Speeding - 120km/h in a posted 100km/h zone - no radar...

paradigm
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 8:41 pm

Speeding - 120km/h in a posted 100km/h zone - no radar...

by: paradigm on
Fri Nov 26, 2010 4:53 pm

Hey All,
I received a speeding ticket of 120km/h in a posted 100km/h zone (hwy 401), however the officer did not use radar on my vehicle. Rather he said he followed me and that I was speeding according to the speed of his car. He also said that I was driving in excess of 140km/h but he was writing me a reduced ticket of 120km/h. I do not believe I was speeding, and can he use his speedometer to register a valid speeding ticket for me? What can I do to fight this?

Thank you.




User avatar
Simon Borys
VIP
VIP
Posts: 1065
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:20 am
Contact:

by: Simon Borys on
Fri Nov 26, 2010 10:00 pm

paradigm wrote:can he use his speedometer to register a valid speeding ticket for me?
Yes, it's called pacing. Police vehicle speedometers are calibrated so it's accepted in court.
http://www.boryslaw.ca
NOTHING I SAY ON HERE IS LEGAL ADVICE.


ME AGAIN
Jr. Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2010 9:52 pm

by: ME AGAIN on
Wed Dec 15, 2010 9:36 pm

Saw this dismissed in court one time by a paralegal asking for the certificate of certification of the speedometer, or last date of maintanence/testing of the speedo. Officer stated it said on his speedo it was certified but no dates or further info. Paralegal asked if the speedo gear or cable had ever been altered or repaired, and the officer stated he had no idea of what a speedo gear was. Paralegal requested motion to dismiss and was granted as the crown could not prove that the speedo was actually certified to be true.






paradigm
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 8:41 pm

by: paradigm on
Mon Mar 28, 2011 11:32 am

Hi All,
I am currently stuck home because of a really bad ear infection and the flu. I went to the doctor on the weekend, and whiles there I had a doctor's note written, which my girlfriend will be taking to the courthouse on Monday (tomorrow). My trial is set for tomorrow, she will request to have it adjourned based on the fact that I am representing myself and that I was unable to show because of illness. Will there be any issue with this request? Further, I have already had the trial adjourned once before because of another reason.

Thanks




paradigm
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 8:41 pm

by: paradigm on
Thu Jun 09, 2011 12:59 am

Guys, i am a little late with my request for disclosure - I am requesting it as of June 9th 2011 via fax. Trial date is now July 11, 2011, which leaves me with 4-5 weeks till trial. Will the crown or JP tell me that I am out of luck if/when they do not provide the disclosure in time, and I request an adjournment based on that? This trial has already been adjourned twice before (the original charge was on July 18, 2010, 1st adjournment on November 29, 2010 and 2nd adjournment on March 28, 2011), both because of me.




paradigm
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 8:41 pm

by: paradigm on
Wed Jul 06, 2011 7:22 pm

Guys, I received disclosure with just 2 business days (and 4 including weekend) before the trial. Is this enough time to properly prepare or can an adjournment be made? Furthermore, the disclosure doesn't include all that I request. I requested disclosure for the following:
o a full copy of the police officer’s notes; - RECEIVED
o a copy of both sides of the officer’s copy of the ticket (Notice of Offence); - DID NOT RECEIVE
o a typed version of any hand written notes; - DID NOT RECEIVE
o certificate of certification of the speedometer; - DID NOT RECEIVE
o last date of maintenance / testing of the speedometer; - DID NOT RECEIVE
o speedometer gear / cable maintenance records; - DID NOT RECEIVE

How likely is it that the justice would provide this information that I requested ? Also can I get the trial adjourned because they didn't provide the requested?
o any statements made by the defendant; and
o copies of the original notes of such statements.


Stanton
High Authority
High Authority
Posts: 2111
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 8:49 pm
Location: Ontario

by: Stanton on
Wed Jul 06, 2011 9:57 pm

paradigm wrote: o a copy of both sides of the officer’s copy of the ticket (Notice of Offence); - DID NOT RECEIVE
Probably not relevant unless he made notes on the back of the ticket. But if you have his notes, this won't be the case.
paradigm wrote: o a typed version of any hand written notes; - DID NOT RECEIVE
Only applicable if you honestly can't read the notes.
paradigm wrote: o any statements made by the defendant; and
o copies of the original notes of such statements.
You're the defendant. Did you actually provide a statement? I'm guessing probably not. The officer may have recorded some of your responses in his notes, but this is different from an actual statement. Statements are more common at accidents or in relation to serious charges.

As for your request in regards to the calibration info, I think that could go either way. As Simon said, I think that's JP dependent.


User avatar
Radar Identified
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2881
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:26 pm
Location: Toronto

Moderator

by: Radar Identified on
Wed Jul 06, 2011 10:38 pm

I suppose you could argue that in every speed-measuring device used by police in Ontario, and supported by case law such as R. v. Vancrey, R. v. Schlesinger, etc., the device had to be tested and shown to be working correctly both before and after the stop. Unless there is some sort of proof that the speedometer was working before and after the stop (some kind of independent test or calibration), I would argue that the standard for a speeding conviction (extrapolating from previous case law) has not been met and the charge should be quashed.

Would that work? Don't know. Like Stanton and Simon Borys say, it probably depends on the JP.
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca


Post Reply
  • Similar Topics

Return to “Exceeding the speed limit by 16 to 29 km/h”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests