Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.

Ontario Highway Traffic Act

Discuss the Ontario Highway Traffic Act.


Post Your Traffic Ticket, and Get Help!


The Ontario Traffic Ticket Forum!


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Check It Out
No unread posts New Set Fines Starting Sept 1st, 2015! Read and Learn Here.
  Print view

Getting a stay based on incomplete disclosure
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 1:44 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 12:34 pm
Posts: 14
Hey guys,

Charged end of June, 80 in a 60 (500m before 80 zone begins...but that's besides the point)

Requested trial beginning of July, in person.

Received a court date (October) at the end of July.

Requested disclosure beginning of August (delivered in person), including a request for the radar manual the officer used. They made a photocopy of my request, and stamped my original and gave it back to me.

A week later I receive the officer's written notes and a sheet with the time of the testing of the device, before, and after, and a list of all the other people they caught, which they tried to scratch out but failed to terribly. This was dated mid July meaning they drew up this "disclosure" even before they received my actual detailed request.

What do I do now? Wait and file for a stay? Ask for complete disclosure again, wait, and file for a stay?

I'd appreciate some detailed steps to take next in order to get a stay of proceedings.

P.S. they are not required to show you the radar reading if you ask, right?

Thank you


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 5:57 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:26 pm
Posts: 2881
Location: Toronto
If I read your post correctly, the radar manual was not provided, correct? If so, they do need to provide that (plus officer's notes, which you did get). Try asking again for the manual, and keep a record of it. If that fails, file for a stay.

They are not required to show you the radar reading even if you ask. Some will, some won't, but there is no requirement to show it to you.

_________________
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 6:23 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 12:34 pm
Posts: 14
^^ Ok, that clarifies the radar reading.

Should I ask again so that they see I am persistent? I could just wait and never get it.

Also, perhaps they are processing my actual disclosure request as we speak? Like I said, the disclosure I got was stamped with a mid-July date, before I actually asked for disclosure. Seems like the officer provided disclosure on his own once I asked for a trial date and then when I went to request it, they just sent that out. In fact, when I went to leave my disclosure request, the lady said "One sec, let me see if I have the disclosure here," as if it were normal for the disclosure (or as they like to call it, "officer's notes") to be prepared even before you request it.


Top
 Profile  
 
80/60 Need help from the pros: got [complete] disclosure
PostPosted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:51 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 12:34 pm
Posts: 14
-Mid August I wrote a follow up request specifically asking for the manual

-Drew up stay documents today and went to file them in person, as well as a third disclosure request (second followup). Being a smaller municipality, the prosecutor was there and she came out when the clerks were all wide-eyed at the stay papers. She quickly came out with a copy of the lidar testing procedures. I said this was sufficient but later thought maybe I also need the operating instructions...I didn't finish filling the stay.

The prosecutor offered to lower it but I told her it makes no difference to me if it's lowered or not, since it will affect insurance. She seemed very kind and understanding and said that the onus is on them to prove it in court and that there are "a bunch of things" they need to say and that if they miss anything, it is dismissed.

So now for the hard questions:

1) Now that I've drawn attention to the testing procedures, I figure they will be very thorough and say they did everything it says to do in the few-pages-of-instructions for testing that I was given.

2) If after the officer says what they have to say, there is something that I notice he didn't do, will it be enough to dismiss the case if I mention it after his testimony, or can he simply add, "Oh yes, we did that too." ?

3) I'm trying to draw up a list of what the prosecution needs to establish based on what I've read and what the prosecution just told me:

i) The device was tested properly before and after. [prosecutor said]

ii) The device was in good working order. [prosecutor said]

iii) The officer was properly trained to use it. [prosecutor said]

iv) The offence was committed with a motor vehicle.

Please add to the list so I know what I have to work with!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 15, 2010 12:10 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:26 pm
Posts: 2881
Location: Toronto
Some others (and, including the points you brought up, they cover a lot of territory if you know where to dig):

- Offence occurred on a highway
- Officer visually estimated speed of vehicle
- Officer visually identified vehicle as speeding PRIOR to using device to confirm same ("tracking history")
- Device properly used by officer to obtain speed (see manual)
- Vehicle stopped without sight lost
- Identified the driver (not likely an issue with this case)

_________________
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 15, 2010 2:48 pm 
Offline
Sr. Member

Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:06 pm
Posts: 354
We send notes at arrival of supeona. So in some cases disclosure will be ready before a person requests it.

That will show why the disclosure was stamped mid July even though you requested it at the end of July.

OPS copper


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. stay for late and incomplete disclosure

niros

4

619

Wed Dec 14, 2011 11:31 pm

Simon Borys View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Incomplete disclosure – unsuccessful motion of stay.

alexalex9

13

1743

Mon Apr 11, 2011 7:50 am

hwybear View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. incomplete disclosure

PaulinCanada

4

1238

Mon Aug 23, 2010 9:44 am

OTTLegal View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Incomplete disclosure

loveinfiniti

5

946

Mon Nov 12, 2012 6:04 pm

Simon Borys View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Incomplete/improper disclosure

tobymark

12

1924

Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:27 am

Stanton View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Speeding 45 Over, Incomplete Disclosure

vojkeBDP

4

928

Wed Sep 19, 2012 2:35 am

bend View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Radar Gun Error Code & Incomplete Disclosure

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2 ]

Sped

24

2941

Thu May 17, 2012 7:59 pm

Radar Identified View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. 2 questions based on disclosure info (Disobey stop sign)

tor_resident

5

1912

Wed Aug 14, 2013 9:37 pm

tor_resident View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. No disclosure, no time for 4F. Stay?

FiReSTaRT

2

658

Wed Nov 10, 2010 3:54 pm

redcaesar View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. request to stay for no disclosure

coldanca

0

785

Fri Jun 06, 2014 10:16 am

coldanca View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Motion for Stay- inadequate disclosure

myticket

2

1352

Sun Dec 12, 2010 11:43 am

byttr View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Disclosure reqeust and Stay of Procedings

redcaesar

4

786

Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:55 pm

redcaesar View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Web Development & Search Engine Optimization
Home | Court Listings | Ontario Traffic Ticket

Copyright 2007 - 2017 © Microtekblue Inc. Web Development & Search Engine Optimization Service. We Support phpBB All Rights Reserved.