Wrps Cherry Pickin. Tagged 70 In A 50. No Advance Warning.

pirish
Jr. Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 12:02 pm

Posting Awards

Wrps Cherry Pickin. Tagged 70 In A 50. No Advance Warning.

by: pirish on

As the subject says the police are cherry picking coming down on a highway from Maryhill to Bloomingdale the speed limit is 80 and this is rural.


As you come into Bloomingdale you approach a hill as you go down the hill you pass the 50 km Begins sign. There is no warning sign at the speed limit is dropping by 30 km even though Ontario regulations specifically state 450 meters upstream there Has to be an advance warning when Dropping 20 km or more the office or tag me 70 in the 50. My question is is this entrapment the officer knows there’s no warning sign he picked up five other people while I was there

bend
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1341
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 1:44 am

Posting Awards

Moderator

by: bend on

pirish wrote:
Fri Jan 08, 2021 8:26 pm

There is no warning sign at the speed limit is dropping by 30 km even though Ontario regulations specifically state 450 meters upstream there Has to be an advance warning when Dropping 20 km or more


May I ask where you saw this?


It's always been my understanding that "speed ahead" signs aren't regulated under OTA Regulation 615. Therefore, they should be treated as a courtesy.


You may see things like Ontario Traffic Manuals that will give recommended suggestions on how to use such a sign, which municipalities will follow, but there isn't a legal requirement in the OTA for them.


That is unless I'm missing something...


It might be considered a "cheap ticket" around the water cooler, but it's not entrapment in a legal sense.

bend
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1341
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 1:44 am

Posting Awards

Moderator

by: bend on

Those aren't regulations. Those are guidelines from the Ontario Traffic Manual. "The purpose of the Ontario Traffic Manual (OTM) is to provide information and guidance for transportation practitioners."


Unless a certain guideline correlates to an actual regulation, its recommendations would be considered irrelevant. It's not legislation.


It wouldn't be a valid argument is all I'm saying.

User avatar
highwaystar
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 369
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 5:46 pm

Posting Awards

by: highwaystar on

Bend is correct, guidelines aren't law. They are merely recommendations and can easily be disregarded since they aren't enforceable. There is no legal requirement that prior notice of upcoming speed reductions must be given. The Ontario Traffic Manual is not a regulation, nor is it part of the HTA.

Post a Reply

Return to “Exceeding the speed limit by 16 to 29 km/h”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest