in shopping mall parking lots, some of them on moveable bases, who knows if they are properly placed, etc.).

More importantly, the JP mentioned either a regulation or a previous ruling that the by-law did NOT have to be presented with the ticket. Unfortunately, things were moving fast and I didn't have time to write down the name of that case. But might be of interest to others looking at a similar situation.

The third link I mentioned above has someone asking if anyone had successfully tried the 'by-law' defense for a stop sign, and I think that ruling mentioned by my JP would remove that as even a possible defense.

I also tried to bring up the 'not visible from 60m' (it was not, around a sharp bend), and it was denied because I didn't have certified proof/pictures. The prosecutor jumped in an said that regulation only applied to parking signs. He apologized to me after saying he had misread it. Just interesting to know, because it means he didn't know that off the top of his head (surely that must be a pretty common defense), and also because he didn't read the next rule which states that the 60m is not required if it is not feasible (see above threads for links).



Officer failed to drive the same route I'd followed to reach the sign (or couldn't recall doing so), and thus couldn't verify the sign was clearly visible from _my_ approach. Just some more support for someone else; even though this was a specific 'stop trap' they didn't follow 'best practices'.

Officer said 'rolling stop', wheels were still rotating (estimated I slowed to only 5km/hr). I asked if that measure was listed in HTA 136 (1)(a), he said no; the JP seemed to kind of like that argument. But in the end, he said "full and complete stop, not 5km/hr". (I.e. 'letter of the law is 0.0km/hr). So that's 5km/h over the speed limit there. I don't think there are any speeding tickets issued for 55km/hr in 50km/hr zone, which is the letter of the law there. Perhaps that argument can be made by someone.


As another poster has mentioned, slavish adherence to such traffic control signs in lieu of appropriate situational awareness is inefficient and does not improve safety. A "naked streets"/'complete streets'/Hans Monderman type of approach is more safe.


Anyway, just wanted to let everyone know that my JP specifically mentioned some case where it was determined that the by-law did NOT have to be presented.

A previous poster mentioned that he got an adjournment in order to get the by-law. (http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/post13376.html), but that didn't work with my JP.

Hope that helps someone.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Charged with HTA 136 1 9 disobey stop sign, failed to stop

mel

11

3774

Sat Feb 04, 2012 12:03 am

mel View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Disobey stop sign - Fail to stop HTA 136(1)(a)

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2 ]

ticketfighter

18

11278

Sun Oct 26, 2008 7:32 am

Proper1 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Disobey stop sign - fail to stop, HTA 136(1)(a)

driver

4

4853

Sun Jan 06, 2013 2:24 pm

Kev View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Disobey Stop Sign - HTA 136(1) (A)

karate

1

1768

Sun May 10, 2009 11:45 pm

hwybear View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Question regarding: Disobey stop sign - HTA 136 (1) (a)

justadad

4

1092

Tue May 10, 2016 2:23 pm

jsherk View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. HTA 136 (1)(a)Failure to Stop at Stop Sign, Arguement valid?

Screwed

7

4134

Wed Oct 20, 2010 10:08 pm

Radar Identified View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. HTA 136 (1)(9)Failure to Stop at Stop Sign wrong character

edfun

2

1179

Sun May 15, 2011 10:45 am

edfun View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Fail to stop at stop sign HTA 136 while officer was busy

IPZ06

1

1185

Wed May 02, 2012 6:59 am

Stanton View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Disobey Stop Sign/ Fail to stop Sect 136 (1) (A)

aspar88

7

4908

Thu May 14, 2009 9:15 pm

hwybear View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. So I got a Disobey Stop Sign/ Fail to stop Sect 136 (1) (A)

legendary04

1

9448

Sat Aug 01, 2009 9:12 pm

liveontheedge View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Disobey Stop Sign 136 (1) (a)

sonnyroll

8

801

Fri Jan 20, 2017 4:43 pm

highwaystar View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Fail to stop - the stop sign was not visible from 60m

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2 ]

Marco

17

1475

Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:23 pm

Radar Identified View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Web Development & Search Engine Optimization
Home | Court Listings | Ontario Traffic Ticket

Copyright 2007 - 2017 © Microtekblue Inc. Web Development & Search Engine Optimization Service. We Support phpBB All Rights Reserved.