Re: Failure to weigh evidence So just to close this chapter - I've had my defence ready, adding to it R v. WD in terms of a three pronged test, and planning to talk about judicial interference (these were things that came up in other cases I've heard, while sitting there, and was quit…
Re: Failure to weigh evidence Just found something interesting, by starting to re-read the transcript. After being booted out of the court room, to have the officer explain his shorthand to me, I came back in, and said what I said, but then a debate on a deal with the Crown has ensued…
Re: Failure to weigh evidence To answer both questions:
I took the stand, and I've offered evidence, describing the road conditions, and the events leading to the eventual stop. I was interrupted multiple times (just as I was interrupted during the cross examination), and then told t…
Failure to weigh evidence I have an appeal coming up, on a speeding ticket (HTA 128).
The reason for my appeal is that the JP in the original trial said that I've provided no evidence, whereas I've really provided plenty.
Any case law suggestions to rely upon, in my appeal?
Re: No disclosure after an adjournment - trial coming up bend wrote:avialaw wrote:@bend - the JP has agreed, on record, with me being entitled to a typed version and an explanation of the shorthand.
The reason I bring it up is because usually they'll just have the officer pull you aside go through it with you …
Re: No disclosure after an adjournment - trial coming up @bend - the JP has agreed, on record, with me being entitled to a typed version and an explanation of the shorthand.
@highwaystar - thank you.
@screeech - this was discussed in another thread I've started 6 months ago, specifically relating to that par…
No disclosure after an adjournment - trial coming up Folks,
My alleged offence is rather simple - speeding 134km/h in a 100km/h zone (quoted from the ticket).
Offence took place in Nov 2015. First appearance in May 2016.
Asked for disclosure, and 2.5 weeks before 1st appearance got a few pages from the r…
Re: 34 over, subsection question and notes discrepancy I've decided not to risk it, given what I've seen and heard the JP do for the first little while today, so I've gone the route of getting an adjournment charged to the prosecution, based on the so called disclosure I've received 2 weeks before the trial.
…
Re: 34 over, subsection question and notes discrepancy I've done my share of digging on the fatal flow, prior to jsherk's reply, and I guess what causes me concern is that the issue was addressed in Khoshael years ago, the city of London case subsequently, and most recently by the Ontario Court of Appeal in F…
Re: 34 over, subsection question and notes discrepancy Brilliant, thank you very much for the quick response
This may be a stupid question, however how would I find out I've been convicted (if the JP doesn't notice the error) - do they have to send me a notice of conviction?
Re: 34 over, subsection question and notes discrepancy Wow, the speed of everyone's answers is highly appreciated (as the trial is tomorrow). Here is my ticket - all thoughts are appreciated.
QScan05232016_102008.jpg
34 over, subsection question and notes discrepancy Folks,
My alleged offence is rather simple - speeding 134km/h in a 100km/h zone (quoted from the ticket).
After reading all the vast troves of info here. I still have 2 pressing questions, in advance of my upcoming trial (where I may ask for an adjournm…
