Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.

Ontario Highway Traffic Act

Discuss the Ontario Highway Traffic Act.


Post Your Traffic Ticket, and Get Help!


The Ontario Traffic Ticket Forum!


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Check It Out
No unread posts New Set Fines Starting Sept 1st, 2015! Read and Learn Here.
  Print view

Stay or Adjournment?
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 7:02 am 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2013 6:44 am
Posts: 2
My trial is on Feb 14th (2 days away!), for a 16 over (reduced from 23 over) speed offence.

I received a voicemail on the 8th (friday!!) saying I could come pick up my disclosure. I went in person and picked it up but the disclosure was not complete. They stated they were not going to provide any more info and I could take it up at trial. They cite a a case precedent that basically says they don't have to provide the full manual of the radar but I have found there are (at least) two subsequent cases that specifically reference their case and seem to clearly overrule theirs. So, I am pretty sure I can demonstrate incomplete disclosure especially given the officers notes reference using different modes on the radar unit (making it material to my defence to understand more on how the radar works) and with no time to receive additional info I have to take it up in court.

I am not sure if this is sufficient for the judge to stay the case though? Should I just file for adjournment instead? I assume go for a stay and let the crown argue why they should adjourn instead. My counter argument is that I have already taken 2 partial days off work to fight the case and travelled more than 500km round trip at my expense so making a further two trips (one to pick up the additional disclosure and another to come back to trial again) is unreasonable and far more than the penalty ($55) on the face of the ticket....


Top
 Profile  
 
Re: Stay or Adjournment?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 3:49 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:31 am
Posts: 682
The normal remedy for what you may believe to be incomplete disclosure is and adjournment. Just because you ask for something in disclosure doesn't mean it will be provided. This next appearance will be your opportunity to tell the Justice of the Peace why you believe that the entire manual is required for your defence.
Out of curiosity, which cases are you referring to?


Top
 Profile  
 
Re: Stay or Adjournment?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:22 am 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2013 6:44 am
Posts: 2
Fair enough! Thanks for your feedback.

The two cases I found were Thunder Bay (City) v. Millar which references R. v. Oosterman referencing R. v. Reybroek.

Oosterman and Millar both seem to indicate that on the issue of relevancy, while agreeing with Reybroek that it is the obligation of the applicant to prove relevancy and "there is no absolute right to the disclosure of an entire radar manual in speeding cases.", if it is "reasonably possible" that it may be relevant then the information must be disclosed.

In my case the officers notes make reference to using the radar unit in several different modes with abbreviations and even some arcane handwritten symbols which I have no idea what they mean. Since there were multiple vehicles present and clocked (also mentioned in the officers notes) to prepare a proper defence I think I should understand what those operating modes of the radar unit as well as what the overall specifications of range and accuracy are in my case. I think (or at least hope to establish) that there is a reasonable doubt that the reading taken was from my vehicle and not the other vehicle that was also clocked. Worth a shot anyway since my wife and I both agree our (obviously highly biased) view was the other vehicle was going faster. ;-)

Now that I read them closer it does seem to be my duty to explain why I need them so a stay is obviously inappropriate. But I still also feel the crown is being a little underhanded (a Friday afternoon voicemail that I can come and pick up the disclosure when the trail is 3 days away???)

Edit: Are there subsequent precedents that overrule these that anyone is aware of?


Top
 Profile  
 
Re: Stay or Adjournment?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 7:08 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:31 am
Posts: 682
It also appears that all of these cases are from the Ontario Court of Justice and made by a Justice of the Peace. These decisions are not binding on any other JP.
You should ask for a written explanation of any shortforms used. That may clear up some of the issues.


Top
 Profile  
 
Re: Stay or Adjournment?
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 10:06 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:21 am
Posts: 2933
Location: In YOUR rearview mirror!
some of us on here can decipher notes very well, you can scan and add it we can most likely tell you what it means and will clear up the situation. just remove and/or blank out licence plate/your info and officer ID

and it takes more than just reading a manual to be able to operate the units

_________________
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. How to get an adjournment

Pietro

4

284

Tue Feb 07, 2017 3:04 pm

OTD Legal View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. adjournment, a second time

sarah

4

1342

Fri Jan 09, 2009 9:46 pm

racer View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Enough for 2nd trial adjournment?

zeeyah

2

949

Sat Aug 27, 2011 5:06 am

zeeyah View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Didn't get disclosure -> Trial adjournment?

alexalex9

6

7265

Sun Mar 06, 2011 12:26 am

alexalex9 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. can I request adjournment to file an 11b?

rooferdave

3

1799

Tue Aug 07, 2012 4:56 pm

rooferdave View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. 11b Application with Adjournment by Court

ispiratica

5

963

Mon Feb 24, 2014 4:17 pm

highwaystar View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. 20 over, reduced to 15 over. Received req for adjournment

djruss335

1

600

Mon Mar 23, 2015 1:16 pm

Radar Identified View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. No disclosure after an adjournment - trial coming up

avialaw

7

535

Fri Oct 14, 2016 2:33 pm

screeech View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Adjournment due to improper disclosure, but only one week!

erlkonig

3

1393

Thu Jan 24, 2013 7:40 pm

bend View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Disclosure, adjournment,....no plea bargain offered

Bus320

2

1196

Mon Sep 30, 2013 3:35 pm

Bus320 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Notice of Motion to Adjourn after a previous adjournment

Gloomfrost

3

1656

Sat Nov 02, 2013 4:47 pm

Gloomfrost View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. City of Hamilton trial adjournment request

bandito

2

665

Sun Mar 15, 2015 9:26 pm

bandito View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Web Development & Search Engine Optimization
Home | Court Listings | Ontario Traffic Ticket

Copyright 2007 - 2017 © Microtekblue Inc. Web Development & Search Engine Optimization Service. We Support phpBB All Rights Reserved.