Exemption for pressing buttons 14. (1) A person may drive a motor vehicle on a highway while pressing a button on a hand-held wireless communication device to make, answer or end a cell phone call ...... if the device is placed securely in or mounted to the motor vehicle ...... O. Reg. 366/09, s. 14 (1). I don't see a definition for "button". I have believed that cell phone screen "virtual" buttons are ok to answer calls But now wondering if courts/police interpret it that way?
Exemption for pressing buttons
14. (1) A person may drive a motor vehicle on a highway while pressing a button on a hand-held wireless communication device to make, answer or end a cell phone call ...... if the device is placed securely in or mounted to the motor vehicle
...... O. Reg. 366/09, s. 14 (1).
I don't see a definition for "button".
I have believed that cell phone screen "virtual" buttons are ok to answer calls
But now wondering if courts/police interpret it that way?
You are right that there is no definition of "button" in the Act, nor for that matter, has it been defined by case law. I think there is a valid argument for a 'virtual button' on a screen since very few phones now have physical buttons to place/end calls. From my experience though, the courts have allowed the pressing of an onscreen button, but do not allow swiping. So, if the person is simply pressing a virtual button to place/end the call, they should be ok. The problem however is that most folks don't know how to program their phones that way and need to swipe to get to the phone app, then want to dial by pressing the numbers on the screen, and THEN want to press the virtual button to place the call. That's definitely not what the exemption was intended for. It should only take a 1 time press of a button. Anything more than that and it becomes distracted driving; the whole point ("gravamen" as courts state) for the legislation. Realistically though, I think most people can now use voice activation to place calls via their phone without touching any virtual buttons or at least should be able to program their phone so that it simply only takes 1 press of the 'virtual button' to place a call (i.e. a shortcut on the Home Screen).
You are right that there is no definition of "button" in the Act, nor for that matter, has it been defined by case law. I think there is a valid argument for a 'virtual button' on a screen since very few phones now have physical buttons to place/end calls. From my experience though, the courts have allowed the pressing of an onscreen button, but do not allow swiping. So, if the person is simply pressing a virtual button to place/end the call, they should be ok. The problem however is that most folks don't know how to program their phones that way and need to swipe to get to the phone app, then want to dial by pressing the numbers on the screen, and THEN want to press the virtual button to place the call. That's definitely not what the exemption was intended for. It should only take a 1 time press of a button. Anything more than that and it becomes distracted driving; the whole point ("gravamen" as courts state) for the legislation.
Realistically though, I think most people can now use voice activation to place calls via their phone without touching any virtual buttons or at least should be able to program their phone so that it simply only takes 1 press of the 'virtual button' to place a call (i.e. a shortcut on the Home Screen).
Pretty much echo what highwaystar said. From reading other cases the focus has been was the person touching the phone to make, answer or end a call with a single touch. No emphasis on graphical buttons or physical. Once there's swiping involved, you're pretty much toast. Fiddling with phone settings, even though they might be driving centric (turning on bluetooth, etc) also no good.
Pretty much echo what highwaystar said. From reading other cases the focus has been was the person touching the phone to make, answer or end a call with a single touch. No emphasis on graphical buttons or physical. Once there's swiping involved, you're pretty much toast. Fiddling with phone settings, even though they might be driving centric (turning on bluetooth, etc) also no good.
I was driving on Eglinton W and turn right on Strathearn (near Eglinton/Allen Road). There was a no right turn (from 3pm to 7pm) sign which I didn't see.
The cop was waiting there, apparently nobody sees the signs but they are there.
I don't believe I have much to do here but, trying to find…
I know this technically doesn't fit on this board (3 demerit points) as it seems that 15km/h over just means a 50 dollar fine, I would like some advise though, I'm not sure how I should proceed.
The incident happened in Feb, driving south on highway 400 near Barrie. I was in the fast lane, doing…
Quick question about debris (broken taillights ect) from an accident and responsibility.
If someone hit something that broke off (not cargo), but 30 minutes after the original accident and other cars managed to avoid everything. The debris was avoidable who is responsible for damage to that car.
Need some advice on reaching a plea deal with the prosecutor and how to go about talking to the crown. I'm not here to be lectured ect. I'm aware I made a mistake, and need advice on fixing it. So kindly keep comments about my impulsive decision to yourself.
First post..... My fiancee this week was in an accident and she was handed a 3 demerit point 154 (1) (a) charge for 115 dollars or something and 3 demerit points.
Demerit points do not matter to insurance companies, convictions do ... is there a chance that she could go to court and the…
I was on hwy 37 trying to make my girlfriends ganadmas mass and I live an hour away and I had an hour to get there so I was going fast but not 50 over untill some idiot got on my tail soo close that I was to concentrated on him that I kept going faster…
Got stopped for what I thought was going to be speeding, officer apparently had other ideas which needless to say surprised the heck out of me since Im positive I was not going over 150.
Ive done a LOT of reading already on here, Ticket Combat and some specific cases on Canlii (need to look up even…
I just received my first stop sign ticket in Markham. Has anyone successfully defended a stop sign ticket? If so, what strategies did you use? The officer that pulled me over said I slowed down but didn't stop. I felt that I stopped momentarily. I have no previous moving violations or…