Hey everyone, I got a ticket for picking up my phone while driving when it was on speaker phone. I'm trying to decide if I should bother fighting it. I've never had a ticket of any sort although I doubt that matters in this case. I wasn't looking at the phone or pressing buttons, but again, I don't think that will matter. Not sure if it's worth paying someone $300 to try and fight it or just suck it up and pay? They say about a 70% chance it can get reduced. I'm mostly worried about the points but obviously the $ hurts too. Thanks in advance :)
Hey everyone,
I got a ticket for picking up my phone while driving when it was on speaker phone. I'm trying to decide if I should bother fighting it. I've never had a ticket of any sort although I doubt that matters in this case. I wasn't looking at the phone or pressing buttons, but again, I don't think that will matter.
Not sure if it's worth paying someone $300 to try and fight it or just suck it up and pay? They say about a 70% chance it can get reduced. I'm mostly worried about the points but obviously the $ hurts too.
If all you're looking to do is get the ticket reduced then I wouldn't bother hiring anyone as you can plea bargain with the prosecutor yourself. If I were in your position I would plead not guilty and request a trial with the officer present. Then when your notice of trial arrives in the mail I would request disclosure to see what evidence they have against you. If the evidence looks solid then you can meet with the prosecutor on the day of your trial and work out a deal for a reduction.
If all you're looking to do is get the ticket reduced then I wouldn't bother hiring anyone as you can plea bargain with the prosecutor yourself. If I were in your position I would plead not guilty and request a trial with the officer present. Then when your notice of trial arrives in the mail I would request disclosure to see what evidence they have against you. If the evidence looks solid then you can meet with the prosecutor on the day of your trial and work out a deal for a reduction.
Thanks very much for the reply :) I guess if the evidence isn't great I can always hire someone to get it thrown out on some technicality. I'm mostly concerned about the points for my insurance.
Thanks very much for the reply
I guess if the evidence isn't great I can always hire someone to get it thrown out on some technicality.
I'm mostly concerned about the points for my insurance.
What you're going to want to look for in the disclosure is whether the officer has described your phone. If not, you could consider rolling the dice at trial to see if he's able to describe it without having made notes. According to some posts here, the officer has to be able to describe the phone to obtain a conviction. There are many devices (such as iPods and other MP3 players) that look like cellphones, but are not capable of transmitting or receiving data. If the officer is unable to say, for example, "The phone appeared to be a Samsung Galaxy S8 and had screen icons comparable to what I have seen on similar phones," you may be able to raise doubt as to whether what you were holding was, in fact, a cellphone. If the officer does have a description in his notes, you can try to negotiate with the prosecutor before your trial.
What you're going to want to look for in the disclosure is whether the officer has described your phone. If not, you could consider rolling the dice at trial to see if he's able to describe it without having made notes.
According to some posts here, the officer has to be able to describe the phone to obtain a conviction. There are many devices (such as iPods and other MP3 players) that look like cellphones, but are not capable of transmitting or receiving data. If the officer is unable to say, for example, "The phone appeared to be a Samsung Galaxy S8 and had screen icons comparable to what I have seen on similar phones," you may be able to raise doubt as to whether what you were holding was, in fact, a cellphone.
If the officer does have a description in his notes, you can try to negotiate with the prosecutor before your trial.
Is it better to choose option 2 or 3? I was told if you pick option 2 you can still go to trial but at that point you've already pled guilty so I'm not sure how that works... Thanks in advance :)
Is it better to choose option 2 or 3? I was told if you pick option 2 you can still go to trial but at that point you've already pled guilty so I'm not sure how that works...
Go with option 3 it gives you the most flexibility and keeps all your options open. That way you can negotiate with the prosecutor, or go to trial and try to beat the ticket, or if you change your mind and just want to pay you can do that too right up until your trial actually starts.
Go with option 3 it gives you the most flexibility and keeps all your options open. That way you can negotiate with the prosecutor, or go to trial and try to beat the ticket, or if you change your mind and just want to pay you can do that too right up until your trial actually starts.
I hope I can paint the picture with the accuracy that the truth deserves. I have no intention of just beating a ticket.. but more like beating a really unfair ticket. You decide!
I had entered Canada after a short trip downsouth through Detroit on my way to Toronto. Not being equipped with a GPS…
In June at 401 London and Wellington I got hit twice, speeding which I didn't realize I was doing and cell phone. The Officer made me open my purse and show him my phone. I was going to meet a Rep of my Company in Kitchener, he called I answered. WRONG! The Officer wasn't even nice. My record…
I'm going to preface this with a little concern....I know that at least one moderator on this forum is likely a co-worker of the officer who tagged me. I'm hoping that by being involved here, this moderator is already acting unbiased towards incidents he/she is not directly involved in. Also…
I received a ticket the other day that has my wrong name, wrong address and wrong set fine amount. Is the best thing to do default on it and hope it is quashed and if it isn't file for appeal as per London v. Young ?
Also for an incorrect offence or an offence "not known to law." as an example :
I got ticket for failing to stop at stop sign in Toronto. i heard that the police officer must see the stop line, if there is one, from where he was sitting. That is exactly my case, Is it a strong case? If so do i need a picture to show that there is a stop line and a picture to show that he could…
I got a ticket for going 20 km/h over 50 in Toronto around March of last year and received my court summons for a hearing in February 2012 approx. 3 weeks ago. Mailed out a request for disclosure a week after that. It's now been 2 and a 1/2 weeks since the request and I was…